User talk:MB/Archive 10

This is an archive of past discussions about User:MB. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page.

Archive 5

←

Archive 8

→

"TWD" listed at Redirects for discussion

A discussion is taking place to address the redirect TWD. The discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2021 April 20#TWD until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. UserTwoSix (talk) 01:50, 20 April 2021 (UTC)

Revert this article

Sir Mr. Smart Lion was created article Chandan Madan this article about actor but this article changed in to cricketer so please revert this article in to actor.

Thanks. ध्रुविल९०१२ (talk) 04:51, 20 April 2021 (UTC)

Please sir revert this article

Thanks. ध्रुविल९०१२ (talk) 05:40, 21 April 2021 (UTC)

I will not revert this article. The article on the actor was redirected to a film they appeared in because the actor failed WP:NACTOR. If you think there should be an article on the actor, and you have several acceptable sources, you can create a different article on the actor. I strongly suggest you use the WP:AFC process. MB 13:21, 21 April 2021 (UTC)

Revert This Article

Sir you have recently reviewed article of Sab Jholmaal Hai so why deleted please revert him. Afsalaltai (talk) 09:23, 25 April 2021 (UTC)

Gülçin Yahya Kaçar

Dear Friend, I accidentally deleted your contribution. Would you please add it again?--Gemalmaz ^ileti 16:58, 25 April 2021 (UTC)

Review article

Please Sir Review this article Chandan Madan Afsalaltai (talk) 13:08, 26 April 2021 (UTC)

Afsalaltai, I have reverted the article to the prior version on the cricket player. You cannot overwrite a article on one subject with a different article. If you believe the article on the actor would meet WP:NACTOR, you should create a new article with the WP:AFC process. You can copy the version on the actor from the edit history. Using AFC will cause it to be reviewed by an editor more familiar with the subject notability requirements. Also, If you are editing while not logged-in, you should not do that. MB 13:26, 26 April 2021 (UTC)

But sir when I go to create article and only created draft not create article please help Afsalaltai (talk) 15:35, 26 April 2021 (UTC)

Afsalaltai, Yes, you will be creating a draft which you can then submit for review. If it is accepted, the reviewer will put it into mainspace with the appropriate title (e.g. Chandan Madan (actor). This is the best way to create an article. MB 15:43, 26 April 2021 (UTC)

But sir this title Chandan Madan (actor) was banned so how to create that. Afsalaltai (talk) 15:46, 26 April 2021 (UTC)

Please sir reverted article sab jholmaal hai Afsalaltai (talk) 15:47, 26 April 2021 (UTC)

Afsalaltai, you can use WP:AFC and create a draft. That is not banned. If the article is successfully reviewed (you will have to provide sources with in-depth independent coverage), it can be accepted. Just use the title "Chandan Madan" and a reviewer will do the rest if it is accepted. MB 15:54, 26 April 2021 (UTC)

OK sir. Sor can wikipedia allow dailyhunt refrences ? Afsalaltai (talk) 15:59, 26 April 2021 (UTC)

Afsalaltai, I have no idea what that is. WP:RS guides on how to determine what is reliable. MB 16:04, 26 April 2021 (UTC)

Ok sir thanks for help me Afsalaltai (talk) 16:06, 26 April 2021 (UTC)

Let it go

Stop trying to delete my pages or images. It's in beta and in progress, so you can't touch it. Let it free. Epic4773 (talk) 18:03, 26 April 2021 (UTC)

Epic4773 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) blocked.

F. H. Gillingham & Sons Page Creation

Are you able to help modify and get page approved for publication? Thank you F. H. Gillingham & Sons — Preceding unsigned comment added by Jsbillin (talk • contribs) 19:05, 26 April 2021 (UTC)

Jsbillin, It really needs more and better sources. Can you find any more coverage in regional or national publications or books. Several of the ones in the article presently do not appear to be independent and should be removed. If there is not enough independent in-depth coverage, then it may not qualify for an article in this encyclopedia. MB 19:38, 26 April 2021 (UTC)

Do these work?
https://www.nytimes.com/1986/08/13/garden/old-and-new-thrive-at-vermont-store.html - yes
https://www.nytimes.com/2007/06/22/travel/escapes/22KIDS.html - no, too minor
http://www.preserveamerica.com/gatekeepers/2003-05/billings.html -maybe - can't tell if this is user supplied content
https://www.woodstockmagazine.com/businesses/vt-woodstock-fh-gillingham-sons-general-store - probably not, directory listing
https://www.thecrazytourist.com/28-hidden-gems-in-vermont/ -probably
https://www.bostonglobe.com/lifestyle/travel/2013/05/14/tank-away-quaint-meets-contemporary-village-woodstock/oXfML0vycsNCem1hctx8AN/story.html - probably, but I couldn't access
https://accd.vermont.gov/sites/accdnew/files/documents/HP/Woodstock%20HD_final%20draft.pdf - yes, already in article
https://wirelesswoodstock.org/shopping/f-h-gillingham-sons/ -no, another listing
https://www.onlyinyourstate.com/vermont/best-little-known-attractions-vt/ -not really, not in-depth
http://www.newenglandist.com/blog/winter-in-woodstock - no again
https://longislandweekly.com/traversing-vermont/ - no
https://www.afar.com/magazine/new-england-road-trip-itineraries-for-any-season no

Jsbillin, many of this are just "passing mentions" which to not count towards establishing notability. But a few look like better sources. You can certainly add these to the article. MB 20:49, 27 April 2021 (UTC)

Jsbillin, here are more.

