User talk:MaranoFan/Archive 11
 | This page is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Dear Future Husband
 | Hi MaranoFan, I've begun working on the copy-edit you requested at the Guild of Copy Editors requests page for the article Dear Future Husband. Please feel free to contact me and to correct or revert my edits if necessary. Cheers, Baffle☿gab 01:28, 25 July 2022 (UTC) |
DYK for To Be Loved (Adele song)
On 25 July 2022, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article To Be Loved (Adele song), which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that Adele decided never to perform "To Be Loved" live as it upset her to the point of having to leave the room? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/To Be Loved (Adele song). You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, To Be Loved (Adele song)), and if they received a combined total of at least 416.7 views per hour (i.e., 5,000 views in 12 hours or 10,000 in 24), the hook may be added to the statistics page. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.
Cwmhiraeth (talk) 12:04, 25 July 2022 (UTC)
|
|
Hook update | |
| Your hook reached 5,561 views (463.4 per hour), making it one of the most viewed hooks of July 2022 – nice work! |
theleekycauldron (talk • contribs) (she/they) 04:18, 27 July 2022 (UTC)
DYK for I Drink Wine
On 27 July 2022, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article I Drink Wine, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that Adele reduced the length of "I Drink Wine" from fifteen to six minutes because her label thought that no one would play a fifteen-minute song on the radio? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/I Drink Wine. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, I Drink Wine), and if they received a combined total of at least 416.7 views per hour (i.e., 5,000 views in 12 hours or 10,000 in 24), the hook may be added to the statistics page. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.
— Maile (talk) 12:03, 27 July 2022 (UTC)
DYK for Deja Vu (Olivia Rodrigo song)
On 28 July 2022, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Deja Vu (Olivia Rodrigo song), which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that Olivia Rodrigo and Dan Nigro wrote the song "Deja Vu" within one day? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Deja Vu (Olivia Rodrigo song). You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Deja Vu (Olivia Rodrigo song)), and if they received a combined total of at least 416.7 views per hour (i.e., 5,000 views in 12 hours or 10,000 in 24), the hook may be added to the statistics page. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.
Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 12:02, 28 July 2022 (UTC)
- ... there's no way we could rerun this in three days, right? theleekycauldron (talk • contribs) (she/they) 00:31, 29 July 2022 (UTC)
Promotion of Title (EP)
Precious anniversary
 | |
| Two years! |
|---|
Congratulations for another musical FA! --Gerda Arendt (talk) 07:06, 30 July 2022 (UTC)
- Thank you! Some great coincidence in timing there..--NØ 07:27, 30 July 2022 (UTC)
- I thought the same ;) - also my parent's wedding anniversary --Gerda Arendt (talk) 08:29, 30 July 2022 (UTC)
- Wishing you and yours the best on the occasion!--NØ 08:43, 30 July 2022 (UTC)
- For more great coincidence: thank you today for Dear Future Husband, introduced: "'Dear Future Husband', which is Trainor's list of things a potential suitor needs to do if he wants to "get some... kisses". Its accompanying music video attracted the wrath of cancel culture for depicting her as a domestic housewife, and the song itself received mixed reviews with criticism directed towards its backward portrayal of gender roles. This nomination marks a full circle moment for me as this was one of the first proper articles I created, way back in 2014, and I have seen it through DYK, GAN, and now an FAC!"! - I have a FAC open, in case of interest ;) --Gerda Arendt (talk) 06:52, 6 August 2022 (UTC)
- Wishing you and yours the best on the occasion!--NØ 08:43, 30 July 2022 (UTC)
- I thought the same ;) - also my parent's wedding anniversary --Gerda Arendt (talk) 08:29, 30 July 2022 (UTC)
Many congrats on the TFA. Excellent job taking on all the Trainor articles; she should personally thank you. ;) FrB.TG (talk) 16:53, 6 August 2022 (UTC)
- Thanks a lot for these very kind words, FrB.TG! I found it funny that Trainor gave an interview yesterday where she said she is going back to the Title era's sound because the "universe is talking" to her. I kept wondering if she may view these main page featured articles as signs from the universe too, lol.--NØ 17:12, 6 August 2022 (UTC)
"dear future husband"
hello, MaranoFan! i had a question regarding this article and the associated blurb. the blurb and article lead both mention that the music video "depicts Trainor ... scrubbing floors". would it be more appropriate to state "scrubbing the floor" instead? admittedly, this might be considered original research, but when i watched the music video, i think i only saw trainor scrubbing one floor, the checkered one (presumably of the kitchen). the two mtv sources cited with respect to the scrubbing mention "floors", but the nme source cited states "scrubbing a kitchen floor". (also, considering how the description of the music video was worded in the article body, i have no issue with the use of the word "floors" there.)
