User talk:Lingveno/Archive 1

Ways to improve Jeff Williams (Apple)

Hi, I'm Snowycats. Ochilov, thanks for creating Jeff Williams (Apple)!

I've just tagged the page, using our page curation tools, as having some issues to fix. Your article about Jeff W. is off to a great start!

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, you can leave a comment on my talk page. Or, for more editing help, talk to the volunteers at the Teahouse. Snowycats (talk) 14:03, 29 November 2014 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for December 2

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

AVFoundation

added a link pointing to Framework

Abdullah Khan II

added a link pointing to Kazakh

Nafisa Abdullaeva

added a link pointing to Rugby

Salim Abduvaliev

added a link pointing to Grand Prix

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:17, 2 December 2014 (UTC)

Your signature

Hello Ochilov and welcome to the Wikipedia! I saw your post at the Teahouse and your new customized signature. It might be good if you just changed it slightly, some of the colors or the font, since it now looks very, very much like the signature of editor ChamithN and there might be some confusion about who is who if someone just cast a quick glance at the signatures. You can find all the numbers for the colors here: Web colors, and here are some other guides for fixing your signature:

For customizing your signature you will find information at Wikipedia:Signatures#Customizing your signature, there is also this page: Wikipedia:Smurrayinchester's signature tutorial on how it's done and where you can find examples of signatures. When you have entered the new signature at "Preferences → User profile", the four tildes will automatically create the signature when you type them and click on save.

All the best, w.carter-Talk 17:56, 3 December 2014 (UTC)

• W.carter, thank you for your notification, I just fixed it. Ochilov (talk) 20:11, 3 December 2014 (UTC)

Thank you Ochilov! So much better. :) It is great that you are getting accustomed to the Wikipedia so quickly, answering questions at the Teahouse and all. Please remember though that when you answer someones question, you must also alert that user in some way. Either with a "talk back" template on their talk page

{{Wikipedia:Teahouse/Teahouse talkback|WP:Teahouse/Questions|WP:Teahouse/Questions|ts=~~~~}}

or much easier by just mentioning them in your answer. It is also nice to welcome them to the Teahouse, look at some other editors answers and you will soon get the hang of it. Here is a small guide for how to alert other users:

When someone is posting on your talk page you get an automatic notification. That notification is a red square followed by a long yellow box (for most browsers and settings). In all other cases you have to alert the other editor in some way, either by "ping" or by mentioning them in a link. This will result in a just the red box notification on that users pages. So even if you respond on your talk page you still have to alert the editor you are addressing. If you want to get hold of me you write {{ping|W.carter}} resulting in @W.carter: or [[User:W.carter|W.carter]] resulting in W.carter and sign with the four "squiggles" ~~~~ at the end and hit "Save". There are some more, but these are the basics. And when you ask something on someone's talk page, you also create a new section so your question don't get entangled in some other conversation. If you are having a conversation with another user on some page, it is also customary to add that page to your Watchlist in case someone in the discussion forgets to alert.

The policy is to leave an answer on the same page as the question, keep the conversation intact unless there is some reason for moving it elsewhere. Like complicated questions at the Teahouse can be continued on the appropriate talk page. Cheers, w.carter-Talk 15:07, 4 December 2014 (UTC)

• Thank you, W.carter. It is somehow hard for me to adopt from Russian Wikipedia to English, because there are many differences there. English is sometimes more simple, sometimes not. But I like how it's working. English Wiki more "human understandable" Ochilov (talk) 15:40, 4 December 2014 (UTC)

I think you are doing great. I know how hard it is to come from another WP and adapt to the way things are done here. I come from the chaotic Swedish Wikipedia and my first weeks here were really overwhelming. But I came in contact with some nice editors who showed me how to do things, that is why I now try to help out other "foreign" users. :) Please do not hesitate to ask me about anything that you might find confusing. All the best, w.carter-Talk 15:48, 4 December 2014 (UTC)

• Okay, @W.carter:, i will. Thank you that you are so kind) Ochilov (talk) 15:51, 4 December 2014 (UTC)

A cup of tea for you!

Thank you so much, I just started in EN.Wiki so I promise to do my best as in Spanish :) Arturo Kaufer (talk) 08:58, 6 December 2014 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

	The Special Barnstar
	For your articles appreciation! Larisa Larisa Larisa (talk) 09:06, 6 December 2014 (UTC)

Talkback

Hello, Lingveno. You have new messages at Wikipedia:Village pump (idea lab).
Message added 00:10, 7 December 2014 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Adware

Hi! I saw your comment on Jimbo's talk page about seeing ads on everywhere of wikipedia. I can't comment there since I'm not yet established. Do you see a small green box with a diagonal arrow to the top right of the text? If so, then you definitely have adware/malware. Please run an antivirus or malware scan asap. I wish you the best of luck. SirArren (talk) 23:04, 6 December 2014 (UTC)

Yup, I saw a green box. Thank you, SirArren Ochilov (talk) 07:50, 7 December 2014 (UTC)

Fair use pictures

Hello my friend! A word of caution: I see that you have used the picture File:University of Westminster Crest.jpg in one of your userboxes. With the new script you have you should be able to see that the picture has a thin double red frame (it takes a couple of seconds for it to upload) around it. That means it is a non-free pricture used under the "Fair use" criteria. This is also stated in the copyright license on the picture's page. Such pictures may only be used in the articles for which the license apply, in this case the University of Westminster, and not anywhere else. I made a similar mistake when I made my first user page, and the picture was deleted almost immediately, with no kind comment! So it would be good if you choose another picture (free) from the Commons instead, perhaps one of these. You can link to the university in the userbox instead. Cheers, w.carter-Talk 14:32, 7 December 2014 (UTC)

Thank you for notice, w.carter Ochilov (talk) 15:37, 7 December 2014 (UTC)

A new script for you

Hello Ochilov, when you get messages like the one above ("Disambiguation link notification for December 2") that message is sent by an automatic program, a bot, and is just there to notify you that you have linked a name/word/place in a way that is "wrong". It means that you have made a link that can be many things. Like if you just write Rugby it links to a page where all the "Rugby's" on the WP are listed, and you have to clarify which one of those you mean. The person who read the article should not have to guess. Sometimes you just have to correct the spelling to not make it an disambiguation link. It is very easy to accidentally link "wrong" in this way, we all do it, that is why the WP have these bot-programs to alert us when we do something that should be corrected. So when you get a message like that, you just look where the miss-linked link goes and see how you can clarify it, otherwise other editors will have to spend time just trying to figure out what you mean, like in this drive. I have looked at the pages you have received notifications for and fixed some of those links and you can see how it's done. I could not accurately fix all of them though, since I was not sure if I interpreted the text right. :)