The last one in particular seems to be more about the business than just mentioning it as an attractions. MB 21:25, 27 April 2021 (UTC)

Thanks for the help. Do I just add these as references? I see the page is in for drafting, but don’t want to mix up the process. Vermont encyclopedia (talk) 23:51, 27 April 2021 (UTC)

Jsbillin, Citations should go inline as refs at the end of sentences or paragraphs. These can be used where appropriate to cite parts of the existing article. If some of these refs are about things not already discussed, the article should be expanded. The better shape it is in when a reviewer gets to it, the more likely it is to pass. MB 23:58, 27 April 2021 (UTC)

Mark Siddall

I didn't want to leave a mess, but I may have, after cleaning up, removing primary references, pruning the linkfarm and removing the namedropping--and CU-blocking three obvious CU account. If you can make this article look any better, that would be great. Thanks, Drmies (talk) 03:12, 30 April 2021 (UTC)

Drmies, well I found the missing refs in old versions and put them back (isn't there a bot that would have done that anyway). As long as the ref names didn't change at sometime, that should be good. I have no connection to this article, I just found it in a maint category and fixed the image syntax. When doing that, I noticed all the EL's and removed them. But I didn't watchlist this one to see if they came back or look into any possible COI, I must have been rushed that day. I'm not planning to do any more here. MB 04:00, 30 April 2021 (UTC)

Editing DMA

Hello, thank you for reviewing some of our modifs on the DMA . Here are a few questions:

Why did you delete the Infobox? Was there something wrong about it? I used this template and it seems appropriate for me.

Why did you change all the 'Commission' into 'commission' as we are speaking about the institution and it seems that it needs to keep a capital letter.

Thank you!

Selas97 (talk) 15:01, 29 April 2021 (UTC)

Selas97, The infobox was removed by mistake, I have restored it. As said in the edit summary, I meant to remove just the hatnote because DMA does NOT redirect to the article and no one will wind up there by entering that term so they do not need to be directed elsewhere. WP only capitalizes proper names - see MOS:CAPS. MB 15:13, 29 April 2021 (UTC)

Thank you! Selas97 (talk) 14:39, 30 April 2021 (UTC)

re: Osprey

Hi, not sure why you believe my hatnotes were in error? These terms redirect to the article. 162 etc. (talk) 00:23, 6 May 2021 (UTC)

162 etc., Because after you added the hatnotes, the article was in Category:Missing redirects which means a hatnote did not actually redirect to the article. On closer inspection, Fish hawk does redirect, but not Fish Hawk that you added. I've fixed it now. MB 00:34, 6 May 2021 (UTC)

Thank you for reviewing and restoring. 162 etc. (talk) 00:38, 6 May 2021 (UTC)

Pah

This is the exact opposite of what it is. Are you sure you are up to this? Johnbod (talk) 02:20, 8 May 2021 (UTC)

"KWDR (FM)" listed at Redirects for discussion

A discussion is taking place to address the redirect KWDR (FM). The discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2021 May 13#KWDR (FM) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Mlaffs (talk) 21:07, 13 May 2021 (UTC)

Schools at War

Happens that i'm just developing about a Two-room school, the Draft:Daniels School in Weld County, Colorado, whose students participated in the "Jeep Campaign" within the U.S. Treasury's Schools at War (currently a redlink) program. See Draft:Schools at War. Seems like a great DYK topic, with a section about the Jeep campaign and/or a split-out article about that. The Daniels School's campaign was for $900 for a jeep, presumably before price got raised to $1,150 in the poster. I'd be happy if you wanted to co-develop. --Doncram (talk) 00:34, 25 April 2021 (UTC) P.S. That might have been the first Jeep campaign / Jeep Campaign, but searching on that yields others since: check out amazing commercial in India. --Doncram (talk) 00:41, 25 April 2021 (UTC)

Doncram, does seem interesting. I'd like to work on it. I found this document, but I can't access it through my regular free jstor account. Do you have any college library account to access this? MB 01:30, 25 April 2021 (UTC)

Hi, good, yes, it seems like a pretty significant omission in Wikipedia so far, or a pretty good addition to make, depending on your perspective. I don't currently have jstor access, but it's a good excuse to contact someone I know to try to get it, will try in the next day or two. That article looks spot-on. --Doncram (talk) 04:20, 26 April 2021 (UTC)

Doncram, After a detour to St. Paul, I got back to this and finished it up. MB 01:40, 17 May 2021 (UTC)

Land Utilization Program

This is another gap worth filling, also comes up from working on a Colorado NRHP, Draft:Land Utilization Program Headquarters, where i find I can't easily explain what should exist in a main article on the topic. Land Utilization Program is currently a redlink. It is mentioned and there are multiple sources at National Resources Board of 1934. Save until after Schools at War i suppose. --Doncram (talk) 05:10, 27 April 2021 (UTC)

