User talk:Mangalath jr

Welcome![edit]

Hello, Mangalath jr, and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, such as Transition (2020), may not conform to some of Wikipedia's content policies and may not be retained. In short, the topic of an article must be notable and have already been the subject of publication by reliable and independent sources.

Please review Your first article for an overview of the article creation process. The Article Wizard is available to help you create an article, where it will be reviewed and considered for publication. For information on how to request a new article that can be created by someone else, see Requested articles. If you are stuck, come to the Teahouse, where experienced Wikipedians can help you through the processes.

New to Wikipedia? Please consider taking a look at the our introductory tutorial or reviewing the contributing to Wikipedia page to learn the basics about editing. Below are a few other good pages about article creation.

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions ask me on my talk page or you can just type {{help me}} on this page, followed by your question, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome! 220 of ^ßorg 11:45, 12 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Transition (2020) moved to draftspace[edit]

An article you recently created, Transition (2020), does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Praxidicae (talk) 18:27, 11 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Transition (2020) for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Transition (2020) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Transition (2020) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Praxidicae (talk) 18:36, 11 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

December 2020[edit]

Hello, I'm Asartea. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions—specifically this edit to Transition (2020)—because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Help desk. Thanks. Merry Christmas! Asartea ^Talk ^Contribs! 18:47, 11 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to remove Articles for deletion notices or comments from articles and Articles for deletion pages, as you did at Transition (2020), you may be blocked from editing. Praxidicae (talk) 18:57, 11 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you remove a speedy deletion notice from a page you have created yourself, as you did at Transition (film) (2020). —teb728 t c 09:49, 13 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you create an inappropriate page. The deletion decision applies to any mainspace title where you might want to recreate it. StarM 15:56, 13 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Issuing level 4 warning about removing AfD template from articles before the discussion is complete. (Peachy 2.0 (alpha 8))[edit]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you remove an Articles for deletion notice or a comment from an AfD discussion, as you did at Transition (2020). This is an automated message from a bot about this edit, where you removed the deletion template from an article before the deletion discussion was complete. If this message is in error, please report it.—^{cyberbot I}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 19:03, 11 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Transition (2020). Your edits appear to be vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Merry Christmas! Asartea ^Talk ^Contribs! 19:08, 11 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Issuing level 4 warning about removing AfD template from articles before the discussion is complete. (Peachy 2.0 (alpha 8))[edit]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you remove an Articles for deletion notice or a comment from an AfD discussion, as you did at Transition (2020). This is an automated message from a bot about this edit, where you removed the deletion template from an article before the deletion discussion was complete. If this message is in error, please report it.—^{cyberbot I}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 10:38, 12 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Image without license[edit]

Unspecified source/license for File:Transition Show Card.jpg[edit]

Thanks for uploading File:Transition Show Card.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. Even if you created the image yourself, you still need to release it so Wikipedia can use it. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time after the next seven days. If you made this image yourself, you can use copyright tags like {{PD-self}} (to release all rights), {{self|cc-by-sa-4.0}} (to require that you be credited), or any tag here - just go to the image, click edit, and add one of those. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by MifterBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. NOTE: Once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. --MifterBot ^{(Talk • Contribs • Owner)} 10:46, 12 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Transition (2020), you may be blocked from editing. Materialscientist (talk) 11:09, 12 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Transition (2020)[edit]

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Transition (2020) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion discussion, at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Transition (2020). When a page has substantially identical content to that of a page deleted after a discussion, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Paul ❬talk❭ 12:08, 12 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Transition (film) (2020)[edit]

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Transition (film) (2020) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion discussion, at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Transition (2020). When a page has substantially identical content to that of a page deleted after a discussion, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. —teb728 t c 19:06, 12 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

New changes were made in this page, as I'm the author of the previous page and I deleted the page for renaming the title transition 2020 to transition (film) (2020) ,this page should not be deleted as it is genuine Mangalath jr (talk) 08:26, 13 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

You're also writing about something where you have a direct conflict of interest, so I suggest you stop. Praxidicae (talk) 15:58, 13 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

December 2020[edit]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for persistently making disruptive edits.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. StarM 19:06, 13 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note in the event of an unblock request, editor will need to address COI related to the film he appears determined to create a page about. StarM 19:13, 13 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Mangalath jr (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I'm very new to Wikipedia and I didn't know what I was doing and mistakenly I've done something and got blocked. Please do unblock me because I donnot mean any harm. Thankyou.

