User talk:Kenjimayo

I removed the nicknames from the infobox. (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Alex Kinchen[edit]

Hello Kenjimayo,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Alex Kinchen for deletion, because the article doesn't clearly say why the subject is important enough to be included in an encyclopedia.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions.

CASSIOPEIA (talk) 11:34, 11 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Deletion discussion about Alex Kinchen[edit]

Hello, Kenjimayo,

I wanted to let you know that there's a discussion about whether Alex Kinchen should be deleted. Your comments are welcome at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Alex Kinchen .

If you're new to the process, articles for deletion is a group discussion (not a vote!) that usually lasts seven days. If you need it, there is a guide on how to contribute. Last but not least, you are highly encouraged to continue improving the article; just be sure not to remove the tag about the deletion nomination from the top.

Thanks,

CASSIOPEIA (talk) 13:35, 11 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Cancellation of deletion of Alex Kinchen[edit]

CJE&M
DIA TV : 521 Teheran-ro,
Samseong 1 (il)-dong, Gangnam-gu,
Seoul , 9th floor
Gangnam-gu Seoul 06164
SOUTH KOREA

Main Headquarters
CJ E&M Centre,
66 Sangam-dong,
Mapo-gu, Seoul,
South Korea'

To: Mr.CASSIOPEIA

This article should not be speedily deleted for lack of asserted importance because...It is currently under construction and is a real creditable article about a popular Youtube and CJE&M DIA TV visual artist. Please look up the supporting links and references. You may contact CJE&M. DIA TV is a special online creator content available on TVING South Korea cable platform. link : http://www.cjenm.com/business/mediaContent/diatv. DIA TV Wikipedia page is currently under construction : https://ko.wikipedia.org/wiki/DIA_TV. NO. 1 CONTENT CREATION & MARKETING COMPANY As the largest content provider in Korea with specialized broadcasting channels for different genres, CJ E&M's Media Content Division provides content optimized for diversified platforms. In addition, the creative digital content of DIA TV, Asia's largest MCN operator, and high-quality drama content from STUDIO DRAGON are entertaining customers with emotional impact. Through digital platform TVING, people can watch all of CJ E&M's content anytime and anywhere. South Korea's leading content and media company CJ E&M launched a new project supporting YouTube video creators to help them advance to the global market. The company said it will expand its two-year-old Multi-Channel Network (MCN) service under the rechristened brand name, DIA TV. CJE&M will broadcast programs for introducing Korean creators on its global cable TV service "TVN Asia" available in 10 Southeast Asian regions such as Hong Kong ,Singapore ,Malaysia , Indonesia ,Taiwan ,Philippines ,Cambodia and Myanmar , South Korea and Japan.

Kenji http://www.cjenm.com/main

Hi Kenjimayo, Thank you for you recent edit and creation o f Alex Kinchen. The article is placed under Wikipedia:Articles for deletion for failing WP:CREATIVE. To contest please go to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Alex Kinchen and state your reason and justification and kindly sign off by placing ~~~~. Thank you and welcome to Wikipedia. CASSIOPEIA (talk) 10:15, 12 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for January 12[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

Alex Kinchen (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added links pointing to Japanese, Asian, Filipino, Storyteller, Hirai and Mnet

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:08, 12 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

January 2018[edit]

