Jump to content

User talk:Lummoxxxx

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Welcome!

[edit]

Hello, Lummoxxxx, and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, such as Indian Verbena, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's content policies and may not be retained. In short, the topic of an article must be notable and have already been the subject of publication by reliable and independent sources.

Please review Your first article for an overview of the article creation process. The Article Wizard is available to help you create an article, where it will be reviewed and considered for publication. For information on how to request a new article that can be created by someone else, see Requested articles. If you are stuck, come to the Teahouse, where experienced Wikipedians can help you through the processes.

New to Wikipedia? Please consider taking a look at our introductory tutorial or reviewing the contributing to Wikipedia page to learn the basics about editing. Below are a few other good pages about article creation.

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, ask me on my talk page. You can also type {{help me}} on this page, followed by your question, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome! Onel5969 TT me 14:53, 6 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your contributed article, Indian Verbena

[edit]

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

Hello, I noticed that you recently created a new page, Indian Verbena. First, thank you for your contribution; Wikipedia relies solely on the efforts of volunteers such as you. Unfortunately, the page you created covers a topic on which we already have a page – Verbena. Because of the duplication, your article has been tagged for speedy deletion. Please note that this is not a comment on you personally and we hope you will continue helping to improve Wikipedia. If the topic of the article you created is one that interests you, then perhaps you would like to help out at Verbena. If you have new information to add, you might want to discuss it at the article's talk page.

If you think the article you created should remain separate, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Additionally if you would like to have someone review articles you create before they go live so they are not nominated for deletion shortly after you post them, allow me to suggest the article creation process and using our search feature to find related information we already have in the encyclopedia. Try not to be discouraged. Wikipedia looks forward to your future contributions. Onel5969 TT me 14:53, 6 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Jawan (film), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Atlee. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 06:07, 1 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Lemon Grass

[edit]

Information icon Hello, Lummoxxxx. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Lemon Grass, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 08:02, 29 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Lummoxxxx, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia.

While your contributions are appreciated, I wanted to let you know that I've started a discussion about whether an article that you created, Centenary Memorial Zublee Church, Gumla, should be deleted, as I am not sure that it is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia in its current form. Your comments are welcome at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Centenary Memorial Zublee Church, Gumla.

Deletion discussions usually run for seven days and are not votes. Our guide about effectively contributing to such discussions is worth a read. The most common issue in these discussions is notability, but it's not the only aspect that may be discussed; read the nomination and any other comments carefully before you contribute to the discussion. Last but not least, you are highly encouraged to continue improving the article; just be sure not to remove the tag about the deletion nomination from the top.

If you have any questions, please leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Sohom Datta}}. And don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ . Thanks!

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Sohom (talk) 06:13, 25 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Maliner was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
Maliner (talk) 07:41, 25 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Teahouse logo
Hello, Lummoxxxx! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Maliner (talk) 07:41, 25 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Qcne was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
Qcne (talk) 07:50, 25 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your contributions to St. Ignatius High School Gumla. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it needs more sources to establish notability and you may have a possible Conflict of Interest. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. DoubleGrazing (talk) 10:56, 26 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I have moved this back to drafts, because there is no evidence that the subject is notable. If you publish it again without demonstrating notability, we can no longer it move it to drafts, and it will be proposed for deletion instead. -- DoubleGrazing (talk) 10:58, 26 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Managing a conflict of interest

[edit]

Information icon Hello, Lummoxxxx. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places or things you have written about on the page Draft:St. Ignatius High School Gumla, you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a conflict of interest may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for organizations for more information. We ask that you:

In addition, you are required by the Wikimedia Foundation's terms of use to disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution which forms all or part of work for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation. See Wikipedia:Paid-contribution disclosure.

Also, editing for the purpose of advertising, publicising, or promoting anyone or anything is not permitted. Thank you. DoubleGrazing (talk) 10:59, 26 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by DoubleGrazing was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
DoubleGrazing (talk) 11:14, 26 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not move pending AfC drafts to the main space like you did with Draft:Sun Jia-Qin. You are not an AfC reviewer and should not be clerking pages that are pending review. Uhai (talk) 03:11, 27 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent article submission has been rejected. If you have further questions, you can ask at the Articles for creation help desk or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help. The reason left by DoubleGrazing was: This topic is not sufficiently notable for inclusion in Wikipedia. The comment the reviewer left was: Resubmitted without any improvement. Sources still don't come even close to meeting WP:GNG. Given this, and the multiple earlier declines, I can only assume that better sources are not to be found, and that the subject is therefore inherently non-notable. Rejecting now to avoid further reviewer time being expended on this.
DoubleGrazing (talk) 06:44, 28 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Starfish (2023 film) (October 28)

[edit]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Qcne was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
Qcne (talk) 10:29, 28 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Lemon Grass