Since you are familiar with the use of scripts, I would suggest that you install the User:Anomie/linkclassifier in your common.js. The code is:

importScript('User:Anomie/linkclassifier.js'); // Linkback: [[User:Anomie/linkclassifier.js]]
importStylesheet('User:Anomie/linkclassifier.css'); // Linkback: [[User:Anomie/linkclassifier.css]]

If you have that, you can immediately see if something is wrong with a link you have just made, and save others the trouble later. When you have installed it, take a look at your user page. You have some redirected links, disambiguation link, misspelled redirects there. I have not corrected them since it is bad manners to tweak someone else's user page without permission. :) There are more really helpful scripts to help you edit the WP. All the best, w.carter-Talk 12:59, 7 December 2014 (UTC)

Thank you very much, w.carter. I will use it. Cheers, Ochilov (talk) 13:28, 7 December 2014 (UTC)

P.S. I hope you copied both lines of the script, I can only see one on your page and I don't think it will work then. Look at the original page. w.carter-Talk 14:39, 7 December 2014 (UTC)

Fixed, thanks. Ochilov (talk) 15:55, 7 December 2014 (UTC)

External links

Thank you for helping new users at the Teahouse. However, please make sure that the advice you give there is consistent with Wikipedia policy - telling someone, for example, that they can add blogs to the External Links section of an article when WP:ELNO#11 specifically forbids that (and when the questioner even linked to that policy in their question) is not helpful. I've now supplied the correct information, but in future, if you are not sure how one of Wikipedia's policies works, please don't advise others on its use. Thanks, Yunshui ^雲_水 11:02, 8 December 2014 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for December 9

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Dan Riccio, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Mac. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:05, 9 December 2014 (UTC)

Happy Lucia!

Happy Saint Lucia's day!

---

"Good Morning" Ochilov:
Thanks for all of your contributions to improve Wikipedia!
13 December is the day when Swedes perplex the rest of the world by showing up way too early in the morning dressed in white tunics, candles in their hair, singing and bringing saffron buns and breakfast in bed to nice people. Hope you have a bright day!
    – w.carter-Talk 00:10, 13 December 2014 (UTC)

Thank you very much, have a good day too! --Ochilov (talk) 07:47, 13 December 2014 (UTC)

Ahem...

A friendly piece of advice, many of us are friends here on the Wikipedia but we never display those on our user pages they way you have done with me and Mr. Wales. This is not Facebook where you try to collect as many friends as possible. None of us want to be glorified in userboxes, we are just colleagues working together on this project. :) (Yes, I know that the templates exist, but they are not cool, sorry.) I would appreciate if you removed those boxes. If you have signed Jimbo's guestbook or something, you may create a userbox saying that, that is a more common practice. All the best, w.carter-Talk 20:50, 13 December 2014 (UTC)

Okay, removed. --Ochilov (talk) 04:04, 14 December 2014 (UTC)

Thank you my friend. :) w.carter-Talk 09:58, 14 December 2014 (UTC)

Ways to improve Do-ocracy

Hi, I'm Lstanley1979. Ochilov, thanks for creating Do-ocracy!

I've just tagged the page, using our page curation tools, as having some issues to fix. Ochilov - do you have any more sources/proof of this subject's general notability? I know this is a port from Community Wiki, but in general, for a concept to be notable enough for Wikipedia, it should be better supported by WP:Reliable sources.

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, you can leave a comment on my talk page. Or, for more editing help, talk to the volunteers at the Teahouse. LS1979 (talk) 12:18, 14 December 2014 (UTC)

It also reads like an essay. A tip would be that, despite the free and compatible licencing, other wikis are not good sources to base Wikipedia articles on because they're generally user-created input. If the concept of 'do-ocracy' has been covered extensively in the mainstream press (e.g. the BBC, CNN, reliable newspapers like the Times of London, and so on - I'm using British examples because I'm in the UK), then it can have an article here. However, merely being noted by another wiki is not solely grounds to upload the content here on Wikipedia. Please take a moment to read what Wikipedia is WP:NOT - also see WP:ESSAY.

Sorry if I'm teaching you to suck eggs, as the saying goes. But I'm not sure this generally fits WP's mission. LS1979 (talk) 12:27, 14 December 2014 (UTC)

Okay, I got it, I will search for references. --Ochilov (talk) 12:29, 14 December 2014 (UTC)

Speedy deletion converted to PROD: Hum Jharkhandi Hai (film)

Hello Ochilov. I am just letting you know that I have converted the speedy deletion tag that you placed on Hum Jharkhandi Hai (film) to a proposed deletion tag, because I do not believe CSD applies to the page in question - WP:CSD#A7 does not apply to films. Thank you. JohnCD (talk) 22:03, 14 December 2014 (UTC)

Okay, no problem. --Ochilov (talk) 22:07, 14 December 2014 (UTC)

Some tips and a script

A nice picture to look at while reading all this text.

Hello! When you have created an article it is just as important to see to that there are some other articles that links to it, so that the article does not become a Wikipedia:Orphan. The more articles that link to it, the better for the article, especially if it is up for review and you have to point out how important it is for the Wikipedia. The best way to go hunting for other articles that may be relevant is to just enter the name in the usual searchbox, but instead of clicking on the article that appears as a suggestion you click below at the "containing...". Then you get articles where the name appears even if it is not linked, and you can go and add the links.

That is what I did with some of your articles that I have been working on now. You can also look at the pages mentioned in the article, like I did with Dolchamar. I searched for "Vinilkosmo" to see if there was an article about them, found it and could link to it. I also followed the link to Leena Peisa and saw that Dolchamar was mentioned there, but not linked. Sometimes you have to be a bit of a detective to find everything that an article needs! :)

It is also good to check the "Languages - Edit links" in the far left column by the little "cogwheel" where links to Wikis in other languages are displayed. Links should appear automatically, but this does not always happened. I linked Dolchamar there and got a whole bunch of languages. :)

As for the references, the more info you can put in a ref, the better. It adds credibility and notability to the article. Especially if you can find info like who wrote it and who the publisher is. Another very important bit is the "|trans_title= |" and "|language= |" that you must use if your ref is in another language. I have to use them all the time when I cite Swedish sources and you should do the same with Russian and Esperanto. Look at this article where there are sources from all over the world and how they are handled.

