User talk:Lemon martini

Yes,I really do exist contrary to popular belief.When I find out how to get amazing bits and bobs up and running more of me will appear. Till then leave nice messages. If you are interested in the Wikiquiz,leave comments :)

Hi-I have noticed a user has vandalized the Blood article.I've changed it back and noticed this user's other edits have been just as stupid.Where do I go to report him/her/it?

The user has been warned on his talk page.

In general if a user has been warned sufficiently Wikipedia:Administrator intervention against vandalism, which also shows some of the process of warning people not to vandalise. Regards, Rich Farmbrough, 19:59 13 October 2006 (GMT).

F1

Hi. Sorry it's taken me a while to respond to your message - I didn't spot it at the top of the page!

Hope you enjoy being part of WP:F1.

4u1e 08:39, 4 November 2006 (UTC)

Wikiquiz

Hey, I support you on that quiz thing all the way. If you need any backup or help, just let me know. It sounds like a great idea that I'd like to see put into action. --Kevin ^(TALK) 21:29, 30 December 2006 (UTC)

Grand Prix race summaries

Hi Lemon martini. Thanks for the wonderful race summaries you added to the 1987 and 1988 Grand Prix reports. Reading them has really "taken me back". I have a couple of reminders/suggestions for your future F1-related efforts: When creating a wikilink for "Williams", please link to WilliamsF1 rather than just Williams (which is a disambiguation page), i.e. put "[[WilliamsF1|Williams]]" rather than just "[[Williams]]". Likewise link "Ferrari" to Scuderia Ferrari, "March" to March Engineering, "Lotus" to Team Lotus and "Benetton" to Benetton Formula. And a suggestion on formatting (if I may be so bold): most editors leave a space after each full stop and comma, and either side of a dash. Also, to start a new paragraph, you need to insert two carriage returns, not just one. Have a look at my recent changes to 1988 British Grand Prix to see what I mean. But keep up the great work! DH85868993 04:33, 13 January 2007 (UTC)

Lemon Martini?

Are you the same person as Lemon from DailyF1, F1F, et. al. ? If so, hope all is well.

truly, D. Mazzacane

Guroadrunner 21:24, 18 January 2007 (UTC)

1975 F1 race reports

Hi Lemon martini. Thanks for your recent excellent additions to the 1975 F1 race reports. Are you able to add a reference to the source(s) you have used? I can help you with the actual formatting of references if you don't know how to do it. Regards. DH85868993 11:36, 4 June 2007 (UTC)

Barnstar

Thanks for the barnstar. DH85868993 13:42, 13 September 2007 (UTC)

Thanks!

		The Barnstar of Good Humor
		Hey, I really liked your comment on the Ref Desk. Gave me a really good giggle! Keep up the good work and have a barnstar on me. Xarr☎ 19:51, 19 August 2008 (UTC)

Traxion (video game)

The nomination listing isn't working and it looks like you forgot to write the nomination itself. Can you please fix this? - Mgm|^(talk) 16:26, 16 November 2008 (UTC)

I've expanded the article and added some refs; I hope you'll reconsider the AfD. Bsimmons666 (talk) ^Friend? 01:32, 17 November 2008 (UTC)

Looks like this is a legit account. I will contact the blocking admin. Daniel Case (talk) 15:39, 23 January 2009 (UTC)

RE: RE: NTHINGS

Sorry about that deletion. However, you did do two things wrong. 1: you weren't grammatically correct (not like, with nouns, but it was kinda spam-y), and 2: you accidentally added below the category. I apologize. Feel free to edit the list however you wish! 2J Bäkkvire Maestro ^{RQQ et al} _{favorite haunts} 12:13, 27 January 2010 (UTC)

La Silla Observatory Reward

Hello! Our deadline for the La Silla Observatory page update has passed and we saw that you were the most active contributor. However, since this is our first request, should we point the winner or the contributors claim the award? :) Thanks! 14 April 2011, 18:01 CEST — Preceding unsigned comment added by Lars Lindberg Christensen (talk • contribs)

Helpme tag for IP

Hi, what was the point of this edit? Thanks, Legoktm (talk) 12:29, 20 October 2012 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:08, 23 November 2015 (UTC)

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Lemon martini. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, Lemon martini. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Lemon martini. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)

Account

[1]

Is your account compromised or something? Benjamin (talk) 02:17, 19 March 2019 (UTC)

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abuse of editing privileges.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.

Materialscientist (talk) 10:20, 21 March 2019 (UTC)

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Lemon martini (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

you should not have stopped me. i was just having some fun. it was a laugh putting in balls but you can't take jokes so now i've got lemon_martini blocked. any one else who can't take a joke i'll have them blocked too.Lemon martini (talk) 11:45, 21 March 2019 (UTC)

Decline reason:

This isn't an unblock request, this is an acknowledgement you lack the maturity to edit here. Yamla (talk) 11:54, 21 March 2019 (UTC)

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Recovery of access

Hello,

Please contact cawikimedia.org to recover access to your account. — regards, Revi 12:07, 21 March 2019 (UTC)

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who accepted the request.

