User talk:Locus102
Nomination of George Saghir for deletion[edit]
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article George Saghir is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/George Saghir until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Saqib (talk) 07:38, 19 April 2018 (UTC)
The article Cheollima Civil Defense has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
Same concerns as the AfD from six months ago: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Cheollima Civil Defense
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. – Finnusertop (talk ⋅ contribs) 13:17, 19 April 2018 (UTC)
Nomination of Cheollima Civil Defense for deletion[edit]
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Cheollima Civil Defense is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Cheollima Civil Defense (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. – Finnusertop (talk ⋅ contribs) 13:18, 19 April 2018 (UTC)
Locus102, you are invited to the Teahouse![edit]
|
Hi Locus102! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. We hope to see you there!
Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts 16:04, 19 April 2018 (UTC) |
Hello, Locus102. I wanted to let you know that I’m proposing an article that you started, Ali al-Shihabi, for deletion because I don't think it meets our criteria for inclusion. If you don't want the article deleted:
- edit the page
- remove the text that looks like this:
{{proposed deletion/dated...}} - save the page
Also, be sure to explain why you think the article should be kept in your edit summary or on the article's talk page. If you don't do so, it may be deleted later anyway.
You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions.
SamHolt6 (talk) 00:39, 21 April 2018 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for May 12[edit]
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited May 24 measure, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page South Korean (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:22, 12 May 2018 (UTC)
May 2018[edit]
Hello, I'm Ahecht. I noticed that in this edit to Aceh, you removed content without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry, the removed content has been restored. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Ahecht (TALK
PAGE) 23:42, 12 May 2018 (UTC)
Please do not add or change content, as you did at Toronto van attack, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Johnny Au (talk/contributions) 23:59, 17 May 2018 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for May 19[edit]
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Weh Island, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Indonesian (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:18, 19 May 2018 (UTC)
The article Ahmad al-Hazimi has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
Fails any relevancy to me. - Also WP GNG
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. IAWI (talk) 06:45, 26 May 2018 (UTC)
Nomination of Ahmad al-Hazimi for deletion[edit]
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Ahmad al-Hazimi is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ahmad al-Hazimi until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. IAWI (talk) 08:01, 26 May 2018 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for June 1[edit]
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Abul-Hasan Al-Muhajir, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Kunya (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:34, 1 June 2018 (UTC)
A page you started (Arusha Memorandum) has been reviewed![edit]
Thanks for creating Arusha Memorandum, Locus102!
Wikipedia editor Nick Moyes just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:
This seems a bit short to merit a page of its own. If you don't plan to expand it, I'd prefer to see a WP:REDIRECT to the Shifta war page, with content added there.
To reply, leave a comment on Nick Moyes's talk page.
Learn more about page curation.
Nick Moyes (talk) 22:38, 2 June 2018 (UTC)
June 2018[edit]
Welcome, and thank you for your attempt to lighten up Wikipedia. However, this is an encyclopedia and articles are intended to be serious, so please don't make joke edits. Readers looking for accurate information will not find them amusing. If you'd like to experiment with editing, please use the sandbox instead, where you are given a certain degree of freedom in what you write. Snuggums (talk / edits) 01:01, 6 June 2018 (UTC)
The article Abdurrahim Mollazadeh has been proposed for deletion because it appears to have no references. Under Wikipedia policy, this biography of a living person will be deleted after seven days unless it has at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.
If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp/dated}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within seven days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. Dave Dial (talk) 02:44, 7 June 2018 (UTC)
Speedy deletion nomination of Abdurrahim Mollazadeh[edit]
A tag has been placed on Abdurrahim Mollazadeh requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done for the following reason:
First source is a post on a message board forum. Second source doesn't mention subject at all. Third source mentions subject in passing, saying they attended an event.
Under the criteria for speedy deletion, pages that meet certain criteria may be deleted at any time.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Dave Dial (talk) 18:45, 7 June 2018 (UTC)
There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Dave Dial (talk) 19:00, 7 June 2018 (UTC)
June 2018[edit]
Your recent editing history at Barack Obama religion conspiracy theories shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.
Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.
You are mistaken. That was your 4th revert in 24 hours. You have a little time before I report this to the edit warring board. Also, BLP applies everywhere on the project. Articles AND Talk pages. Dave Dial (talk) 19:39, 7 June 2018 (UTC)
Added, so I suggest you self-revert before I report this to the edit warring board. Dave Dial (talk) 19:40, 7 June 2018 (UTC)
it was the third. stop removing sourced material i dont know whether you genuinely can't understand the purpose of the Barack Obama religion conspiracy theories page (to detail conspiracy theories held about his religion) or are you just trolling me
Note[edit]
Please carefully read this information:
The Arbitration Committee has authorised discretionary sanctions to be used for pages regarding living or recently deceased people, and edits relating to the subject (living or recently deceased) of such biographical articles, a topic which you have edited. The Committee's decision is here.
Discretionary sanctions is a system of conduct regulation designed to minimize disruption to controversial topics. This means uninvolved administrators can impose sanctions for edits relating to the topic that do not adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, our standards of behavior, or relevant policies. Administrators may impose sanctions such as editing restrictions, bans, or blocks. This message is to notify you that sanctions are authorised for the topic you are editing. Before continuing to edit this topic, please familiarise yourself with the discretionary sanctions system. Don't hesitate to contact me or another editor if you have any questions.--NeilN talk to me 20:02, 7 June 2018 (UTC)