by the way, i was also wondering if you knew how it was determined that meghan trainor was performing "dear future husband" in this picture. i admittedly could not find anything in the picture that clearly identified the song being performed, and the picture's description on commons does not appear to mention the song either. dying (talk) 05:33, 2 August 2022 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
- Hi dying, feel free to make the "scrubbing" change or any other small changes that you think improve the article. Regarding the image, I just assumed good faith about it when it was transferred over from Flickr. Lips Are Movin seems to have offered some explanation here.--NØ 06:55, 2 August 2022 (UTC)
- thanks, MaranoFan. i have replaced "floors" with "the floor" in the blurb here.[a] also, i apologize in advance for the length of the rest of this comment.i was previously unaware of Lips Are Movin's statement, so i appreciate you pointing it out to me. normally, i would agree that a distinctive background that has been associated with the song's performance would be convincing evidence that the picture shows the singer performing the song in question.[b] however, the picture featured in the "dear future husband" blurb appears to contain no such distinctive background, or anything similar that could easily identify the song being sung.[c]in any case, i ended up performing a bunch of original research to try to either convince myself that she was likely performing "dear future husband" in the photo, or convince myself that she was likely not, and happily, i was successful in completing the former. i thought i might write up my findings here in case a future editor has the same question, so that you can reference this comment like you referenced Lips Are Movin's comment for me.i am pretty convinced that the picture was taken at around 2:17 into this video, which was recorded in philadelphia during the jingle ball 2014 tour, at the same concert during which the photo was taken. at around that time in the video, trainor is not near the other two performers, her stance appears similar to the one she has in the photo,[d] she is stage right far enough that a photo would likely not capture the large screens on the stage,[e] the purple lights are dominant (as opposed to the blue or white ones), and the wheels and wires visible at the bottom right of the photo can also be seen in the video.however, i am now questioning whether the song being performed in this picture is correctly identified by the caption in this article.[f] the two pictures appear to have been taken from the same flickr photostream. assuming that they were taken by the same camera, the metadata has not been tampered with,[g] and the camera's clock was not reset during the performance, the first picture appears to have been taken about two minutes after the second, as the first has a timestamp of 21:04:54 and the second 21:02:27. incidentally, there happens to be a clock atop the stage left speakers that is visible in the "dear future husband" video, and around 2:46 into the video, the clock clearly reads "9:04". this video, showing trainor's performance of "close your eyes" in the same concert, appears to show the same clock reading "9:06" about 0:44 into the video, suggesting that "close your eyes" was the song performed after "dear future husband", and therefore would not have been the song trainor was performing in the second picture.[h]if i am correct about the first picture being taken about 2:17 into the "dear future husband" video, then, according to the timestamps of the two photos, it appears that the second photo was taken about 10 seconds before recording for this video commenced. since the video begins with trainor singing the lyrics "break, and don't forget the flowers every anniversary", the video clearly starts after the song's performance had already started. i was unable to find another video for this specific performance, but did find one video of a similar performance in chicago about a week later with roughly the same stage setup. in this video, trainor sings the lyrics "break, and don't forget the flowers every anniversary" around 0:15 into the video, and 10 seconds before, at 0:05 into the video, she is singing the lyrics "all my life" from the beginning of the song. at this point, trainor is again not near the other two performers, her stance appears similar to the one she has in the second photo,[i] she is in the center of the stage so a photographer near stage right[j] would likely capture much of stage left in the background,[k] and the blue lights are dominant.this is obviously not an airtight analysis, but if you agree with the conclusion, then the caption in the extended play article is currently not accurate. luckily, though, since the extended play contains both "close your eyes" and "dear future husband", simply replacing the first title with the second should be sufficient to address this concern.[l] alternatively, if you want to use a photo from the performance of a different song, there are a number of other photos in this commons category that are from the same photostream, so it should not be too difficult to determine what songs were being performed by looking at the timestamps and reviewing the previously linked videos.please feel free to let me know if you need any assistance or clarification. thanks for reading all of this. hope it helps! dying (talk) 08:08, 5 August 2022 (UTC)
