User talk:LightningComplexFire/2020 archives

MirahezeGuy, you are invited to the Teahouse!

Hi MirahezeGuy! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like Lectonar (talk). Visit the Teahouse We hope to see you there! Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts 16:04, 13 September 2020 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Shalimar Restaurant (chain)

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Shalimar Restaurant (chain) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a company, corporation or organization that does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. David Biddulph (talk) 14:32, 30 September 2020 (UTC)

@David Biddulph: I'll try to fix it in my sandbox then --♦M-ir_AHE-zeGUy♦ (talk) 14:34, 30 September 2020 (UTC)

sig test

♦/\/\/\TheGeometryDashFan/\/\/\♦ (talk) 16:24, 7 October 2020 (UTC)
♦/\/\/\TheGeometryDashFan/\/\/\♦ (talk) 16:24, 7 October 2020 (UTC)
--♦/\/\/\TheGeometryDashFan/\/\/\♦ (talk) 20:25, 13 October 2020 (UTC) --User:GeometryDashFan12/sig (talk) 20:26, 13 October 2020 (UTC)

--{{SUBST:User:GeometryDashFan12/sig}} (talk) 19:16, 14 October 2020 (UTC)

Nomination of Copper Fire (2020) for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Copper Fire (2020) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Copper Fire (2020) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. McMatter ^(talk)/_(contrib) 16:15, 1 October 2020 (UTC)

Templates that link to user-space pages

I'm not sure what value {{Global user page}} (https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/User:{{PAGENAME}}), {{User CentralAuth}} (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:CentralAuth/{{PAGENAME}}), and {{Sandboxlinkup}} (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:{{PAGENAME}}/sandbox) have.

Correction - I see what value they have, but there are already ways of doing this. Plus, it's much more common to use a wikilink thank a URL for internal links, and much more common to use an interwiki link for links to other Wikimedia Foundation projects.

For example, the "canonical" way to do "Global user page" would be either with an interwiki, mw:User:LightningComplexFire ([[mw:User:{{BASEPAGENAME}}]]}), or by a URL using either the "fullurl" magic word, https://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/User:LightningComplexFire ({{fullurl:mw:User:{{BASEPAGENAME}}}}), or the "canonicalurl" magic word, https://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/User:LightningComplexFire ({{canonicalurl:mw:User:{{BASEPAGENAME}}}}).

Centralauth and the sandbox are similar, except use Special:CentralAuth/LightningComplexFire ([[Special:CentralAuth/{{BASEPAGENAME}}]]) and User:LightningComplexFire/sandbox ([[User:{{BASEPAGENAME}}/sandbox]]) instead of mw:User:LightningComplexFire ([[mw:User:{{BASEPAGENAME}}]]}).

You can also use {{subst:BASEPAGENAME}} in place of {{BASEPAGENAME}} in the examples above, which will substitute the page name as it is right now for the calculated-at-time-of-viewing magic word BASEPAGENAME. On this page it renders as GeometryDashFan12 but unlike the ones above, it will stay that way even if the page is later moved. You can see this for yourself by editing this comment. davidwr/(talk)/(contribs) 18:17, 8 October 2020 (UTC)

Odd thanks received from you

I got a notification dated 11 minutes ago saying you thanked me for my action from an automated action to my account in 2016 that gave me "extended confirmed user" rights.[1]

It's very unusual to get "thanked" for something that old, particularly for something that was automatic.

Did you thank me, or did I just discover a bug in the system? davidwr/(talk)/(contribs) 16:46, 15 October 2020 (UTC)

@Davidwr: It was on accident --a gd fan (talk) 16:47, 15 October 2020 (UTC)

OK as long as it wasn't on account of a bug in the Wikimedia software. That was my main concern. davidwr/(talk)/(contribs) 16:52, 15 October 2020 (UTC)

Image without license

Unspecified source/license for File:Animated-Flag-Palestine.gif

Thanks for uploading File:Animated-Flag-Palestine.gif. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. Even if you created the image yourself, you still need to release it so Wikipedia can use it. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time after the next seven days. If you made this image yourself, you can use copyright tags like {{PD-self}} (to release all rights), {{self|cc-by-sa-4.0}} (to require that you be credited), or any tag here - just go to the image, click edit, and add one of those. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

• Wikipedia:Image use policy
• Wikipedia:File copyright tags

This is an automated notice by MifterBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. NOTE: Once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. --MifterBot ^{(Talk • Contribs • Owner)} 19:00, 15 October 2020 (UTC)

Your recent report

Hi, thanks for reporting this. In the future, if you see content this egregious, please report it immediately. Don't worry about following the typical warning structure. Anarchyte (talk • work) 15:12, 19 October 2020 (UTC)

You're welcome --a gd fan (talk) 19:00, 19 October 2020 (UTC)

File source problem with File:Wcjdghost.png

Thank you for uploading File:Wcjdghost.png. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the page from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of the website's terms of use of its content. If the original copyright holder is a party unaffiliated with the website, that author should also be credited. Please add this information by editing the image description page.