Doncram, yes it will have to wait. I found the Abbott labs connection to S-at-W, it's in the article now. MB 05:34, 27 April 2021 (UTC)

Current Event tag on Google I/O

Hi MB, you reverted my edits on Google I/O because the tag was incorrect, however the event was (and is) still ongoing. I left a comment in there to explain that this was not a full list and I (or anyone else) could add onto that, I was just looking for reliable sources, so sorry for any confusion. Happy editing -- LemonSlushie 🍋 (talk) (edits) 21:50, 18 May 2021 (UTC)

LemonSlushie, that template is used on current events like an airplane crash where the article is being updated frequently as new information becomes available (e.g. latest news reports). It sounds like you just needed a standard update tag - which I have just added. Also, these kinds of template take a date in the format |date=May 2021. MB 22:00, 18 May 2021 (UTC)

Yeah, that seems to be what I needed, thanks! -- LemonSlushie 🍋 (talk) (edits) 22:03, 18 May 2021 (UTC)

Review this Article

Sir Review this article The Honey Bunny Show With Kapil Sharma Drewdramfir (talk) 16:07, 20 May 2021 (UTC)

It is in the queue and a reviewer with knowledge of this subject area will eventually review it. MB 16:18, 20 May 2021 (UTC)

Review this article

Please Sir review this article Alif Laila (2020 TV series)

Review Satyadeo Prasad Singh (talk) 07:30, 21 May 2021 (UTC)

Biological organisation

Hi there. I saw that you reverted my changing of the spelling in biological organisation article, citing MOS:RETAIN and broken direct hatnotes. I concede the hatnotes. However, the title of the article itself is written in British English and the language banner on the article's talk page states that British English is established variety for that article. Thus, going by MOS:RETAIN, British English should be language variety used in that article. Just to be clear, I myself use US English and so this has nothing to do with my personal preference. But I think consistency is important and I wanted to clarify this with you first before bringing it up on the article's talk page. danielkueh (talk) 18:17, 21 May 2021 (UTC)

Danielkueh, I was just cleaning out the broken redirects category and probably should have looked at this one more closely. It seemed that the US spelling had been there for years. Since the title has British spelling, it does make sense that the article matches (assuming the title has been stable). MB 18:23, 21 May 2021 (UTC)

MB, got it. I thought that might be the case (broken redirects), but wanted to confirm with you first. From what I can see, the title has been in use since 2006. I will go ahead and make the appropriate changes but leave redirects alone. Thanks for the clarification. danielkueh (talk) 18:26, 21 May 2021 (UTC)

Alt tag became less specific for Bear Gulch Reservoir

Hi I'm wondering why you removed the more specific wording to reference a reservoir being at the location in the alt text for Bear Gulch Reservoir as seen [1]. It would seem to be more useful to explicitly state especially for screenreader users and those not loading the images a more specific context of the image such as "Location of Bear Gulch Reservoir in California." rather than removing the reference to the infobox object being located in the image. The alt text and caption should be able to stand independent of the context of the infobox title due to these being elements to help when the image is not loaded or using accessibility tools. Am I missing something in your fix or highlighting an oversight? Wolfgang8741 says: If not you, then who? (talk) 01:46, 26 May 2021 (UTC)

The map had no caption, so I added one. This is a very standard caption used on thousands of article. The title of the article includes "Reservoir", as well as the name at the top of the infobox. So restating that it is a reservoir again in the caption is redundant. Infoboxes are supposed to convey important information "at a glance", they should never repeat things unnecessarily. I removed it from the alt_map_caption for the same reason. Wouldn't a screenreader already have read the title of the article and then repeated it when reading the name at the first line of the infobox? MB 02:15, 26 May 2021 (UTC)

"North Rim" listed at Redirects for discussion

A discussion is taking place to address the redirect North Rim. The discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2021 May 30#South Rim until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Mdewman6 (talk) 00:29, 30 May 2021 (UTC)

Nationality in Infobox

Why did you call it redundant? A lot of other YouTuber personalities have it listed as well; the whole point of a infobox is to give a quick glance of specific items otherwise all of it is redundant. This is of course related to recent edit in Akidearest --WashuOtaku (talk) 22:08, 29 May 2021 (UTC)

Washuotaku, this is explained in WP:INFONAT. Nationality is used when it is different than the country of birth. There is no need to say that someone born in California is an American. MB 23:48, 29 May 2021 (UTC)

Follow-up, so for example The Anime Man has both Austrailia and Japan as Nationality, but reading the WP:INFONAT, the Citizenship field should be used instead because he's dual-citizen? I am also working on Draft:Gigguk and he was born in England, but wouldn't I use British as nationality because it is not straight forward? I want to make sure I am doing these correctly since I am outside my comfort zone of doing mostly highway articles. --WashuOtaku (talk) 00:04, 30 May 2021 (UTC)