- Wow, thanks for this... detailed analysis. Really, I appreciate it. So I guess the only change that needs to be made is captioning the picture in Title (EP) as a performance of "Dear Future Husband"?--NØ 08:16, 5 August 2022 (UTC)
- yeah, in that article and the portuguese one. dying (talk) 08:52, 5 August 2022 (UTC)
- Wow, thanks for this... detailed analysis. Really, I appreciate it. So I guess the only change that needs to be made is captioning the picture in Title (EP) as a performance of "Dear Future Husband"?--NØ 08:16, 5 August 2022 (UTC)
- thanks, MaranoFan. i have replaced "floors" with "the floor" in the blurb here.[a] also, i apologize in advance for the length of the rest of this comment.i was previously unaware of Lips Are Movin's statement, so i appreciate you pointing it out to me. normally, i would agree that a distinctive background that has been associated with the song's performance would be convincing evidence that the picture shows the singer performing the song in question.[b] however, the picture featured in the "dear future husband" blurb appears to contain no such distinctive background, or anything similar that could easily identify the song being sung.[c]in any case, i ended up performing a bunch of original research to try to either convince myself that she was likely performing "dear future husband" in the photo, or convince myself that she was likely not, and happily, i was successful in completing the former. i thought i might write up my findings here in case a future editor has the same question, so that you can reference this comment like you referenced Lips Are Movin's comment for me.i am pretty convinced that the picture was taken at around 2:17 into this video, which was recorded in philadelphia during the jingle ball 2014 tour, at the same concert during which the photo was taken. at around that time in the video, trainor is not near the other two performers, her stance appears similar to the one she has in the photo,[d] she is stage right far enough that a photo would likely not capture the large screens on the stage,[e] the purple lights are dominant (as opposed to the blue or white ones), and the wheels and wires visible at the bottom right of the photo can also be seen in the video.however, i am now questioning whether the song being performed in this picture is correctly identified by the caption in this article.[f] the two pictures appear to have been taken from the same flickr photostream. assuming that they were taken by the same camera, the metadata has not been tampered with,[g] and the camera's clock was not reset during the performance, the first picture appears to have been taken about two minutes after the second, as the first has a timestamp of 21:04:54 and the second 21:02:27. incidentally, there happens to be a clock atop the stage left speakers that is visible in the "dear future husband" video, and around 2:46 into the video, the clock clearly reads "9:04". this video, showing trainor's performance of "close your eyes" in the same concert, appears to show the same clock reading "9:06" about 0:44 into the video, suggesting that "close your eyes" was the song performed after "dear future husband", and therefore would not have been the song trainor was performing in the second picture.[h]if i am correct about the first picture being taken about 2:17 into the "dear future husband" video, then, according to the timestamps of the two photos, it appears that the second photo was taken about 10 seconds before recording for this video commenced. since the video begins with trainor singing the lyrics "break, and don't forget the flowers every anniversary", the video clearly starts after the song's performance had already started. i was unable to find another video for this specific performance, but did find one video of a similar performance in chicago about a week later with roughly the same stage setup. in this video, trainor sings the lyrics "break, and don't forget the flowers every anniversary" around 0:15 into the video, and 10 seconds before, at 0:05 into the video, she is singing the lyrics "all my life" from the beginning of the song. at this point, trainor is again not near the other two performers, her stance appears similar to the one she has in the second photo,[i] she is in the center of the stage so a photographer near stage right[j] would likely capture much of stage left in the background,[k] and the blue lights are dominant.this is obviously not an airtight analysis, but if you agree with the conclusion, then the caption in the extended play article is currently not accurate. luckily, though, since the extended play contains both "close your eyes" and "dear future husband", simply replacing the first title with the second should be sufficient to address this concern.[l] alternatively, if you want to use a photo from the performance of a different song, there are a number of other photos in this commons category that are from the same photostream, so it should not be too difficult to determine what songs were being performed by looking at the timestamps and reviewing the previously linked videos.please feel free to let me know if you need any assistance or clarification. thanks for reading all of this. hope it helps! dying (talk) 08:08, 5 August 2022 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Notes
- ^ i trimmed a bit of the blurb as there is actually a limit of 1025 characters, but it is not often mentioned and not always strictly enforced, so i can easily understand if you were not previously aware of it. i hope i have not removed anything substantial.
