User talk:LukeTheSpook

Welcome to my talk page. -- The Spooky One. Click here to leave me a new message Please try to keep discussions on topic. As much as I Enjoy randomness, this is not the place for it. If you want to be random, check out Uncyclopedia. Please sign your comments with four tildes (like this: ~~~~) If you're replying to an existing message, please indent your message using colons. (If your message is over several paragraphs, please indent and sign them all. That way other users [including me] can respond to your individual points) My Alternative account is LTS-sLither so don't get your panties in a bunch if you see someone who is a lot like me but isn't (unless that somone isn't my IP address or LTS-sLither) - -The Spooky One (talk to me) 01:40, 17 September 2008 (UTC) By the way, you can email me if you want.

Richboyliang

i'm deleting the stuff on vundo because some idiot always deletes my section on removing virtumonde and i dont know who, and no one bothered him about that so i wonder why all my GOOD edits are being removed like the section i added several months ago! Richboyliang (talk) 01:39, 13 November 2008 (UTC)

Wikipedia:WhyNot?Doctrine

I assume you have not saw WP:WTHN? Seems pretty much the same to me. Hoping you are well! :) — neuro^(talk) 04:09, 9 November 2008 (UTC)

Userbox

I thought it summed up my wiki-philosophy quite well :) Jomunro (talk) 15:02, 9 November 2008 (UTC)

Sum 41 A-class review

Hey there, I saw your request for an A-class review on the article's peer review page, but I'm not sure if I'm supposed to initiate it. According to the WP guidelines, it looks like the nominator (one of the article's main editors, like you or Timmeh) is supposed to put it up for review from the talk page. But I'd be glad to review it once it's up. Cheers, Ink Runner (talk) 22:59, 11 November 2008 (UTC)

Eh? I'm still confused. It looks like A class can only be given at the WikiProjects (like WikiProject Canada or WikiProject Rock Music, whatever the article is part of), but the projects don't have A class reviews. If the review is conducted at the page linked to in the peer review, would you mind showing me how to do it? (Total n00b here) Cheers, Ink Runner (talk) 03:11, 12 November 2008 (UTC)

Ki-Jana Carter

Doesn't that Yahoo Sports story itself say that Carter was one of several former Penn State backs who didn't have a very good career in the NFL? Blueboy96 21:53, 12 November 2008 (UTC)

Travelling Tragotion

See [1]! Btw:

--Say Headcheese!--hexaChord² 11:35, 13 November 2008 (UTC)

Chinese Democracy

Hello, I would like to inform you of this discussion. There is agreement that the nomination is premature and the article shouldn't be nominated until several weeks after the album is issued. Please withdraw the nomination and resubmit at a later date. The article is very good, but it will still change quite dramatically. We hope you won't feel let down by this and look forward to you resubmitting the piece in due course. Thank you and sincere regards. — Realist² 22:12, 13 November 2008 (UTC)

If it's Chinese Democracy you are working on, that's BH related and we could do it under the Task Force banner. I don't see the project too narrow, quite the contrary. But do as you wish, you're always welcome. And, yeah, I will remind your note in the future. Didn't think this would vanish that fast though. --Say Headcheese!--hexaChord² 22:44, 13 November 2008 (UTC)

Stephanie Plitt

Hi. I declined the speedy deletion of Stephanie Plitt because the article does assert a limited notability, even though the claim is unreferenced. I agree it is potentially a hoax, but except for blatant cases, AfD is preferred for suspected hoax articles. Euryalus (talk) 03:28, 14 November 2008 (UTC)

I agree - there's a fine (and slightly subjective) line between blatant hoaxes (which are speediable) and other potential hoaxes which aren't. This was pretty close to that line, but AfD is not only a good default option but also a successful AfD means the article may not be recreated per CSD:#G4. Euryalus (talk) 03:38, 14 November 2008 (UTC)

The Beatles

Read Talk: The Beatles/Archive 18#Former members because during The Beatles' entire recording history from 1962 to 1970, the lineup of John, Paul, George and Ringo was stable. So they are all listed as "current members" based on consensus. Steelbeard1 (talk) 11:45, 14 November 2008 (UTC)

