User talk:Sathraho

Recent edit to Malda Zilla School

Hello, and thank you for your recent contribution. I appreciate the effort you made for our project, but unfortunately I had to undo your edit because I believe the article was better before you made that change. Feel free to contact me directly if you have any questions. Thank you! ^{Babymissfortune} 03:20, 29 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Ok MCJDept (talk) 09:01, 29 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

January 2020

Welcome to Wikipedia. I noticed that your username, "MCJDept", may not meet Wikipedia's username policy because it seems to be the name of an organization. If you believe that your username does not violate our policy, please leave a note here explaining why. As an alternative, you may ask for a change of username by completing the form at Special:GlobalRenameRequest, or you may simply create a new account for editing. Thank you. 331dot (talk) 17:05, 16 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia:WikiProject Asia/The 10,000 Challenge

Your articles are welcome! Hope you're well!♦ Dr. Blofeld 18:23, 30 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I m well. Sathraho (talk) 19:35, 30 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for February 1

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Old Malda Municipality, Malda, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Revolutionary Socialist Party and IND (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 15:37, 1 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of West Bengal Commission for Women

Hello Sathraho,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged West Bengal Commission for Women for deletion, because it seems to be copied from another source, probably infringing copyright.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to rewrite it in your own words, you can contest this deletion, but don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Thanks!

Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Csgir (talk) 04:32, 10 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of West Bengal Commission for Women

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on West Bengal Commission for Women requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be an unambiguous copyright infringement. This page appears to be a direct copy from http://wbcdwdsw.gov.in/User/wings_wbcfw. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images taken from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites or other printed material as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to use it for any reason — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. The same holds if you are not the owner but have their permission. If you are not the owner and do not have permission, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for how you may obtain it. You might want to look at Wikipedia's copyright policy for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. ❯❯❯ S A H A 08:25, 10 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

February 2020

Your addition to West Bengal Commission for Women has been removed in whole or in part, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without evidence of permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for more information on uploading your material to Wikipedia. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted material, including text or images from print publications or from other websites, without an appropriate and verifiable license. All such contributions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of content, such as sentences or images—you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously and persistent violators of our copyright policy will be blocked from editing. See Wikipedia:Copying text from other sources for more information. ❯❯❯ S A H A 12:29, 10 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome!

Hello, Sathraho, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions, especially your edits to West Bengal Commission for Women. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:

You may also want to complete the Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Wikipedia. You can visit the Teahouse to ask questions or seek help.

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask for help on your talk page, and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome! ❯❯❯ S A H A 12:43, 10 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Ok thanks 😊 Sathraho (talk) 12:52, 10 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Naghma Sahar

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Naghma Sahar, requesting that it be deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under two or more of the criteria for speedy deletion, by which pages can be deleted at any time, without discussion. If the page meets any of these strictly-defined criteria, then it may soon be deleted by an administrator. The reasons it has been tagged are:

It appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion discussion, such as at articles for deletion. (See section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) If a page has substantially identical content to that of a page deleted after debate, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.
It appears to be about a person, organization (band, club, company, etc.), individual animal, or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. (See section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) Such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. -- φ OnePt618^Talk φ 07:35, 11 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for February 11

An automated process has detected that you recently added links to disambiguation pages.

Department of School Education (West Bengal) (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Salt Lake

West Bengal Commission for Women (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Member

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 16:17, 11 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Anjilee Istwal for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Anjilee Istwal is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Anjilee Istwal until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Hitro talk 05:44, 15 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Dear, Sir The Anjilee Istwal article page is notable people who is an Indian journalist and anchor on NDTV India the Hindi news channel of NDTV network.Please suggest this article page to develop and improve the page.If any faults you can help and support to correction any faults in this article. Thanking you Yours faithfully Sathraho (talk) 13:11, 15 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Nidhi Kulpati (Journalist) moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Nidhi Kulpati (Journalist), does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Praxidicae (talk) 15:12, 24 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Dear, Sir The article page Nidhi Kulpati (Journalist) is an well known journalist in India who worked with many channels and currently she is the senior editor and anchor on NDTV India the Hindi news channel of NDTV network. I am already added the notable source or reliable source in this page from news the criteria of Wikipedia.Sir if here faults by me I respectly request you to help this article for improve or develope. I hope you will help me by your Administration power. Yours faithfully Sathraho (talk) 19:33, 24 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Nidhi Kulpati (Journalist) (February 24)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Praxidicae was:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