- ^ for example, the background was distinctive enough in the picture featured in this blurb to easily identify the song.
- ^ also, it seems like an editor other than Lips Are Movin had added the picture and caption to the article, as seen here, so i am not sure if Lips Are Movin's statement is relevant with respect to this specific picture.
- ^ the microphone is in her right hand, raised up to her mouth, and nearly parallel to the ground; her left hand is slightly closed, raised above her elbow, and held slightly away from her body; and her knees are slightly bent.
- ^ the iheartradio logo is in the photo's background, and can also be seen stage right past the video screens around 1:23 into this video of her at the same concert.
- ^ a similar caption appears in the portuguese version of the article.
- ^ the metadata lists the same author and camera model for both.
- ^ the same youtube channel also has videos of two other songs that trainor performed that night, and the video for "lips are movin" shows the clock reading "9:09" right at the start, while the video for "all about that bass" has the clock reading "9:14" at around 1:13 into the video. these videos appear to conform with this set list, so i would assume that the first song trainor performed that night was "dear future husband".
- ^ she is largely standing up straight with her hands close to her body.
- ^ this was the likely location of the photographer for the first photo.
- ^ the iheartradio logo at stage left appears to be at the right edge of the photo's background.
- ^ obviously, the same should be done with the caption in the portuguese article.
Your GA nomination of Can I Get It
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Can I Get It you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. 
This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Ippantekina -- Ippantekina (talk) 13:42, 17 August 2022 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of Can I Get It
The article Can I Get It you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold 
. The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Can I Get It for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Ippantekina -- Ippantekina (talk) 02:22, 18 August 2022 (UTC)
Promotion of Title (album)
Triple Crown
Congratulations! — Bilorv (talk) 20:48, 26 August 2022 (UTC)
List of interpolated songs
Hi, I noticed you contributed to the page before and was wondering what your thoughts are as there is currently a discussion here. As of now, I'm improving the page by adding sources to each entry in the list. Thank you. Hiddenstranger (talk) 02:20, 27 August 2022 (UTC)
- Thanks for the invite. I am not sure I have an opinion to offer on this. The discussion does seem to have some good insights already--NØ 02:45, 27 August 2022 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of Can I Get It
The article Can I Get It you nominated as a good article has passed 
; see Talk:Can I Get It for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already appeared on the main page as a "Did you know" item, or as a bold link under "In the News" or in the "On This Day" prose section, you can nominate it within the next seven days to appear in DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On This Day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Ippantekina -- Ippantekina (talk) 11:02, 18 August 2022 (UTC)
New redirect
Hi, hope you are doing well. Would you mind redirecting the page Beautiful Love (Justin Bieber song) to Justin Bieber discography#As lead artist and add the single to his discography page? It is out in some parts of the world and will be out on August 30 midnight in your time wherever you are. There is a link that I am using for proof (but it does not work if it is not midnight in your area): https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uhk5mCvYs8Q. Thank you! 198.17.32.159 (talk) 20:58, 29 August 2022 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of Happier Than Ever (song)
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Happier Than Ever (song) you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Kyle Peake -- Kyle Peake (talk) 20:41, 31 August 2022 (UTC)
Thank you
 |
... for your comments for Ich will den Kreuzstab gerne tragen, BWV 56, making it a featured article! - I'm happy to see that Title is already a FA, before I even got to comment. Images of a rich summer, especially in music -- Gerda Arendt (talk) 21:21, 31 August 2022 (UTC)
Adele FACs
Hello again. I hope you are enjoying your wikibreak. I have noticed that you have shifted your focus to Adele songs lately and I was curious if you have any specific songs in mind for the FAC? I'm guessing one of these would be "Water Under the Bridge"? Apologies for the super random question. I was just curious lol. I really should listen to 30 again. I've not gone back to it since the whole Vegas fiasco put off of Adele (as silly as that may sound) so I'd be curious on how I'd feel about it now. "To Be Loved" was my favorite at the time. I hope you are doing well! Aoba47 (talk) 20:18, 30 August 2022 (UTC)
