User talk:MaxPlays

November 2016[edit]

Hello, I'm Doug Weller. An edit that you recently made to History of Europe seemed to be a test and has been removed. If you want more practice editing, please use the sandbox. If you think a mistake was made, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks! Doug Weller talk 12:24, 18 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for April 24[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited State-owned enterprise, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Telia. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:15, 24 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

October 2017[edit]

Hello, I'm Pkbwcgs. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to RiceGum have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think a mistake was made, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Pkbwcgs (talk) 18:41, 17 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message[edit]

Hello, MaxPlays. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

December 2017[edit]

This is your only warning; if you vandalize Wikipedia again, as you did at Getting Over It with Bennett Foddy, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. You know better. -- ferret (talk) 20:41, 31 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

January 2018[edit]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because it appears that you are not here to build an encyclopedia.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Mifter (talk) 21:25, 1 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

MaxPlays (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I made the edit after I watched the Dunkey's video, thought it was funny and did not think about it enough. I didn't know what the consequences would be. I learned my lesson and I won't let it happen again. But at the same time I think the block was unfair, because the warning said: "if you vandalize Wikipedia again, you may be blocked from editing without further notice", but I still got blocked, although I didn't vandalize after I got the warning. MaxPlays (talk) 17:31, 5 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

I am declining your unblock request because it does not address the reason for your block, or because it is inadequate for other reasons. To be unblocked, you must convince the reviewing administrator(s) that

the block is not necessary to prevent damage or disruption to Wikipedia, or
the block is no longer necessary because you
1. understand what you have been blocked for,
2. will not continue to cause damage or disruption, and
3. will make useful contributions instead.

Please read the guide to appealing blocks for more information. SQL ^{Query me!} 03:49, 7 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

MaxPlays (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I agree that the edit that I made was disruptive to Wikipedia and I understand why I was blocked. I promise to not do what I did then again, and continue doing productive edits to Wikipedia. MaxPlays (talk) 10:25, 13 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Your response (while appreciated) doesn't address all of the concerns regarding the reason for your block. You've also been blocked for using more than one account to cause disruption on Wikipedia, and you didn't address this at all. Until you do, I'm not going to approve your unblock request. ~Oshwah~^{(talk) (contribs)} 10:41, 13 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

MaxPlays (talk) 10:25, 13 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

R.I.P. Avicii[edit]

One of my favorite artists is now gone :'( MaxPlays (talk) 19:39, 20 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

latest set of unblock requests[edit]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

MaxPlays (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

The edit I made back then was very stupid and inconsiderate, I will not do it again and instead I want to contribute to Wikipedia. MaxPlays (talk) 14:14, 25 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

What Oshwah said. Please fully address the edits/behavior that led to your

block, and why they were inappropriate. Please describe in detail what you will do instead. Please deal in detail with your block evasion/use of more than one account. Please describe in detail what constructive edits you would make.-- Dlohcierekim  (talk) 16:37, 25 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

What is it that you want to contribute? You will also need to address your block evasion, as Oshwah states. 331dot (talk) 14:38, 25 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

MaxPlays (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I admit that the edit I made to Getting Over It with Bennett Foddy was wrong and inappropriate and I understand why I was blocked. I promise I will not vandalize Wikipedia again and that the block is no longer needed to prevent damage or disruption. The accused "block evasion" may come from the fact that I tried to make a new account after being blocked. Since that option was clearly visible for me, I thought it would be allowed, but I was wrong. I have not evaded the block in any other way. I want to be unblocked because I would want to contribute to articles of several topics as I have done on the English Wikipedia before the block and on the Finnish Wikipedia. MaxPlays (talk) 14:35, 8 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

You were asked by AGK to demonstrate a contribution [...] by cpying the source of an article, pasting it into a new section, and making the change(s) you would make. As I can see, you only pasted a content of an article here, but did not make any changes. At least, you did not save the changes as separate edits, so I can't see them. Vanjagenije (talk) 23:44, 11 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

I just did what AGK said: I pasted the source and made the changes. I didn't know that I had to do the changes in a separate edit, since nobody said to do so. MaxPlays (talk) 17:00, 12 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I would like Vanjagenije to see the message above.MaxPlays (talk) 11:53, 17 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Questions from administrator(s)[edit]

Hi, MaxPlays:

Have you edited Wikipedia or created an account since being blocked?
Please demonstrate a contribution that, if unblock, you would like to make by cpying the source of an article, pasting it into a new section, and making the change(s) you would make.

AGK ■ 19:58, 31 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

1. I haven't edited the English Wikipedia at all outside of this talk page after being blocked. I tried to make a new account, but it didn't work since my IP was blocked too. 2. I'll do this later. MaxPlays (talk) 20:04, 1 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

MaxPlays (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

It's now been over a year since the block and I would want to be able to contribute to the Wikipedia again. I already explained the reasons why I should be unblocked in my previous requests. MaxPlays (talk) 17:13, 12 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Procedural decline only. This unblock request has been open for more than two weeks but has not proven sufficiently convincing for any reviewing administrator to take action. You are welcome to request a new block review if you substantially reword your request. Yamla (talk) 12:15, 6 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who accepted the request.

MaxPlays (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I got blocked nearly two years ago after I did one inappropriate edit. In that time I've grown as a person, and understood that what I did was wrong, and that it's not anyone's benefit to vandalize a project like Wikipedia. The supposed block evasion came because I tried to make a new account soon after I was blocked. I didn't know it was against the rules, since the option to create an account was clearly visible to me. You can see that my edits on Finnish and English Wikipedia have all been helpful to the project, except for the edit I was blocked for. I hope you can now forgive my mistakes and unblock me, since I would really like to be able to edit English Wikipedia again. MaxPlays (talk) 14:42, 5 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Accept reason:

It was not right that you were blocked for one edit. The warning was sufficient and only if you had continued to cause disruption would it have been correct to block you. I am sorry it has taken 5 unblock requests to fix this. Welcome back and I look forward to seeing many constructive edits from you in the future. — Martin (MSGJ · talk) 16:14, 9 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you very much for unblocking me, I really appreciate it. MaxPlays (talk) 18:47, 9 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2019 election voter message[edit]

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:20, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to WikiProject Medicine![edit]

We at Wikiproject Medicine would like to thank you for your contribution now during the 2019–20 coronavirus pandemic. We are far from out of the woods with regard to the pandemic and understand that your focus may lie on coronavirus efforts.
We would still like to shine a light on our active medical community, which you are more than welcome to join. As a participant you can ask questions and get help about best practices on editing any health or medical article — on our talk-page. We are a (mostly) collegial bunch, and I do hope you feel welcome to participate. Currently there are two active communities:

Wikipedia:WikiProject Medicine (talk — The general medical community)
Wikipedia:WikiProject COVID-19 (talk — A temporary COVID-19 community)

Please join up!

Best regards, Carl Fredrik^talk 10:02, 20 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message[edit]

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:52, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message[edit]

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:47, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message[edit]

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:33, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

March 2023[edit]

Please do not add or change content, as you did at Islamic terrorism in Europe, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. TompaDompa (talk) 19:29, 18 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for June 29[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited List of northernmost items, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Alta. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 06:04, 29 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message[edit]

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:48, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]