Welcome to Wikipedia. Please do not remove Articles for deletion notices from articles, as you did with Alex Kinchen. Otherwise, it may be difficult to create consensus. If you oppose the deletion of an article, please comment at the deletion discussion instead. Thank you. : Noyster (talk), 17:50, 13 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not remove Articles for deletion notices from articles or remove other people's comments in Articles for deletion pages. Doing so won't stop the discussion from taking place. You are, however, welcome to comment about the proposed deletion on the appropriate page. Thank you. CASSIOPEIA (talk) 18:17, 13 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to remove Articles for deletion notices or comments from articles and Articles for deletion pages, as you did at Alex Kinchen, you may be blocked from editing. CASSIOPEIA (talk) 18:38, 13 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you remove an Articles for deletion notice or a comment from an AfD discussion, as you did at Alex Kinchen. CASSIOPEIA (talk) 18:45, 13 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 2 days for repeatedly removing an "articles for deletion" notice from the article Alex Kinchen, despite several messages informing you that doing so is unacceptable. You did so eight times, which is a number I do not believe I have ever before encountered in all the years for which I have been a Wikipedia administrator. If you wish to continue to contribute to Wikipedia then you must start taking notice of what other editors tell you, and be willing to express your disagreements by discussion, not by ignoring what other editors say and just repeatedly doing what you prefer. Also, I wonder what you thought you might achieve. The usual reason why "articles for deletion" notices get removed is that inexperienced editors think that doing so will prevent deletion of articles, but since you continued after you had been told that was not the case it is difficult to undersatand. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. The editor who uses the pseudonym "JamesBWatson" (talk) 21:11, 13 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Kenjimayo. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places or things you have written about on Wikipedia, you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a COI may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic. Editing for the purpose of advertising or promotion is not permitted. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for organizations for more information. We ask that you:

avoid editing or creating articles about yourself, your family, friends, company, organization or competitors;
propose changes on the talk pages of affected articles (see the {{request edit}} template);
disclose your COI when discussing affected articles (see WP:DISCLOSE);
avoid linking to your organization's website in other articles (see WP:SPAM);
do your best to comply with Wikipedia's content policies.

In addition, you must disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation (see WP:PAID).

Also please note that editing for the purpose of advertising, publicising, or promoting anyone or anything is not permitted. The editor who uses the pseudonym "JamesBWatson" (talk) 21:21, 13 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

You MUST stop with edits such as this on DIA TV. This is still promotional. RickinBaltimore (talk) 15:39, 16 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked temporarily from editing for making legal threats or taking legal action.

You are not allowed to edit Wikipedia while the threats stand or the legal action is unresolved.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.

Additionally, you will have to address your violations of WP:COI, WP:PAID, and WP:PROMO before being unblocked. --Yamla (talk) 15:51, 16 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Yamla[edit]

If you have been threaten in anyway please keep my original messages documented here for future references. Deleting an article without giving the proper time to edit is it self harassment from wikipedia user : Yamla. Please inform me of the proper editing duration for an article to be deleted or notified. suejunwon@gmail.com

Please note that you are not permitted to edit here at all, except to unconditionally withdraw your legal threat. That's it, that's all. You may do so as part of a wider unblock request addressing your other violations, but you may not edit in any other manner. If you do so, I will lock down this page. --Yamla (talk) 16:07, 16 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

If and when you withdraw your legal threat and request an unblock, I suggest that you address in your unblock reason the following two facts. (1) After being blocked for repeatedly removing an "articles for deletion" notice you three times did so again. (2) After being informed that editing Wikipedia for the purpose of advertising is not accepted or promotion you openly stated that the person you have been editing about is "advertising his career for google ad purposes", in a context where it is difficult to see any possible meaning other than that your editing of Wikipedia is intended for that purpose.

Also, if you still are considering suing anyone, I suggest that before spending money on legal representation, you carefully consider the following fact. Wikipedia is no more legally required to accept content from you than would be a book publisher, a newspaper, a television network, or any other publisher in any medium. It is therefore not at all clear what you would sue for.

As already explained to you in the section above titled "Deletion discussion about Alex Kinchen", usual practice is that a deletion discussion is allowed to run for a week before a decision is taken. That time can be extended if there is not yet a clear consensus after a week. I hope that answers your question about "the proper editing duration for an article to be deleted or notified", though it is not entirely clear to me what you mean by that, so I can't be sure. The editor who uses the pseudonym "JamesBWatson" (talk) 17:58, 16 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]