User talk:Maurreen/archive 8

Archives[edit]

/archive 1, Sep-Oct 2004
/archive 2, Nov 2004
/archive 3, Dec 04 - Jan 05
/archive 4, August 2005
/archive 5, June 2006
/archive 6, August 2006 ???
/archive 7, June - August 2006
/archive 8, Sep 2006 - 2009

Tribe[edit]

Maureen:

Sudhans are a real tribe so the article is not nonsense but it does not to be cleaned up

Trueblood78664.173.197.170 05:26, 24 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

OK[edit]

Maurreen, thanks - it was a good idea to link to the SOS CD version from V0.5N for now. I had presumed we were continuing as discussed here and here to the next version, though I understand that you may not want to take on Release Version 1.0 just yet. I just didn't want nominators to get annoyed that they had missed the deadline, and I've always regarded nomination as an ongoing, permanent fixture of the project (once begun). We can always re-open the link in a few days if it's needed. See my comments here and hopefully we can get a consensus. Cheers, Walkerma 19:04, 1 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the note. I'm really glad we seem to be coming broadly to the same conclusions, and probably others are too - hopefully that means we can easily get a consensus on what to do next. Walkerma 17:19, 2 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Geography wikipedia project[edit]

Hello, I thought you might be interested in helping Wikipedia:WikiProject_Geography. If so, just add your name to the page. Thanks AlexD 11:35, 1 September 2006 (UTC)

Thank you for your reply, I know what you mean about neglecting things in real life, so I think the project is going to be a bit more laid back than most and not trying to get everything done quickly, so i look forward to your help and edits. Thanks againAlexD 22:07, 2 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

IRC channel[edit]

Click on this link: #wikipedia-static for the static subcommittee IRC channel. (Sunday 10th meeting at 4pm EST)
Click on this link: #wikimedia-spcomm for the Special Projects Committee channel (Sunday 3rd meeting at 4pm EST)

If you still have problems, remember I'm a complete novice, but Tito can probably help - he helped me out. Talk to you tomorrow! Walkerma 20:18, 2 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Completing Version 0.5 reviews[edit]

Maurreen, thanks for all your help on things like the core topics and core bios. And now we've made V0.5 over 1000 articles! I understand you're busy, but now we only have about four weeks left to review articles for Wikipedia:Version 0.5. I was wondering if you could take a look at Wikipedia:Version_0.5/To_do and sign up for something - perhaps the core topics or biographies? I'd like us to make sure we don't miss anything important. And once the end of the month rolls around we can take a well-deserved break...! Any help you can give would be most welcome. Thanks, Walkerma 21:46, 3 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the reply, I'd guessed it was probably the case. Thanks too for the update on the IRC. Walkerma 22:54, 3 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Regarding having a main encyclopedia-section with balance, and appendices of featured content and raw "good" content, you said:

"It seems very halfway to me. The threshold varies too much, the amount of attention, etc., varies too much."

The first section -- small and refined -- is indeed 'halfway', at least until it grows to encompass most of WP. The other two sections definitely contain material with varied quality, depth, and tone / intended audience; which is why they could make fine appendices. But perhaps I did not understand what you meant :-) +sj + 21:42, 10 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

AID[edit]

You helped choose Sjoerd Kuyper (random unreferenced BLP of the day for 25 May 2024 - provided by User:AnomieBOT/RandomPage via WP:RANDUNREF) as this week's WP:AID winner[edit]

Thank you for your support of the Article Improvement Drive.
This week Sjoerd Kuyper (random unreferenced BLP of the day for 25 May 2024 - provided by User:AnomieBOT/RandomPage via WP:RANDUNREF) was selected to be improved to featured article status.
Hope you can help.

Green caterpillar 00:18, 10 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia talk:Maintenance collaboration of the week change[edit]

You probably don't remember, but a long time ago (couple of months I think), you posted a request at Wikipedia talk:Maintenance collaboration of the week for help with editing the maintenance collaboration. Please check there for my reply. --Draicone ^(talk) 12:10, 12 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The Morning Post vs. Morning Post[edit]

Can you help me correct the title of this British/London daily newspaper???
It should be [[The Morning Post]].
I cannot MOVE the page The Morning Post REDIREDTS to Morning Post.

Thanks. --- Ludvikus 03:33, 14 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Please vote[edit]

Hello, there. Please take the time to vote for the various candidates over at Core_biographies#Voting_booth. If you can, try to read a bit about the candidates you don't know about so you can get a better idea of how to vote. Thanks! ♠ SG →Talk 10:44, 16 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia:WikiProject ethics and law[edit]

Just letting you know that there are basically two criteria for deleting WikiProjects. These include no activity in 3 months and no listed members. Right now, the project above qualifies as both. If you were to add a membership list, then it would qualify for neither. It is being added to the Wikipedia:WikiProject Council's directory, and will with any luck attract more members when it is a bit more visible. Best of luck. Badbilltucker 15:41, 27 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Geography is now the COTF[edit]

You showed support for Geography at Wikipedia:Version 1.0 Editorial Team/Core topics/Core topics COTF. This article was selected as our collaboration of the fortnight. Hope you can help.

