User talk:Manzanitasyndrome
Welcome!
[edit]
|
December 2011
[edit]Hello! I'm a bot created by another Wikipedia editor. I wanted to let you know that I removed a link that you recently added to the page Ramstein Air Base here. I did this because http://anotherworldblog.wordpress.com/2011/11/29/living-in-pseudo-america, is probably inappropriate for an encyclopedia. We usually avoid linking to blogs, forums, and social media sites.
We appreciate your help in making Wikipedia better for everyone. If I made a mistake, feel free to undo my edit. If you have any questions, you can ask at the Help desk.
Thank you! --XLinkBot (talk) 12:40, 2 December 2011 (UTC)
Your recent edits.
[edit] Welcome to Wikipedia. At least one of your recent edits, such as the edits you made to Zwarte Piet, did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at the welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. Thank you. Planetary ChaosTalk 12:45, 8 December 2011 (UTC)
Hello, User talk:ManzanitasyndromeI have been reviewing your edits. I would like you to please review what links are to be avoided. I would also encourage you to please read Wikipedias The three-revert rule-policy Thank you. Happy editing! Planetary ChaosTalk 13:00, 8 December 2011 (UTC)
- Not really an edit test. Not really 3RR. Neither comment is appropriate but I think it's important that you don't seem to have consensus. While you may feel that the article is not a blog, it's still not a reliable source. --Walter Görlitz (talk) 14:52, 8 December 2011 (UTC)
- Concerning your here and here. Wikipedia has a bright-line rule concerning 3RR and 3RR does apply and, to both of you. In the future, to avoid a possible block please use the article's talk page to discuss the changes; work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection. You may still be blocked for edit warring even if you do not exceed the technical limit of the three-revert rule if your behavior indicates that you intend to continue to revert repeatedly. Having said that, reliable source also applies. In regards to the edit test template. It is mandatory to use these templates in succession. Also, please be Civil when using edit summaries or the talk pages. Happy editing! Planetary ChaosTalk 08:29, 9 December 2011 (UTC)