And the script. When you want to edit a text after all the refs are in it is sometimes hard to se what is what. That is when the User:PleaseStand/References segregator is very useful. To use it you have to edit by clicking on the "main" Edit tab (for the entire page) at the top if the page. A new green button will appear in the edit window. A click on that will temporarily segregate the text from the refs, creating temp. ref names and you can edit refs or text much easier. At a "preview" the edit window is reset to normal, but any edits are saved. I suggest you install it and try it out as you fix up some of the refs in the earlier articles that you created. Read more about the script at it's page. Good night for now my friend, w.carter-Talk 21:30, 14 December 2014 (UTC)

Thank you very much, my friend, good night to you too. --Ochilov (talk) 22:10, 14 December 2014 (UTC)

A thought

Hello my friend, since you are very active, your talk page is beginning to attract some traffic. Nice! :) I think it's time for you to install an archiving function on it. I have a good and simple one on my talk page that I nicked from Yunshui some time ago. You can probably figure it out and how to adjust the settings the way you want them, otherwise just 'ping' me and I'll do it for you. Best, w.carter-Talk 20:26, 15 December 2014 (UTC)

Thank you, done, but can you check it because I don't sure that it is working. --Ochilov (talk) 08:13, 16 December 2014 (UTC)

Counter reset to 1. Hopefully it will kick in once the oldest post on the page is 30 days old, since that is how you made the settings. Do you want me to do a test by archiving the first post on the page? w.carter-Talk 09:16, 16 December 2014 (UTC)

Yes, thank you. --Ochilov (talk) 09:19, 16 December 2014 (UTC)

W.carter, how can I put the yellowbox header like yours for archives? --Ochilov (talk) 09:25, 16 December 2014 (UTC)

"Great minds think alike!" :) If you want to be able to archive things yourself, here or at any page, you can install this script:

• {{subst:Iusc|User:Technical_13/Scripts/OneClickArchiver.js}}

• See User:Equazcion/OneClickArchiver for more info.

The "Archive" function at every post will appear. I prefer to have mine switched off by using the // in front of the script when I don't use it. That is because it is SO easy to archive things by mistake since the "click-thing" is too close to the scroll bar. Look in the "History" of my User:W.carter/common.js to see how I did it. Now I have to go back to work for a while. See you later! w.carter-Talk 09:33, 16 December 2014 (UTC)

Thank you very much, bye! --Ochilov (talk) 09:35, 16 December 2014 (UTC)

Rajunn27 (talk) 10:30, 16 December 2014 (UTC)hi

Rajunn27 (talk) 10:30, 16 December 2014 (UTC)Hi

Rajunn27 (talk) 10:41, 16 December 2014 (UTC)hi

Rajunn27 (talk) 10:41, 16 December 2014 (UTC)I created a topic cxotoday, its marked for deletion saying unambiguous advertising, but this site is about business technology, Its coverage is unbiased and offers knowledge about industry developments

Hi, Rejunn27 and welcome to Wikipedia. At first, you should have references in your articles so other users can chek it. At second, it should pass by general notability rules. Read these two pages to know, why article was deleted:

• Wikipedia:Your first article
  
• Wikipedia:Conflict of interest.

And please, put ur signature at the and, not top. --Ochilov (talk) 10:57, 16 December 2014 (UTC)

I have unreviewed a page you curated

Hi, I'm KylieTastic. I wanted to let you know that I saw the page you reviewed, G.M.Public School,Karachi, and have un-reviewed it again. If you have any questions, please ask them on my talk page. Thank you. KylieTastic (talk) 19:56, 16 December 2014 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for December 17

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Judith Aissen, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Mayan. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:04, 17 December 2014 (UTC)

Welcoming new users

I noted that you welcomed Frederic Nicolas Frichot with the {{Welcome to Wikipedia}} template. Thanks for that -- our new users need to feel welcome. But - when you use this template, you must "subst" it (i.e. use it this way: {{subst:Welcome to Wikipedia}}). Otherwise, the part at the beginning that says "I'm <user name here>" changes each time a new user edits the talk page, and that gets very confusing! WikiDan61^ChatMe!_ReadMe!! 14:06, 19 December 2014 (UTC)

Okay, thanks for that notification, WikiDan61. --Ochilov (talk) 14:49, 19 December 2014 (UTC)

24th British Academy Scotland Awards

Hi, the other day I requested that the 2014 British Academy Scotland Awards be renamed 24th British Academy Scotland Awards. However on inspection I have discovered that they go by year rather than ceremony number. Is it possible to reverse this? Thanks TheDeadRat (talk) 20:17, 20 December 2014 (UTC)

(talk page stalker) Hello TheDeadRat, to move the page once again or reverse and delete the inappropriate page will have to be done by an admin. You must explain the situation and place a request at Wikipedia:Requested moves. Best,w.carter-Talk 20:37, 20 December 2014 (UTC)

Hi. I've just tried your suggestion but it is coming up with an error. Not sure where I'm going wrong. TheDeadRat (talk) 21:49, 20 December 2014 (UTC)

@TheDeadRat: Not sure what you did, but I've fixed it now. See: Wikipedia:Requested moves/Technical requests. Best, w.carter-Talk 22:26, 20 December 2014 (UTC)

History of sewing patterns

It isn't actually a copyvio. If you scroll down http://www.reconstructinghistory.com/blog/sewing-patterns.html (which is the same as the article) you can see they got it from https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Pattern_(sewing)&oldid=638743030#Evolution_of_American_sewing_pattern_manufacturers. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 21:47, 21 December 2014 (UTC)

Okay, I got it, thanks. --Ochilov (talk) 07:11, 22 December 2014 (UTC)

Koliada

Hello, Ochilov

Although I have been editing and creating new pages on Wikipedia, the account Botev1912 is new. Can you tell me to whom should I speak about removing the article Koliada (goddess), because it is totally inadequate. Also Koliada is mentioned as either male or a female deity - not as a goddess. I have make a whole new article about it - Koliada (deity) as you saw.

Best wishes,

User:Botev1912

• Hi, Botev1912, just place {{db-owner}} there. Also, I strongly recommend you to place redirect in your old account page, move your user talk to new account as archive and put redirect there too. Best regards, --Ochilov (talk) 05:34, 23 December 2014 (UTC)

Requesting that you remove speedy deletion

	Requesting that you remove speedy deletion
	Article in question: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Alois_Strohmayer Yajeepms (talk) 17:22, 23 December 2014 (UTC)

Listen to: Hallodrie, Polka Schnell, Schöne Ida and especially Alsergruntler-Waltzer. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Yajeepms (talk • contribs) 17:28, 23 December 2014 (UTC)

Hello, Yajeepms and welcome to Wikipedia. I see you added more information and references to the article. It was just one sentence there and no citations to verification, but now I am remowing the template. Thanks for your contributions! --Ochilov (talk) 17:41, 23 December 2014 (UTC)

Thank you. I was not aware that you needed to cite references within 10 minutes of making an article. Is there any way to show that it is still under construction? --Yajeepms (talk) 17:44, 23 December 2014 (UTC)

Yes, of course. You can place {{subst:L}} there, if I not mistaken. It will give you right to monopolly edit your page. --Ochilov (talk) 17:47, 23 December 2014 (UTC)

Okay, thanks for your help.

