User talk:Matt Wears a Hat

This user is interested in ancient Rome.

en

This user is a native speaker of the English language.

:

This user is a member of the
Cold War task force
of WikiProject Military history.

This user is a member of the Crusades task force
of WikiProject Military history.

You have been indefinitely blocked from editing for Vandalism. If you feel this block is unjustified, you may contest it by adding the text {{unblock|your reason here}} below. Tiderolls 01:24, 24 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Matt Wears a Hat (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I dont know why I was blocked at all. I was making constructive edits and did not violate and laws or do any kind of damage whatsoever.? I dont what i did, but what ever it may be, I am sorry for it and please let continue to try and improve wikipedia articles. Thanks

Decline reason:

Checkuser verified sockpuppet of blocked user. --jpgordon^{::==( o )} 01:38, 24 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

}}

Sockpuppet admission[edit]

An editor has expressed a concern that this account may be a sockpuppet of Thewarison101 (talk · contribs · logs).
Please refer to the sockpuppet investigation of the sockpuppeteer, and editing habits or contributions of the sockpuppet for evidence. This policy subsection may be helpful.

Account information: block log – contribs – logs – abuse log – CentralAuth

See [1] for admission. Dennis Brown - 2¢ © 01:37, 24 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Matt Wears a Hat (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

That was my old account which no one believed I could change, but i did based on some constructive edits I was making under this account as well as the edits I hopefully can make after someone unblocks me. Thanks you.

Decline reason:

Creating a sock is not a way to get yourself unblocked, quite the contrary. Max Semenik (talk) 03:57, 24 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Matt Wears a Hat (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I dont know hat else to do, can i retire my old account and use this account for a clean start policy or something. Thanks'

Decline reason:

No you can't. I suggest you to leave Wikipedia alone. Max Semenik (talk) 22:09, 24 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Matt Wears a Hat (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

well, i dont want to have to wait for another 6 years to get a new ip address, so is there anything I can do go gain an unblock?

Decline reason:

Socks cannot use a new account for a clean start (A clean start is not permitted if there are active bans, blocks or sanctions in place against the old account). Suggest you go back to your original account and request wp:standard offer Ronhjones ^(Talk) 22:12, 25 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Matt Wears a Hat (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Thank you Ronhjohhnes, i will ask for the standard offer to be considered in this unblock since i dont want to be away from wikipedia forever. I shall wait six months without sockpuppetry. I promise to avoid the behavior that led to the block/ban. I have not and will not create any extraordinary reasons to object to a return. Thanks and will see everyone in 6 months. Thank you Wikipedia.

Decline reason:

Procedural decline, since user is no longer requesting an unblock. Please make the request for the standard offer in six months from your original account, and we'll consider it at that time. Seraphimblade ^{Talk to me} 02:58, 27 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Matt Wears a Hat (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

i cant since my talk page was banned after i was messing around with it and reverting edits. i will send standard offer 5 and a half months from now. thanks

Decline reason:

Not a request for unblock. Closedmouth (talk) 07:03, 27 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.