You helped choose Mark Twain as this week's WP:AID winner[edit]

Thank you for your support of the Article Improvement Drive.
This week Mark Twain was selected to be improved to featured article status.
Hope you can help.

_→AzaToth 00:20, 23 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Industry is now the Core Topics COTF[edit]

You showed support for Industry at Wikipedia:Version 1.0 Editorial Team/Core topics/Core topics COTF. This article was selected as our collaboration of the fortnight. Hope you can help.

Sex is the new COTF[edit]

You showed support for Sex at Wikipedia:Version 1.0 Editorial Team/Core topics/Core topics COTF. This article was selected as our collaboration of the fortnight. Hope you can help.

Walkerma 06:40, 2 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Confucius is now the COTF[edit]

You showed support for Confucius at Wikipedia:Version 1.0 Editorial Team/Core topics/Core topics COTF. This article was selected as our collaboration of the fortnight. Hope you can help.

Natural science is now the COTF[edit]

You showed support for Natural science at Wikipedia:Version 1.0 Editorial Team/Core topics/Core topics COTF. This article was selected as our collaboration of the fortnight. Hope you can help.

Metal is now the COTF[edit]

You showed support for Metal at Wikipedia:Version 1.0 Editorial Team/Core topics/Core topics COTF. This article was selected as our collaboration of the fortnight. Hope you can help.

Walkerma 16:07, 31 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Need people with an opinion[edit]

Hey there. I noticed that in the past, you have participated in a discussion about Filmographies and lists of works in general here. There is now a RfC discussing this and more aspects here. It would be nice if you took a look and gave your comments on those matters. Thank you. theroachman ^T ^C 11:09, 15 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Chemical element is now the Core Topics COTF[edit]

You showed support for Chemical element at Wikipedia:Version 1.0 Editorial Team/Core topics/Core topics COTF. This article was selected as our collaboration of the fortnight. Hope you can help.

Thanks, Walkerma 15:46, 22 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Projects by type[edit]

Thank you for your contribution to the Category:Project management category in the past. This now links to Category:Projects by type for examples of projects in different domains. However, there is currently a Call for Deletion for this category. If you would like to contribute to the discussion, you would be very welcome. Please do this soon if possible since the discussion period is very short. Thank you for your interest if you can contribute. Regards, Jonathan Bowen 03:31, 17 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Ca-on-wd.gif[edit]

Hello, Maurreen. An automated process has found and removed an image or media file tagged as nonfree media, and thus is being used under fair use that was in your userspace. The image (Image:Ca-on-wd.gif) was found at the following location: User talk:Maurreen. This image or media was attempted to be removed per criterion number 9 of our non-free content policy. The image or media was replaced with Image:NonFreeImageRemoved.svg , so your formatting of your userpage should be fine. Please find a free image or media to replace it with, and or remove the image from your userspace. User:Gnome (Bot)-talk 19:30, 15 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

No content in Category:Wikipedia problems[edit]

Hello, this is a message from an automated bot. A tag has been placed on Category:Wikipedia problems, by 84.66.17.239, another Wikipedia user, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. The tag claims that it should be speedily deleted because Category:Wikipedia problems has been empty for at least four days, and its only content has been links to parent categories. (CSD C1).

To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait before possibly deleting Category:Wikipedia problems, please affix the template {{hangon}} to the page, and put a note on its talk page. This bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion, it did not nominate Category:Wikipedia problems itself. Feel free to leave a message on the bot operator's talk page if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot. Thanks. --Android Mouse Bot 2 21:45, 25 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Europe is now the core topics collaboration[edit]

You showed support for Europe at Wikipedia:Version 1.0 Editorial Team/Core topics/Core topics COTF. This article was selected as our collaboration of the fortnight. Hope you can help.

Thanks, Walkerma 04:09, 4 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Asia is the new COTF[edit]

You showed support for Asia at Wikipedia:Version 1.0 Editorial Team/Core topics/Core topics COTF. This article was selected as our collaboration of the fortnight. Hope you can help.

List of American copy editors[edit]

A {{prod}} template has been added to the article List of American copy editors, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but the article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice explains why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may contest the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page. Also, please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. THF 23:06, 5 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Request for comment on Category Redirect template[edit]

Because you are a member of WikiProject Categories, your input is invited on some proposed changes to the design of the {{Category redirect}} template. Please feel free to view the proposals and comment on the template talk page. --Russ (talk) 21:39, 11 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Basic topic lists[edit]

Hello, can you please add a brief description to this category you created? 16@r (talk) 19:35, 4 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of Template:V1.0 nom possible[edit]

A tag has been placed on Template:V1.0 nom possible requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section T3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a deprecated or orphaned template. After seven days, if it is still unused and the speedy deletion tag has not been removed, the template will be deleted.