Speedy deletion declined: Lelant Wharf railway station

Hello Ochilov. I am just letting you know that I declined the speedy deletion of Lelant Wharf railway station, a page you tagged for speedy deletion, because of the following concern: The reason given is not a valid speedy deletion criterion. Thank you. PhantomSteve/talk|contribs\ 15:07, 23 December 2014 (UTC)

PhantomSteve, so what about PROD? --Ochilov (talk) 15:29, 23 December 2014 (UTC)

Regarding the initial tagging, I see that you used {{db-reason|1=Unrematkable place, no claim of significance}} - when you tag something for speedy deletion, this can only be done if you state which one (or more) of the speedy deletion criteria are met, and you didn't do that. Some speedy deletion criteria (A7, A9 and A11) do take significance into account, but none of those apply because it's not about a real person, individual animal(s), organization, web content, organized event or musical recording, and it's not an obvious invention. Several templates - at least one for each different criterion - are available with precomposed rationales (for example, if A11 did apply, you could use either {{db-a11}} or {{db-invented}}), and the generic {{db-reason}} should only be used in special circumstances, see the bulleted list in its documentation.

Regarding your last question: you can PROD it, because it's not been PRODded before; and "Unrematkable place, no claim of significance" may well be an acceptable rationale in that case, but personally I would expand it a little. --Redrose64 (talk) 17:25, 23 December 2014 (UTC)

Thank you for your explanation, Redrose64. --Ochilov (talk) 18:25, 23 December 2014 (UTC)

Merry Christmas!

Dear Lingveno,
MERRY CHRISTMAS!!! Best wishes to you, your family and relatives this holiday season! Take this opportunity to bond with your loved ones, whether or not are you celebrating Christmas. This is a special time for everybody, and spread the holiday spirit to everybody out there!
From a fellow editor,
--Nahnah4 (talk | contribs | guestbook) 09:24, 24 December 2014 (UTC)

This message promotes WikiLove. Created by Nahnah4 (talk | contribs | guestbook). To use this template, leave {{subst:User:Nahnah4/Merry Christmas}} on someone else's talk page.

Thank u very much, Merry Christmas to u too! --Ochilov (talk) 09:30, 24 December 2014 (UTC)

deerbrook mall can not add to far right out buildings = 7 50.254.21.214 (talk) 04:58, 25 December 2014 (UTC)

New Page Patrol

Hi Ochilov. Following upon your request at WP:PERM I've been checking your recent NP patrols ove the last 5 or 6 days. Althought it does not require a user right, New Page Patrol is more important than any of the othr reviewer rights because it is our only 'firewall' against unwanted new pages. As such it is not a place for empirical experience - it needs to be got right first time. Most of the experience should be gained by doing vandalism or recent changes patrol, but even those need experiece, especially a native user level of English. Your accuracy rate is not quite up to par, with Basekchance, Motherofall (Mathrusri Anasuya Devi), Ella The Elephant (movie), Titoof (video game), Shalby hospital, People Magazine Awards, Ester Satorová, Miss Vietnam 2014 - Nguyen Cao Ky Duyen, ProofHub, being recent examples of tagging that was either wrong, or using the wrong criteria for deletion, or simply patrolling articles that should have been tagged for deletion. --Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 05:45, 25 December 2014 (UTC)

Okay, I've got it, I'll be more careful. --Ochilov (talk) 05:51, 25 December 2014 (UTC)

Help needed

Thanks for taking care about wikipedia contain Ochilov. My antive language is french, so sorry for language mistake. Can you help me to know why the page Auroville/population graphs was deleted and how to found the right place to put this information ? Thanks in advance, Lionel Scheepmans ^{✉ Wiki ou eMail} 13:58, 23 December 2014 (UTC)

P.S. Is this place better for you ? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Lionel Scheepmans (talk • contribs) 14:10, 23 December 2014 (UTC)

(talk page stalker) Bonjour Lionel Scheepmans, placing the graphs at the page of Auroville as such is better that having a separate page, but everything that you add must have recerences to state where you have obtained the information, otherwise it might be deleted anyhow. Pease read Help:Referencing for beginners for this. If you have any further questions you are welcome to ask at my talk page. Best, w.carter-Talk 14:24, 23 December 2014 (UTC)

W.carter, thank you for replying queries when I am after the keybord. I really appreciate it. --Ochilov (talk) 15:03, 23 December 2014 (UTC)

For sure W.carter like in fr.wikipedia every things have to be referenced. That's why I put the link of original data on the title of various charts. For the other, you can see original data on this page. I'm the author of all graph and statistical analyses. You can have confirmation on this web age. It's actually only in French but an other pod-cast will be edit in English in few time. Thanks for you help and good continuation. Lionel Scheepmans ^{✉ Wiki ou eMail} 16:17, 23 December 2014 (UTC)

Lionel Scheepmans, Welcome to English Wikipedia and please, read this one. --Ochilov (talk) 16:23, 23 December 2014 (UTC)

User:Ochilov and W.carter, thanks for you help. What do you thing about may actual reference ? For the question of original research, I don't understand. The original research was done out side wikipedia. Graphs are only pictures well accepted on Wikimedia Common and use on Wikipedia like every boddy can use his picture uploaded on common for illustrating and enhance an article. Other wise we can delete all graph presente on wikipedia ! What do you mean about this ? Have a nice day, Lionel Scheepmans ^{✉ Wiki ou eMail} 09:09, 24 December 2014 (UTC)

@Lionel Scheepmans: Graphs are not "only pictures" since they are a way to present numbers and facts, that could otherwise be presented in tables or words. Any fact in the Wikipedia has to be accompanied by a reference that states where the fact has been found, if the fact is to remain uncontested. This is the same for facts represented in a numerical way, in a table or a graph. A reliable reference is something where readers and other editors can check that what you have put in the graph or table is right. If you look at the tables in this article especially in the Boston#Demographics section you can see a small text at the bottom of the "Historical population" saying where the data for the tables and graphs was found. That is the sort of thing you need to attach. The "Race/Ethnicity Composition" even has references for most of the numbers in the table. If all the facts that are illustrated in the graphs was written in a referenced text next to the graph, then the graph would be "only a picture". And the references should be by the pictures, easy to access, readers should not have to go to "on the title of various charts" or try to locate this discussion to find the source of the facts.

