User talk:MarianStern

Welcome![edit]

Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. The following links will help you begin editing on Wikipedia:

Please bear these points in mind while editing Wikipedia

Respect copyrights – do not copy and paste text or images directly from other websites.
Maintain a neutral point of view – this is one of Wikipedia's core policies.
Take particular care while adding biographical material about a living person to any Wikipedia page and follow Wikipedia's Biography of Living Persons policy. Particularly, controversial and negative statements should be referenced with multiple reliable sources.
No edit warring or abuse of multiple accounts.
If you are testing, please use the Sandbox to do so.
Do not add troublesome content to any article, such as: copyrighted text, libel, advertising or promotional messages, and text that is not related to an article's subject. Deliberately adding such content or otherwise editing articles maliciously is considered vandalism; doing so will result in your account or IP being blocked from editing.
Do not use talk pages as discussion or forum pages as Wikipedia is not a forum.

The Wikipedia tutorial is a good place to start learning about Wikipedia. If you have any questions, see the help pages, add a question to the village pump or ask me on my talk page. By the way, you can sign your name on Talk and discussion pages using four tildes, like this: ~~~~ (the software will replace them with your signature and the date). Again, welcome! Doug Weller talk 15:48, 13 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Please don't remove dead links summarily[edit]

Please read Wikipedia:Link rot. The new addresses were extremely easy to find. Thanks. Doug Weller talk 15:49, 13 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked as a sockpuppet[edit]

This account has been blocked indefinitely as a sock puppet of GingerBreadHarlot (talk · contribs · global contribs · page moves · user creation · block log) that was created to violate Wikipedia policy. Note that using multiple accounts is allowed, but using them for illegitimate reasons is not, and that all edits made while evading a block or ban may be reverted or deleted. If this account is not a sock puppet, and you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}} below. Mike V • Talk 18:00, 20 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

MarianStern (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I am not Gingerbreadharlot. I saw the archive about eating time of Phagan on frank, leo and looked up correct time. Phagans momma said she ate lunch at 11:30 a.m. not 11:00 a.m. MarianStern (talk) 03:52, 23 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Do you have a source too support that assertion? PhilKnight (talk) 00:20, 25 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

MarianStern (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

PhilKnight according to the Leo Frank trial brief of evidence Phagan ate lunch at 1130 not 11am LEO M. FRANK, Plaintiff in Error vs. From Fulton Superior Court. STATE OF GEORGIA Defendant in Error BRIEF OF THE EVIDENCE. MRS. J. W. COLEMAN, sworn for the State. I am Mary Phagan’s mother. I last saw her alive on the 26th day of April, 1913, about a quarter to twelve, at home, at 146 Lindsey Street. She was getting ready to go to the pencil factory to get her pay envelope. About 11:30 she ate some cabbage and bread. She left home at a quarter to twelve. She would have been fourteen years old the first day of June, was fair complected, heavy set, very pretty, and was extra large for her age. She had on a lavender dress, trimmed in lace, and a blue hat. She had dimples in her cheeks. MarianStern (talk) 01:10, 25 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

I can only assume that your rather cryptic remarks about "eating time of Phagan" mean that you think the evidence of sockpuppetry is one edit related to that matter. However, I have made extensive comparisons of the editing history of this account with the histories of several other accounts, and there are numerous pieces of evidence, which together make it perfectly clear that you have used more than one account in ways that are unacceptable. The editor who uses the pseudonym "JamesBWatson" (talk) 12:30, 25 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

MarianStern (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Having looked at many of the other cases, It appears these petitions for ban removal almost never lead to blocks being lifted, However, I wanted to point out to the co-owner (activist editor Tom North shoreman of Ohio) of the Leo Frank article and my real life estranged friend who submitted me as a sockpuppet that there are secondary sources supporting I was in fact correct about the time Phagan ate her lunch, which was 11:30 a.m., not 11:00 a.m. as the editors misinterpreted from Oney, who says Phagan woke up at 11:00 a.m. but does not give a time she ate her lunch. So Three secondary sources put her eating lunch at 11:30am, and one at 11:00 a.m., the final arbiter is the Leo Frank trial brief of evidence. Phagan's mom said it was 11:30 a.m.

1. The Murder of Little Mary Phagan by Mary Phagan Kean, page 17 the Legacy:

quote: "At 11:30 a.m. she ate some cabbage and bread for lunch.

2. Popular Crime: Reflections on the Celebration of Violence By Bill James, 2012, page 112

quote: Mary Phagan ate a lunch of cabbage and bread about 11:30..... Source:

https://books.google.co.uk/books?id=bxyQgM6U5IQC&pg=PT128&dq=11:30+mary+phagan&hl=en&sa=X&ved=0ahUKEwidgPbo1o7OAhUJpJQKHX-CAoMQ6AEIMTAA#v=onepage&q=11%3A30%20mary%20phagan&f=false

3. A Little Girl is Dead, Harry Golden, 1965, page 364 The evidence uncontradicted discloses that Mary Phagan ate her dinner at 11:30 o'clock

There you go MarianStern (talk) 14:18, 25 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Checkuser verified abuser of multiple accounts. --jpgordon^{𝄢𝄆 𝄐𝄇} 14:44, 25 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

MarianStern (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Am I able to out an individual sleeper cell guy who is an experienced editor on wikipedia, with years under his belt, who is pretending to be a liberal and pro-Jew, to work his way up to admin (this ambitious upstart with years of editing not far away from achieving admin, i give it 1-2 more years) to get all these sanctions lifted? MarianStern (talk) 14:51, 25 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

WP:NOTTHEM, does not address reason for block. Removing talk page access for wasting our time. OhNoitsJamie ^Talk 15:09, 25 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Note that I CU confirmed and blocked User:Eleconledmouse as a sock reinstating edits made by this editor. Doug Weller talk 15:48, 25 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]