- Hey Aoba, how's it going! Yeah, I'd love to keep writing about miss Trainor but she doesn't have a lot of hits left, lol. When I saw the Adele wikiproject I had started had been marked as inactive, I figured I should shift my focus there. I think the "Water Under the Bridge" article is heading in the right direction but I'd like to redo the critical reception section before an FAC because it's not sorted by thematic elements currently. Also on an unrelated note, congrats on the promotion of your FA! I admire your patience in not harrassing the coords with pings despite having a staggering 7 supports.--NØ 05:06, 31 August 2022 (UTC)
- That makes sense. I also think it is sometimes just refreshing to change your focus, and Adele has plenty of hits for you to focus on with an eye toward the FAC process. The reception sections are always the toughest ones to write because it is all about presenting the information in an engaging way while also still providing the reader with a clear understanding of how an item was received and that's a lot to balance and do well. Thank you for the congratulations. I am planning on taking at least a small break from song articles for a while. I am trying to be better with my patience on here and it means a lot that you pointed that out. As I've gotten older, I recognize that we all have our own individual responsibilities and things going on in our lives so I am trying to be more respectful of that. I believe my FAC is a really good example of how a well-attended peer review can have such a great impact on the FAC process. I'd be curious to see how people would react to Paris Hilton have a song FA lol. Aoba47 (talk) 18:06, 31 August 2022 (UTC)
- It's always a pleasant surprise to see unlikely topics become FAs. I might try to bring "Marvin Gaye" to FAC one day, which would be a fun challenge given that it is a universally panned song, lol. Honestly, I'm in a similar predicament when it comes to song articles and a bit bored of them at this point.--NØ 18:32, 31 August 2022 (UTC)
- I always have fun elevating more obscure topics to FA status. I think it emphasizes a particularly unique aspect of Wikipedia in that readers can get information about a topic that is not as easy to research or find in general. I still enjoy working on song articles, but it is important to take a step back to try new things. Sometimes things can be quite repetitive, especially as song articles share similar structures, etc. What kind of articles would you like to work on next? I'd love to return to fictional characters. That was one of my main focuses when I first joined Wikipedia and it has been a significant span of time since I have done anything with that. I'd also love to do fashion and literature articles. For me, at least, my primary goal is to work on at least one or two new projects as I've been primarily looking back on my old GAs and sometimes that gives me a weird sense of anxiety lol. Aoba47 (talk) 19:00, 31 August 2022 (UTC)
- I think something like a movie, tour, or biography would be a natural transition from the topics I currently work on. Although it's a bit hard to find ample information to write comprehensive tour articles. I think your catalogue is quite diverse already, with several TV-related articles. I'm sure you will do great with fictional characters whenever you do decide to return to them.--NØ 06:41, 1 September 2022 (UTC)
- That makes sense. There are a few tour FAs that you can look at for inspiration. I do strive to have a diverse catalog, but a lot of it just boils down to my interests being super random lol. Best of luck with whatever project you do decide to pursue next! Aoba47 (talk) 17:07, 1 September 2022 (UTC)
- I think something like a movie, tour, or biography would be a natural transition from the topics I currently work on. Although it's a bit hard to find ample information to write comprehensive tour articles. I think your catalogue is quite diverse already, with several TV-related articles. I'm sure you will do great with fictional characters whenever you do decide to return to them.--NØ 06:41, 1 September 2022 (UTC)
- I always have fun elevating more obscure topics to FA status. I think it emphasizes a particularly unique aspect of Wikipedia in that readers can get information about a topic that is not as easy to research or find in general. I still enjoy working on song articles, but it is important to take a step back to try new things. Sometimes things can be quite repetitive, especially as song articles share similar structures, etc. What kind of articles would you like to work on next? I'd love to return to fictional characters. That was one of my main focuses when I first joined Wikipedia and it has been a significant span of time since I have done anything with that. I'd also love to do fashion and literature articles. For me, at least, my primary goal is to work on at least one or two new projects as I've been primarily looking back on my old GAs and sometimes that gives me a weird sense of anxiety lol. Aoba47 (talk) 19:00, 31 August 2022 (UTC)