If the template is intended to be substituted, please feel free to remove the speedy deletion tag and please consider putting a note on the template's page indicating that it is substituted so as to avoid any future mistakes (<noinclude>{{transclusionless}}</noinclude>).

Thanks. --MZMcBride (talk) 03:36, 16 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

CfD: Domotics[edit]

Hiya Maurreen, I'm from Raleigh originally and still read the N & O from time to time...never noticed any copyediting problems in the business section, so keep up the good work :) You created a category called "Domotics" 4 years ago. It's a term that never caught on, and most of the articles in that category are also tagged "Home automation", which is what you get redirected to if you type "domotics", anyway. In tech articles in particular, we're trying to make things easier for the many non-native-English speakers by using words that aren't too obscure, and "domotics" only get 79K Google hits...do you have any objection to merging it into "Home automation"? - Dan Dank55 (talk) 22:36, 19 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

MfD nomination of Wikipedia:Wikiquette alerts[edit]

Wikipedia:Wikiquette alerts, a page you created, has been nominated for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Wikipedia:Wikiquette alerts (2nd nomination) and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of Wikipedia:Wikiquette alerts during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 00:03, 26 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Feedback[edit]

I've been working on the stub for Broadcast Journalism. I'd appreciate any feedback you might have has as well as any suggestions for further expansion on the article. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Tmac9986 (talk • contribs) 01:08, 20 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of Template:Chem-cat[edit]

A tag has been placed on Template:Chem-cat requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section T3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a deprecated or orphaned template. After seven days, if it is still unused and the speedy deletion tag has not been removed, the template will be deleted.

If the template is intended to be substituted, please feel free to remove the speedy deletion tag and please consider putting a note on the template's page indicating that it is substituted so as to avoid any future mistakes (<noinclude>{{transclusionless}}</noinclude>).

Thanks. --MZMcBride (talk) 21:56, 23 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

CfD nomination of Category:Basic topic lists[edit]

Operation COOKIE MONSTER[edit]

CfD nomination of Category:Media business[edit]

Category:Media business, which you created, has been nominated for deletion, merging, or renaming. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the Categories for discussion page. Thank you. Cgingold (talk) 12:35, 11 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

MoS[edit]

Hi Maurreen. I listed some MoS issues at Some MoS issues. Also, I added and populated some subcategories to Category:Wikipedia style guidelines in hopes of getting a better handle on what are official MoS' page and what are not. If you have some time, please take a look. Thanks. Bebestbe (talk) 20:57, 12 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

No content in Category:American multimedia companies[edit]

Hello, this is a message from an automated bot. A tag has been placed on Category:American multimedia companies, by another Wikipedia user, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. The tag claims that it should be speedily deleted because Category:American multimedia companies has been empty for at least four days, and its only content has been links to parent categories. (CSD C1).

To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait before possibly deleting Category:American multimedia companies, please affix the template {{hangon}} to the page, and put a note on its talk page. If the article has already been deleted, see the advice and instructions at WP:WMD. Feel free to contact the bot operator if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot, bearing in mind that this bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion; it does not perform any nominations or deletions itself. To see the user who deleted the page, click here CSDWarnBot (talk) 18:20, 27 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

HMX-1[edit]

You made an edit to the talk page of this article quite a while ago, however, since you stated you were part of the squadron, I was wondering if you had information I could look for? Is there a list of past commanders of HMX-1?

The reason I am asking, is that the grandfather of a girl I know is a retired marine col. He doesn't talk much about his service. However, he has models of just about every marine helicopter in his den. And he has a retirement gift of a jar of jelly beans signed by President Reagan.

Is there a list of past commanders of HMX-1?Claffey27 (talk) 19:16, 15 February 2009 (UTC)claffey27[reply]

CfD nomination of Category:Media by interest[edit]

Archives of the Manual of Style[edit]

As the editor with the most contributions to Wikipedia talk:Manual of Style/Archive 10, you might be able to answer the question asked at Wikipedia talk:Manual of Style#Archives of this page. Here is a permanent link. -- Wavelength (talk) 04:10, 2 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

CfD nomination of Category:Newspapering[edit]

RE: US Armed Forces, specifically titles[edit]

This is old news, probably, but I wanted to let you know that ranks are capitalised in ALL circumstances, as they are official titles. Example, you would still write "Sergeant First Class," or "Lieutenant Colonel" whether they were followed by a name or not. As well, the Army in specific has taken a unique view on the word "soldier." When used specifically to descxribe its own members, the Army purposely capitalises the word. It's their prerogative. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 82.146.160.51 (talk) 20:56, 2 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

CfD nomination of Category:Newspaper business[edit]