User talk:M Waner

March 2018[edit]

Welcome to Wikipedia. We appreciate your contributions, including your edits to List of animated films in the public domain in the United States, but we cannot accept original research. Original research refers to material—such as facts, allegations, ideas, and personal experiences—for which no reliable, published sources exist; it also encompasses combining published sources in a way to imply something that none of them explicitly say. Please be prepared to cite a reliable source for all of your contributions. Thank you. FilmandTVFan28 (talk) 09:49, 23 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add original research or novel syntheses of published material to articles as you apparently did to List of animated films in the public domain in the United States. Please cite a reliable source for all of your contributions. Thank you. FilmandTVFan28 (talk) 10:05, 23 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to violate Wikipedia's no original research policy by adding your personal analysis or synthesis into articles, as you did at List of animated films in the public domain in the United States, you may be blocked from editing. Daiyusha (talk) 10:35, 23 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on List of animated films in the public domain in the United States. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Please be particularly aware that Wikipedia's policy on edit warring states:

Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made.
Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes; work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. Daiyusha (talk) 10:39, 23 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

M Waner, you are invited to the Teahouse![edit]

Hi M Waner! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like I JethroBT (talk).

Visit the Teahouse

We hope to see you there!

Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts

14:22, 23 March 2018 (UTC)

STOP[edit]

Stop the long term bogus edits of List of animated films in the public domain in the United States. You have been repeatedly warned. If it happens again you will be reported as a vandal, your account may be blocked. You need to use the talk page and explain why you are making these edits. -- GreenC 15:50, 30 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked temporarily from editing for persistent edit-warring, and failure to take any notice of messages from other editors expressing concerns about your editing. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. The editor who uses the pseudonym "JamesBWatson" (talk) 19:16, 30 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

April 2018[edit]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 1 week for edit warring. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. --Dlohcierekim (talk) 11:01, 13 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Suspected Sockpuppet[edit]

I have labelled this account as a suspected sockpuppet because the contributions are similar and also, I do edit on Wikia and this user has registered under this name as well to dodge a ban. Yay Dad (talk) 18:18, 4 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This account has been blocked indefinitely as a sock puppet that was created to violate Wikipedia policy. Note that using multiple accounts is allowed, but using them for illegitimate reasons is not, and that all edits made while evading a block or ban may be reverted or deleted. If this account is not a sock puppet, and you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}} below.