If the necessary information is not added within the next seven days, the image will be deleted. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem.

Please refer to the image use policy to learn what images you can or cannot upload on Wikipedia. Please also check any other files you have uploaded to make sure they are correctly tagged. Here is a list of your uploads. If you have any questions or are in need of assistance please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Ytoyoda (talk) 13:47, 26 October 2020 (UTC)

File:Wcjdghost.png listed for discussion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Wcjdghost.png, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. Ytoyoda (talk) 16:10, 26 October 2020 (UTC)

Disambugition pages

For proposing an intriguing idea with some creative misppelings:

Whack! You've been whacked with a wet trout. Don't take this too seriously. Someone just wants to let you know that you did something silly.

Cheers, {{u|Sdkb}} ^talk 19:51, 26 October 2020 (UTC)

Your thread has been archived

Hi GeometryDashFan12! The thread you created at the Wikipedia:Teahouse, 2 q, has been archived because there was no discussion for a few days (usually at least two days, and sometimes four or more). You can still find the archived discussion here. If you have any additional questions that weren't answered then, please feel free to . The archival was done by Lowercase sigmabot III, and this notification was delivered by Muninnbot, both automated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing {{bots|deny=Muninnbot}} here on your user talk page. Muninnbot (talk) 19:02, 27 October 2020 (UTC)

Important Notice

This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.

You have shown interest in post-1932 politics of the United States and closely related people. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.

For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.

Doug Weller talk 16:34, 30 October 2020 (UTC)

@Doug Weller: Does that mean I'm in trouble? --a gd fan (talk) 16:41, 30 October 2020 (UTC)

No, but your edit to Antifa - or rather to two articles on Antifa in two countries - were reverted. Please don't do that again without discussing it at the talk page. Terrorism is not a label to be tossed around without discussion and damn good sources (hopefully not political ones). Doug Weller talk 16:52, 30 October 2020 (UTC)

Your thread has been archived

Hi GeometryDashFan12! The thread you created at the Wikipedia:Teahouse, Automatic number of contributions, has been archived because there was no discussion for a few days (usually at least two days, and sometimes four or more). You can still find the archived discussion here. If you have any additional questions that weren't answered then, please feel free to . The archival was done by Lowercase sigmabot III, and this notification was delivered by Muninnbot, both automated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing {{bots|deny=Muninnbot}} here on your user talk page. Muninnbot (talk) 19:02, 30 October 2020 (UTC)

November 2020

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.. Shut up guys a gd fan (talk) 17:32, 2 November 2020 (UTC)

Your recent editing history at Antifa (United States) shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See the bold, revert, discuss cycle for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you do not violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. Binksternet (talk) 16:21, 2 November 2020 (UTC)

You have been blocked from editing from certain pages (Antifa (United States)) for a period of 1 week for not adhering to neutral point of view and edit warring. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  Ivanvector (^Talk/_Edits) 16:23, 2 November 2020 (UTC)

@Binksternet: No, its because some antifa defender reverted my edit removing biased content, and he said it was unexplained. I reverted the content to explain why I removed it and now you are reverting my edit for edit warring, and my edit should stay. a gd fan (talk) 16:24, 2 November 2020 (UTC)

And why am I temporarily blocked from editing an article because I was edit warring? It was only 1 revert that I made and there are vandals and LTAs that have shorter blocks. And if you want to enforce NPOV, then remove what I removed, not suck up to terrorists a gd fan (talk) 16:27, 2 November 2020 (UTC)