Washuotaku, The Anime Man looks correct. Citizenship and Nationality are usually the same, so just use Nationality, except in rare cases when someone is a national but not a citizen (and this would need to be explained in the article). For Draft:Gigguk, I would not include nationality at all because it still corresponds to birth_place. He was born in England and his nationality is English/British/UK. There really isn't consensus to say birthplace is "England", or "England, UK". I would leave the birth_place as England and remove nationality to keep the infobox to the most important things. MB 00:20, 30 May 2021 (UTC)

Thank you for your explanation. I recently taken over editing on Draft:Gigguk, hopefully I can make the article better than just a copy/paste from Wikitubia. --WashuOtaku (talk) 00:35, 30 May 2021 (UTC)

Please help review my newly expanded article: Gourd mouth organ

Hello there, I'm currently working on expanding the article Gourd mouth organ as a part of my university unit. Can you please help me improve my article by giving any feedback, advice or assessment? Thank you very much! And hope you have a lovely day. Ryssian (talk) 11:31, 31 May 2021 (UTC)

DYK for Gravel Place, Pennsylvania

On 2 June 2021, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Gravel Place, Pennsylvania, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that the Delaware, Lackawanna and Western once stockpiled 15,000 train cars of coal at Gravel Place, Pennsylvania, to be able to operate through a miners' strike? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Gravel Place, Pennsylvania. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Gravel Place, Pennsylvania), and if they received a combined total of at least 416.7 views per hour (i.e., 5,000 views in 12 hours or 10,000 in 24), the hook may be added to the statistics page. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

— Amakuru (talk) 12:03, 2 June 2021 (UTC)

Sorry

My edit summary reverting one of your recent edits was unnecessarily snappy. Thanks for your attention to detail, work, and apologies. Best, Eddie891 ^Talk _Work 01:28, 4 June 2021 (UTC)

Eddie891, no problem. I just created Francisco Múgica (disambiguation). Do you know if Francisco Mugica should redirect to the Mexican general? Or if there is no Primary Target, the dab is best target. MB 01:34, 4 June 2021 (UTC)

I rather think the general is the primary topic— definitely over the cyclist and architect (I’ve searched them) and I suspect the filmmaker based on the quality of articles in en and es, though that isn’t a foolproof method. Cheers, Eddie891 ^Talk _Work 01:38, 4 June 2021 (UTC)

DYK for The Saint Paul Hotel

On 4 June 2021, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article The Saint Paul Hotel, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that when The Saint Paul Hotel was built in 1908–1910, a rathskeller was carved into the sandstone beneath the building? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/The Saint Paul Hotel. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, The Saint Paul Hotel), and if they received a combined total of at least 416.7 views per hour (i.e., 5,000 views in 12 hours or 10,000 in 24), the hook may be added to the statistics page. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

Cwmhiraeth (talk) 12:02, 4 June 2021 (UTC)

New to Wikipedia

Hello MB. I m here new to Wikipedia creation of pages. Would you guide me some basic ? Vinothcj (talk) 01:47, 3 June 2021 (UTC)

Vinothcj, that is a very general question. Have your looked at WP:YFA? MB 01:51, 3 June 2021 (UTC)

MB, Appreciate your response. I went through the page you had tagged above. But please guide me how to upload an image with a fair usage policy. Tried understanding from various articles. But could not understand.

Vinothcj, I am not an expert in this area. Have you looked at WP:FUR? If you need further help, I would suggest asking at WP:TEAHOUSE. MB 17:56, 3 June 2021 (UTC)

MB, Can you please check and review this article? Ravikumar Rajendran

Note: article G11'ed. MB 16:34, 4 June 2021 (UTC)

Edit

Why did you edit my change? It is clear $2 billion in the 1940s is worth $28 Billon not Trilion in 2021 values. (See this link to a US inflation calculator https://www.usinflationcalculator.com/inflation/consumer-price-index-and-annual-percent-changes-from-1913-to-2008/) Ar558a (talk) 22:08, 6 June 2021 (UTC)

That was a mistake. I put back your edit a few minutes later. You apparently did not check the edit history. MB 22:18, 6 June 2021 (UTC)

DYK for Schools at War

On 6 June 2021, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Schools at War, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that the American Schools at War program (promotional poster pictured) raised over $2 billion (over $28 trillion today) to help pay for World War II? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Schools at War. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Schools at War), and if they received a combined total of at least 416.7 views per hour (i.e., 5,000 views in 12 hours or 10,000 in 24), the hook may be added to the statistics page. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

— Amakuru (talk) 00:02, 6 June 2021 (UTC)

And it is the leading item in the DYK section at the Wikipedia mainpage right now, and is displayed with the Schools at War poster here. It all looks great; I do hope many persons come read the article. Thank you for bringing it along so far and including me in the DYK, for this and for The Saint Paul Hotel DYK, too. --Doncram (talk) 00:23, 6 June 2021 (UTC)

Doncram, well the numbers are in. I'm a bit disappointed, it got just over 5,000 views which is good, but I was expecting more. It didn't help that it ran 8pm/5pm to 8am/5am Eastern/Pacific instead of during the day. See my list of most viewed - Baker City Hotel had over 3x (in 24 hours) but doesn't strike me as particularly interesting. You just never can predict. At least we have an article on this now which is of course more important. MB 16:38, 7 June 2021 (UTC)

