User talk:Lubo-Iv-95

Statistics

Hello! Thanks for updating the statistics on the Nehuén Pérez article, but in the future could you please update the timestamps so other editors and readers know when the statistics were last updated. For the career statistics table, all you need to do is use the date of your edit at the top of the stats table. While for the infobox just use five tildes (~) in the "club-update" section. R96Skinner (talk) 15:21, 8 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, sorry, my miss. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Lubo-Iv-95 (talk • contribs) 15:25 2019-01-08 (UTC)

January 2019

Thank you for your contributions. Please mark your edits as "minor" only if they are minor edits. In accordance with Help:Minor edit, a minor edit is one that the editor believes requires no review and could never be the subject of a dispute. Minor edits consist of things such as typographical corrections, formatting changes or rearrangement of text without modification of content. Additionally, the reversion of clear-cut vandalism and test edits may be labeled "minor". Update stats. is not a minor edit, it is new information Matthew hk (talk) 18:19, 9 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. When you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion (but never when editing articles), such as at User talk:Lubo-Iv-95, please be sure to sign your posts. There are two ways to do this. Either:

Add four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment, or
With the cursor positioned at the end of your comment, click on the signature button located above the edit window.

This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is necessary to allow other editors to easily see who wrote what and when.

Thank you. Matthew hk (talk) 18:20, 9 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Guillem Jaime for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Guillem Jaime is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Guillem Jaime until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. GirthSummit _(blether) 14:30, 28 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Kike Saverio for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Kike Saverio is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kike Saverio until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. GirthSummit _(blether) 19:58, 28 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Ignasi Vilarrasa for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Ignasi Vilarrasa is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ignasi Vilarrasa until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. GirthSummit _(blether) 20:00, 28 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Óscar Mingueza

The article Óscar Mingueza has been proposed for deletion. The proposed deletion notice added to the article should explain why.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. MYS 77 ^✉ 18:48, 1 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Notability of football players

Hi, I wanted to drop you a quick line on the notability thresholds for football players. First though, please let me thank and congratulate you on the prolific work you have been doing updating lots of articles on footballers - please don't see my approach as criticism, you are clearly doing a lot of good work in this area.

You are probably aware that we have criteria to determine whether or not footballers are sufficiently notable to merit having their own Wikipedia article - these can be found at WP:NFOOTY. The requirements are basically that they have played (or managed) in a Tier 1 international match, or in a match in a fully professional league - there is a list of the leagues considered to be fully professional here. I recently nominated a few of the pages you created for deletion, because the players (all from Barcelona B) had only ever played in the Segunda Division B, which is not fully professional. There are, I think, a few other pages you may have created for players who have similarly never played in a fully professional league - see Lazar Carević for example. Since these don't meet the notability requirements, I intend to go through and nominate these for deletion at some point, but if you prefer you could nominate them yourself via a CSD WP:G7, if you are the author and the only person who has done significant work on them.

As I said, I hope that you don't take this is any kind of criticism - the vast majority of the work you've done appears to be good, and on players who clearly meet the notability requirements - I'm just tidying up a few of the non-notable (or 'not yet' notable) loose ends. Please keep up the good work, but perhaps check the notability requirements carefully before creating any more pages for players in non-fully professional leagues. Cheers GirthSummit _(blether) 07:36, 5 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there, I understand the requirements now. Proceed with this, if possible to archive them of some sort will be great, if not, no issue.

Hi - I'm glad you understand. Your request about archiving the pages is reasonable, since of course these players may become notable in future, so I spoke with an experienced page reviewer about how we could achieve that. He suggested that you could create 'user space' pages for them - essentially, make a new page under your user space, marked as 'Draft', and copy/paste all the text from any pages that are going to be deleted into there. If I let you know which ones I think need to go before I nominate for deletion, would you be happy to archive in your user space like this? Cheers GirthSummit _(blether) 22:49, 5 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

OK, thanks for the info. Once I have the time, will do it.

Proposed deletion of Iñaki Peña

The article Iñaki Peña has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Fails both WP:GNG and WP:NFOOTY, never played in a WP:FPL

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. MYS 77 ^✉ 19:50, 2 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Lazar Carević

The article Lazar Carević has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Fails both WP:GNG and WP:NFOOTY, never played in a WP:FPL

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. MYS 77 ^✉ 20:01, 2 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2019 election voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:24, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

February 2020

Whack!

You've been whacked with a wet trout.

Don't take this too seriously. Someone just wants to let you know you did something silly.

