Jump to content

User talk:Masteroftheturnip

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Hello, Masteroftheturnip, and Welcome to Wikipedia!

Thank you for your contributions to this free encyclopedia. If you decide that you need help, check out Getting Help below, ask at the help desk, or place {{Help me}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking or by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your username and the date. Also, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field. Below are some useful links to help you get started. Happy editing! KylieTastic (talk) 08:39, 12 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: The Pleasant Valley Days (July 11)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Mcmatter were:
This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.
This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:
Make sure you add references that meet these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
McMatter (talk)/(contrib) 05:23, 11 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Teahouse logo
Hello, Masteroftheturnip! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! McMatter (talk)/(contrib) 05:23, 11 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: The Pleasant Valley Days (July 12)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by KylieTastic was:
This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:
Make sure you add references that meet these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
KylieTastic (talk) 08:39, 12 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: The Pleasant Valley Days (August 9)[edit]

Your recent article submission has been rejected. If you have further questions, you can ask at the Articles for creation help desk or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help. The reason left by Mcmatter was: This topic is not sufficiently notable for inclusion in Wikipedia.
McMatter (talk)/(contrib) 05:40, 9 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Help request[edit]

uhh uhh Masteroftheturnip (talk) 05:14, 21 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Don't put the help template in the section header. It just makes a sort of mess.
I can imagine that you are wondering about your rejected draft. The sources that you provided are themselves too promotional to be considered as independent, in-depth reporting about the celebration. I imagine the reviewer did some more searching before issuing a rejection, and they found nothing else better than what you had already offered.
Yes, having your draft rejected is a disappointment. But part of being a Wikipedia editor is learning how to use sources to establish notability for a subject. You could try some other subject.
But, before trying to create another new article, can I suggest that you spend some time improving existing articles? By making corrections and additions, with suitable sources, you'll be on your way to understanding better what's needed for creating a new article. It might still be difficult, but perhaps less frustrating. — jmcgnh(talk) (contribs) 05:44, 21 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

September 2023[edit]

Information icon Hello, I'm Novo Tape. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Talk:Citizen's arrest have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse or the Help desk. Thanks. Sincerely, Novo Tape (She/Her)My Talk Page 19:59, 21 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Information icon Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Citizen's arrest. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Sincerely, Novo Tape (She/Her)My Talk Page 20:02, 21 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Warning icon Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Citizen's arrest, you may be blocked from editing. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 20:12, 22 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Citizen's arrest. Schminnte (talk • contribs) 20:15, 22 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Stop icon
You have been blocked indefinitely from editing to prevent further vandalism.
If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  ~ ToBeFree (talk) 20:17, 22 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

:([edit]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Masteroftheturnip (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Your reason here My friend took my computer and edited it. He took it during school, and now the school IP address is banned. I am a legitimate editor of Wikipedia, as you can see from my edits. There have been past infractions, but those are all by my friend, as can be proven by the time stamp on all of them. They occurred within the same 50 minute range of one of my classes, which is where my friend, who knows my password, has taken my computer repeatedly and vandalized Wikipedia. I apologize for any inconvenience this caused anybody

Decline reason:

Sorry, but compromised accounts may not be unblocked. --jpgordon𝄢𝄆𝄐𝄇 21:44, 22 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Masteroftheturnip (talk) 21:13, 22 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Draft:Camman18[edit]

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Draft:Camman18, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Qcne (talk) 13:36, 6 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:The Pleasant Valley Days[edit]

Information icon Hello, Masteroftheturnip. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:The Pleasant Valley Days, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 06:06, 9 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:The Pleasant Valley Days[edit]

Hello, Masteroftheturnip. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "The Pleasant Valley Days".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz Read! Talk! 05:31, 9 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Masteroftheturnip&oldid=1205233472"