User talk:Kunalroyindia

Welcome!

Hello, Kunalroyindia, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, like Two Novel Parameters for Validation of Predictive QSAR Models, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines for page creation, and may soon be deleted.

There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the New contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{helpme}} on this page, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Where to ask a question or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! andy (talk) 10:16, 3 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of Two Novel Parameters for Validation of Predictive QSAR Models[edit]

A tag has been placed on Two Novel Parameters for Validation of Predictive QSAR Models requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be a blatant copyright infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words.

If the external website belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text — which means allowing other people to modify it — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. If you are not the owner of the external website but have permission from that owner, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission. You might want to look at Wikipedia's policies and guidelines for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. andy (talk) 10:16, 3 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Validation of QSAR models[edit]

A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Validation of QSAR models, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process because of the following concern:

Original research

All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because, even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. andy (talk) 10:18, 3 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

This is NOT a research article but a write-up on "validation of QSAR models" based on published references. According to Wikipedia guidelines "Research that consists of collecting and organizing material from existing sources within the provisions of this and other content policies is encouraged: this is "source-based research", and it is fundamental to writing an encyclopedia. Take care, however, not to go beyond what is expressed in the sources or to use them in ways inconsistent with the intent of the source, such as using material out of context. In short, stick to the sources." Kunalroyindia (talk) 11:45, 4 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of ETA index in QSAR[edit]

A proposed deletion template has been added to the article ETA index in QSAR, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process because of the following concern:

Original research

All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because, even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. andy (talk) 10:19, 3 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

AfD nomination of ETA index in QSAR[edit]

I have nominated ETA index in QSAR, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/ETA index in QSAR. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.

Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. andy (talk) 08:30, 4 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I've also added Validation of QSAR models andy (talk) 08:45, 4 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

This is NOT a research article but a write-up on ETA indices based on published references. According to Wikipedia guidelines "Research that consists of collecting and organizing material from existing sources within the provisions of this and other content policies is encouraged: this is "source-based research", and it is fundamental to writing an encyclopedia. Take care, however, not to go beyond what is expressed in the sources or to use them in ways inconsistent with the intent of the source, such as using material out of context. In short, stick to the sources." The same is applicable for "Validation of QSAR models" page. Kunalroyindia (talk) 11:22, 4 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

QSAR articles and conflict of interest[edit]

Hi. Concerning the Validation of QSAR models and ETA index in QSAR articles, the problem is not with reliable sources but rather with conflict of interest. In the former article, you are a co-author on 5/7 = 71% of the citations while on the later, the number is 20/28 = 71%.

In particular, the WP:COI guideline states:

Excessive self-citation is strongly discouraged.

Just as excessively citing ones own publications in a review article or any scientific article for that matter is frowned upon, the same applies to Wikipedia. Wikipedia is not a self-promotional advertising opportunity. Wikipedia strives to make sure that articles maintain a neutral point of view and not give undue weight to any particular viewpoint. Only highlighting ones own research publications is incompatible with Wikipedia's goals.

As discussed here, there is a developing consensus to merge the Validation and ETA article into the QSAR and Connectivity indices articles. These proposed mergers would help to present a more balance view of this area of research. Boghog2 (talk) 18:04, 6 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I agree that the page "ETA index in QSAR" ( http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ETA_index_in_QSAR ) can be merged with the page "Topological index" ( http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Topological_index ) while the page "Validation of QSAR models" ( http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Validation_of_QSAR_models ) can be merged with the page "QSAR" ( http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Qsar ). Kunalroyindia (talk) 05:52, 7 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Great! Thanks for your understanding. I will need a few days to complete the mergers. Cheers. Boghog2 (talk) 18:51, 7 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Managing a conflict of interest[edit]

Hello, Kunalroyindia. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places or things you have written about on the page Q-RASAR, you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a conflict of interest may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for organizations for more information. We ask that you:

avoid editing or creating articles about yourself, your family, friends, colleagues, company, organization, clients, or competitors;
propose changes on the talk pages of affected articles (you can use the {{edit COI}} template);
disclose your conflict of interest when discussing affected articles (see Wikipedia:Conflict of interest § How to disclose a COI);
avoid linking to your organization's website in other articles (see Wikipedia:Spam § External link spamming);
do your best to comply with Wikipedia's content policies.

In addition, you are required by the Wikimedia Foundation's terms of use to disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution which forms all or part of work for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation. See Wikipedia:Paid-contribution disclosure.

Also, editing for the purpose of advertising, publicising, or promoting anyone or anything is not permitted. Thank you. 2A00:23EE:1478:6AAC:D41C:52FF:FE2C:4707 (talk) 11:11, 11 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]