User talk:Markstephens2014
Welcome!
[edit]Hello, Markstephens2014, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, such as Snehil Sharma, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines, and may not be retained.
There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the Teahouse, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{help me}} on this page, followed by your question, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers:
- Starting an article
- Your first article
- Contributing to Wikipedia
- Biographies of living persons
- How to write a great article
- The five pillars of Wikipedia
- Help pages
- Tutorial
I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Questions or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! Gbawden (talk) 09:25, 19 January 2015 (UTC)
Speedy deletion nomination of Snehil Sharma
[edit]![](http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/thumb/1/15/Ambox_warning_pn.svg/48px-Ambox_warning_pn.svg.png)
If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.
A tag has been placed on Snehil Sharma requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Gbawden (talk) 09:25, 19 January 2015 (UTC)
Ways to improve Snehil Sharma
[edit]Hi, I'm Virophage. Markstephens2014, thanks for creating Snehil Sharma!
I've just tagged the page, using our page curation tools, as having some issues to fix. Hello, if you plan to link this to something else to expand your topic, please remove my tag when you do so.
The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, you can leave a comment on my talk page. Or, for more editing help, talk to the volunteers at the Teahouse. Virophage (talk) 09:25, 19 January 2015 (UTC)
Please do not remove speedy deletion notices from pages you have created yourself, as you did with Snehil Sharma. If you believe the page should not be deleted, you may contest the deletion by clicking on the button that says: Contest this speedy deletion, which appears inside the speedy deletion notice. This will allow you to make your case on the article's talk page. Administrators will consider your reasoning before deciding what to do with the article. Thank you. The editor who uses the pseudonym "JamesBWatson" (talk) 16:52, 19 January 2015 (UTC)
@JamesBWatson I don't know that personality Snehil Sharma, personally. But I love his dancing and seen many of his stage performances and Choreography. About Barnstar, as I got it from a user, I gave that back, may be Snehil Sharma is also an editor Wikipedia, not sure I am new here, I don't know the meaning of all that. My writing about him is genuine. If not me someone will write the same article in future because he is quite famous in his fields, I just wrote his article using the correct references. Sorry Sir, If I said something wrong.--Markstephens2014 (talk) 11:56, 22 January 2015 (UTC)
- What has any of that got to do with the message I posted here? The editor who uses the pseudonym "JamesBWatson" (talk) 13:33, 22 January 2015 (UTC)
February 2015
[edit] Please do not remove Articles for deletion notices from articles or remove other people's comments in Articles for deletion pages, as you did with WordPress themes. Doing so won't stop the discussion from taking place. You are, however, welcome to comment about the proposed deletion on the appropriate page. Thank you. --Animalparty-- (talk) 07:15, 20 February 2015 (UTC)
Deletion discussion about Snehil Sharma
[edit]Hello, Markstephens2014,
I wanted to let you know that there's a discussion about whether Snehil Sharma should be deleted. Your comments are welcome at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Snehil Sharma .
If you're new to the process, articles for deletion is a group discussion (not a vote!) that usually lasts seven days. If you need it, there is a guide on how to contribute. Last but not least, you are highly encouraged to continue improving the article; just be sure not to remove the tag about the deletion nomination from the top.
Thanks, Hroðulf (or Hrothulf) (Talk) 15:02, 25 April 2015 (UTC)
Blocked as a sockpuppet
[edit]![]() | This account has been blocked indefinitely as a suspected sock puppet of Snehilsharma (talk · contribs · global contribs · page moves · user creation · block log) that was created to violate Wikipedia policy. Note that using multiple accounts is allowed, but using them for illegitimate reasons is not, and that all edits made while evading a block or ban may be reverted or deleted. If this is a sock puppet account, and your original account is blocked, please also note that banned or blocked users are not allowed to edit Wikipedia; and all edits made under this account may be reverted. If this account is not a sock puppet, and you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}} below. Vanjagenije (talk) 19:06, 26 April 2016 (UTC) |