User talk:Maru Pradesh, Bharat
October 2023[edit]
Hello, I'm The Herald. An edit that you recently made to Bishangarh seemed to be a test and has been reverted. If you want to practice editing, please use your sandbox. If you think a mistake was made, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks! The Herald (Benison) (talk) 15:43, 30 October 2023 (UTC)
- sandbox is for kids, dear Maru Pradesh, Bharat (talk) 15:47, 30 October 2023 (UTC)
You are suspected of sockpuppetry, which means that someone suspects you of using multiple Wikipedia accounts for prohibited purposes. Please make yourself familiar with the guide to responding to investigations, then, if you wish to do so, respond to the evidence at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Hari7773. Thank you. Belbury (talk) 16:05, 30 October 2023 (UTC)
You have been blocked from editing for a period of 31 hours for persistently making disruptive edits. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.
If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page:
{{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. RegentsPark (comment) 17:25, 30 October 2023 (UTC)- {{unblock|reason=I am a responsible wikipedian, and why you block me without warning}} Maru Pradesh, Bharat (talk) 17:39, 30 October 2023 (UTC)
- Spamming an article talk page and multiple user talk pages with the same request is disruptive. Seeing that that is the sum total of your contributions, technically, I could have blocked you indefinitely as WP:NOTHERE. I suggest you wait out your block and the sockpuppet investigation above. RegentsPark (comment) 17:54, 30 October 2023 (UTC)
Blocked as a sockpuppet[edit]
Wikipedia's technical logs indicate that this user account has been or may be used abusively as a sockpuppet of User:Hari7773 per the evidence presented at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Hari7773. It has been blocked indefinitely from editing to prevent abuse.
Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.
If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you should review the guide to appealing blocks, and then appeal your block by adding the following text below this notice:
Administrators: Checkusers have access to confidential system logs not accessible by the public or by administrators due to the Wikimedia Foundation's privacy policy. You must not loosen or remove this block, or issue an IP block exemption, without consulting with a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee. Administrators who undo checkuser blocks without permission from a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee may be summarily desysopped. Girth Summit (blether) 15:11, 4 November 2023 (UTC)
Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.
If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you should review the guide to appealing blocks, and then appeal your block by adding the following text below this notice:
{{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}}. Note that anything you post in your unblock request will be public, so you may alternatively use the Unblock Ticket Request System to submit an appeal if it contains information that must be private.Administrators: Checkusers have access to confidential system logs not accessible by the public or by administrators due to the Wikimedia Foundation's privacy policy. You must not loosen or remove this block, or issue an IP block exemption, without consulting with a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee. Administrators who undo checkuser blocks without permission from a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee may be summarily desysopped.