[edit]

Hello, Lummoxxxx. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Lemon Grass".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz Read! Talk! 07:07, 29 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Starfish (2023 film) (November 7)

[edit]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Kilaseell was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
Kilaseell - Message me! - 19:51, 7 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: SSC (2023 Series) (November 27)

[edit]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by BuySomeApples was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
BuySomeApples (talk) 11:52, 27 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Linus Pingal Ekka (December 3)

[edit]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Ratnahastin was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
Ratnahastin (talk) 13:42, 3 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Linus Ekka

[edit]

Hello Lummoxxxx, I have reverted your edit on the page List of Catholic bishops of India, because Fr. Ekka is not yet a bishop, he is a bishop-elect or bishop-designate. We will make this change after he receives episcopal ordination and assumes charge of the diocese, which will happen within a few months. I would recommend that you edit the page Linus Pingal Ekka also, to say that he is still a priest and not yet a bishop. Regards, The Discoverer (talk) 13:26, 9 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Vincent Barwa (December 12)

[edit]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by NoobThreePointOh was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
NoobThreePointOh (talk) 11:07, 12 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

request

[edit]

how to publish Manoj Dey page Xzantiyamoloy (talk) 16:12, 19 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I have sent you a note about a page you started

[edit]

Hello, Lummoxxxx. Thank you for your work on Starfish (2023 film). DreamRimmer, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

Please add reception section.

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|DreamRimmer}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

DreamRimmer (talk) 05:04, 7 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

January 2024

[edit]

Information icon Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did at St. Ignatius High School Gumla, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear to be constructive and has been reverted. If you only meant to make a test edit, please use your sandbox for that. Thank you. Significa liberdade (she/her) (talk) 20:53, 20 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Rajiw Satish Toppo (February 1)

[edit]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by KylieTastic was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
KylieTastic (talk) 14:52, 1 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I have sent you a note about a page you started

[edit]

Hello, Lummoxxxx. Thank you for your work on SSC (2023 series). North8000, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

Suggest merging this into SSC. There's no indication of wp:notability of the 2023 series. Also this article has little content. A re3pition of basic SSC info, a paragraph of un-readable gibberish, (how did that manage to stay in?) and then a listing of 4 episodes.

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|North8000}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

North8000 (talk) 20:30, 23 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited St. Ignatius High School Gumla, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Urban.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:04, 28 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

February 2024

[edit]

Copyright problem icon Your edit to St. Ignatius High School Gumla has been removed in whole or in part, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without evidence of permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for more information on uploading your material to Wikipedia. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted material, including text or images from print publications or from other websites, without an appropriate and verifiable license. All such contributions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of content, such as sentences or images—you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously, and persistent violators of our copyright policy will be blocked from editing. See Wikipedia:Copying text from other sources for more information. DanCherek (talk) 00:34, 29 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of St. Ignatius High School Gumla for deletion

[edit]
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article St. Ignatius High School Gumla is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/St. Ignatius High School Gumla until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

StartGrammarTime (talk) 04:50, 17 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

March 2024

[edit]

Information icon Welcome to Wikipedia. Please do not remove Articles for deletion notices from articles, or remove other people's comments in Articles for deletion debates. Otherwise, it may be difficult to create consensus. If you oppose the deletion of an article, please comment at the respective page instead. Thank you. Liz Read! Talk! 04:50, 24 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your contributed article, अगस्तुस एक्का

[edit]

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

Hello, I noticed that you recently created a new page, अगस्तुस एक्का. First, thank you for your contribution; Wikipedia relies solely on the efforts of volunteers such as you. Unfortunately, the page you created covers a topic on which we already have a page – Augastus Ekka. Because of the duplication, your article has been tagged for speedy deletion. Please note that this is not a comment on you personally and we hope you will continue helping to improve Wikipedia. If the topic of the article you created is one that interests you, then perhaps you would like to help out at Augastus Ekka. If you have new information to add, you might want to discuss it at the article's talk page.

If you think the article you created should remain separate, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Additionally if you would like to have someone review articles you create before they go live so they are not nominated for deletion shortly after you post them, allow me to suggest the article creation process and using our search feature to find related information we already have in the encyclopedia. Try not to be discouraged. Wikipedia looks forward to your future contributions. CycloneYoris talk! 04:59, 10 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

April 2024

[edit]

Information icon Hi Lummoxxxx! I noticed that you recently marked an edit as minor that may not have been. "Minor edit" has a very specific definition on Wikipedia—it refers only to superficial edits that could never be the subject of a dispute, such as typo corrections or reverting obvious vandalism. Any edit that changes the meaning of an article is not a minor edit, even if it only concerns a single word. Thank you. Wikishovel (talk) 05:24, 10 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]