DYK for Saint John's Methodist Episcopal Church (Kingman, Arizona)

On 11 June 2021, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Saint John's Methodist Episcopal Church (Kingman, Arizona), which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that Clark Gable and Carole Lombard were married at Saint John's Methodist Episcopal Church after eloping in 1939? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Saint John's Methodist Episcopal Church (Kingman, Arizona). You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Saint John's Methodist Episcopal Church (Kingman, Arizona)), and if they received a combined total of at least 416.7 views per hour (i.e., 5,000 views in 12 hours or 10,000 in 24), the hook may be added to the statistics page. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

— Amakuru (talk) 12:02, 11 June 2021 (UTC)

Lead images

I noticed that you removed the composer's image from all of Daron Hagen's operas with the edit summary, "rmv images not of subject from infobox" and "MOS:LEADIMAGE, image should be of the subject - a poster or advertisement of the opera, not the composer". 1) MOS:LEADIMAGE does not prescribe a lead image in the detail you assert ("poster or advertisement of the opera"). 2) There are hundreds of opera articles that show the composer's image, which is fully in line with MOS:LEAD. 3) I've been editing opera articles here for 15 years, and I've never seen anyone proposing a guideline similar to your edit summary, nor have I ever encountered an editor who removed a composer's image from an opera article. I suggest you restore the image in all those instances where you removed them from opera pages. -- Michael Bednarek (talk) 00:54, 13 June 2021 (UTC)

If there are other article on operas with images of the composer then they should be removed also. Operas are no different that other works of art, e.g. TV shows, books, movies, sculptures, paintings, etc. I have never seen one of this with an image of any person associated with the work. They commonly contain an image of a logo, book cover, title card, the artwork itself, etc. MOS:LEADIMAGE says the images should "representations of the topic". I don't see that the composer is a representation of the topic. MB 01:01, 13 June 2021 (UTC)

Can Banned this Article

Hi MB Sir I ask question

Can Honey Bunny Ka Jholmaal Article is a Banned on Wikipedia please answer Beryndey (talk) 06:20, 13 June 2021 (UTC)

Review Article

Hi MB sir I have created Honey Bunny In Bank Robbery article please review my article. Beryndey (talk) 07:43, 16 June 2021 (UTC)

Please Sir Review my article

Help with COI tag

Hi MB! You had looked into my very first article Janaka_Ratnayake, published today and marked with a COI tag. It must be a misunderstanding so I just wanted to know what put this article into that category? I'm new to this and I'm planning on doing a few articles on most of the businessmen and businesswomen that aren't given the spotlight especially for their contributions to Sri Lanka specifically. It is just my way of helping Sri Lanka stand out globally. Would really appreciate your input and your approval. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Wikilahara (talk • contribs) 17:16, 15 June 2021 (UTC)

Wikilahara, I placed the COI tag because you have made no other edits to other articles and because some of the article sounds promotional. These are common indications that the article was written by someone with a COI who is trying to promote someone or something. To improve the article, you should add citations to every paragraph that has none. And more importantly, you should remove everything that is not purely neutral/factual. Things like "He gained a wealth of experience and exposure" should not be written in Wikipedia's voice. That sounds like it was written by someone trying to promote this person. It is fine to write articles on topics that are notable (per the Wikipedia meaning of that), but not to "help Sri Lanka stand out globally". All articles must be neutral. If you have not read WP:WBA and WP:NPOV, you should be familiar with them. MB 20:40, 15 June 2021 (UTC)

Hi MB! Thank you for your valuable advice. I’ve made the edits, I think it’s good to go. Can you let me know please cheers! Wikilahara (talk) 15:02, 16 June 2021 (UTC)

Wikilahara, it looks much better now. I removed the tags and did some other minor cleanup. MB 21:43, 18 June 2021 (UTC)

Thanks MB! Appreciate the quick response and all your support! Wikilahara (talk) 08:52, 19 June 2021 (UTC)

Help Review an article

Good day Mr MB I hope you're doing ok Please help review this article Delta State University Of Science And Technology Ozoro Idoghor Melody (talk) 04:34, 20 June 2021 (UTC)

Independent sources

Steg steg, A source that begins "Rudy Silla, our father" is obviously not independent of Rudy Silla. Please take a look at Wikipedia:Independent sources. Also, most routine communication like this should be done on Wikipedia via talk pages like this, not email. MB 03:29, 22 June 2021 (UTC)

User of strikethrough on Candidates of the 44th Canadian federal election

Hi there.

From what I read on the WP:NOSTRIKE template page, the use of the template may be incorrect in this case. Strikethrough doesn't fall under WP:NOSTRIKE and is being used on the page for intuitive markup of withdrawn or rejected candidates/contestants. There's certainly nothing on the template page restricting use of strikethrough to Talk pages. G. Timothy Walton (talk) 18:14, 25 June 2021 (UTC)

G. Timothy Walton, I don't follow your comment. WP:NOSTRIKE is a guideline, part of the MOS. It specifically says Since strikethrough is normally ignored by screen readers, its rare use in articles (e.g., to show changes in a textual analysis) will cause accessibility problems and outright confusion if it is the only indication used .