As for the original research. Wikipedia does not accept anything where you say "I wrote this, so therefore it is true", that is called original research. Your work has to have been published and written about in an independent book/paper/website before it can be used as fact here. This rule always annoy scholars and academics who are used to be regarded as "reliable sources". But look at it all objectively, we have no way of knowing who you really are or what you have written. Anyone can get an account here and make up a story about who they are, it is after all the Internet. If I, W.carter, said that a was an accomplished astrophysicist who have written lots of papers, would you trust me on this? Just because I said so? Well, I'm not and it does not matter who I am, I just confer facts that can be found in reliable sources. I hope this has made things somewhat clearer for you. Best, - w.carter-Talk 11:34, 24 December 2014 (UTC)

W.carter, thanks for this answer. But please what I need is a help. For the graph 1 to 6 all data are accesible on auroville.org, the link is on the graph them self and my work is not a reaserch but just to present all official data on a other form, and that what every boby do in Wikipedia, just take information from good source and present it in a new form by creating article. I you don't agree with this point of view I wait from you a solution not only an objection. I'm not a user hiding beind a use name, I use my real name for all my web activity and It's realy easy for a french speaker to found all information about me on internet, including copy of my diplome. More than this you have on your disposition a link to auroville radio (official radio) whit photo and interview. What do you say about : " we have no way of knowing who you really are or what you have written" don't match with me. For the graph 7 to 14, I folow you about the fact than we need a reference source to leave them on wikipedia. I've already contacted auroville radio to propose the publication of theses graph on their site. If you have alternative solution to enhance the Auroville article with my work, I'm still open to learn someting. Thank for your edits to fixe the title on the article and Marry chismas to you and Ochilov. Lionel Scheepmans ^{✉ Wiki ou eMail} 14:01, 25 December 2014 (UTC)

Okay, as you say, Lionel Scheepmans, I think your sources are verifiable, so you can add this information to the article and link to the source. --Ochilov (talk) 14:48, 25 December 2014 (UTC)

@Lionel Scheepmans: Done. I have gone to the sources of the refs and fixed up the article the way it should be. Take a look at it and I think you will know what I meant earlier. :) - w.carter-Talk 14:56, 25 December 2014 (UTC)

Perfect. It was a great interwiki solidarity user. If one day you need help on fr.wikipedia please contact me, I will be happy to give you a hand. Let's ging the bels ! Lionel Scheepmans ^{✉ Wiki ou eMail} 15:04, 25 December 2014 (UTC)

@Lionel Scheepmans: Merci beaucoup, mon ami! C'est toujours bon d'avoir des amis sur d'autres websites. Collaboration, c'est toujours la meilleure. Joyeux Noël à toi aussi, w.carter-Talk 15:46, 25 December 2014 (UTC)

I have unreviewed a page you curated

Thanks for reviewing Oral Biology and Tooth Morphology, Ochilov.

Unfortunately MrX has just gone over this page again and unreviewed it. Their note is:

Thanks for helping review new articles. Articles without sources should not be reviewed without at least adding cleanup tags. Adding a tag stating that the page is a new unreviewed article unfortunately doesn't really help.

To reply, leave a comment on MrX's talk page.

• Didn't really know it. Next time I'll be more careful. --Ochilov (talk) 15:29, 27 December 2014 (UTC)
  • No problem. There's lots to learn.- MrX 15:39, 27 December 2014 (UTC)

Happy New Year!

Dear Lingveno,
HAPPY NEW YEAR!!! A new year has come! How times flies! 2015 will be a new year, and it is also a chance for you to start afresh! Thank you for your contributions!
From a fellow editor,
--Nahnah4 (talk | contribs | guestbook) 09:26, 1 January 2015 (UTC)

This message promotes WikiLove. Created by Nahnah4 (talk | contribs | guestbook). To use this template, leave {{subst:User:Nahnah4/Happy New Year}} on someone else's talk page.

I have unreviewed a page you curated

Hi, I'm Woohookitty. I wanted to let you know that I saw the page you reviewed, List of professional sports teams in Rhode Island, and have un-reviewed it again. If you have any questions, please ask them on my talk page. Thank you. User:Woohookitty ^{Disamming fool!} 10:07, 16 January 2015 (UTC)

Talk back

I have left you a message on your talk page here. Have a nice day! Jim Carter (from public cyber) 10:43, 24 January 2015 (UTC)

Thank u, have a nice day too --Ochilov (talk) 11:32, 24 January 2015 (UTC)

Teahouse talkback: you've got messages!

Hello, Lingveno/Archive 1. Your question has been answered at the Teahouse Q&A board. Feel free to reply there!
Please note that all old questions are archived after 2-3 days of inactivity. Message added by Brandon (MrWooHoo) • Talk to Brandon! 12:31, 5 May 2015 (UTC). (You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{teahouse talkback}} template).

• @MrWooHoo:, thank you very much for your help. --Ochilov (talk) 13:24, 6 May 2015 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:Keeping discussion

Template:Keeping discussion has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 12:49, 13 August 2015 (UTC)

JSTOR cleanup drive

Hello TWL users! We hope JSTOR has been a useful resource for your work. We're organizing a cleanup drive to correct dead links to JSTOR articles – these require JSTOR access and cannot easily be corrected by bot. We'd love for you to jump in and help out!

See the list

Sent of behalf of Nikkimaria for The Wikipedia Library's JSTOR using MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:18, 16 November 2015 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Federal Republic of Lostisland

The article Federal Republic of Lostisland has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Not notable. Dubious claim to notability (created by a schoolgirl one day) and a search turns up no evidence establishing notability, while the refs do nothing for it either.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. JohnBlackburne^words_deeds 17:20, 17 November 2015 (UTC)

Nomination of Federal Republic of Lostisland for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Federal Republic of Lostisland is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Federal Republic of Lostisland until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. JohnBlackburne^words_deeds 01:28, 18 November 2015 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for November 18

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Federal Republic of Lostisland, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Russian, Hunter Island and Northern Herald. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:55, 18 November 2015 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:08, 24 November 2015 (UTC)

autopatrolled

Hi Ochilov, I just wanted to let you know that I have added the "autopatrolled" permission to your account, as you have created numerous, valid articles. This feature will have no effect on your editing, and is simply intended to reduce the workload on new page patrollers. For more information on the patroller right, see Wikipedia:Autopatrolled. Feel free to leave me a message if you have any questions. Happy editing! Katie^talk 15:51, 11 December 2015 (UTC)

Katie, thanks! --Ochilov (talk) 16:16, 11 December 2015 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Next Step Up School

The article Next Step Up School has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

It's an ad. The sources cited are also ads. ("Next Step Up School: Make your child successful!"; "Next Step Up School – The school of the future")

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Nataev ^talk 06:23, 8 January 2016 (UTC)

Not to put too fine a point on it, but the article is written in Engrish. ("in January 1, 2011"? Prepositions of time, anyone? And this one is classic) And you claim to have near native speaker knowledge of English. Not good. Nataev ^talk 06:31, 8 January 2016 (UTC)

Dear Nataev, not to put too fine a point on your knowledge of geography and comparative linguistics, but as far as I know, Uzbekistan is located in the Central Asia, not in the East Asia, while Engrish refers to speakers of Easter Asian languages, especially Japanese language. I also want to point here that native speakers of English differ by age and literacy level, are not they? ;) --Ochilov (talk) 08:45, 8 January 2016 (UTC)