Decline reason:

You were warned about the inappropriateness of your edits several times. Why didn't you stop the first time you were warned? MER-C 18:58, 15 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Mangalath jr (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I am really sorry I didn't know the seriousness of the issue and I really didn't know what I was doing I didnot mean any harm and I will surely not repeat the mistake in the future... Hope you understand. Thankyou.

Decline reason:

You will need to explain what it is you have done and address the seeming conflict of interest that you have, as well as tell us what edits you wish to make if unblocked, which will help us determine if you do indeed understand what is happening. I am declining your request. 331dot (talk) 09:58, 16 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Mangalath jr (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I tried to put up my movies details up on Wikipedia what I didn't know is that there was something called conflict of interest I didn't know we shouldn't put up something of our personal intrest so I won't be doing that again. Even if you lift up the block I wouldn't make another issue. I've been blocked for disruptive edits but if you unblock me I won't do any harm I understand the seriousness of the situation now. I'm really sorry for creating an issue. Hope you understand.Thankyou.

Decline reason:

duplicate request _signed,Rosguill ^talk 18:21, 18 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Blocking Admin Comment I'll leave this for someone else as I'm obviously involved, but I'm assuming good faith in his explanation above and would support a second chance if creator agrees to his unblock request in not editing related to his movie, other than edit requests per standard practice should it be deemed notable and have an article. StarM 13:58, 16 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Mangalath jr, would you be willing to accept an unblock on the condition that you refrain from editing anything related to Transition, as suggested by StarM? _signed,Rosguill ^talk 22:47, 17 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who accepted the request.

Mangalath jr (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I accept my mistake and I promise to not make any edit on Transition Anymore. Thank you for understanding

Accept reason:

Mangalath jr has accepted the condition that they not make any edits related to the film Transition with which they have a conflict of interest. _signed,Rosguill ^talk 18:23, 18 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Sockpuppet investigation[edit]

An editor has opened an investigation into sockpuppetry by you. Sockpuppetry is the use of more than one Wikipedia account in a manner that contravenes community policy. The investigation is being held at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Mangalath jr, where the editor who opened the investigation has presented their evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with the guide to responding to investigations, and then feel free to offer your own evidence or to submit comments that you wish to be considered by the Wikipedia administrator who decides the result of the investigation. If you have been using multiple accounts (in a manner contrary to Wikipedia policy), please go to the investigation page and verify that now. Leniency is usually shown to those who promise not to do so again, or who did so unwittingly, but the abuse of multiple accounts is taken very seriously by the Wikipedia community.

StarM 17:42, 26 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

March 2021[edit]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 31 hours for abusing multiple accounts. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. StarM 00:40, 27 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Courtesy @Rosguill: although I imagine you're fine as this was a blatant disregard of the agreement under which you unblocked. StarM 00:45, 27 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Star Mississippi, at this point I would set it back to indefinite, this person is WP:NOTHERE _signed,Rosguill ^talk 03:02, 27 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Rosguill Sock blocks are a new area for me. I indeffed the puppet but wasn't entirely sure how to handle master. I imagine he'll give us a reason to indef if it's not OK to do one now? Thanks! StarM 11:53, 27 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Nothing wrong with a 31 hour block, but I'd have blocked indefinitely in this case. Mangalath jr was previously unblocked with the promise not to edit about the Transition movie. Instead, they violated WP:SOCK to continue editing about the Transition movie. Pretty shady and most certainly shows we cannot trust this user to abide by their word. --Yamla (talk) 16:35, 27 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I was thinking the same thing. _signed,Rosguill ^talk 18:01, 27 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks Rosguill and Yamla and especially in light of the unblock request essentially showing his determination to get this article posted. Converting to indef to hopefully solve this once and for all, especially if the latest title is also SALTed. StarM 18:13, 27 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because it appears that you are not here to build an encyclopedia.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. StarM 18:14, 27 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Mangalath jr (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I have nothing to do with the above statement, eventhough both the account share the same IP address it doesnt mean Iit is sock puppetry, Please try to understand Im not involved in it

Decline reason:

Confirmed sockpuppetry. This is as clear-cut a case as I've ever seen, based on checkuser technical evidence. I have zero doubt that the same person controls both accounts. Yamla (talk) 13:08, 1 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

You are not permitted to remove or edit declined unblock requests for your currently active block. You may remove all other content, but not that, from this page. --Yamla (talk) 22:57, 1 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]