Before you consider appealing this block, I suggest you read our guidelines on reliable sources, neutral point of view, original research, tendentious editing, and just for fun, no personal attacks. If after reading through these guidelines you think you can convince administrators that you'll stop trying to use two user-submitted wiki websites and a handful of Youtube videos to support the removal of properly-sourced and analyzed material that you happen to disagree with, then by all means see the guide to appealing blocks for instructions to prepare a block appeal. In the meantime you are free to discuss your proposed changes on the article's talk page, as long as you can do so without being disruptive. I see you have already received a notice about the discretionary sanctions that apply to the topic of post-1932 American politics, so I will not repeat it. Ivanvector (^Talk/_Edits) 16:40, 2 November 2020 (UTC)

You reverted twice and used rubbish sources. As for bias, political articles are always subject to a variety of biases by the nature of politics and WP:NPOV is how we deal with that. The next step for you if you don't change will be a longer block or a topic ban from anything to do with American politics. Doug Weller talk 17:11, 2 November 2020 (UTC)

@Doug Weller: ANTIFA is still violent, even with those "rubbish" a gd fan (talk) 17:15, 2 November 2020 (UTC)

And it WAS 1 revert that I made, not 2 a gd fan (talk) 17:18, 2 November 2020 (UTC)

The sentence immediately before the one you removed says This may involve digital activism, harassment, physical violence, and property damage against those whom they identify as belonging to the far right. You appear to have overlooked that. FDW777 (talk) 17:21, 2 November 2020 (UTC)

If both of those sentences stayed, then the paragraph will look ironic a gd fan (talk) 17:23, 2 November 2020 (UTC)

I had no idea it was impossible to engage in violent and non-violent activities at different times. FDW777 (talk) 17:26, 2 November 2020 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

Userpage editnotice

Hi, I noticed that you have a custom editnotice for your userpage. That particular editnotice (the creepy pictures of the "ghost" and threat that the ghost will haunt you) isn't really appropriate; would you please remove it? GeneralNotability (talk) 19:14, 2 November 2020 (UTC)

I have deleted it per the user's request. Ivanvector (^Talk/_Edits) 19:40, 2 November 2020 (UTC)

Please remain civil on your user page

Hello, I have noticed your comments on the country of Israel, on your user page, and they violate Wikipedia's Civility Policy. (WP:CIVIL) Please remove the negative comments, and delete the userbox. While you may not like a particular group of people, it is inappropriate to have that material on Wikipedia. JackFromReedsburg (talk | contribs) 19:06, 3 November 2020 (UTC)

Fine, but I would rather not a gd fan (talk) 19:10, 3 November 2020 (UTC)

MfD nomination of User:GeometryDashFan12/Userboxes/Anti-Israel

User:GeometryDashFan12/Userboxes/Anti-Israel, a page which you created or substantially contributed to, has been nominated for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; you may participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:GeometryDashFan12/Userboxes/Anti-Israel and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of User:GeometryDashFan12/Userboxes/Anti-Israel during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. Joseph2302 (talk) 16:10, 5 November 2020 (UTC)

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you make personal attacks on other people. Comment on content, not on fellow editors. For the avoidance of doubt, you are to treat all persons with respect while editing on this website, per the civility policy. We give a very wide latitude to users making political statements and expressing support for various positions on their user pages and/or through the creation and use of userboxes, but we do not tolerate hatred nor hateful statements of any kind. Furthermore you are to respond civilly and respectfully to fellow contributors; your casting of aspersions that other editors "love praising killers" or that you "don't even care" are disrespectful and unacceptable. One more incident of this behaviour and you will be blocked from editing.

Please also see this important notice:

This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.

You have shown interest in the Arab–Israeli conflict. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.

For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.

-- Ivanvector (^Talk/_Edits) 17:15, 5 November 2020 (UTC)

November 2020

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 2 weeks for making personal attacks towards other editors. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  Ivanvector (^Talk/_Edits) 20:08, 5 November 2020 (UTC)

What attack!? What did I do!? a gd fan (talk) 20:13, 5 November 2020 (UTC)

You were given a final warning about edits like this just three hours ago. In addition to your ongoing disrespectful comments, your edits on the PETA talk page are indistinguishable from trolling. You can use these two weeks to read and understand the civility and no personal attacks policies, and if you can't improve your attitude then maybe this website is not for you. Ivanvector (^Talk/_Edits) 20:16, 5 November 2020 (UTC)

The first was a joke, and the second and third aren't attacks. a gd fan (talk) 20:18, 5 November 2020 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of File:CropScreenshot123456qwerty.png