Lemon martini (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

"Compromised account.After I reported User:159.15.129.71 for spamming everywhere with scrotums,it seemed my account was hacked in revenge(these was even noted in previous unblock request from their IP).Even once the IP that had latched on was blocked,there were then attempts from other IPs to continue vandalizing everywhere.This was noted and a global lock put on so that access could not be gained.After I contacted the stewards,there has now been an investigation by the WMF and User:JSutherland has helped monitor the activity and has been able to refresh the account to before it was compromised and access has been regranted with a new password.I fully understand it had to be blocked as a protective measure to stop the running amok with posting of gobbledegook and obscene pictures. Now that access has been regained,I would love to resume the productive editing I was previously doing(and have been for over 12 years without so much as a warning)and so am submitting the appeal.Any further clarification please don't hesitate to ask.

Accept reason:

Unblocking per the below comments. 331dot (talk) 21:48, 1 May 2019 (UTC)

Lemon martini (talk) 16:25, 29 April 2019 (UTC) (the genuine Lemon_Martini)

Normally we do not unblock compromised accounts per WP:COMPROMISED. However, you indicate that you have dealt with the WMF; could you ask them to comment on this matter? 331dot (talk) 19:24, 29 April 2019 (UTC)

• @331dot: Account access was restored by JSutherland (WMF) per "situation resolved".[2] ~Swarm~ ^{sting} 19:51, 1 May 2019 (UTC)

  Yes, I scrambled their password in the backend so old sessions should have been invalidated. Joe Sutherland (WMF) (talk) 21:16, 1 May 2019 (UTC)

• Many thanks to @331dot: and @JSutherland (WMF): for doing all the work to get me back up and running. Have a Wikicookie each! Lemon martini (talk) 20:10, 3 May 2019 (UTC)

ArbCom 2019 election voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:08, 19 November 2019 (UTC)

Seriously

Hi, Lemon martini. I was re-reading the thread about Trumpabteilung at ANI, and it struck me that it may have — typographically — looked like my impatient comment ("Oh, seriously") was directed at you for leaving the user a warning. It wasn't, at all; I think it was a good idea on your part to warn them; what I was impatient about was that they had been around for so long without any admin blocking them. Especially now that several admins had commented in the thread. Bishonen | tålk 16:46, 26 February 2020 (UTC).

Blocked

Hello. I've blocked this account for abusive sockpuppetry, evidenced by checkuser logs. This is a checkuser block. In a spirit of generosity I have set the length at only 3 months. If you wish to appeal this block you will find plenty of instructions around, including at WP:APB. -- zzuuzz ^(talk) 15:45, 12 April 2020 (UTC)

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Lemon martini (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

Hi-I'm not quite sure what's happened here-I've only edited sporadically recently but as the only edits I have made have been from my logged in account and so far have been to my knowledge constructive(please feel free to verify these).I'm not sure who if anyone I'm supposed to be a sock of-I did have some trouble with abusive impersonations of my account but that was over a year ago and was dealt with by the WMF and measures put in place to ensure that there was no repeat.Perhaps I've hit some collateral from a range block? Lemon martini (talk) 15:58, 12 April 2020 (UTC)

Decline reason:

As below, it appears that there was recent activity from your device that are unacceptable. SQL^{Query me!} 17:06, 12 April 2020 (UTC)
Logged out editing would need to be discussed. Declined.
 — Berean Hunter (talk) 17:06, 12 April 2020 (UTC)

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

That's the thing-as I said above,the only edits I have made have been whilst actually logged in.I haven't edited whilst logged out at all.It's not that the account has been compromised,it's that another editor seems to have hit the same IP area as mine. Lemon martini (talk) 17:28, 12 April 2020 (UTC)

Lemon martini, Also the same device. SQL^{Query me!} 01:40, 15 April 2020 (UTC)

Checkuser needed. Unfortunately there has been some other recent activity from your device, which was not amusing. Given its nature I would find even an excuse that it was your little brother, housemate, or cat who did it to be implausible. I have added a template which should expedite review from other checkusers, since (unless you freely reveal the activity) only a checkuser can review the block. Should this review not fall in your favour, your last line of appeal is the Arbitration Committee (details previously linked). -- zzuuzz ^(talk) 16:46, 12 April 2020 (UTC)

(edit conflict) with Berean Hunter - I looked at this via checkuser, and came to the same conclusion as both BH and zzuuzz. SQL^{Query me!} 17:07, 12 April 2020 (UTC)

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:29, 24 November 2020 (UTC)

You have been removed from Wikipedia:Local Embassy due to inactivity

Hi Lemon_martini! You're receiving this notification because you were previously listed at Wikipedia:Local Embassy, but you haven't made any edits to the English Wikipedia in over 6 months.

Because of your inactivity, you have been removed from the list. If you would like to resubscribe, you can do so at any time by visiting Wikipedia:Local Embassy.

Thank you! Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 18:04, 26 April 2021 (UTC)