Jump to content

User talk:Lilsusanalex

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
[edit]

I have removed the image from your user page, because it certainly violated Wikipedia's copyright policy, and it probably also infringed copyright law. The image is not licensed for free use. Wikipedia's fair use policy allows use of unlicensed images in articles under a very limited set of circumstances, in accordance with the United States legal concept of "fair use", but use on user pages is never acceptable. JBW (talk) 09:18, 23 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Ok, Thank you. Lilsusanalex (talk) 09:22, 23 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: JohNel NG (October 23)

[edit]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by S0091 was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
S0091 (talk) 17:02, 23 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Teahouse logo
Hello, Lilsusanalex! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! S0091 (talk) 17:02, 23 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: JohNel NG (October 26)

[edit]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Theroadislong was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
Theroadislong (talk) 07:09, 26 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Itohan Agbator (October 29)

[edit]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Theroadislong was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
Theroadislong (talk) 11:11, 29 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

JohNel NG moved to draftspace

[edit]

An article you recently created, JohNel NG, is not suitable as written to remain published. It appears there is a WP:UPE or WP:COI conflict. Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, and have addressed the UPE/COI issue, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. As per WP policy, please do not move into mainspace yourself. Onel5969 TT me 21:32, 1 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: JohNel NG (November 2)

[edit]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Asilvering was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
asilvering (talk) 00:46, 2 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: JohNel NG (November 2)

[edit]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by KylieTastic was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
KylieTastic (talk) 19:34, 2 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: JohNel NG (November 7)

[edit]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Bonadea was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
bonadea contributions talk 14:00, 7 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: JohNel NG (November 13)

[edit]
Your recent article submission has been rejected. If you have further questions, you can ask at the Articles for creation help desk or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help. The reason left by S0091 was: This topic is not sufficiently notable for inclusion in Wikipedia. The comment the reviewer left was: Many of sources are PR pieces. some from dubious sources. Nothing suggests he meets the notability criteria.
S0091 (talk) 17:48, 13 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked as a sockpuppet

[edit]
Wikipedia's technical logs indicate that this user account has been or may be used abusively as a sockpuppet of User:Buysomebananas per the evidence presented at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Buysomebananas. It has been blocked indefinitely from editing to prevent abuse.

Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.
If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you should review the guide to appealing blocks, and then appeal your block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}}. Note that anything you post in your unblock request will be public, so you may alternatively use the Unblock Ticket Request System to submit an appeal if it contains information that must be private.

Administrators: Checkusers have access to confidential system logs not accessible by the public or by administrators due to the Wikimedia Foundation's privacy policy. You must not loosen or remove this block, or issue an IP block exemption, without consulting with a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee. Administrators who undo checkuser blocks without permission from a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee may be summarily desysopped.
Girth Summit (blether) 18:06, 16 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]