A tag has been placed on File:CropScreenshot123456qwerty.png requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F9 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the file appears to be a blatant copyright infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images taken from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use it — which means allowing other people to use it for any reason — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. The same holds if you are not the owner but have their permission. If you are not the owner and do not have permission, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for how you may obtain it. You might want to look at Wikipedia's copyright policy for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. JackFromReedsburg (talk | contribs) 20:14, 5 November 2020 (UTC)

PA

Read wp:npa", You comment ion content, not the motivation of a user.Slatersteven (talk) 09:51, 6 November 2020 (UTC)

Speedy deletion of User:GeometryDashFan12/sandbox/sjw

The page User:GeometryDashFan12/sandbox/sjw has been speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This was done under section U5 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appeared to consist of writings, information, discussions, and/or activities not closely related to Wikipedia's goals. Please note that Wikipedia is not a free web hosting service. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such pages may be deleted at any time.

Please do not recreate the material without addressing these concerns, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If you think this page should not have been deleted for this reason, or you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. GeneralNotability (talk) 19:00, 8 November 2020 (UTC)

@GeneralNotability: That sandbox was to add a new section to another article --a gd fan (talk) 20:02, 12 November 2020 (UTC)

August Complex

@Ajs2004:, may you please add information regarding August Complex containment on 2020 California wildfires and August Complex Fire? I'm blocked. https://inciweb.nwcg.gov/incident/6983/ is proof. --a gd fan (talk) 20:07, 12 November 2020 (UTC)

GeometryDashFan12, while you are blocked you may not recruit other editors to make edits on your behalf. You can make this edit yourself if you successfully appeal your block or after it expires. Ajs2004 may be blocked if they edit for you and your block may be extended. Ivanvector (^Talk/_Edits) 20:11, 12 November 2020 (UTC)

@Ivanvector: I didn't know that, sorry --a gd fan (talk) 20:12, 12 November 2020 (UTC)

Unblock req

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

LightningComplexFire (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

Hello, my name is GDF12, and I would like to request an unblock, for the following reasons: 1st, I will not threaten and edit any political pages in the future, 2nd, I will follow guidelines at all times, and last, I love Wikipedia a lot, it is my hobby and I don't like getting sanctioned from it. I promise I won't talk about Antifa or Israel much, and I don't want to get blocked again. Thank you and have a good day/night --a gd fan (talk) 20:23, 12 November 2020. @Ivanvector: (UTC) Hello? Is anyone gonna respond? @GeneralNotability, Anarchyte, Tegel, Favonian, and Jimbo Wales:

Decline reason:

Your block appears to have expired. SQL^{Query me!} 21:00, 23 November 2020 (UTC)

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Your GA nomination of Silverado fire

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Silverado fire you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Buidhe -- Buidhe (talk) 23:41, 21 November 2020 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Silverado fire

The article Silverado fire you nominated as a good article has failed ; see Talk:Silverado fire for reasons why the nomination failed. If or when these points have been taken care of, you may apply for a new nomination of the article. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Buidhe -- Buidhe (talk) 01:21, 22 November 2020 (UTC)

Your thread has been archived

Hi GeometryDashFan12! The thread you created at the Wikipedia:Teahouse, NoIndexed pages, has been archived because there was no discussion for a few days (usually at least two days, and sometimes four or more). You can still find the archived discussion here. If you have any additional questions that weren't answered then, please feel free to . The archival was done by Lowercase sigmabot III, and this notification was delivered by Muninnbot, both automated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing {{bots|deny=Muninnbot}} here on your user talk page. Muninnbot (talk) 19:02, 23 November 2020 (UTC)

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:58, 24 November 2020 (UTC)

RFA transclusion

Please don't transclude an RFA unless you are asked to (you made two mistakes doing so), and in the very unlikely chance you need to, please make sure that the standard template is used for the RFA. power~enwiki (π, ν) 19:16, 30 November 2020 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: List of closed Wikipedias (December 1)

Your recent article submission has been rejected. If you have further questions, you can ask at the Articles for creation help desk or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help. The reason left by Praxidicae was: This submission is contrary to the purpose of Wikipedia. The comment the reviewer left was: This doesn't belong on Wikipedia, much less in Mainspace. It possibly belongs on Meta but also seems unlikely as m:List of Wikipedias exists and covers closed projects.