- It's always a pleasant surprise to see unlikely topics become FAs. I might try to bring "Marvin Gaye" to FAC one day, which would be a fun challenge given that it is a universally panned song, lol. Honestly, I'm in a similar predicament when it comes to song articles and a bit bored of them at this point.--NØ 18:32, 31 August 2022 (UTC)
- That makes sense. I also think it is sometimes just refreshing to change your focus, and Adele has plenty of hits for you to focus on with an eye toward the FAC process. The reception sections are always the toughest ones to write because it is all about presenting the information in an engaging way while also still providing the reader with a clear understanding of how an item was received and that's a lot to balance and do well. Thank you for the congratulations. I am planning on taking at least a small break from song articles for a while. I am trying to be better with my patience on here and it means a lot that you pointed that out. As I've gotten older, I recognize that we all have our own individual responsibilities and things going on in our lives so I am trying to be more respectful of that. I believe my FAC is a really good example of how a well-attended peer review can have such a great impact on the FAC process. I'd be curious to see how people would react to Paris Hilton have a song FA lol. Aoba47 (talk) 18:06, 31 August 2022 (UTC)
WikiCup 2022 September newsletter
The fourth round of the WikiCup has now finished. 383 points were required to reach the final, and the new round has got off to a flying start with all finalists already scoring. In round 4, Bloom6132 with 939 points was the highest points-scorer, with a combination of DYKs and In the news items, followed by BennyOnTheLoose, Sammi Brie and Lee Vilenski. The points of all contestants are swept away as we start afresh for the final round.
At this stage, we say goodbye to the eight competitors who didn't quite make it; thank you for the useful contributions you have made to the Cup and Wikipedia, and we hope you will join us again next year. For the remaining competitors, remember that any content promoted after the end of round 4 but before the start of round 5 can be claimed in round 5. Remember too that you must claim your points within 14 days of "earning" them, and importantly, before the deadline on October 31st!
If you are concerned that your nomination, whether it be for a good article, a featured process, or anything else, will not receive the necessary reviews, please list it on Wikipedia:WikiCup/Reviews Needed (remember to remove your listing when no longer required). If you want to help out with the WikiCup, please do your bit to help keep down the review backlogs! Questions are welcome on Wikipedia talk:WikiCup, and the judges are reachable on their talk pages or by email. If you wish to start or stop receiving this newsletter, please feel free to add or remove yourself from Wikipedia:WikiCup/Newsletter/Send. The judges are Sturmvogel 66 and Cwmhiraeth. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 12:44, 3 September 2022 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of Water Under the Bridge (song)
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Water Under the Bridge (song) you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Ippantekina -- Ippantekina (talk) 12:41, 7 September 2022 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of Happier Than Ever (song)
The article Happier Than Ever (song) you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Happier Than Ever (song) for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Kyle Peake -- Kyle Peake (talk) 18:02, 2 September 2022 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of Happier Than Ever (song)
The article Happier Than Ever (song) you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Happier Than Ever (song) for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already appeared on the main page as a "Did you know" item, or as a bold link under "In the News" or in the "On This Day" prose section, you can nominate it within the next seven days to appear in DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On This Day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Kyle Peake -- Kyle Peake (talk) 06:42, 4 September 2022 (UTC)
DYK for Can I Get It
On 13 September 2022, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Can I Get It, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that Adele moans in "Can I Get It", a song about desire for a real relationship instead of casual sex? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Can I Get It. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Can I Get It), and if they received a combined total of at least 416.7 views per hour (i.e., 5,000 views in 12 hours or 10,000 in 24), the hook may be added to the statistics page. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.