Since it is ignored by screenreaders, the text will be read like normal text and the meaning will not be conveyed. Strikethrough does fall under WP:NOSTRIKE, that is exactly what it is about. It should not be used. MB 20:14, 25 June 2021 (UTC)

G. Timothy Walton Ah, I didn't notice that, if it was mentioned on the WP:NOSTRIKE page. Can you recommend something that would be noticed by screenreaders but not give the wrong impression to regular users? G. Timothy Walton (talk) 20:46, 25 June 2021 (UTC)

G. Timothy Walton, Screenreaders just read regular text. You could put a note after every one, or maybe remove them all from the table and make a new section listing candidates that withdrew before the election. MB 02:07, 26 June 2021 (UTC)

Hello - Draft review - short

Hello! I am quite new to Wikipedia (only about 12 edits) and I wrote my first article today. Would you mind reviewing it? Draft:Anne Lequy. I'd be really pleased. Also, the article is quite short and I included many citations (some of them are in german but this should be okay). I really took a lot of time to make this draft, so it turned out quite good (I think). I would love to hear your suggestions for improvement. Lmqay (talk) 17:20, 27 June 2021 (UTC)

NRHP infobox at Barnard Observatory

I recently saw you overhaul and improve an NRHP infobox and I was wondering whether you could do the same to the NHRP infobox at Barnard Observatory. (I have no idea how to do it myself.) Thanks! ~ HAL333 20:46, 27 June 2021 (UTC)

HAL333, done. It didn't need much. Since the observatory infobox was "primary", I mostly just removed parameters from the NRHP infobox that were duplicates. Only need one map, coords once, etc. MB 03:25, 28 June 2021 (UTC)

Much appreciated. ~ HAL333 03:50, 28 June 2021 (UTC)

Article Discussion

Hi, I hope you are having the best time of your like. I am honored to invite you to the following discussion. Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nick DiGiovanni its a Article i created. Thanks Brascoian ^{(talk to me)} 15:01, 30 June 2021 (UTC)

Jewish Museum of Florence

Moin, references already added yesterday, and the article is now mentioned through the excerpt tag in the main article of the Great Synagogue of Florence. Cheers. --Virum Mundi (talk) 06:57, 1 July 2021 (UTC)

A cup of tea for you, with my thanks!

Thanks for contributing to the quality of my draft - today is its birthday as a Wikipedia page!

ProfessorKaiFlai (talk) 09:54, 10 July 2021 (UTC)

External links removed on Miccosukee Land Co-op

Hi MB, I had an observation about the Miccosukee Land Co-op. You simply removed the external links, but it looks like an inexperienced editor was putting those in as an attempt at citations. Would it have not been better to convert them to footnotes, especially since inline footnotes were identified as an issue by the {{No footnotes}} hatnote? I can care for retrofitting the deleted external links as ref/citations, but going forward, please consider converting such external links to footnotes where appropriate. Peaceray (talk) 19:02, 11 July 2021 (UTC)

Thanks for the hatnote fix on the WH Merritt article!

I didn't think the previous version was right, but I didn't know what to replace it with. Thanks for that! Mr Serjeant Buzfuz (talk) 03:47, 13 July 2021 (UTC)

Your revert

First, a century is definitely not an "era". The infobox is badly at fault in not warning users against entering a century.

Second, centuries are not linked.

So I'll go back in a few days and remove it again, unless you have a solution for these problems. Tony (talk) 01:03, 22 July 2021 (UTC)

Tony1, link please. I'm not sure what this is about. MB 01:06, 22 July 2021 (UTC)

Sorry: diff. And sorry also about the errant question-mark symbol you had to remove. Tony (talk) 01:09, 22 July 2021 (UTC)

Tony1, I was drawn to the article because the errant question-mark symbol was causing problems. I reverted the edit primarily because of that. I don't have a strong opinion on usage of |era=. The template says:" , and gives one example of "|era = New Imperialism/WWI". I'm not sure why a century might not be the best "era" in some cases. It appears in the infobox after the heading: "Historical era:" and seems appropriate in this article. I you leave it blank, the ibox heading becomes "History" which looks fine too. This template is quite convoluted and poorly documents. I don't see why you say century is not an era; an era is some period of time which could be a century. And I did not link it. MB 01:28, 22 July 2021 (UTC)

Thanks, MB. Tony (talk) 01:31, 22 July 2021 (UTC)

Kim Jung-soo (baseball)

Hi, MB. I have a question. Why did you redirect from Kim Jung-soo (baseball) to Kia Tigers? Sawol (talk) 13:30, 24 July 2021 (UTC)

Sawol (talk · contribs), I was fixing a incorrect link in Korean Series Most Valuable Player Award. This article says he was the MVP and played on the Haitai Tigers which is now the Kia Tigers. Since there is no article on the player, I redirected this link to the his team. His name is listed there in the middle of the history section.

