Jump to content

User talk:Majokthefirst

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Your submission at Articles for creation: ThaWave Podcast (July 6)

[edit]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Curbon7 was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
Curbon7 (talk) 13:00, 6 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Teahouse logo
Hello, Majokthefirst! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Curbon7 (talk) 13:00, 6 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Hello Curbon7, Thank you for for your review; I take your suggestions seriously and I have successfully added more sources that I believe are independent of the subject. Majokthefirst (talk) 13:16, 8 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Curbon7, Thank you for for your review; I take your suggestions seriously and I have successfully added more sources that I believe are independent of the subject. Majokthefirst (talk) 11:51, 8 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

IMDb not an acceptable ref. David notMD (talk) 11:01, 9 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Well noted! Thanks Majokthefirst (talk) 11:38, 9 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: ThaWave Podcast (July 11)

[edit]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by TipsyElephant was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
TipsyElephant (talk) 12:35, 11 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your thread has been archived

[edit]
Teahouse logo

Hi Majokthefirst! The thread you created at the Wikipedia:Teahouse, More secondary sources, has been archived because there was no discussion for a few days.

You can still read the archived discussion. If you have follow-up questions, please create a new thread.


See also the help page about the archival process. The archival was done by Lowercase sigmabot III, and this notification was delivered by Muninnbot, both automated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing {{bots|deny=Muninnbot}} on top of the current page (your user talk page). Muninnbot (talk) 19:01, 13 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Albino Bol Dhieu (August 17)

[edit]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Greenman was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
Greenman (talk) 19:04, 17 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on ThaWave Podcast, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. PRAXIDICAE🌈 21:43, 17 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@praxidicae, Thanks for being a bully. I'll continue to learn and maybe someday Majokthefirst (talk) 07:05, 18 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Blocked as a sockpuppet

[edit]
Wikipedia's technical logs indicate that this user account has been or may be used abusively as a sockpuppet of User:Tha.wave per the evidence presented at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Tha.wave. It has been blocked indefinitely from editing to prevent abuse.

Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.
If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you should review the guide to appealing blocks, and then appeal your block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}}. Note that anything you post in your unblock request will be public, so you may alternatively use the Unblock Ticket Request System to submit an appeal if it contains information that must be private.

Administrators: Checkusers have access to confidential system logs not accessible by the public or by administrators due to the Wikimedia Foundation's privacy policy. You must not loosen or remove this block, or issue an IP block exemption, without consulting with a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee. Administrators who undo checkuser blocks without permission from a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee may be summarily desysopped.
Girth Summit (blether) 09:45, 18 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Albino Bol Dhieu (August 18)

[edit]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Curbon7 was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
Curbon7 (talk) 14:10, 18 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]