Schwede66 12:02, 13 September 2022 (UTC)
|
|
Hook update | |
| Your hook reached 5,494 views (457.8 per hour), making it one of the most viewed hooks of September 2022 – nice work! |
theleekycauldron (talk • contribs) (she/her) 21:00, 14 September 2022 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of When We Were Young (Adele song)
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article When We Were Young (Adele song) you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Kyle Peake -- Kyle Peake (talk) 09:41, 16 September 2022 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of Water Under the Bridge (song)
The article Water Under the Bridge (song) you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Water Under the Bridge (song) for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Ippantekina -- Ippantekina (talk) 10:01, 9 September 2022 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of Water Under the Bridge (song)
The article Water Under the Bridge (song) you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Water Under the Bridge (song) for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already appeared on the main page as a "Did you know" item, or as a bold link under "In the News" or in the "On This Day" prose section, you can nominate it within the next seven days to appear in DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On This Day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Ippantekina -- Ippantekina (talk) 13:01, 9 September 2022 (UTC)
Promotion of I Drink Wine
- Wow, nice work! ---Another Believer (Talk) 14:22, 18 September 2022 (UTC)
- Congratulations on the promotion! Aoba47 (talk) 01:21, 21 September 2022 (UTC)
- Thank you so much for the encouragement, guys. Another Believer, if possible, could you weigh in on my TFA request for the article? I need some help as an absolutely ridiculous comment popped up there today. Much appreciated.--NØ 19:09, 23 September 2022 (UTC)
DYK for Happier Than Ever (song)
On 24 September 2022, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Happier Than Ever (song), which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that Billie Eilish and Finneas O'Connell wrote the melody for their four-time Grammy-nominated song "Happier Than Ever" on an $80 guitar? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Happier Than Ever (song). You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Happier Than Ever (song)), and if they received a combined total of at least 416.7 views per hour (i.e., 5,000 views in 12 hours or 10,000 in 24), the hook may be added to the statistics page. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.
Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 00:03, 24 September 2022 (UTC)
Four Award
|
Four Award | |
| Congratulations! You have been awarded the Four Award for your work from beginning to end on I Drink Wine. — Bilorv (talk) 18:36, 24 September 2022 (UTC) |
Your GA nomination of When We Were Young (Adele song)
The article When We Were Young (Adele song) you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:When We Were Young (Adele song) for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Kyle Peake -- Kyle Peake (talk) 11:01, 17 September 2022 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of When We Were Young (Adele song)
The article When We Were Young (Adele song) you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:When We Were Young (Adele song) for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already appeared on the main page as a "Did you know" item, or as a bold link under "In the News" or in the "On This Day" prose section, you can nominate it within the next seven days to appear in DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On This Day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Kyle Peake -- Kyle Peake (talk) 08:21, 18 September 2022 (UTC)
- Congrats! ---Another Believer (Talk) 14:21, 18 September 2022 (UTC)
DYK for Water Under the Bridge (song)
On 5 October 2022, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Water Under the Bridge (song), which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that Adele's song "Water Under the Bridge" is about her relationship with Simon Konecki, which she is usually reluctant to discuss in her music? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Water Under the Bridge (song). You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Water Under the Bridge (song)), and if they received a combined total of at least 416.7 views per hour (i.e., 5,000 views in 12 hours or 10,000 in 24), the hook may be added to the statistics page. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.
Cwmhiraeth (talk) 00:02, 5 October 2022 (UTC)