The comment the reviewer left was:

sources published by her employer don't establish notability and the rest are just flat out unreliable.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Nidhi Kulpati (Journalist) and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Nidhi Kulpati (Journalist), click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Praxidicae (talk) 19:44, 24 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Sathraho! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Praxidicae (talk) 19:44, 24 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

February 2020

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to remove Articles for deletion notices or comments from articles and Articles for deletion pages, as you did at Anjilee Istwal, you may be blocked from editing. Praxidicae (talk) 17:48, 26 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Nidhi Kulpati (Journalist) (February 27)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Sulfurboy were:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The content of this submission includes material that does not meet Wikipedia's minimum standard for inline citations. Please cite your sources using footnotes. For instructions on how to do this, please see Referencing for beginners. Thank you.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Nidhi Kulpati (Journalist) and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Nidhi Kulpati (Journalist), click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Sulfurboy (talk) 02:40, 27 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry for Wrong Editing

Dear, Sir/Wikipedian I m sorry for wrong editing on the article page next time I don't editing without followed by rules of Wikipedia. I hope you will forgive me for this. Yours faithfully Sathraho (talk) 10:06, 27 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deletion discussion about Naghma Sahar

Hello, Sathraho

Welcome to Wikipedia! I edit here too, under the username The9Man and it's nice to meet you :-)

I wanted to let you know that I've started a discussion about whether an article that you created, Naghma Sahar, should be deleted. Your comments are welcome at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Naghma Sahar (2nd nomination).

You might like to note that such discussions usually run for seven days and are not ballot-polls. And, our guide about effectively contributing to such discussions is worth a read. Last but not least, you are highly encouraged to continue improving the article; just be sure not to remove the tag about the deletion nomination from the top.

If you have any questions, please leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|The9Man}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ . Thanks!

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

The9Man | (talk) 11:26, 3 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Mirza Kayesh Begg

Hello Sathraho,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Mirza Kayesh Begg for deletion, because the article doesn't clearly indicate why the subject is important enough to be included in an encyclopedia.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Thanks!

Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

- The9Man ^(Talk) 08:55, 19 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Sir But this is an notable person. I requested to you please remove deletion tagged by you.I will request you to help this article page for developing. Yours faithfully Sathraho (talk) 12:10, 19 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Sir I am also added many notable sources in this article page. You can see references. The source were collected from News or Online News of India. Sathraho (talk) 12:12, 19 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Nidhi Kulpati (Journalist) (March 20)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Sulfurboy was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Nidhi Kulpati (Journalist) and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Nidhi Kulpati (Journalist), click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Sulfurboy (talk) 05:25, 20 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Okay Sathraho (talk) 05:36, 20 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Some policies for Indian politician articles.

Do not add honorific prefix and suffix as per WP:NCIN
Do not add native Indian script as per WP:NOINDICSCRIPT
Do not add flags as per MOS:INFOBOXFLAG

If you have added these, kindly remove them. - Fylindfotberserk (talk) 07:43, 20 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Ok Sir Sathraho (talk) 11:32, 20 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

DO not add honorific prefix or suffix like 'Honorable' and 'MP/MLA', etc. Visit WP:NCIN. - Fylindfotberserk (talk) 17:36, 21 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

A kitten for you!

You are welcome.