Praxidicae (talk) 14:27, 1 December 2020 (UTC)

Hello, GeometryDashFan12! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Praxidicae (talk) 14:27, 1 December 2020 (UTC)

Clean up tags

Please stop tagging articles for clean up until you have a better understanding of what it entails. How is this "lead to short"? It's a single sentence sub-stub. Tagging this article, created by an Adminstrator, as a hoax and pinging Jimbo Wales in your edit summary? Why? Here you put the more sources needed tag intended for an entire article into a section - a section which includes inline citations. While your intent is to be helpful, the outcome is not. You have only been using this account for 2 months+ and have more warnings and blocks than I would expect to see in 2 years of editing. I strongly suggest you seek a mentor to avoid further issues.-- Jezebel's Ponyo^{bons mots} 20:41, 1 December 2020 (UTC)

@Ponyo: Ok, sorry, about the "hoax" I thought I saw something with misinformation, so I tried pinging any admin that came to mind, but then I noticed the references, so I removed the hoax tag. --a gd fan (talk) 20:47, 1 December 2020 (UTC)

I don't doubt your good faith in adding the tags, but it's not helpful if they're incorrect. -- Jezebel's Ponyo^{bons mots} 20:51, 1 December 2020 (UTC)

Articles

You've been warned previously not to edit the user pages of other editors - doing so is now a requirement for your continued ability to edit Wikipedia, additionally, I would strongly encourage you to now spend as little time as possible editing your own user page, and instead to focus on material improvements to the articles that are the core purpose of Wikipedia. Nick (talk) 19:10, 2 December 2020 (UTC)

Your thread has been archived

Hi GeometryDashFan12! The thread you created at the Wikipedia:Teahouse, interwiki redirects, has been archived because there was no discussion for a few days (usually at least two days, and sometimes four or more). You can still find the archived discussion here. If you have any additional questions that weren't answered then, please feel free to . The archival was done by Lowercase sigmabot III, and this notification was delivered by Muninnbot, both automated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing {{bots|deny=Muninnbot}} here on your user talk page. Muninnbot (talk) 19:03, 3 December 2020 (UTC)

User Page / "Least Favorites"

Hi there.

The "Least Favorites" section on your user page comes off as aggressive, hateful, and generally un-collegial. I would strongly advise you remove it, it will not make you many friends here. -- a ^{they/them | argue | contribs} 21:48, 3 December 2020 (UTC)

Your thread has been archived

Hi GeometryDashFan12! The thread you created at the Wikipedia:Teahouse, AfC, has been archived because there was no discussion for a few days (usually at least two days, and sometimes four or more). You can still find the archived discussion here. If you have any additional questions that weren't answered then, please feel free to . The archival was done by Lowercase sigmabot III, and this notification was delivered by Muninnbot, both automated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing {{bots|deny=Muninnbot}} here on your user talk page. Muninnbot (talk) 19:02, 4 December 2020 (UTC)

Category:2020 identifications has been nominated for deletion

Category:2020 identifications has been nominated for deletion. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Le Deluge (talk) 15:28, 7 December 2020 (UTC)

Tech News: 2020-50

Latest tech news from the Wikimedia technical community. Please tell other users about these changes. Not all changes will affect you. Translations are available.

Recent changes

• You can now put pages on your watchlist for a limited period of time. Some wikis already had this function. [2][3]

Changes later this week

• Information from Wikidata that is used on a wiki page can be shown in recent changes and watchlists on a Wikimedia wiki. To see this you need to turn on showing Wikidata edits in your watchlist in the preferences. Changes to the Wikidata description in the language of a Wikimedia wiki will then be shown in recent changes and watchlists. This will not show edits to languages that are not relevant to your wiki. [4][5]
• The new version of MediaWiki will be on test wikis and MediaWiki.org from 8 December. It will be on non-Wikipedia wikis and some Wikipedias from 9 December. It will be on all wikis from 10 December (calendar).

Future changes

• You can vote on proposals in the Community Wishlist Survey between 8 December and 21 December. The survey decides what the Community Tech team will work on.

Tech news prepared by Tech News writers and posted by bot • Contribute • Translate • Get help • Give feedback • Subscribe or unsubscribe.

16:14, 7 December 2020 (UTC)

Your thread has been archived

Hi GeometryDashFan12! The thread you created at the Wikipedia:Teahouse, 20 years and One Billion Edits, has been archived because there was no discussion for a few days (usually at least two days, and sometimes four or more). You can still find the archived discussion here. If you have any additional questions that weren't answered then, please feel free to . The archival was done by Lowercase sigmabot III, and this notification was delivered by Muninnbot, both automated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing {{bots|deny=Muninnbot}} here on your user talk page. Muninnbot (talk) 19:03, 7 December 2020 (UTC)

Same Thing

Hi, I have the same problem as yours. It always says ERROR. Hope its not the whole system is broken.