I noticed you tried previously in Talk:The_Beatles/Archive_17#former.2F_current_members. Give up. You will not prevail again. Steelbeard1 (talk) 13:50, 14 November 2008 (UTC)

Pink Floyd

Hi Luke. At the risk of being an annoyance, or coming across as resisting change, I have reverted your insertion of headings again. As I stated on the talk page, if headings are to be used, they should be accompanied by this template, as used in the "discography" section of the article: {{main|Pink Floyd discography}} which produces:

Main article: Pink Floyd discography

Even though you didn't address my concerns about the headings turning the paragraphs' topics into a discussion of the albums rather than band history, or ask for consensus when a change is challenged, I'll agree to their being included if they also include the templates, which I believe are a formatting standard at WP.

But the bigger reason for the revert is your removal of "unsourced statements" which have "fact" tags dated November 2008. It is standard practice to wait a reasonable time for the person who inserted the questionable content to re-check their sources and improve the article; this is why tags are dated, and why the date is only a month instead of month/day. Although there are no explicit directions on how long to wait, the use of the month suggests waiting at least 2 months before removing info like this, unless you believe the info to be highly unlikely (and I see no reason why this would be the case here), in which case you should remove the content (not even bother tagging it) but also leave a note on the contributor's talk page (or the article's talk page) inviting them to add it back with proper citation.

A few PS's: When you removed one of the unsourced statements, you left behind a bit in brackets, which would make no sense after the removal. I also see you reverted the use of quotes instead of italics on Household Objects. As I understand it, this was a proposed album title, rather than a song title, so italics are correct. You also removed the word "The" at the beginning of The Dark Side of the Moon. The longer name is the original title. While it's true that one of the many CD releases does remove the word, this appears to have been done unintentionally. There is no indication the label or band were deliberately trying to change the title decades after its original release, and even if they were, we would probably prefer to use the original title in the article. --A Knight Who Says Ni (talk) 02:13, 15 November 2008 (UTC)

Thanks for the support!

Thanks for supporting me at my successful Rfa! Hope to work with you in the future!--Aervanath lives in the Orphanage 17:34, 15 November 2008 (UTC)

Re: rosters

Sure, I forgot about that so I'll add it. As far as Campbell goes, he never signed a contract (the Army changed its rules just before he would have), so he can't go on Reserve/Military (the last player to do so was Kyle Eckel). His rights remain with the Lions until the end of the league year, when he will be re-entered into the draft-eligible pool. Pats1 ^T/C 01:15, 16 November 2008 (UTC)

Verifiability and citations

Zealously removing uncited material is counter productive. Wikis work most effectively when people add unsourced material, any questionable material gets challenged, differences get discussed and citations are added. This is the natural progression of articles. Removing material that is obviously correct (like "Sight and Sound" and Citazen Kane) helps nobody, goes against WP:AGF, and makes people wonder about your motives. Every article has unsourced material. Since this is a wiki, thousands of people will see the article, and incorrect material will be removed and challenged. Let the process happen. The amount of time you and I have spent reverting material back and forth could have been spent finding citations. Articles get perfected when you improve what is there, and only remove things when you must. Wikipedia did not spring forth out of the Internet ether fully formed and cited. It evolved. I suggest you look through the history of some of our featured articles and see some of their earliest edits. Usually there was just a stub, then several paragraphs with no citations, etc... -- ☑ SamuelWantman 19:01, 16 November 2008 (UTC)

A certain report to AIV

I declined the report as being not blatent vandalism, suggesting it got taken to ANI, and it has now been removed (by another) as stale. I don't know how you wish to proceed with this, but such reports to AIV are likely not to be the best method (some admins might be a bit protective, etc.) Just my thoughts on this. LessHeard vanU (talk) 23:17, 16 November 2008 (UTC)

Jimbo isn't likely to do anything, but it is going to be seen by a lot of people... I don't think you are achieving anything here, but it is your choice. LessHeard vanU (talk) 23:28, 16 November 2008 (UTC)