Fylindfotberserk (talk) 11:32, 20 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you ☺️ Sathraho (talk) 11:32, 20 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Gazole move

I don;t how you assumed that Gazole is a city. According to census 2011, it is a village [1]. And only town with population greater than 100,000 is considered a city. Whether it is a city, town or village, has nothing to do with the move. I'm moving it back. Now we should call it a city or a village can be discussed in teh talk page. - Fylindfotberserk (talk) 17:36, 20 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

If you are referring to Gazole (community development block), then it is another thing. - Fylindfotberserk (talk) 17:41, 20 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

It is community development block with many villages. In 2014 the Minister of Urban Development and Municipal Affairs was announced that the upcoming Municipality is Gazole and Chanchal in Malda district. It is Gazole and upcoming Municipality. I was also seen this City. Sathraho (talk) 17:45, 20 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your sources do not mention gazole. And what is its population? - Fylindfotberserk (talk) 17:46, 20 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

That seems the village article. You are referring to Gazole (community development block) not Gazole Town. Edit there probably. - Fylindfotberserk (talk) 17:47, 20 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The total population in this area is 37018 with some neighborhoods Sathraho (talk) 17:53, 20 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I got it. It write 'Gaajol'. But with a popualtion of 37018, it is still a Class II town, not a city. - Fylindfotberserk (talk) 17:55, 20 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Dear, Sir It's mentioned in the source You can see the name different written by newspaper (gajol) but the original name is Gazole. I want request you to see the map of the Gazole map on Google Maps and see the map area or houses in this City Sathraho (talk) 17:55, 20 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Yes it's a class II town. Sathraho (talk) 17:57, 20 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Can you provide a link to its population? - Fylindfotberserk (talk) 17:59, 20 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Sir I am seen map of the Gazole from Google Maps and see the area is covered with the two Census town of the Gazole Block and neighborhood villages. The two census and villages combination is created the population of this town. Sathraho (talk) 18:05, 20 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Well, I'd like to know the names of the villages with census link. I mean, we have to source that population number. - Fylindfotberserk (talk) 18:08, 20 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

https://www.malda.gov.in/census You can see this for Normally. Sathraho (talk) 18:16, 20 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Akanda,Grail,Bajegrail,Kotalhat,Bndhail,Bujruk Bandhail,Ranghabhita,Gazole,Hatinda,Saidpur,Durgapur,Haridas,Bagsarai. There villages are nearby in this town or covered with this town. Sathraho (talk) 18:21, 20 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Couldn't find these villages in the link - Fylindfotberserk (talk) 18:27, 20 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I want to you see the link that's I was sent you. The name of Gazole have two Gram Panchayats and there population is near fifty thousands. I hope you doubts are clear... Thank you ☺️ for discussion Sathraho (talk) 18:30, 20 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

https://www.census2011.co.in/data/subdistrict/2214-gazole-maldah-west-bengal.html you can see this site for villages name Sathraho (talk) 18:34, 20 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

That's why I'm confused. GAZOLE - I - 31176 and GAZOLE - II = 18442 . Total = 49618. But you put 37,018 in the article. Why? - Fylindfotberserk (talk) 18:34, 20 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Census2011.co.in is unreliable and blacklisted. DO not use it. - Fylindfotberserk (talk) 18:37, 20 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I am only census some near villages. That's I was seen. I don't know the population is growing in this site. I am personally calculated 37018 population. Sathraho (talk) 18:39, 20 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Ok I don't the census site. Sathraho (talk) 18:40, 20 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry for confused you...! Sathraho (talk) 18:41, 20 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Dear, Sir Can you help me for Mirza Kayesh Begg article page will be develope by you. I hope you will help me for this created article page is developed by you. Sathraho (talk) 18:48, 20 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I want request you to remove the tags for deletion of the Article page Mirza Kayesh Begg. Sathraho (talk) 18:49, 20 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Begg's article was removed because the community didn't find him to be notable as per WP:A7 policy. He is notable as the spouse of Mausam Noor only. A person to have an article needs to independently notable as per WP:GNG. If he , in future becomes an MP or MLA, he'll get an article. Secondly, if he becomes famous independently, and his achievements get covered in the press widely, he'll get an article. - Fylindfotberserk (talk) 07:16, 21 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for March 21