Larryzhao|Talk|Contribs 22:46, 7 December 2020 (UTC)

North Complex Fire Caps

I appreciate your effort to cleanup capitalization, but "fire", as part of the name of a wildfire, is capitalized. Like any other natural feature that is lowercase when a general term it is capitalized when included in proper a name. (Think lake, river, mountain, hurricane...) Thank you again for your efforts. Crescent77 (talk) 15:30, 8 December 2020 (UTC)

Your thread has been archived

Hi GeometryDashFan12! The thread you created at the Wikipedia:Teahouse, Help, has been archived because there was no discussion for a few days (usually at least two days, and sometimes four or more). You can still find the archived discussion here. If you have any additional questions that weren't answered then, please feel free to . The archival was done by Lowercase sigmabot III, and this notification was delivered by Muninnbot, both automated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing {{bots|deny=Muninnbot}} here on your user talk page. Muninnbot (talk) 19:01, 8 December 2020 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Slater and Devil fires has been accepted

Slater and Devil fires, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. It is commonplace for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Theroadislong (talk) 16:29, 10 December 2020 (UTC)

Your thread has been archived

Hi GeometryDashFan12! The thread you created at the Wikipedia:Teahouse, What's an internal error?, has been archived because there was no discussion for a few days (usually at least two days, and sometimes four or more). You can still find the archived discussion here. If you have any additional questions that weren't answered then, please feel free to . The archival was done by Lowercase sigmabot III, and this notification was delivered by Muninnbot, both automated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing {{bots|deny=Muninnbot}} here on your user talk page. Muninnbot (talk) 19:04, 10 December 2020 (UTC)

Your signature

Hi, your signature is non-compliant with Wikipedia's signature policies, in particular:

1. Images should not be used in signatures, as per WP:SIGIMAGE
2. <big> tags should not be used, as they can disrupt text around it (WP:SIGAPP)
3. The yellow text is almost unreadable for someone with reasonably good eyesight, so will be impossible to read for people with visions problems, and as such almost all shades of yellow on a white background fail MOS:COLOR.
   

Please can you read through Wikipedia:Signatures and update your signature to be compliant with that page? Joseph2302 (talk) 16:00, 11 December 2020 (UTC)

@Joseph2302: The fire isn't an image, it's an emoji, but I will remove the yellow and big --🔥LightningComplexFire🔥 16:45, 11 December 2020 (UTC)

Also, your signature is currently 292 bytes long when the normal limit is 256, you are currently circumventing this limit using substitution of user:LightningComplexFire/sig. See WP:SIGLEN. PorkchopGMX (talk • contribs • Merry Christmas!) 15:03, 12 December 2020 (UTC)

Thank you for removing the big markup in User:LightningComplexFire/sig! As PorkchopGMX noted, your signature exceeds the character limit, which is actually 255. Also, it is missing a closing </span> tag, which is causing missing end tag lint errors. I struggled with it and I don't see any way of saving all aspects of your signature within the 255-character limit. I suggest sacrificing the text shadow, and going with this:

—🔥[[User:LightningComplexFire|<b style="color:red">Lightning</b>]][[User talk:LightningComplexFire|<b style="color:orange">Complex</b>]][[Special:Contribs/LightningComplexFire|<b style="color:yellow">Fire</b>]]🔥 : —🔥LightningComplexFire🔥

That works, with 44 characters to spare. However, it does not address Joseph2302's concern over the poor contrast of yellow on white. I assume you are contemplating another "warm" color to use instead and I leave that to you. —Anomalocaris (talk) 11:47, 15 December 2020 (UTC)

I see that you have updated User:LightningComplexFire/sig largely along my suggestion, and you've added a bit more, using exactly 255 characters. Congratulations! —Anomalocaris (talk) 21:59, 15 December 2020 (UTC)

Hello @LightningComplexFire:, i hate to bother you again, but unfortunately you will have to change your sig again. It is 261 bytes long (over the limit of 255) and it contains a transclusion of a template, something that isn’t allowed in signatures. Also by transcluding the {{ping}} template in your sig you may accidentally ping the user named Ping. You will have to change {{ping|Ping}} in your signature to Ping to fix these issues. PorkchopGMX (talk • contribs • Merry Christmas!) 15:33, 18 December 2020 (UTC)