And I also want to point here that it is a second time when you are telling me to change my English proficiency level (the first was on Meta) just pointing out typos. Please, stop that and stop showing every my mistake in Uzbek Wikipedia's Skype chat. It is really impolite. I hope you understood me. --Ochilov (talk) 09:00, 8 January 2016 (UTC)

"Engrish" is also used to generally refer to poor English. Things like "the Central Asia" and "native speaker of English differ by age and literacy level, are not they?" are great examples of poor English/Engrish. What I pointed out are not typos, they are mistakes. Anyhow, that's not my main point. Work on your article on Next Step Up School before it gets deleted. Nataev ^talk 11:35, 8 January 2016 (UTC)

The second example was typo. Also, I do not think that oddee.com is a serious website to consider as a reliable source for Linguistics and if you really think it is, as I see now, I have nothing to talk about with you. Feel free to write me when you will improve your knowledge of basic Geography and Linguistics (at least, required school base). ---Ochilov (talk) 13:14, 8 January 2016 (UTC)

"Typo" is a countable noun, if you know what I mean. Oddee.com is not a serious website, it's a blog. I didn't say it was a serious website. Don't jump to conclusions about my knowledge of geography and linguistics. By the way, why do you capitalize "geography" and "linguistics"? Or is that what native speakers do? Anyway, forget my comments about your near native speaker knowledge of English. Instead, try to improve your article. I have a feeling that you personally have something to do with this language center. You know perfectly well that ads are not reliable sources. Nataev ^talk 18:51, 8 January 2016 (UTC)

Nataev, I added some more sources. About my relation to NSUS - I have been their student in 2012. --Ochilov (talk) 20:33, 8 January 2016 (UTC)

Every single source you cited is a paid ad (some of them complete with the address and phone number of this language center. Actually, most of them are marked as ads by the author(s): 1, 2, 3.) So, at this point, the article still lacks reliable, neutral sources. Nataev ^talk 05:09, 9 January 2016 (UTC)

Millat

Siz o'zbekmisiz? — Preceding unsigned comment added by ZOKIDIN (talk • contribs)

@ZOKIDIN:, albatta ;) --Ochilov (talk) 11:09, 18 January 2016 (UTC)

• Ochilov mana bu yerda yozing. Manga yordam bering.

• Agar haqiqiy admin bo'lsangiz, sizdan bitta iltimos. Никита-Родин-2002 ni global tarzda chetlating. Uzur, boshqa iloj yo'lini ko'rmayapman. Uni deb meni hamma yerdan chetlatishyapti. Axir bu insofdanmi? Yana Nikita o'zgaruvchan statik proksi orqali ham davom ettiryapti. Menga ishonishmayapti. Meni Nikita deb bloklashyapti. Aslida Nikita deganlari 2002 yilda tug'ilgan bir yosh bola, mening otimdan ko'p narsalarni qilib kelyapti. Nikitani global chetlatib, sababi degan joyida ZOKIDIN otidan hamma yerga axlot (musor) larni yozgani uchun deb yozing. Shunda balki boshqalar ishonar men aslida 1991 yillik Zukhriddin ekanimni. Meni haligacha Nikita deyyishyapti. Iltimos yordam bering.
• Tepadagi Ollohni o'rtaga qo'yib, qasam ichamanki, Никита-Родин-2002 men emasman! U meni otimdan ish qiladi va haligacha qilyapti. Sizdan iltimosim ikkita:
• (1) Rus, English wikipediyalarga Никита-Родин-2002 to'sib qo'yilgan. Shuni ustma-ust yana to'siq qo'yib, sababi degan joyda English tilida: "ZOKIDIN degan O'zbekning hayotiga taxtid qilish, uni otidan ZOKIDIN2 + ZOKIDIN3 + ZOKIDIN4 + ZOKIDIN5 + Disneyzokidin accountlarini (kuklalarni) ochib, vandalizm bilan shug'ullanish" deb yozing.
• (2) Rus va English wikipedia mamu'riyatiga mening ishimni Hakamlik komiteti (Арбитражный комитет) ga ko'rib chiqishlarini iltimos qilib so'rang.

• Agar tepadagi ikkita iltimosimni bajarsangiz, aytganizni qilaman. Siz manga Наставник bo'ling, iltimos. Sizning yordamingizsiz hech kimman bu vikipediyada.

greetings

Tetra quark has given you Baby food! Baby food promotes WikiLove through tastiness and hopefully this baby food has made your day better. Baby food can be enjoyed by anyone and everyone! Spread the WikiLove by giving someone else baby food, whether it be someone with whom you've had disagreements with, a good friend, or a stranger.

Spread the goodness of baby food by adding {{subst:Baby food}} to someone's talk page with a friendly message!

ACC access approved

Ochilov, thank you for interest in the account creation process. I have verified your Identification [1] and I have approved your request, welcome to the team. You may now access (Time dependent, a tool root has to set your access in the database) the interface here. Before you do so, please read the account creation guide and our username policy thoroughly to familiarize yourself with the process. You should also join (Also needs a switch flipped by a moderator/admin) us on IRC #wikipedia-en-accounts ^connect where a bot informs us when new account requests come in and to get any advice on requests as well as the (Also needs a switch flipped by a moderator/admin) mailing list. Please note that we have implemented a policy of zero tolerance on mishandled requests, and that failure to assess correctly will result in suspension. I would like to emphasize that it is not a race to complete a request, and each one should be handled diligently and thoroughly. Currently you are allowed to create up to six accounts per day, although you won't be able to create an account with a similar name to that of another user; these requests are marked "Account Creator Needed" by the bot and "Flagged user needed" on the interface. However, if you reach the limit frequently, you can request the account creator permission at WP:PERM/ACC. Please keep in mind that the ACC tool is a powerful program, and misuse will result in your access being suspended by a tool administrator. Don't hesitate to get in touch with me if you have any questions. Thank you for participating in the account creation process. Again welcome!
Mlpearc (open channel) 04:25, 4 February 2016 (UTC)

• HERE — Preceding unsigned comment added by 213.230.76.236 (talk) 08:42, 3 March 2016 (UTC)

Pending changes reviewer granted

Hello. Your account has been granted the "pending changes reviewer" userright, allowing you to review other users' edits on pages protected by pending changes. The list of articles awaiting review is located at Special:PendingChanges, while the list of articles that have pending changes protection turned on is located at Special:StablePages.

Being granted reviewer rights neither grants you status nor changes how you can edit articles. If you do not want this user right, you may ask any administrator to remove it for you at any time.

See also:

• Wikipedia:Reviewing, the guideline on reviewing
• Wikipedia:Pending changes, the summary of the use of pending changes
• Wikipedia:Protection policy#Pending changes protection, the policy determining which pages can be given pending changes protection by administrators. Widr (talk) 08:08, 28 March 2016 (UTC)

2011–12 Kent Invicta Football League

Hi!