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Rakhi Birla, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Doctor (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 12:32, 21 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia and copyright

Hello Sathraho, and welcome to Wikipedia. Your additions to Panipat Municipal Corporation have been removed in whole or in part, as they appear to have added copyrighted content without evidence that the source material is in the public domain or has been released by its owner or legal agent under a suitably-free and compatible copyright license. (To request such a release, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission.) While we appreciate your contributions to Wikipedia, there are certain things you must keep in mind about using information from sources to avoid copyright and plagiarism issues.

You can only copy/translate a small amount of a source, and you must mark what you take as a direct quotation with double quotation marks (") and cite the source using an inline citation. You can read about this at Wikipedia:Non-free content in the sections on "text". See also Help:Referencing for beginners, for how to cite sources here.
Aside from limited quotation, you must put all information in your own words and structure, in proper paraphrase. Following the source's words too closely can create copyright problems, so it is not permitted here; see Wikipedia:Close paraphrasing. (There is a college-level introduction to paraphrase, with examples, hosted by the Online Writing Lab of Purdue.) Even when using your own words, you are still, however, asked to cite your sources to verify the information and to demonstrate that the content is not original research.
Our primary policy on using copyrighted content is Wikipedia:Copyrights. You may also want to review Wikipedia:Copy-paste.
If you own the copyright to the source you want to copy or are a legally designated agent, you may be able to license that text so that we can publish it here. Understand, though, that unlike many other sites, where a person can license their content for use there and retain non-free ownership, that is not possible at Wikipedia. Rather, the release of content must be irrevocable, to the world, into the public domain (PD) or under a suitably-free and compatible copyright license. Such a release must be done in a verifiable manner, so that the authority of the person purporting to release the copyright is evidenced. See Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials.
In very rare cases (that is, for sources that are PD or compatibly licensed) it may be possible to include greater portions of a source text. However, please seek help at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions, the help desk or the Teahouse before adding such content to the article. 99.9% of sources may not be added in this way, so it is necessary to seek confirmation first. If you do confirm that a source is public domain or compatibly licensed, you will still need to provide full attribution; see Wikipedia:Plagiarism for the steps you need to follow.
Also note that Wikipedia articles may not be copied or translated without attribution. If you want to copy or translate from another Wikipedia project or article, you must follow the copyright attribution steps in Wikipedia:Translation#How to translate. See also Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia.

It's very important that contributors understand and follow these practices, as policy requires that people who persistently do not must be blocked from editing. If you have any questions about this, you are welcome to leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. MrClog (talk) 12:48, 31 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The 10k challenge

Hello Sathraho. You are invited to join the new WikiProject India 10,000 Challenge, a challenge which aims to see 10,000 improvements, destubs, and creations for Indian articles, covering every state of India and topic. Articles on all related topics are welcome. We need numbers to make this work and do something extraordinary for India on Wikipedia! Every 100 articles submitted will be copied into the wider Asian challenge. Sign up on the page if interested and start contributing!
If you know someone who might be interested, please invite them by:

{{subst:WikiProject India/The 10,000 Challenge Invite|~~~~}}

Thanks, ❯❯❯ S A H A 16:42, 8 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Nidhi Kulpati (Journalist)

Hello, Sathraho. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Nidhi Kulpati".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! —Nnadigoodluck🇳🇬 00:42, 21 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 03:03, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Shehnaz Quadery for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Shehnaz Quadery is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Shehnaz Quadery until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

𝐋𝐨𝐫𝐝𝐕𝐨𝐥𝐝𝐞𝐦𝐨𝐫𝐭𝟕𝟐𝟖🧙‍♂️^{Let's Talk !} 15:56, 19 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]