Re: My earlier message

I must apologise Luke. I have no excuses for my behaviour earlier and I shall not attempt to make any. But I must be honest; I did not appreciate your posting the picture of the trout, I did not appreciate being templated like that and, in regards to SlayerXT and his socks, I was acting in good faith and doing as any admin would have done. SlayerXT knows of our policies and he knows what not do. His blatant and continuous socking was disruptive and he has been warned many times. Once again, I apologise for my unprovoked attack and, quite rightly, have been desysopped. See you around, friend. Scarian^{Call me Pat!} 00:29, 17 November 2008 (UTC)

Apology Accepted. Sorry if i was being an asshole, looking back, it seems i almost provoked you. - -' The Spook (TALK) _{(Share the Love with Barnstars)} 00:32, 18 November 2008 (UTC)

unblock

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

LukeTheSpook (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

I didn't do anything wrong!! WTF! PeaceOfSheat and Sum44 are my alternate accounts, but i wasn't socking. I was using PeaceOfSheat as a test account and created Sum44 in sort of rage to see if it would get blocked by a certain admin in a sock case due to the username. But i never vandalised anything or abused multiple accounts. Sum88 is not my account! It's SlayerXT's account. I didn't do anything wrong, please unblock me! Check the IP, Sum88's IP should be different thatn Sum44's.

Decline reason:

You admit to breaking Wikipedia rules for the sole purpose of making a point? Why can you be trusted when, at your own admission, you created an alternate account just to see if it would be blocked? That is decidedly NOT an allowed use of an alternate account! What assurances can you make that you do not intend to "test the system" in other ways??? — Jayron32.talk.contribs 22:19, 17 November 2008 (UTC)

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

LukeTheSpook (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

...But i never broke any rules. I didn't vandlise anything. I was blocked because someone thinks that SlayerXT is me, but he's not. I apoligize for creating the account sum44. I swear i'll never do anything like that again. I just want to edit wikipedia, it' my hobby, i never intended for anything bad to happen here. My only accounts are LTS-sLither, PeaceOfSheat, Sum44, and This one, i have not used them to sock at all! I didn't abuse multiple accounts to push any point of view? i'm just trying to contribute to the encyclopedia! - -' The Spook (TALK) _{(Share the Love with Barnstars)} 22:26, 17 November 2008 (UTC)

Decline reason:

CheckUser has determined you have used more than one account. Those accounts were used abusively because you used them to edit the same article in order to avoid such policies as WP:3RR. You knew what you were doing was against policy, please do not play it off like you didn't — Tiptoety ^talk 05:57, 18 November 2008 (UTC)

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

I apologize for reporting Scarian to AIV, and i shouldn't have, but i was seriosly offended by the user's actions, . I need a wikibreak. But realize that the original block was not fair. Sum44 and Sum88 do not have the Same IP addresses, and are not the same users.... I've stated my accounts above... please fix this. - -' The Spook (TALK) _{(Share the Love with Barnstars)} 22:39, 17 November 2008 (UTC)

Please fix this. for the last time i'm not SlayerXT. I love wikipedia, and follow all the guidlines and stuff. I'm sorry for reporting Scarian to Jimbo, i'm sorry for creating the account sum44 to try and proove a point, but look at my edits, minus my first few edits (me and wikipedia didn't get along at first...) I've been contributing to this encyclopedia. That's all i want to do. I need this, please ublock me. - -' The Spook (TALK) _{(Share the Love with Barnstars)} 22:59, 17 November 2008 (UTC)

Here's an email i just sent to Scarian:

I owe you a big big apology. It seems i was disrupting wikipedia to make a point. For some reason, i was blocked as a "sockpuppet" for the account Sum44 which i created. I, however am not, SlayerXT, SlayerXTT, HentaimanXT, HentiamanXTT, or Sum88. The whole point of me creating the account Sum44 was for you to find it and block it so i could reveal to you that you need to be careful when blocking because not all is as it seems. But i got fucked over that, as somone thought that Sum44 was blocked user Sum88 and blocked me for sockpuppetry. I also shouldn't have reported you to AIV or even to jimbo, but your comments deeply offended me and i didn't know what else to do. I wanted you to get de-admined because at the time i thought you deserved it. But looking back i realize that i provoked you too much and you rightfully got pissed. I just want to be able to edit wikipedia, it's all i have to do. It's my one and only hobby. If you want, please forward this to Jimbo. I hope (if you havn't already) that you get re-sysopped, you were a great admin. Sorry if i was a thorn in your side.