Special:Diff/941207650 - by typing in one less ~ puts your signature on the article instead of the timestamp. Iggy (Swan) (Contribs) 14:11, 18 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

September 2020

Hello, I'm Oblow14. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, FC Barcelona B, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at the tutorial on citing sources. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Oblow14 (talk) 22:32, 26 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for October 4

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited 2020–21 First Professional Football League (Bulgaria), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Galin Ivanov. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:01, 4 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Piping German clubs

Hi there. Thanks for updating Ludovit Reis. Please don't pipe VfL Osnabrück to "Osnabrück"; see WP:KARLSRUHER for details. Kind regards, Robby.is.on (talk) 21:24, 1 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

October 2020

Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to James Ward-Prowse, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear to be constructive and has been reverted. If you only meant to make a test edit, please use your sandbox for that. Thank you. Mattythewhite (talk) 16:46, 12 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

no-live-updates.

Seriously, do not do live updates to player statistics while games are being played. Govvy (talk) 20:34, 1 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Ok, sorry for that. Will not.

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 03:00, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

January 2021

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to blank out or remove portions of page content, templates, or other materials from Wikipedia without adequate explanation, as you did at Samuel Umtiti, you may be blocked from editing. Mattythewhite (talk) 18:08, 5 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Mattythewhite: I've seen you change it the other way around when, according to the WP:FOOTY consensus, both layouts are okay. So how can you warn somebody else for this sort of change? Robby.is.on (talk) 18:12, 5 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

You mean merge the division cells? I don't think I've ever done that. Mattythewhite (talk) 18:13, 5 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Mattythewhite: I missed that Lubo-Iv-95's change was effectively a revert of yours. So I should rephrase my question: Why are warning a fellow editor for reverting a cosmetic change you made when both variants are okay? Robby.is.on (talk) 18:34, 5 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

It's more than a mere cosmetic change, it's based on accessibility, as is explained at WP:FOOTY/Players. Mattythewhite (talk) 18:40, 5 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

It is not: "our readers won't be disadvantaged noticeably if we don't repeat every cell that contains duplicate data". You know, I actually prefer repeated cells. But I think it's wrong and borderline uncivil to accuse someone of disruptive editing for this when there's no clear consensus. Robby.is.on (talk) 19:40, 5 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for September 23

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited 2021–22 First Professional Football League (Bulgaria), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Georgi Milanov.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 05:59, 23 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:53, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hristiyan Petrov moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Hristiyan Petrov, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 17:04, 9 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Hristiyan Petrov

Hello, Lubo-Iv-95. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Hristiyan Petrov, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 18:01, 11 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Hristiyan Petrov

Hello, Lubo-Iv-95. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Hristiyan Petrov".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 17:58, 9 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Maurício Garcez (July 23)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Greenman was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines for sports persons and athletes). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Needs more than just listings to establish notability.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Maurício Garcez and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Greenman (talk) 18:44, 23 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Lubo-Iv-95! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Greenman (talk) 18:44, 23 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Hristiyan Petrov (August 15)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by KylieTastic was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Hristiyan Petrov and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

KylieTastic (talk) 08:13, 15 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Maurício Garcez (November 2)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Onel5969 was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines for sports persons and athletes). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

You need in-depth coverage from independent, reliable sources to show they meet notability.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Maurício Garcez and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Onel5969 ^{TT me} 20:45, 2 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:42, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Hristiyan Petrov (January 1)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Pichemist was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Hristiyan Petrov and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

_Signed, Pichemist ^{( Contribs | Talk )} 09:36, 1 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Maurício Garcez (January 9)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by TheChunky was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines for sports persons and athletes). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Maurício Garcez and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

❯❯❯ Chunky aka Al Kashmiri (✍️) 02:59, 9 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Hristiyan Petrov (January 26)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Tails Wx was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Hristiyan Petrov and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Tails Wx 17:14, 26 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for March 5

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited 2022–23 PFC CSKA Sofia season, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Saša Ilić.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:08, 5 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

June 2023

Hello! Please, when you edit the Bulgarian Summer Transfers page - add reliable sources or update the existing ones - otherwise the references list becomes a mess. Thank you!

Disambiguation link notification for July 25

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited 2023–24 First Professional Football League (Bulgaria), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Georgi Minchev.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:03, 25 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:52, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for July 28

An automated process has detected that you recently added links to disambiguation pages.

2024–25 First Professional Football League (Bulgaria)

added a link pointing to Stanislav Ivanov

PFC CSKA Sofia II

added a link pointing to Ivan Tasev

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 20:49, 28 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Pavel Zhabov for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Pavel Zhabov, to which you have significantly contributed, is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or if it should be deleted.

The discussion will take place at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Pavel Zhabov until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

To customise your preferences for automated AfD notifications for articles to which you've significantly contributed (or to opt-out entirely), please visit the configuration page. Delivered by SDZeroBot (talk) 01:02, 4 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2024 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2024 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 2 December 2024. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:41, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]