Also, you removed three valid entries from the dab page Kim Jeong-su without an edit summary or any explanation. Why did you do that? MB 16:15, 24 July 2021 (UTC)

Template:Infobox engineer

Hi MB, your recent edit to Template:Infobox engineer seemed to have broken something, resulting in {{{website}}} always being visible. I've reverted it for now, but you might want to re-attempt whatever you were trying to do. Cheers, Jr8825 • Talk 00:25, 25 July 2021 (UTC)

Jr8825, minor syntax error. All fixed now. Thanks for letting me know. MB 01:42, 25 July 2021 (UTC)

AWB

re. the infobox picture at Ye Choirs of New Jerusalem: please take care that your AWB edits do not impact such situations - I don't know if this is used on other pages, and I haven't seen it on any on my watchlist yet beside this one, but it's likely not helpful anywhere... RandomCanadian (talk / contribs) 03:03, 25 July 2021 (UTC)

A humble request for a page rename

Hello. I would sincerely request you to move a page tilt. It is "Consulate General of Russia in Chennai". I want to get it renamed it to "Consulate General of Russia, Chennai. (that is, replace the "Russia in Chennai" to "Russia, Chennai". I tried doing it, but the device broke down while the moving. Please do this small taks.

The reason I am asking this, is that all pages regarding the consulates especially in India and states have comma (",") instead of "in". Please do this. Utkarsh555 (talk) 15:26, 27 July 2021 (UTC)

Utkarsh555, I can't do this move because there is already a redirect at Consulate General of Russia, Chennai. I put in a technical move request at WP:RM. You could have done that also. MB 03:35, 28 July 2021 (UTC)

Oh thank you so much!

Utkarsh555 (talk) 15:15, 28 July 2021 (UTC)

Phoenix, Arizona Reassessment

Phoenix, Arizona, an article that you or your project may be interested in, has been nominated for an individual good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the reassessment page. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. --Whiteguru (talk) 10:45, 1 August 2021 (UTC)

List of human-caused disasters in South Korea

I see you made an edit to this list. Few have. I come to you seeking advice. The article was entitled **List of manmade disasters in Korea.** Now for some reason an editor wishes the use of "human-caused," saying the more-common term excludes women. I do not see this in the style guide. But then again, I am a poor writer. Can you join us on the talk page for this article? --PaulinSaudi (talk) 17:08, 1 August 2021 (UTC)

Mariam Sheikhalizadeh

salam man admin maryam hastam lotfan etelaat ra pak nakonid

please respect to my edit iam maryam sheikhalizadeh social media admin why you are remove information whats your problem respect to maryam

MOHA2000MOHA, refer to the information on your own talk page. MB 17:51, 5 August 2021 (UTC)

List of minor DC Comics characters merger

Hi MB,

I just pinged you in on the discussion page for this article so that you may be able to discuss with that other user if needed. I'll let you guys take it from there.
--WuTang94 (talk) 18:00, 21 August 2021 (UTC)

Help on Christina Anna Skytte

Hi! Thank you for helping me with Christina Anna Skytte! I'm editing on phone right now so it was a bit hard lol. Demotasi (talk) 22:11, 22 August 2021 (UTC)

Jim Brown

Thank you for your assistance in Jim Brown (author). Your improvements help me understand how to make articles better and more inline with standards! CaliBuds (talk) 11:15, 27 August 2021 (UTC)

CjayQ

I believe you've unintentionally created CjayQ after I moved it to draftspace due to the creator having an apparent conflict of interest. Just to let you know. Sdrqaz (talk) 21:34, 29 August 2021 (UTC)

Sdrqaz, Thanks, I did some cleanup and tagged it as BLP PROD. I didn't notice anything unusual like an edit conflict. Not sure what happened, but I was definitely not trying to recreate it in mainspace. MB 22:11, 29 August 2021 (UTC)

Strange stuff. Anthony Appleyard has now performed a history merge, so we're all good. Thanks for your work. Sdrqaz (talk) 22:39, 29 August 2021 (UTC)

Edit conflict on Elk Grove station

Thanks for your help on Elk Grove station. I added coordinates for the proposed station and made some other additions. Eastmain (talk • contribs) 19:51, 4 September 2021 (UTC)

DYK for Chevelon Creek Bridge

On 9 September 2021, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Chevelon Creek Bridge, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that the Chevelon Creek Bridge, built in Arizona in 1912–1913, was part of one of America's first national highways? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Chevelon Creek Bridge. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Chevelon Creek Bridge), and if they received a combined total of at least 416.7 views per hour (i.e., 5,000 views in 12 hours or 10,000 in 24), the hook may be added to the statistics page. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

—valereee (talk) 00:02, 9 September 2021 (UTC)

char template and redirects

Re your edit note at Bullet (typography), am I correct to assume that {{code}} has the same undesirable effect as {{char}}? (For such tiny glyphs, we really do need to 'frame' them in someway because they are rather difficult to see otherwise.) --John Maynard Friedman (talk) 15:59, 9 September 2021 (UTC)

John Maynard Friedman, I would expect so. I agree that "framing" is helpful. I think just using {{hatnote}} is the best way to handle this since this is such a rare situation. The {{redirect}} template could be coded to recognize this special case, but I don't think it makes sense to do that for such a small "edge case" on a template used so frequently. MB 16:11, 9 September 2021 (UTC)

i thought so, good to have it confirmed, thanks. --John Maynard Friedman (talk) 18:27, 9 September 2021 (UTC)

New Page Patrol newsletter September 2021

Hello MB,

Please join this discussion - there is increase in the abuse of Wikipedia and its processes by POV pushers, Paid Editors, and by holders of various user rights including Autopatrolled. Even our review systems themselves at AfC and NPR have been infiltrated. The good news is that detection is improving, but the downside is that it creates the need for a huge clean up - which of course adds to backlogs.