--Luke

- -' The Spook (TALK) _{(Share the Love with Barnstars)} 23:19, 17 November 2008 (UTC)

For what it's worth, Sum88 appears  Unrelated at first glance; SlayerXT is stale; Sum44 and POS are  Confirmed. I haven't been following the AN/I thread closely, so won't comment beyond that for now. – Luna Santin (talk) 00:00, 18 November 2008 (UTC)

I've said that. Last time i checked, you're allowed to have multiple accounts. I wasn't even abusing them. would someone please explain to me how i'm "abusing" multiple accounts and prove your points by showing edits i have made. On All 3 accounts, i've only made positive edits. - -' The Spook (TALK) _{(Share the Love with Barnstars)} 00:29, 18 November 2008 (UTC)

And why is somone reverting all my edits! I did nothing wrong! PLEASE HELP ME OUT HERE! - -' The Spook (TALK) _{(Share the Love with Barnstars)} 00:39, 18 November 2008 (UTC)

Banned users edits should be reverted per WP:BAN. I undid your inappropriate reversions of Scarian to reflect that. Grsz^{11 →Review!} 16:56, 18 November 2008 (UTC)

For some reason that seems really counter-productive. - -' The Spook (TALK) _{(Share the Love with Barnstars)} 23:04, 18 November 2008 (UTC)

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

LukeTheSpook (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

I had multiple accounts, but i wasn't abusing anything. Look at PeaceOfSheats and Sum44's edits. Both of them Barely edited at all. I only used PeaceOfSheat as an experimental account where every edit i made was by using the random article button and improving the article, and i only did about 4 edits on Sum44. Please show individual edits where i broke rules. I didn't do anything wrong here!

Decline reason:

Sorry, but abusing multiple accounts is not allowed here. —Travis^talk 02:37, 19 November 2008 (UTC)

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

We're done here. You have not obviously read over any of our policies and procedures, have not acknowledged that your sockpuppetry was abusive and a waste of our time in having to deal with it, and have not acknowledged any wrong-doing in this matter. I've protected your talk page from further needless block requests after noting your cookie-cutter replies and three block requests. If you want to discuss this further, and present evidence of your case -- as I requested twice earlier, but went unanswered, then you can send me an e-mail via the "E-mail this user" link on my talk page. seicer | talk | contribs 01:42, 19 November 2008 (UTC)

Image:Wrhslogo.gif listed for deletion

An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, Image:Wrhslogo.gif, has been listed at Wikipedia:Images and media for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Skier Dude (talk) 04:27, 6 December 2008 (UTC)

Signpost updated for November 24, 2008 through January 3, 2009

Three issues have been published since the last deliver: November 24, December 1, and January 3.

The Wikipedia Signpost Weekly Delivery

Volume 4, Issue 45	24 November 2008	About the Signpost

From the editor: 200th issue
ArbCom elections: Candidate profiles	News and notes: Fundraiser, milestones
Wikipedia in the news	Dispatches: Featured article writers — the inside view
Features and admins	The Report on Lengthy Litigation

Volume 4, Issue 46	1 December 2008	About the Signpost

ArbCom elections: Elections open	Wikipedia in the news
WikiProject Report: WikiProject Solar System	Features and admins
The Report on Lengthy Litigation

Volume 5, Issue 1	3 January 2009	About the Signpost

From the editor: Getting back on track
ArbCom elections: 10 arbitrators appointed	Virgin Killer page blocked, unblocked in UK
Editing statistics show decline in participation	Wikipedia drug coverage compared to Medscape, found wanting
News and notes: Fundraising success and other developments	Dispatches: Featured list writers
Wikipedia in the news	WikiProject Report: WikiProject Ice Hockey
Features and admins	The Report on Lengthy Litigation

You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list.--ragesoss (talk) 21:42, 3 January 2009 (UTC)