I see that you've added an unreferenced tag to this article 2011–12 Kent Invicta Football League

The two main sections of the article, League Table and Results, both quote a couple of websites as source. I'm puzzled as to why you should think that no sources have been cited. Drawoh46 (talk) 15:17, 28 March 2016 (UTC)

@Drawoh46:, oh, sorry. They are just done in unusual way :D --Ochilov (talk) 15:34, 28 March 2016 (UTC)

I can see why you missed seeing the sources. (Most other football league seasonal articles quote the main sources in the same way; it's embedded within the templates.) I've now hidden the References section title, and made a reference in "reason for edit" to the location of the sources. Thanks! Drawoh46 (talk) 08:19, 29 March 2016 (UTC)

Rollback granted

Hi Ochilov. After reviewing your request for "rollbacker", I have enabled rollback on your account. Keep in mind these things when going to use rollback:

• Getting rollback is no more momentous than installing Twinkle.
• Rollback should be used to revert clear cases of vandalism only, and not good faith edits.
• Rollback should never be used to edit war.
• If abused, rollback rights can be revoked.
• Use common sense.

If you no longer want rollback, contact me and I'll remove it. Also, for some more information on how to use rollback, see Wikipedia:New admin school/Rollback (even though you're not an admin). I'm sure you'll do great with rollback, but feel free to leave me a message on my talk page if you run into troubles or have any questions about appropriate/inappropriate use of rollback. Thank you for helping to reduce vandalism. Happy editing! Widr (talk) 06:06, 31 March 2016 (UTC)

@Widr:, thanks for trust! :) --Ochilov (talk) 06:11, 31 March 2016 (UTC)

You're welcome! Widr (talk) 06:16, 31 March 2016 (UTC)

Help with English Wikipedia article on Abdullah Khan II

I have been looking to try and undertake a major copy edit of the English Wikipedia article on Abdullah Khan II.

I have made some progress, but the middle and later parts of the existing article are very hard to understand. There are sentences that do not make sense. Also numerous names are included in the article without any explanation as to who or what they are or how they relate to Abdullah Khan and his life and achievements.

I note that you added much of the current material to this article in November 2014 and the article has not changed much since then. I note from your profile that you can communicate in a number of languages including Russian. Am I right in assuming from the bibliography that you sourced your additional material for the article from Russian sources??

Given that you say in your profile that you can communicate in English to a professional standard, you will appreciate that the article at the moment has a number of sentences that are difficult to understand or follow. Is it possible for you to have another look at the article and see if you make it read more clearly? Alternatively, do you know of any good internet based sources that I can use to improve the article. Any suggestions you can make to help me with this article would be appreciated. Thank you --Chewings72 (talk) 10:50, 15 May 2016 (UTC)

@Chewings72:, hi! I have made some clean-up. I am going to look up for good sources in English for you. I already have some in Russian, if you are fine with them, I can send. --Lingveno (talk) 11:21, 15 May 2016 (UTC)

Thank you for your quick response. There is still more work to be done on the article. If you have any references you can pass onto me, that would be appreciated.Chewings72 (talk) 11:35, 15 May 2016 (UTC)

@Chewings72:, here are some sources in Russian: 1, 2. --Lingveno (talk) 11:38, 15 May 2016 (UTC)

Thank you.Chewings72 (talk) 11:56, 15 May 2016 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for June 26

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Esperantujo, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages International language and Chuck Smith. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:31, 26 June 2016 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for September 25

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Pamirid race, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Indo-Europeans and Uzbek. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:31, 25 September 2016 (UTC)

10,000 Asia Challenge

Hi, I wondered if you'd be interested in joining Wikipedia:WikiProject Asia/The 10,000 Challenge based on Wikipedia:The 10,000 Challenge and Wikipedia:WikiProject Africa/The 10,000 Challenge? The idea is to showcase the work being done on wikipedia across the continent, and inspire more people to create and work on countries which might not usually get much attention and then possibly running some contests to bring in new editors. I know it's very existence will definitely make me more likely to contribute more on Uzbekistan and other countries. Could be a way to highlight work needing doing for Uzbekistan and draw in new editors! Not sure, but if interested add your name to the participants and I'll consider setting something up later in the month.♦ Dr. Blofeld 20:40, 8 October 2016 (UTC)

Dr. Blofeld, sorry, but I do not live in Uzbekistan and currently I contribute solely to Bavarian/German/Esperanto topics. --Lingveno (talk) 05:34, 9 October 2016 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Viktoriia Taranchuk

The article Viktoriia Taranchuk has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

The coverage (references, external links, etc.) does not seem sufficient to justify this article passing Wikipedia:General notability guideline and the more detailed Wikipedia:Notability (biographies) requirement. If you disagree and deprod this, please explain how it meets them on the talk page here in the form of "This article meets criteria A and B because..." and ping me back through WP:ECHO or by leaving a note at User talk:Piotrus. Thank you.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. _{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here} 06:57, 8 November 2016 (UTC)

Yulchon-myeon for the WAM

I created Yulchon-myeon for the WAM, but you said it's 294 words, so I added. --ㅂㄱㅇ (talk) (Bieup Giyeok Ieung) 13:16, 10 November 2016 (UTC)

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Lingveno. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)

Undisclosed paid editing

Hi. Please review WP:PAID more closely. The current note on this page is insufficient. The policy requires that it is made clear precisely which contributions you have been paid for and by whom. Simply saying that you advertise on upwork is not enough. The normal way to disclose is to list all the articles you have created for pay on your user page (not talk page) and also add {{connected contributor (paid)}} to the talk page of each article. Please ensure that you take the time to become compliant with the policy as soon as possible and desist from further paid edits until the disclosures are up to scratch. Thanks SmartSE (talk) 11:48, 30 March 2017 (UTC)

@Smartse:, thank you for the notice. I will add the list to the userpage asap and the templates to the talk pages as well. Best, Lingveno (talk) 11:55, 30 March 2017 (UTC)

Thanks. A closer read of WP:BIO, WP:BLP and WP:V would not go a miss either given the edits I've just made to Rebecca Vogels. While paid editing is permitted, if you are not compliant with core policies and let the pay cloud your judgement, the community are unlikely to be supportive. SmartSE (talk) 12:25, 30 March 2017 (UTC)

Also this is really not cool - all you've done is add a reference to an article about the company. It doesn't have any of this information in i.e. it's a WP:FAKE. SmartSE (talk) 12:38, 30 March 2017 (UTC)

@Smartse:, I have marked all the article talk pages and have made a notice on my Meta userpage which appears in all projects, by the rules that has to be enough. Also, the contributions are tagged. --Lingveno (talk) 18:10, 3 April 2017 (UTC)

