User talk:March1310
Welcome[edit]
|
March1310, you are invited to the Teahouse![edit]
|
Hi March1310! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. We hope to see you there!
Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts 16:02, 1 October 2016 (UTC) |
AfC notification: Draft:Phil Day has a new comment[edit]
Teahouse talkback: you've got messages![edit]
Please note that all old questions are archived after 2-3 days of inactivity. Message added by Murph9000 (talk) 05:38, 3 October 2016 (UTC). (You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{teahouse talkback}} template).
- Hi, March1310, I also saw your Teahouse question and went ahead and did some copyedit on Draft:Phil Day (artist). (If you don't like my changes for whatever reasons, feel free to undo them.) It looks like you've done a lot of work there. As I'm writing this, the draft is still pending review. One place I could see some improvement is the way you're using the {{cite}} template, just to give the article a more consistent look (normally it's put inside the ref tags). If you want to discuss my edits or anything, feel free. Please type
{{u|Reidgreg}}if you reply here so that I'll get an alert. Happy editing! - Reidgreg (talk) 18:29, 4 October 2016 (UTC)
Reidgreg Thanks! I'm not sure what you you mean regarding {{cite}} template. I'm happy to change it so it is more consistent. Just not sure what that is? March1310 (talk) 21:47, 4 October 2016 (UTC)
- Your work on a four day old account impressed me, so I wasn't sure how familiar you were with Wikipedia (if you'd done a lot of editing before creating an account). Let me stress that you've done the important part: you've referenced your sources and demonstrated notability (in my opinion). This is just a matter of tidying up, and is non-urgent. Apologies if I get a little long-winded. Help:Referencing for beginners with citation templates is probably too basic for you but Wikipedia:Citation templates might be too much.
- Citation templates create output specifically meant to appear in the References section of an article. It's a good way of collecting reference information, gives standard output, and allows for a lot of advanced tricks with metadata. Although not a requirement, I feel it's a good habit to use the cite family of templates. If you look at a mature article like J. M. Coetzee#References, you can see how a lot of information is presented in a way that's easy to absorb. And guess what? One of the websites you reference, http://catalogue.nla.gov.au, provides Wikipedia citation data (for books) that you can copy & paste into the article!
- One of the last references is
<ref name=grants>2015 http://creative.vic.gov.au/news/2015/$1.3m-investment-in-victorias-independent-arts-sector</ref>. Try replacing that with<ref name=grants>{{cite web |url=http://creative.vic.gov.au/news/2015/$1.3m-investment-in-victorias-independent-arts-sector |title=$1.3M Investment in Victoria's Independent Arts Sector |publisher=creative.vic.gov.au |date=1 June 2016 |accessdate=5 October 2016}}</ref>and see the results. (Or better yet, just add one after the other (temporarily) so you can compare them on the Ref list.) - It looks like someone tried to experiment at this by placing {{essay}} inside a set of ref tags. However, this is not a citation template and resulted in a banner being placed in the references.
- The article presently uses {{cite book}} in the section, "Mountains Brown Press: titles", outside of the ref tags. There are a couple minor issues with this. (1) Normally the citation goes inside/between the <ref></ref> tags so that it will appear as a footnote where {{reflist}} has been placed. (2) The section isn't actually referring to any information from the books, so referencing doesn't seem necessary. (3) The citation template's output results in a slight clash of style with that of the prose. I would suggest moving the cite templates between the ref tags (adding the website URL as a parameter preceded by |url= ), and before the ref tag list the publication in the style book title (publication year) to match the prose, with no closing punctuation (as it is a bullet list).
- Sorry for going on. It might not be a bad idea to look at this diff of the changes I made to the article yesterday, mostly little Manual of Style tweaks. - Reidgreg (talk) 17:20, 5 October 2016 (UTC)
Reidgreg Thankyou so much for all your help (and editing), much appreciated. I am new to this, but I am reasonably familiar with computers. I'll be sure to use all your suggestions. Hopefully I'll have all the citations fixed by the end of the weekend. And again, thankyou so much. March1310 (talk) 21:31, 5 October 2016 (UTC)
Reidgreg I was wondering if you could point me in the right direction. I'm having trouble with copyright of images. How do I upload under 'fair use'?March1310 (talk) 06:11, 6 October 2016 (UTC)
- I see this has been addressed at Wikipedia:Teahouse/Questions#How to add an image under 'fair use'. I've never actually uploaded an image, and I know the Teahouse staff can give you better answers/advice on this. I can tell you that a few months ago I was rightly corrected for copyright violation because I was using a broader definition of fair use than can be tolerated here. Wikipedia has to be fairly strict due to its policy for free reuse and modification of content. The 10 criteria at WP:NFCCP give you a checklist. Part of that is like showing notability, that the image itself is notable and further illustrates the information in the prose of the article. My expectation is that you'd be best to concentrate efforts on justifying one image which would best serve the article. - Reidgreg (talk) 12:55, 6 October 2016 (UTC)
Reidgreg Thank You!March1310 (talk) 22:00, 6 October 2016 (UTC)
The article Julian Davies (author) has been proposed for deletion because it appears to have no reliable references. Under Wikipedia policy, this biography of a living person will be deleted unless it has at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.
