User talk:LeJBoy0

Welcome![edit]

Hello, LeJBoy0, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:

You may also want to take the Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Wikipedia.

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or click here to ask for help on your talk page, and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome! agtx 23:14, 14 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Reference errors on 14 July[edit]

Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that some edits performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. They are as follows:

On the WDBJ page, your edit caused a URL error (help). (Fix | Ask for help)
On the WSLS-TV page, your edit caused a URL error (help). (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check these pages and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, ReferenceBot (talk) 00:17, 15 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for notifying me, User:ReferenceBot. I have corrected these errors.

Block[edit]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for block evasion; abuse of multiple accounts. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Diannaa (talk) 01:07, 15 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

LeJBoy0 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I have realized that I have abused my two accounts and I promise not to make any more to abuse. If I make any more and you are able to track me down, I give you permission to delete that account and any others if I were to go back on my word. Might I also add that I only created this account so I could start off fresh and avoid stuff like this. LeJBoy0 (talk) 01:13, 15 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

After this nastiness and this fulfilled pledge of block evasion, there is already the forgone conclusion that any other accounts you create will be blocked. OhNoitsJamie ^Talk 14:15, 15 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

LeJBoy0 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I have since moved on from the nastiness and fulfilled pledge of block evasion. This is something you guys must realize. Anyway, I would like to issue a sincere apology to all those that I have dealt with. LeJBoy0 (talk) 16:39, 15 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Under the circumstances, a standard offer approach could be taken in this case. PhilKnight (talk) 19:43, 15 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Is there any alternatives to the standard offer?

Given your history, no. OhNoitsJamie ^Talk 04:36, 16 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

But I don't have six months to wait. Don't you realize I have moved on from my "history" and have issued you guys an apology?

You don't have a choice in the matter given your block history. I'm not commenting further on this. OhNoitsJamie ^Talk 17:28, 16 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Fine. One less person I have to deal with. One day us misunderstood users will no longer be silenced by unforgiving scums like you.

Congrats; your talk page access has been revoked. You're not doing anything other than making it less likely that you will ever be allowed to edit here. OhNoitsJamie ^Talk 19:51, 16 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]