Replaceable fair use Image:Op md.jpg

Replaceable fair use

Thanks for uploading Image:Op md.jpg. I noticed the description page specifies that the media is being used under a claim of fair use, but its use in Wikipedia articles fails our first non-free content criterion in that it illustrates a subject for which a freely licensed media could reasonably be found or created that provides substantially the same information. If you believe this media is not replaceable, please:

1. Go to the media description page and edit it to add {{di-replaceable fair use disputed}}, without deleting the original replaceable fair use template.
2. On the image discussion page, write the reason why this image is not replaceable at all.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace this non-free media by finding freely licensed media of the same subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license, or by taking a picture of it yourself.

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified how these images fully satisfy our non-free content criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification (7 days if uploaded before 13 July 2006), per our non-free content policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Stifle (talk) 12:21, 29 March 2009 (UTC)

Replaceable fair use Image:Painforpleasure.jpg

Replaceable fair use

Thanks for uploading Image:Painforpleasure.jpg. I noticed the description page specifies that the media is being used under a claim of fair use, but its use in Wikipedia articles fails our first non-free content criterion in that it illustrates a subject for which a freely licensed media could reasonably be found or created that provides substantially the same information. If you believe this media is not replaceable, please:

1. Go to the media description page and edit it to add {{di-replaceable fair use disputed}}, without deleting the original replaceable fair use template.
2. On the image discussion page, write the reason why this image is not replaceable at all.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace this non-free media by finding freely licensed media of the same subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license, or by taking a picture of it yourself.

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified how these images fully satisfy our non-free content criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification (7 days if uploaded before 13 July 2006), per our non-free content policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Stifle (talk) 11:40, 27 April 2009 (UTC)

File:DTLI clean.jpg listed for deletion

An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, File:DTLI clean.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Peripitus (Talk) 11:39, 24 June 2009 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Kung Fu Panda OST.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Kung Fu Panda OST.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of "file" pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Skier Dude (talk 06:50, 11 December 2010 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Self titled.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Self titled.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of "file" pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Courcelles 05:48, 15 December 2010 (UTC)

Fair use rationale for File:Jerry Finn.jpg

Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:Jerry Finn.jpg. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the file description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. J Milburn (talk) 19:47, 6 January 2011 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Gnr aint it fun.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Gnr aint it fun.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of "file" pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Courcelles 13:30, 22 January 2011 (UTC)

Non-free rationale for File:Page 44- We Know The Way.ogg

Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:Page 44- We Know The Way.ogg. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under non-free content criteria, but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia is acceptable. Please go to the file description page, and edit it to include a non-free rationale.

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified the non-free rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. — ξ^xplicit 00:25, 9 October 2011 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:The Hell Song.JPG

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:The Hell Song.JPG. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

PLEASE NOTE:

• I am a bot, and will therefore not be able to answer your questions. If you have a question, place a {{helpme}} template, along with your question, beneath this message.
• I will remove the request for deletion if the file is used in an article once again.
• If you receive this notice after the image is deleted, and you want to restore the image, click here to file an un-delete request.
• To opt out of these bot messages, add {{bots|deny=DASHBot}} to your talk page.
• If you believe the bot has made an error, please turn it off here and leave a message on my owner's talk page.

Thank you. DASHBot (talk) 17:33, 29 October 2011 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Fatlip2.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Fatlip2.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

PLEASE NOTE:

• I am a bot, and will therefore not be able to answer your questions. If you have a question, place a {{helpme}} template, along with your question, beneath this message.
• I will remove the request for deletion if the file is used in an article once again.
• If you receive this notice after the image is deleted, and you want to restore the image, click here to file an un-delete request.
• To opt out of these bot messages, add {{bots|deny=DASHBot}} to your talk page.
• If you believe the bot has made an error, please turn it off here and leave a message on my owner's talk page.