Your thread has been archived

Hi LightningComplexFire! The thread you created at the Wikipedia:Teahouse, Bot programming, has been archived because there was no discussion for a few days (usually at least two days, and sometimes four or more). You can still find the archived discussion here. If you have any additional questions that weren't answered then, please feel free to . The archival was done by Lowercase sigmabot III, and this notification was delivered by Muninnbot, both automated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing {{bots|deny=Muninnbot}} here on your user talk page. Muninnbot (talk) 19:03, 12 December 2020 (UTC)

Your thread has been archived

Hi LightningComplexFire! The thread you created at the Wikipedia:Teahouse, How do I make a draft get reviewed faster other than adding WikiProject tags?, has been archived because there was no discussion for a few days (usually at least two days, and sometimes four or more). You can still find the archived discussion here. If you have any additional questions that weren't answered then, please feel free to . The archival was done by Lowercase sigmabot III, and this notification was delivered by Muninnbot, both automated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing {{bots|deny=Muninnbot}} here on your user talk page. Muninnbot (talk) 19:04, 13 December 2020 (UTC)

Your thread has been archived

Hi LightningComplexFire! The thread you created at the Wikipedia:Teahouse, Stub or Start, has been archived because there was no discussion for a few days (usually at least two days, and sometimes four or more). You can still find the archived discussion here. If you have any additional questions that weren't answered then, please feel free to . The archival was done by Lowercase sigmabot III, and this notification was delivered by Muninnbot, both automated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing {{bots|deny=Muninnbot}} here on your user talk page. Muninnbot (talk) 19:04, 13 December 2020 (UTC)

Tech News: 2020-51

Latest tech news from the Wikimedia technical community. Please tell other users about these changes. Not all changes will affect you. Translations are available.

Recent changes

• There is a Wikipedia app for KaiOS phones. It was released in India in September. It can now be downloaded in other countries too. [6]

Changes later this week

• The new version of MediaWiki will be on test wikis and MediaWiki.org from 15 December. It will be on non-Wikipedia wikis and some Wikipedias from 16 December. It will be on all wikis from 17 December (calendar).

Tech news prepared by Tech News writers and posted by bot • Contribute • Translate • Get help • Give feedback • Subscribe or unsubscribe.

21:33, 14 December 2020 (UTC)

Hi

Hey! I see that you like to do a lot of wildfire edits! And I was also wondering if you live in the Sonoma/Napa area? Cause I’m mostly into this because I went thru the 2017 Tubbs fire and kincade. Also I would like to thank you for making the Mountain View fire page, I was literally getting on rn just to make it then I see that you did it. But other than that I just wanted to say hi. Hockey4life101 (talk) 04:52, 16 December 2020 (UTC)

I used to live in Alameda County, but I moved away. I now live in Texas. But North California is my real home :) --🔥LightningComplexFire🔥 (always @Ping: me when replying) 13:39, 16 December 2020 (UTC)

I remember seeing smoke from the Camp Fire before, and my mom's friend had to be evacuated from the Woolsey Fire. --🔥LightningComplexFire🔥 (always @Ping: me when replying) 13:41, 16 December 2020 (UTC)

@Hockey4life101: I started editing the wildfire articles because the SCU Complex threatened the city I used to live. --🔥LightningComplexFire🔥 (always @Ping: me when replying) 13:46, 16 December 2020 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Bond Fire has been accepted

Bond Fire, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. It is commonplace for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thanks again, and happy editing!

I dream of horses (Contribs) Please notify me after replying off my talk page. Thank you. 14:18, 17 December 2020 (UTC)

Talk alert test

--LightningTest (talk) 15:58, 17 December 2020 (UTC)

Your thread has been archived

Hi LightningComplexFire! The thread you created at the Wikipedia:Teahouse, Reviewing, has been archived because there was no discussion for a few days (usually at least two days, and sometimes four or more). You can still find the archived discussion here. If you have any additional questions that weren't answered then, please feel free to . The archival was done by Lowercase sigmabot III, and this notification was delivered by Muninnbot, both automated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing {{bots|deny=Muninnbot}} here on your user talk page. Muninnbot (talk) 19:02, 18 December 2020 (UTC)

Your thread has been archived

Hi LightningComplexFire! The thread you created at the Wikipedia:Teahouse, Category error, has been archived because there was no discussion for a few days (usually at least two days, and sometimes four or more). You can still find the archived discussion here. If you have any additional questions that weren't answered then, please feel free to . The archival was done by Lowercase sigmabot III, and this notification was delivered by Muninnbot, both automated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing {{bots|deny=Muninnbot}} here on your user talk page. Muninnbot (talk) 19:02, 18 December 2020 (UTC)

Revert?