Nomination of Rebecca Vogels for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Rebecca Vogels is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rebecca Vogels until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. SmartSE (talk) 12:21, 30 March 2017 (UTC)

Nomination of Elyor Karimov for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Elyor Karimov is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Elyor Karimov until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. SmartSE (talk) 15:41, 1 April 2017 (UTC)

Copying within Wikipedia requires proper attribution

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you copied or moved text from München Hauptbahnhof into Munich. While you are welcome to re-use Wikipedia's content, here or elsewhere, Wikipedia's licensing does require that you provide attribution to the original contributor(s). When copying within Wikipedia, this is supplied at minimum in an edit summary at the page into which you've copied content, disclosing the copying and linking to the copied page, e.g., copied content from [[page name]]; see that page's history for attribution. It is good practice, especially if copying is extensive, to also place a properly formatted {{copied}} template on the talk pages of the source and destination. The attribution has been provided for this situation, but if you have copied material between pages before, even if it was a long time ago, please provide attribution for that duplication. You can read more about the procedure and the reasons at Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. Thank you. If you are the sole author of the prose that was moved, attribution is not required. — Diannaa 🍁 (talk) 17:33, 12 April 2017 (UTC)

Diannaa, thanks for letting know, just forgot to attribute :) --Lingveno (talk) 17:36, 12 April 2017 (UTC)

Notice of Conflict of interest noticeboard discussion

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Conflict of interest/Noticeboard regarding a possible conflict of interest incident with which you may be involved. Thank you. SmartSE (talk) 12:36, 23 April 2017 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Chad Elie

The article Chad Elie has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Not independently notable from United States v. Scheinberg

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Joseph2302 (talk) 23:15, 27 April 2017 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Roger Gench

The article Roger Gench has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Mostly unsourced, spam

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Joseph2302 (talk) 23:15, 27 April 2017 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Ahmad Ashkar

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Ahmad Ashkar, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Joseph2302 (talk) 23:16, 27 April 2017 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Alexander Hagerup (May 3)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by SwisterTwister was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Alexander Hagerup and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
• You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

SwisterTwister talk 22:40, 3 May 2017 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Alejandro Rioja (May 3)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by SwisterTwister was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Alejandro Rioja and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
• You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

SwisterTwister talk 22:40, 3 May 2017 (UTC)

Draft:Alejandro Rioja concern

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Alejandro Rioja, a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:32, 4 October 2017 (UTC)

Please do not add promotional material to Wikipedia. While objective prose about beliefs, organisations, people, products or services is acceptable, Wikipedia is not intended to be a vehicle for soapboxing, advertising or promotion. Thank you. SwisterTwister talk 18:27, 5 October 2017 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Martin Saidler (October 15)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Scope creep was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Martin Saidler and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
• You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

scope_creep (talk) 10:56, 15 October 2017 (UTC)

Hello! Lingveno, I noticed your article was declined at Articles for Creation, and that can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! scope_creep (talk) 10:56, 15 October 2017 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Draft:Martin Saidler

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Draft:Martin Saidler, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Joseph2302 (talk) 11:00, 15 October 2017 (UTC)

October 2017

Please do not add promotional material to Wikipedia, as you did to Draft:Martin Saidler. While objective prose about beliefs, organisations, people, products or services is acceptable, Wikipedia is not intended to be a vehicle for soapboxing, advertising or promotion. Thank you. Joseph2302 (talk) 11:01, 15 October 2017 (UTC)

Catalan Republic recognition

We are discussing it over here. The account does not seem to be official (if it is, we have not enough proof about it as it is not a confirmed Twitter account), so we are waiting for some sort of reliable source to confirm it. Impru20 (talk) 20:31, 27 October 2017 (UTC)

Thank you, Impru20. Will follow the article's talk page for the updates. --Lingveno (talk) 20:33, 27 October 2017 (UTC)

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, Lingveno. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)

Managing a conflict of interest

Hello, Lingveno. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places or things you have written about in the article Bill Viola, you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a COI may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic. Editing for the purpose of advertising or promotion is not permitted. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for organizations for more information. We ask that you:

• avoid editing or creating articles about yourself, your family, friends, company, organization or competitors;
• propose changes on the talk pages of affected articles (see the {{request edit}} template);
• disclose your COI when discussing affected articles (see WP:DISCLOSE);
• avoid linking to your organization's website in other articles (see WP:SPAM);
• do your best to comply with Wikipedia's content policies.

In addition, you must disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation (see WP:PAID).

Also please note that editing for the purpose of advertising, publicising, or promoting anyone or anything is not permitted. Thank you. Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 22:13, 6 December 2017 (UTC)

Hi! As I previously sad, I am now working on adding the sources. All I have done is added the missing exhibitions of him, there is nothing promotional there. Best, Lingveno (talk) 22:16, 6 December 2017 (UTC)

As you know, COI editors are strongly discouraged from editing articles directly. I've left information on the talk-page on how to make an edit request. Please use that, and no other, method to attempt to further your employer's purposes here. I see that our article on Lynn Chadwick will need to be rewritten to get rid of the guff from the gallery. Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 22:31, 6 December 2017 (UTC)

Will do so from now. I have added the artist's list to the main article with the sources, will refrain from adding the links to the gallery. Best, Lingveno (talk) 22:45, 6 December 2017 (UTC)

William T. Reid, IV moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, William T. Reid, IV, appears to have been moved into mainspace by a paid editor, rather than being submitted through the AfC process. I've moved it to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel that the article is ready for mainspace, please submit it using the Articles for Creation template at the top of the page. Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 22:46, 6 December 2017 (UTC)

Reid Collins & Tsai LLP moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Reid Collins & Tsai LLP, appears to have been moved into mainspace by a paid editor, rather than being submitted through the AfC process. I've moved it to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel that the article is ready for mainspace, please submit it using the Articles for Creation template at the top of the page. Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 22:46, 6 December 2017 (UTC)

Nomination of Secrets of a digital marketing ninja for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Secrets of a digital marketing ninja is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Secrets of a digital marketing ninja until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 09:18, 7 December 2017 (UTC)

December 2017

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you use Wikipedia for soapboxing, promotion or advertising. From the above it is clear that your paid editing is continuing to cause disruption. I had thought you had realised the need to tread carefully but you have either forgotten this or are willfullingly ignoring it. SmartSE (talk) 10:40, 7 December 2017 (UTC)

@Smartse:,I have decided to refrain from any further paid editing. Please block me if you notice me doing it again. Best, Lingveno (talk) 11:18, 7 December 2017 (UTC)

Ok that sounds like a sensible decision. SmartSE (talk) 13:12, 7 December 2017 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Secrets of digital marketing ninja.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Secrets of digital marketing ninja.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:42, 10 December 2017 (UTC)