Thank you. DASHBot (talk) 17:36, 29 October 2011 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Motivation single alt.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Motivation single alt.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

PLEASE NOTE:

• I am a bot, and will therefore not be able to answer your questions. If you have a question, place a {{helpme}} template, along with your question, beneath this message.
• I will remove the request for deletion if the file is used in an article once again.
• If you receive this notice after the image is deleted, and you want to restore the image, click here to file an un-delete request.
• To opt out of these bot messages, add {{bots|deny=DASHBot}} to your talk page.
• If you believe the bot has made an error, please turn it off here and leave a message on my owner's talk page.

Thank you. DASHBot (talk) 17:37, 29 October 2011 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:INTOODEEP.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:INTOODEEP.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

PLEASE NOTE:

• I am a bot, and will therefore not be able to answer your questions. If you have a question, place a {{helpme}} template, along with your question, beneath this message.
• I will remove the request for deletion if the file is used in an article once again.
• If you receive this notice after the image is deleted, and you want to restore the image, click here to file an un-delete request.
• To opt out of these bot messages, add {{bots|deny=DASHBot}} to your talk page.
• If you believe the bot has made an error, please turn it off here and leave a message on my owner's talk page.

Thank you. DASHBot (talk) 17:38, 29 October 2011 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Fatlip.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Fatlip.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

PLEASE NOTE:

• I am a bot, and will therefore not be able to answer your questions. If you have a question, place a {{helpme}} template, along with your question, beneath this message.
• I will remove the request for deletion if the file is used in an article once again.
• If you receive this notice after the image is deleted, and you want to restore the image, click here to file an un-delete request.
• To opt out of these bot messages, add {{bots|deny=DASHBot}} to your talk page.
• If you believe the bot has made an error, please turn it off here and leave a message on my owner's talk page.

Thank you. DASHBot (talk) 17:38, 29 October 2011 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Motivation tin.JPG

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Motivation tin.JPG. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

PLEASE NOTE:

• I am a bot, and will therefore not be able to answer your questions. If you have a question, place a {{helpme}} template, along with your question, beneath this message.
• I will remove the request for deletion if the file is used in an article once again.
• If you receive this notice after the image is deleted, and you want to restore the image, click here to file an un-delete request.
• To opt out of these bot messages, add {{bots|deny=DASHBot}} to your talk page.
• If you believe the bot has made an error, please turn it off here and leave a message on my owner's talk page.

Thank you. DASHBot (talk) 17:39, 29 October 2011 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:AKNF UK.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:AKNF UK.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Skier Dude (talk) 03:42, 31 October 2011 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Little motel.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Little motel.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

PLEASE NOTE:

• I am a bot, and will therefore not be able to answer your questions. If you have a question, place a {{helpme}} template, along with your question, beneath this message.
• I will remove the request for deletion if the file is used in an article once again.
• If you receive this notice after the image is deleted, and you want to restore the image, click here to file an un-delete request.
• To opt out of these bot messages, add {{bots|deny=DASHBot}} to your talk page.
• If you believe the bot has made an error, please turn it off here and leave a message on my owner's talk page.

Thank you. DASHBot (talk) 17:47, 1 January 2012 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Dashboard education little motel.JPG

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Dashboard education little motel.JPG. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

PLEASE NOTE:

• I am a bot, and will therefore not be able to answer your questions. If you have a question, place a {{helpme}} template, along with your question, beneath this message.
• I will remove the request for deletion if the file is used in an article once again.
• If you receive this notice after the image is deleted, and you want to restore the image, click here to file an un-delete request.
• To opt out of these bot messages, add {{bots|deny=DASHBot}} to your talk page.
• If you believe the bot has made an error, please turn it off here and leave a message on my owner's talk page.

Thank you. DASHBot (talk) 17:49, 1 January 2012 (UTC)

Non-free rationale for File:No Truth at all.ogg

Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:No Truth at all.ogg. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under non-free content criteria, but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia is acceptable. Please go to the file description page, and edit it to include a non-free rationale.