Reverting is for vandalism. Choose "Undo" so you can add a comment. I'm assuming the source you've found is reliable. Deb (talk) 19:23, 18 December 2020 (UTC) ...though actually, you don't even need to undo, just re-add the entry with a source. Deb (talk) 19:24, 18 December 2020 (UTC)

Could you add some context to that entry? Most readers won't even know what country the fire was in. Deb (talk) 09:53, 19 December 2020 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Red Salmon Complex fire has been accepted

Red Salmon Complex fire, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Bkissin (talk) 20:34, 18 December 2020 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: 2020 Lassen County Wildfires has been accepted

2020 Lassen County Wildfires, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Pahunkat (talk) 19:04, 20 December 2020 (UTC)

Tech News: 2020-52

Latest tech news from the Wikimedia technical community. Please tell other users about these changes. Not all changes will affect you. Translations are available.

Tech News

• Because of the holidays the next issue of Tech News will be sent out on 11 January 2021.

Recent changes

• The {{citation needed}} template shows when a statement in a Wikipedia article needs a source. If you click on it when you edit with the visual editor there is a popup that explains this. Now it can also show the reason and when it was added. [7]

Changes later this week

• There is no new MediaWiki version this week or next week.

Future changes

• You can propose and discuss what technical improvements should be done for geographic information. This could be coordinates, maps or other related things.
• Some wikis use LanguageConverter to switch between writing systems or variants of a language. This can only be done for the entire page. There will be a <langconvert> tag that can convert a piece of text on a page. [8]
• Oversighters and stewards can hide entries in Special:AbuseLog. They can soon hide multiple entries at once using checkboxes. This works like hiding normal edits. It will happen in early January. [9]

Tech news prepared by Tech News writers and posted by bot • Contribute • Translate • Get help • Give feedback • Subscribe or unsubscribe.

20:52, 21 December 2020 (UTC)

Vandalism reverting

Sorry about reverting your vandalism. It was Twinkle that said it was vandalism so I rollbacked them. –Cupper52^Discuss! 11:11, 23 December 2020 (UTC)

Cupper52, be careful when using auto vandalism detection. Always scan the text using diffs to see if the change was vandalism or not. JackFromReedsburg (talk | contribs) 15:17, 23 December 2020 (UTC)

The Signpost: 28 December 2020

• News and notes: Year-end legal surprises cause concern, but Public Domain Day is imminent

• In the media: Concealment, data journalism, a non-pig farmer, and some Bluetick Hounds

• Arbitration report: 2020 election results

• Opinion: How to make your factory's safety and labor issues disappear

• Featured content: Very nearly ringing in the New Year with "Blank Space" – but we got there in time.

• Traffic report: 2020 wraps up

• News from the WMF: What Wikipedia saw during election week in the U.S., and what we’re doing next

• Recent research: Predicting the next move in Wikipedia discussions

• Essay: Subjective importance

• Op-Ed: An unforgettable year we might wish to forget

• Gallery: Angels in the architecture

• Humour: 'Twas the Night Before Wikimas

* Read this Signpost in full * Single-page * Unsubscribe * MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 04:25, 28 December 2020 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Rock House Fire (December 30)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Theroadislong was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Rock House Fire and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Rock House Fire, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
• If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Theroadislong (talk) 19:22, 30 December 2020 (UTC)

AfC notification: Draft:Rock House Fire has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Rock House Fire. Thanks! Theroadislong (talk) 21:25, 30 December 2020 (UTC)

@Theroadislong: I do not know what you mean by "incorrect tense". Can you please clarify? --🔥LightningComplexFire🔥 21:27, 30 December 2020 (UTC)

For instance "The fire has possibly been ignited" should read "The fire was possibly ignited" Theroadislong (talk) 21:32, 30 December 2020 (UTC)

@Theroadislong:  Done, is there anything else I need to fix? --🔥LightningComplexFire🔥 21:37, 30 December 2020 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Rock House Fire (December 31)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by AmandaNP was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Rock House Fire and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Rock House Fire, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
• If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

-- Amanda (aka DQ) 00:26, 31 December 2020 (UTC)