If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp/dated}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within seven days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. --Animalparty! (talk) 23:59, 4 October 2016 (UTC)
Julian Davies (author) article[edit]
Hello, thanks for writing this article! I’ve just read it and I’m a bit concerned that it has no citations. That worries me since without proof that this person is notable, meaning covered enough in media to write a fair article on them (here's a specific guide for authors), the article may get deleted.
Are there any reliable sources (ones not written by or for this person) you can add? If so just edit the article and add citations using the cite tool, or if you have any thoughts or questions just let me know. Blythwood (talk) 04:56, 5 October 2016 (UTC)
Blythwood.Thanks for the quick response. I've only just started adding citations. Many of Davies novels were short listed for literary awards, and all were reviewed by major news papers, and literary reviews. Unfortunately (for me), most were published before news papers embraced online reviews. But I am slowly getting them together. I'v added a couple of online citations for now. March1310 (talk) 07:34, 5 October 2016 (UTC)
Leaving Template Crud in Articles[edit]
If you create an article in article space, such as Cassandra Atherton, but use an article or a draft as a template, please remove anything that is clearly inapplicable, such as my comment that disambiguation would be required. That was applicable to Phil Day, but it is not applicable to Atherton, and I have removed it. Robert McClenon (talk) 02:36, 8 October 2016 (UTC)
Robert McClenon Thanks. My mistake. March1310 (talk) 03:10, 8 October 2016 (UTC)
License tagging for File:Wong Sat 1904.jpg[edit]
Thanks for uploading File:Wong Sat 1904.jpg. You don't seem to have indicated the license status of the image. Wikipedia uses a set of image copyright tags to indicate this information.
To add a tag to the image, select the appropriate tag from this list, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the tag to the image's description. If there doesn't seem to be a suitable tag, the image is probably not appropriate for use on Wikipedia. For help in choosing the correct tag, or for any other questions, leave a message on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 10:05, 9 October 2016 (UTC)
ImageTaggingBot. Thanks you very much. Really helpful. Thanks again.March1310 (talk) 03:03, 10 October 2016 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for October 9[edit]
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Wong Ah Sat, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Bathurst. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:00, 9 October 2016 (UTC)
talk Thankyou! Fixed.March1310 (talk) 02:49, 10 October 2016 (UTC)
October 2016[edit]
Hello, I'm CAPTAIN RAJU. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions —the one you made with this edit to Wong Ah Sat— because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. CAPTAIN RAJU (✉) 20:41, 10 October 2016 (UTC)
CAPTAIN RAJU No worries. Thanks. March1310 (talk) 20:48, 10 October 2016 (UTC)
AfC notification: Draft:Phil Day (artist) has a new comment[edit]
SwisterTwister I've removed the citations citing Day's book information. I was wondering if you could specify which aspects of the article require third-party news/reviews. March1310 (talk) 09:23, 21 October 2016 (UTC)
SwisterTwister Have added some third-part news/reviews.March1310 (talk) 05:34, 26 October 2016 (UTC)
Your submission at Articles for creation: Phil Day (artist) has been accepted[edit]
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.
You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.
- If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
- If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .
Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!
SwisterTwister talk 05:39, 26 October 2016 (UTC)SwisterTwister Thankyou! I have since introduced links to the page from other articles.March1310 (talk) 01:28, 28 October 2016 (UTC)
Hi, March1310! Great to see a new user and glad to see you are not easily discouraged (contributing to Wikipedia has quite a steep leaning curve). Don't be afraid to ask for help. And, as someone with a bit of an interest in Chinese Australian history, great to see your article on Wong Ah Sat. Kerry (talk) 22:15, 29 October 2016 (UTC)
ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open![edit]
Hello, March1310. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)
ArbCom 2017 election voter message[edit]
Hello, March1310. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)
File source problem with File:Wong Sat 1904.jpg[edit]
Thank you for uploading File:Wong Sat 1904.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the page from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of the website's terms of use of its content. If the original copyright holder is a party unaffiliated with the website, that author should also be credited. Please add this information by editing the image description page.
If the necessary information is not added within the next days, the image will be deleted. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem.
Please refer to the image use policy to learn what images you can or cannot upload on Wikipedia. Please also check any other files you have uploaded to make sure they are correctly tagged. Here is a list of your uploads. If you have any questions or are in need of assistance please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 15:38, 23 October 2018 (UTC)
ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message[edit]
| Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add |