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified the non-free rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 20:30, 23 August 2012 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free media (File:Fight with tools.jpg)

Thanks for uploading File:Fight with tools.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Hazard-Bot (talk) 04:07, 29 December 2012 (UTC)

File:Ncaa football sparty.jpg listed for deletion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Ncaa football sparty.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. (ESkog)^(Talk) 02:09, 7 June 2013 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Washburn logo.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Washburn logo.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Corkythehornetfan (talk) 05:24, 29 December 2013 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:VAWarpedTour2003Compilation.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:VAWarpedTour2003Compilation.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 18:39, 21 June 2014 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Warped tour 2004.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Warped tour 2004.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 18:40, 21 June 2014 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Cotton hill.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Cotton hill.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 17:37, 3 October 2014 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of With or Without Your Help

The article With or Without Your Help has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No references, no claim of notability, fails WP:NSONG and WP:GNG.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Richhoncho (talk) 22:52, 24 August 2015 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:LoreleiStyx.JPG

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:LoreleiStyx.JPG. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:03, 29 April 2017 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Wild Horses2.JPG

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Wild Horses2.JPG. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:31, 22 December 2017 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Slice of fried gold.JPG

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Slice of fried gold.JPG. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:27, 29 June 2018 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Withorwithout.png

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Withorwithout.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:36, 29 June 2018 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Deeveedee.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Deeveedee.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:46, 11 October 2018 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Walking disaster 2.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Walking disaster 2.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 19:14, 5 November 2018 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of File:Going the distance ost.jpg

The file File:Going the distance ost.jpg has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non-free album cover being used in a decorative manner in Going the Distance (2004 film)#Soundtrack. Non-free album cover art is generally allowed to be used for primary identification purposes in stand-alone articles about albums, but its use in other articles is generally only allowed when the cover art itself is the subject of sourced critical commentary as explained in WP:NFC#cite_note-3 and the context for non-free use required by WP:NFCC#8 is evident. There is no such commentary for this particular album cover anywhere in the article, and the use of soundtrack album cover art in articles about films or TV programs is generally not allowed for this reason as explained in WP:FILMSCORE.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. -- Marchjuly (talk) 10:39, 1 January 2019 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:The Way You Look Tonight (The Lettermen) label.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:The Way You Look Tonight (The Lettermen) label.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 02:50, 16 September 2019 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Noreason.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Noreason.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 02:22, 20 October 2019 (UTC)

File:Joe Delamielleure.jpg listed for discussion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Joe Delamielleure.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. Magog the Ogre (t • c) 03:27, 8 February 2020 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Dandelion Stones.JPG

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Dandelion Stones.JPG. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:18, 11 May 2020 (UTC)

Nomination of Flobots Present... Platypus for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Flobots Present... Platypus is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Flobots Present... Platypus until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Hog Farm _Bacon 21:05, 19 July 2020 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Present Platypus.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Present Platypus.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 02:27, 28 July 2020 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of File:Walking with a ghost.jpg

The file File:Walking with a ghost.jpg has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Walking with a Ghost (EP) merged/redirected to The White Stripes. Cover art no longer used in any article.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

This bot DID NOT nominate any of your contributions for deletion; please refer to the history of each individual page for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 10:01, 22 February 2022 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Walking with a ghost.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Walking with a ghost.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 19:25, 22 February 2022 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:House called awful end.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:House called awful end.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:23, 24 June 2022 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Brown Sugar.JPG

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Brown Sugar.JPG. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:05, 21 November 2022 (UTC)

File source problem with File:Wrhs.gif

Thank you for uploading File:Wrhs.gif. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the page from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of the website's terms of use of its content. If the original copyright holder is a party unaffiliated with the website, that author should also be credited. Please add this information by editing the image description page.

If the necessary information is not added within the next seven days, the image will be deleted. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem.

Please refer to the image use policy to learn what images you can or cannot upload on Wikipedia. Please also check any other files you have uploaded to make sure they are correctly tagged. Here is a list of your uploads. If you have any questions or are in need of assistance please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. ✗plicit 11:24, 6 December 2022 (UTC)

"Mr. Precision" listed at Redirects for discussion

The redirect Mr. Precision has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2023 December 18 § Mr. Precision until a consensus is reached. Steel1943 (talk) 17:29, 18 December 2023 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:Page 44

Template:Page 44 has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. WikiCleanerMan (talk) 16:07, 31 December 2023 (UTC)