User talk:KindCowboy69

Well Hello there visitor! I dunno what to write here What do i write here?

Be kind to me i am a naughty boi :D

New theme for you[edit]

Hello, as you said you miss school, here's a template for you. Feel free to ask more userboxes as that's my hobby here. Request one, follow the directions on my user page.

Add {{User:AussieCoinCollector/mcschool}} and it'll produce User:AussieCoinCollector/mcschool

AussieCoinCollector (talk) wish the entire world's COVID-19 status was like WA, 275+ days of no local cases :) 07:33, 15 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you so much for the userbox :D, Good aussie!-- KindCowboy69 ☮ 07:44, 15 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Feel free to check out my other ones too. Link here Also stay COVID safe, as us Aussies are struggling with one local case in the entire nation. Can not imagine what it's like with 200,000 cases AussieCoinCollector (talk) wish the entire world's COVID-19 status was like WA, 275+ days of no local cases :) 08:08, 15 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Sure :), And as for the covid cases, well, we are almost done with virus, but still cant go out without facing risk, Be safe! -- KindCowboy69 ☮ 08:14, 15 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

And then there's Western Australia who most likely, "COVID-19" is not in their vocab. AussieCoinCollector (talk) wish the entire world's COVID-19 status was like WA, 275+ days of no local cases :) 08:18, 15 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

People live in WA? lol -- KindCowboy69 ☮ 08:26, 15 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Well, most live in Perth but some do live in other places. It's also home to the most isolated town in Australia and the city in the world. It's more of a mining state though. But they want to be their own country. (plus it is home to Australia's richest person Gina Rinehart) But the state holds more than 2 million people and not going to lie but it's too far. (tbh took at this — Preceding unsigned comment added by AussieCoinCollector (talk • contribs) 08:34, 15 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Damn looking at a map, your country seems more diverse geographically than us, Maybe I'll ride across the outback one day yeah, Thank you lol, Adding it on to my bucketlist :D -- KindCowboy69 ☮ 08:37, 15 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Well a few days back, some Queenslanders rushed to get to South Australia without passing through New South Wales. if you look at this map it's the only road from QLD to SA. But it's a dirt and gravel track that gets one vehicle per 3 days. But when Queensland got one case, a lot of sedans went through this track and got stuck. AussieCoinCollector (talk) wish the entire world's COVID-19 status was like WA, 275+ days of no local cases :) 08:50, 15 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Damn, Why is google maps marking dirt roads as major highways, And those drivers must be stupid to be driving around an entire state just because of one case lmao, people need to take a chill pill with the fear. -- KindCowboy69 ☮ 08:54, 15 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

It was the UK strain and borders close for one case here. I know we were the ones to start toilet paper panic buying but I guess it prevented a recession. It's also kinda strange when google puts highways that abruptly end at state borders like this or this AussieCoinCollector (talk) wish the entire world's COVID-19 status was like WA, 275+ days of no local cases :) 08:59, 15 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@KindCowboy69: oh and don't forget, if you were to drive across the outback, take a satellite phone with you. By looking at this map, most areas aren't covered AussieCoinCollector (talk) wish the entire world's COVID-19 status was like WA, 275+ days of no local cases :) 09:12, 15 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Sure lad! P.s Your user page is so cool, might copy it :)

Well, mine was inspired by User:KylieTastic and User:Evad37. I know my edit notice looks harsh but it's to prevent vandals and promo guys from abusing me. Cheers mate, AussieCoinCollector (talk) wish the entire world's COVID-19 status was like WA, 275+ days of no local cases :) 09:25, 15 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

A barnstar for you![edit]

	The Surreal Barnstar
	For: 1. Inspiration to create more userboxes 2. Compliment on my userpage, which I will improve on (maybe by adding more colour (color) to it) AussieCoinCollector (talk) wish the entire world's COVID-19 status was like WA, 275+ days of no local cases :) 00:56, 16 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you! My firt barnstar! This makes my day :D -- KindCowboy69 ☮ 03:22, 16 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This was the same for me a few days back when User:Akrasia25 gave me a barnstar AussieCoinCollector (talk) wish the entire world's COVID-19 status was like WA, 275+ days of no local cases :) 03:29, 16 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

A belated welcome![edit]

Here's wishing you a belated welcome to Wikipedia, KindCowboy69! I see that you've already been around a while and wanted to thank you for your contributions. Though you seem to have been successful in finding your way around, you may still benefit from following some of the links below, which help editors get the most out of Wikipedia:

Need some ideas of what kind of things need doing? Try the Task Center.

If you don't already know, you should sign your posts on talk pages by using four tildes (~~~~) to insert your username and the date.

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Again, welcome! Empire AS ^Talk! 18:39, 12 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

about master film article using pinkvilla[edit]

I am sorry sir I wont ping anyone in the film talk page. Can you please remove the pinkvilla's estimate 225 crore from both lead and box office section Lodaku (talk) 06:41, 28 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Ahh no, I cant intervene here, I was merely making a suggestion on why you should'nt ping a single user for a request, You shouldn't be asking me either, You can either make a better point for justifying your request in said article's talk page or you can contribute more to wiki and do the edit yourself. On an unrelated note, You might want to change your username, Read WP:UN, Additionally, Please dont refer to editors as 'sir' :)

DS notification[edit]

This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.

You have shown interest in India, Pakistan, and Afghanistan. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.

For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.

HighInBC ^{Need help? Just ask.} 08:17, 2 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Yup I ll continue being a good boi -- KindCowboy69 ☮ 08:32, 2 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Don't get scared of this notification. I can see that your English is better than most random editors from India. Wikipedia is not biased against any community and country, but some Wikipedians are indeed biased. Whoever shows you any blue linked message, click those blue links and read the page, as well as remember it. Wikipedia is a reflection of online, offline sources, and most editors can't do anything about this. 2402:3A80:112A:C814:D1BC:941A:6FC6:928A (talk) 13:51, 2 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Yup, I certainly understand your point, I wanted to reply to the notfication as i saw it was made by another editor and not a bot, And thank you so much for clearing some things with me, I understand your point about bias and feel really bad for having ranted in a talk page, Feels silly in retrospect, I will do my best to make constructive suggestions on where that page can be improved rather than ranting about it next time, My sincere apologies, Have a nice day! -- KindCowboy69 ☮ 14:20, 2 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I don't care much about your rant. I don't want you to get blocked or banned. You have less than 300 edits right now. There are many things about Wikipedia, that you will learn with time. Till then, don't enter political, religious area. Editing such pages require experience. 2402:3A80:110B:1E1D:2D8C:88C2:9B8F:A60F (talk) 14:32, 2 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Certainly, I'd rather disengage than get banned :D, Thank you for the warning <3

In any article, you can see link to page information on left side. You can see how many editors have kept the page on their watchlist. (You can't see, if total page watchers are less than 30) Those who kept the article on their watchlist, and if they are currently active, then they check most recent edits.

They don't do anything, if they support the edit, but if they disagree, they will revert the edit.

However they will have to explain with edit summary, why they reverted edit. They just can't remove sourced content without explanation. If any page is extended confirmed protected, it means the page is contentious. This essay is about editing such articles Wikipedia:Controversial articles.

Adding some non-controversial info from reliable sources won't be problem, if you are editing page about some less popular person.

But if you edit Narendra Modi's page, you will have to face experienced editors. There are editors with 20,000 edits, 70,000 edits, 1 lakh+ edits. 2402:3A80:110B:1E1D:2D8C:88C2:9B8F:A60F (talk) 14:45, 2 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]