Copyright violations are also a serious issue. Most non-regular contributors do not understand why, and most of our Reviewers are not experts on copyright law - and can't be expected to be, but there is excellent, easy-to-follow advice on COPYVIO detection here.

At the time of the last newsletter (#25, December 2020) the backlog was only just over 2,000 articles. New Page Review is an official system. It's the only firewall against the inclusion of new, improper pages.

There are currently 706 New Page Reviewers plus a further 1,080 admins, but as much as nearly 90% of the patrolling is still being done by around only the 20 or so most regular patrollers.

If you are no longer very active on Wikipedia or you no longer wish to be part of the New Page Reviewer user group, please consider asking any admin to remove you from the list. This will enable NPP to have a better overview of its performance and what improvements need to be made to the process or its software.

Various awards are due to be allocated by the end of the year and barnstars are overdue. If you would like to manage this, please let us know. Indeed, if you are interested in coordinating NPR, it does not involve much time and the tasks are described here.

To opt-out of future mailings, please remove yourself here. Sent to 827 users. 04:32, 16 September 2021 (UTC)

Your mfd noms

Look I get that mfd is a bit of a confusing place for those who are new. The PAGs that govern mfd are in many ways different from afd, and somewhat more esoteric. It's clear to me that you're acting in good faith, but abandoned draft is not on it's own a reason for deletion at mfd see WP:STALEDRAFT. That means that all of your noms are arguably eligible for speedy keep under WP:SK#1; for that reason I suggest you withdraw them all to save the time of your fellow contributors. As a cautionary note, to this point the level of disruption is relatively minor, but if you repeat this pattern of behaviour you will eventually find yourself explaining things to an exasperated crowd at ANI, not exactly a pleasant experience. I would also suggest seeking guidance from some of the mfd regulars if your interested in expanding your participation in that area, and we could definitely use the help. I'm around somewhat irregularly, and this is a shared IP anyway (albeit one that's somewhat unlikely to be used by other fluent speakers of english), so while I can provide a bit of assistance, I think you're best seeking guidance from a more active contributor if interested. Regards, 81.177.3.8 (talk) 18:26, 17 September 2021 (UTC)

Motograter

What do you mean Pre-Release doesn't exist? Click it or search the term in en.wikipedia.org and I get taken to a page about a heavy metal band from the '90s. What happens for you? --Wikisian (talk) 04:15, 25 September 2021 (UTC)

Wikisian, now I see the confusion. Pre-Release exists. But what you put in the hatnote was Pre-release (lower case "r"). The search box doesn't make a distinction, but the hatnote error checking code does. The hatnote will work if you put it back with Pre-Release. MB 04:19, 25 September 2021 (UTC)

I'm not sure what you mean "the hatnote will work if..." The purpose of the hatnote is to inform the reader about why they might have landed on a page they didn't expect, and offer a link to what they might be looking for. The hatnote I included does that. As you admit, Wikipedia search automatically sends uncapitalized terms to their capitalized counterparts, so the redirect exists, and anyone who searches for the term "pre-release" (regardless of capitalization) ends up at the Motograter article. Again, feel free to check this. I find it odd you would go so far as to continuously undo constructive edits without even checking them. If you truly think it's "unconstructive" to disambiguate a term mostly used in computing from an obscure redirect to a heavy metal band due to an even more obscure EP they made, then I'll happily change the redirect to the software release cycle article, which is where it is probably most appropriate anyway. --Wikisian (talk) 05:32, 25 September 2021 (UTC)

Wikisian, What I meant by "the hatnote will work if..." is that the hatnote will not cause the article to be listed in Category:Missing redirects if it contains the actual redirect Pre-Release instead of Pre-release. Pre-release does NOT exist, that it why it is a redlink here. You seem to be missing this. The search box does get you there anyway, but Pre-release does not exist, therefore the hatnote software says there is a problem. I was not making any evaluation on your choice of a target. I went ahead and put the hatnote back with the correct capitalization to eliminate the error. MB 14:14, 25 September 2021 (UTC)

Draft check

Hey MB can you check an draft Draft:Kolkatar Harry and make decision as per wiki guidelines coz you have more experience in this. 2409:4060:2E97:889E:1897:1F6B:F9C2:BD0 (talk) 21:31, 25 September 2021 (UTC)

You will have to wait for someone who works in AFC to look at this draft. I know little about this subject area. MB 21:35, 25 September 2021 (UTC)

Mulayam Singh Chaudhary Mai Mai

Mulayam Singh Chaudhary Mai Mai am going back from facebook follow through christ jesus name changes tomorrow morning long story telling myself my 2409:4053:E97:2445:0:0:1C4A:E401 (talk) 20:51, 24 December 2021 (UTC)