User talk:KikiJuanita

October 2021[edit]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Royal Melbourne Show. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Bbb23 (talk) 11:48, 15 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

It is not unconstructive but true as the show was cancelled in 2021 due to this, and with talking to the Agriculture Society because the Vic Government wouldn't give up the use of the site KikiJuanita (talk) 11:59, 15 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Supanova Expo. Bbb23 (talk) 12:16, 15 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abuse of editing privileges.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.

Materialscientist (talk) 12:24, 15 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

KikiJuanita (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

someone (bbb23) was stalking my every edit tonight on here, and wouldn't allow any links to further reference and backup said statements that I was making, become live before they removed them from the site and reverted to the previous posts without any fact checking and clarification as to what in some cases are rumors floated by the of interested parties. This ban is unfair and unjust! KikiJuanita (talk) 12:47, 15 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

You are blocked, not banned. (blocks and bans are different) You seem to have a conflict of interest(please review) with the Royal Melbourne Show, plus an ax to grind with your government officials. You edit warred to keep your unsourced, personal statments part of the article. Wikipedia is not the place for you to air your grievances with your government regarding how it impacts your events. If you want to make any contributions to Wikipedia that are unrelated to your conflict of interest, please describe what those might be. I am declining your request. 331dot (talk) 13:36, 15 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Materialscientist 331dot   — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2001:8003:D4FE:9100:E83E:A9BE:FEAD:A412 (talk) 21:30, 20 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Can you please unblock me now - as you have also seemed to block my IP address and therefore other users of Wikipedia who access the same IP are unable to also sign in or are also getting error messages when looking at a page and their being a privacy breech because of this about attackers possibly trying to steal information KikiJuanita (talk) 02:11, 20 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I am not understanding an of this gibberish that is being sprouted by admin....what does it mean by auto-sign??!! Again I ask that I am unblocked or I will be contacting my state communication ombudsman since I am getting security private breech messages which I have never received before since before this block. You are putting my private information on my computer at risk! KikiJuanita (talk) 04:03, 21 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for making legal threats on your talk page while blocked.. In addition, your ability to edit your talk page has also been revoked.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then submit a request to the Unblock Ticket Request System. Girth Summit _(blether) 05:50, 21 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Restore TPA and unblock discussion[edit]

per UTRS appeal #50104 --Deepfriedokra (talk) 02:03, 29 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

How do you know your IP is blocked unless you tried too evade your block? You say others on your IP are blocked as well. How would you know this? --Deepfriedokra (talk) 02:19, 29 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Others on my IP are getting errors messages occasionally when trying to look at Wikipedia; which wasn't happening before said block on my account. I have not tried to evade said block, but others who are on same IP have mentioned this to me. KikiJuanita (talk)

Deepfriedokra Can you please respond to this, I have abided by and done what I said above and would like my account restored please ```` And I withdraw my threat of legal action, hereby now. KikiJuanita (talk)

How long is this block going to last?!? KikiJuanita (talk)

other people on my same IP address are now finding that they can not sign in, because you have now also blocked it!! Enough is enough! Please unblock my IP!

Unblock Please?!?[edit]

Can I now please be unblocked. Has anyone read my above statements or is this going to continue indefinitely? KikiJuanita (talk) 11:28, 25 August 2022 (UTC) Deepfriedokra doing what you ask, and asking here. How much longer will this ban last or am I banned indefinitely. No one is answering me, hence why I go to the other site for unblocking and having it be refused.[reply]

Your email[edit]

has been read. What a waste of time. I do not respond to emails when other options, like talk page discussion, are available. I did not block you; I simply restored your talk page access.

@Materialscientist: blocked you originally for disruptive editing. Please describe, concisely and clearly, how your edits merited a block, what you would do different, and what constructive edits you would make. Please don't talk about what others have done wrong, for many reasons.

Please follow instructions to request unblocking by using the unblock request template.

{{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.

Please read the guide to appealing blocks. I won't ask how you know anything about other users with this IP if you have not tried to edit not logged in. Your IP was autoblocked to prevent block evasion. Thanks, -- Deepfriedokra (talk) 12:05, 7 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Managing a conflict of interest[edit]

Hello, KikiJuanita. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places or things you have written about on the page Melbourne Royal Show, you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a conflict of interest may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for organizations for more information. We ask that you:

avoid editing or creating articles about yourself, your family, friends, colleagues, company, organization, clients, or competitors;
propose changes on the talk pages of affected articles (you can use the {{edit COI}} template);
disclose your conflict of interest when discussing affected articles (see Wikipedia:Conflict of interest § How to disclose a COI);
avoid linking to your organization's website in other articles (see Wikipedia:Spam § External link spamming);
do your best to comply with Wikipedia's content policies.

In addition, you are required by the Wikimedia Foundation's terms of use to disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution which forms all or part of work for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation. See Wikipedia:Paid-contribution disclosure.

Also, editing for the purpose of advertising, publicising, or promoting anyone or anything is not permitted. Thank you. -- Deepfriedokra (talk) 12:13, 7 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

KikiJuanita (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I am asking again to be unblocked from this ridiculous ban that has been now over two years. How much longer is this going to last? At no point was I putting up false information, for which the original block was done for - the admin who blocked, did not even read said sources that I linked before deleting all that I wrote. KikiJuanita (talk) 21:38, 16 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

You will not be unblocked until you successfully contest your block. See WP:GAB to understand how to write an appropriate unblock request. Yamla (talk) 21:44, 16 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

KikiJuanita (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Repeating as above what I wrote before, but with unblock. I am asking again to be unblocked from this ridiculous ban that has been now over two years. How much longer is this going to last? At no point was I putting up false information, for which the original block was done for - the admin who blocked, did not even read said sources that I linked before deleting all that I wrote. There are many pages that I have seen with that of completely false information, one being for the suburb of Langwarrin, in Frankston Victoria Australia - where some bonehead has stated there is a beach in Langwarrin. Considering this suburb is landlocked, that is completely false and clearly the admins on here who are meant to fact check things, and who claim to be making sure this isn't happening with false info are not doing their jobs, and are instead picking on people who are actually putting up correct info for which they can verify. Again I ask, that you please unblock me because this has just now gotten beyond a joke that I am being punished for the truth!

Decline reason:

Per below, and no response in six days. — Daniel Case (talk) 07:04, 20 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

I'm not reviewing this, but see WP:TRUTH. Blocks are not a punishment, but a means of preventing disruption to Wikipedia. You need to assure us that there will be no more disruption from you for unblocking to be considered. You also made a legal threat above("I will be contacting my state communication ombudsman") and you will need to indicate that action is concluded and/or withdraw any and all legal threats as well. We cannot stop you from undertaking legal action, but you cannot make legal threats on Wikipedia or edit if a legal action is underway. 331dot (talk) 12:32, 14 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]