User talk:Leman2010

Leman2010, you are invited to the Teahouse

Hi Leman2010! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from peers and experienced editors. I hope to see you there! Jtmorgan (I'm a Teahouse host) Visit the Teahouse This message was delivered automatically by your robot friend, HostBot (talk) 20:40, 8 December 2013 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: IB Career Related Programme (December 10)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! The submission has not been accepted because it included copyrighted information, which is not permitted on Wikipedia. You are welcome to write an article on the subject, but please do not use copyrighted work.

The existing submission may be deleted at any time. Copyrighted work cannot be allowed to remain on Wikipedia.

• If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
• You can also get real-time chat help from experienced editors.

(t) Josve05a (c) 18:08, 10 December 2014 (UTC)

Teahouse talkback: you've got messages!

Hello, Leman2010. Your question has been answered at the Teahouse Q&A board. Feel free to reply there!
Please note that all old questions are archived after 2-3 days of inactivity. Message added by Chamith (talk) 10:15, 11 December 2014 (UTC). (You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{teahouse talkback}} template).

Teahouse talkback: you've got messages!

Hello, Leman2010. Your question has been answered at the Teahouse Q&A board. Feel free to reply there!
Please note that all old questions are archived after 2-3 days of inactivity. Message added by Yunshui ^雲_水 12:23, 11 December 2014 (UTC). (You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{teahouse talkback}} template).

Copyright violations - only warning

Having gone through your contribution history, I see that virtually every piece of text you have added to Wikipedia has been copied from elsewhere on the internet. This is not permitted; it is a violation of Wikipedia's terms of service and licencing. This is your only warning; if you insert copyrighted material from another site into Wikipedia again, you will be blocked from editing. Yunshui ^雲_水 12:43, 11 December 2014 (UTC)

December 2014

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for violating copyright policy by copying text or images into Wikipedia from another source without verifying permission. You have been previously warned that this is against policy, but have persisted.

Please take this opportunity to be sure you understand our copyright policy and our policies regarding how to use non-free content. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. However, you should read the guide to appealing blocks first.  Yunshui ^雲_水 12:19, 12 December 2014 (UTC)

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Leman2010 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

I'm in my sandbox trying to clean up to get rid of all copyright violations and insert totally new text and you block me. I totally understand the copyright rules but can't I edit in sandbox? I'm not trying to put up same contents again! Thanks for understanding first attempts. Leman2010 (talk) 12:47, 12 December 2014 (UTC)

Decline reason:

You evidently don't "totally understand the copyright rules". Just try appearing in court and saying to the judge "ah, but the copy of someone else's work that I posted to the internet had the word sandbox at the top of it, so that means it wasn't a copyright infringement", and see what the judge says to that. The editor who uses the pseudonym "JamesBWatson" (talk) 18:00, 12 December 2014 (UTC)

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Leman2010 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

I plead guilty your honor but was used to the definition of sandbox in software development where a sandbox is usually totally separated from an operational environment. . This allows one to edit text without it being in public view and thereby ensure it doesn't infringe any laws before it is released. Clearly my understanding was totally wrong due to inexperience rather than maliciousness. Leman2010 (talk) 14:10, 15 December 2014 (UTC)

Decline reason:

Looking at 'IB Career Related Programme' this was presumably intended to be moved into the encyclopedia at some point, and was a copyright violation. In this context, I am declining your request to be unblocked. PhilKnight (talk) 17:35, 18 December 2014 (UTC)

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

And the sandbox is not in the encyclopedia. However, you are still putting text owned by someone else onto Wikimedia Foundation servers. Since on the Teahouse page ("Draft page deleted copyright" section) you say that you work for the company, I'd say that you also have a conflict of interest with regard to all your edits. If you couldn't edit at all about IB, would you still edit? Origamite^ⓣⓒ 16:49, 15 December 2014 (UTC)