User talk:Lobx10

Welcome!

Hello, Lobx10, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:

You may also want to complete the Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Wikipedia. You can visit the Teahouse to ask questions or seek help. Need some ideas about what kind of things need doing? Try the Task Center.

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask for help on your talk page, and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome! ~TNT (she/they • talk) 03:07, 24 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

January 2022

Welcome, and thank you for your attempt to lighten up Wikipedia. However, this is an encyclopedia, and articles are intended to be serious, so please don't make joke edits, as you did to Tucker Carlson. Readers looking for accurate information will not find them amusing. If you'd like to experiment with editing, please use your sandbox instead, where you are given a certain degree of freedom in what you write. TartarTorte 00:31, 24 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Literally 1984 User talk:Lobx10 00:51, 24 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

March 2022

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Battle of the Alamo have been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
For help, take a look at the introduction.
The following is the log entry regarding this message: Battle of the Alamo was changed by Lobx10 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.926972 on 2022-03-01T17:41:24+00:00

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 17:41, 1 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

June 2022

Please do not introduce incorrect information into articles, as you did to Saudi Arabia. Your edits could be interpreted as vandalism and have been reverted. If you believe the information you added was correct, please cite references or sources or discuss the changes on the article's talk page before making them again. If you would like to experiment, use your sandbox. Thank you. Vif12vf/Tiberius (talk) 01:19, 15 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I never added any incorrect statements to w:Saudi Arabia. I was merely stating what reality stated before me. Saudi Arabia has nearly every characterists that a fascist state (ie nazi germany) would need. Absolute power in one leader, No free and fair elections if there are any elections to begin with, Massive corruption, Mass-survialence, Persecution (often violent) of any form of oppsition groups, De Facto enslavement of women, State-Sanctioned Murder of LGBTs and Atheists (I myself am a member of the latter group), etc. Lobx10 (talk) 05:02, 15 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Doesn't come close to a fascist state. Please do your research. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 50.111.29.1 (talk) 15:07, 2 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

September 2022

Hi Lobx10! I noticed that you recently marked an edit as minor at Darya Dugina that may not have been. "Minor edit" has a very specific definition on Wikipedia—it refers only to superficial edits that could never be the subject of a dispute, such as typo corrections or reverting obvious vandalism. Any edit that changes the meaning of an article is not a minor edit, even if it only concerns a single word. Please see Help:Minor edit for more information. Thank you. -- Toddy1 (talk) 03:45, 2 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

May you explain further as to your reasoning? Lobx10 (talk) 16:23, 2 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

If you still do not understand what a minor edit is then read Help:Minor edit.-- Toddy1 (talk) 16:58, 2 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Lobx10! I wanted to let you know about the Bold, Revert, Discuss cycle. While it is appreciated that you did a bold edit to Darya Dugina, if it is reverted, the prefered thing to do instead of putting it there again is to discuss it on the talk page. If you believe something should be there, don't be afraid to wring it to the talk page and comment your reasoning. Thank you! AdrianHObradors (talk) 22:21, 2 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Ok. I will note this for the future. Lobx10 (talk) 20:24, 5 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

December 2022

Hello. I wanted to let you know that your recent edit(s) to the 2012 (film) plot summary have been removed because they added a significant amount of unnecessary detail. Please avoid excessive detail and high word counts when editing plot summaries/synopses. You may read the plot summary edit guides to learn more about contributing constructively to plot summaries/synopses. There are also specific guidelines for films, musicals, television episodes, anime/manga, novels and non-fiction books. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. DonIago (talk) 13:46, 30 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your input. I ran my edit through a word count, and it came to a total of 881 words, which is 181+ max amount of words. Lobx10 (talk) 01:53, 31 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]