User talk:Klevehagfd

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Türksat 5A. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. If you disagree on the relevance of some sourced content in an article, you are asked to discuss it on the talk page before any other action. 2804:5364:3100:9:0:0:0:A01D (talk) 10:16, 9 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

i'm not talking anything with vandals behind VPNs, period. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Klevehagfd (talk • contribs)

January 2021

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Türksat 5A; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus, rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Points to note:

Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made;
Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes and work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. Caius G. (talk) 10:56, 9 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. Constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, but a recent edit of yours to the page Türksat 5A has an edit summary that appears to be inaccurate or inappropriate. The summaries are helpful to people browsing an article's history, so it is important that you use edit summaries that accurately tell other editors what you did. Feel free to use the sandbox to make test edits. Caius G. (talk) 10:56, 9 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

i'm not familiar with wikipedia, not enough experience on how the things going. but i see massive politically-motivated vandalism and anti-Turkism in pages related to Turks and Turkey. suprisingly innovative descriptions in Turksat 5A page, like "'armed bombing drones' — Preceding unsigned comment added by Klevehagfd (talk • contribs)

Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. When you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion (but never when editing articles), please be sure to sign your posts. There are two ways to do this. Either:

Add four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment, or
With the cursor positioned at the end of your comment, click on the signature button located above the edit window.

This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is necessary to allow other editors to easily see who wrote what and when.

Thank you. Drm310 🍁 (talk) 15:26, 9 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Notice of edit warring noticeboard discussion

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. The thread is Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring#User:Klevehagfd reported by User:Caius G. (Result: ). Thank you. Caius G. (talk) 11:50, 9 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked for sockpuppetry

You have been blocked temporarily from editing for abusing multiple accounts per the evidence presented at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Klevehagfd. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Cabayi (talk) 17:42, 9 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

May 2021

Hi Klevehagfd! I noticed that you recently marked an edit as minor at Türksat 5A that may not have been. "Minor edit" has a very specific definition on Wikipedia – it refers only to superficial edits that could never be the subject of a dispute, such as typo corrections or reverting obvious vandalism. Any edit that changes the meaning of an article is not a minor edit, even if it only concerns a single word. Please see Help:Minor edit for more information. 15 (talk) 22:31, 7 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]