Jump to content

User talk:Meio2934

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Your submission at Articles for creation: sandbox (December 17)

[edit]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by DoubleGrazing were: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
DoubleGrazing (talk) 08:04, 17 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Teahouse logo
Hello, Meio2934! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! DoubleGrazing (talk) 08:04, 17 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Draft:Maycon Devon, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to have no meaningful content or history, and the text is unsalvageably incoherent. If the page you created was a test, please use the sandbox for any other experiments you would like to do.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Spiderone(Talk to Spider) 12:37, 17 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Managing a conflict of interest

[edit]

Information icon Hello, Meio2934. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places or things you have written about on the page Draft:Maycon Devon, you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a conflict of interest may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for organizations for more information. We ask that you:

In addition, you are required by the Wikimedia Foundation's terms of use to disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution which forms all or part of work for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation. See Wikipedia:Paid-contribution disclosure.

Also, editing for the purpose of advertising, publicising, or promoting anyone or anything is not permitted. Thank you. DoubleGrazing (talk) 12:39, 17 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Maycon Devon, requesting that it be deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under two or more of the criteria for speedy deletion, by which pages can be deleted at any time, without discussion. If the page meets any of these strictly defined criteria, then it may soon be deleted by an administrator. The reasons it has been tagged are:

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. DoubleGrazing (talk) 07:36, 18 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

December 2023

[edit]

Information icon Please do not add promotional material to Wikipedia. While objective prose about beliefs, organisations, people, products or services is acceptable, Wikipedia is not a vehicle for soapboxing, advertising or promotion. Thank you. Liz Read! Talk! 07:58, 18 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Information icon

As previously advised, your edits, such as the edit you made to Maycon Devon, give the impression you have a financial stake in promoting a topic, but you have not complied with Wikipedia's mandatory paid editing disclosure requirements. You were asked to cease editing until you responded by either stating that you are not being directly or indirectly compensated for your edits, or by complying with the mandatory requirements under the Wikimedia Terms of Use that you disclose your employer, client and affiliation. Again, you can post such a disclosure on your user page at User:Meio2934, and the template {{Paid}} can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form: {{paid|user=Meio2934|employer=InsertName|client=InsertName}}. Please respond before making any other edits to Wikipedia. Spiderone(Talk to Spider) 18:45, 18 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

i"m doing no such a thing, I would never do work at Wikipedia for financial agreements. I am simply trying to add valuable source of information at Wikipedia. besides this is not the first article I'm editing. writing is a passion of mine, I look around for people to write about. Meio2934 (talk) 20:08, 18 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Maycon Devon for deletion

[edit]
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Maycon Devon is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Maycon Devon until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Alansohn (talk) 12:16, 18 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Precious Pepala (December 18)

[edit]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Jamiebuba was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
Jamiebuba (talk) 17:54, 18 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Managing a conflict of interest

[edit]

Information icon Hello, Meio2934. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places or things you have written about on Wikipedia, you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a conflict of interest may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for organizations for more information. We ask that you:

In addition, you are required by the Wikimedia Foundation's terms of use to disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution which forms all or part of work for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation. See Wikipedia:Paid-contribution disclosure.

Also, editing for the purpose of advertising, publicising, or promoting anyone or anything is not permitted. Thank you. Liz Read! Talk! 02:05, 19 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Nic Kaufmann (December 20)

[edit]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Cabrils was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
Cabrils (talk) 01:16, 20 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia: check out the Teahouse!

[edit]
Teahouse logo
Hello! Meio2934, you are invited to the Teahouse, a forum on Wikipedia for new editors to ask questions about editing Wikipedia, and get support from peers and experienced editors. Please join us! Liz Read! Talk! 01:45, 20 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you :) I will sure do 😊 Meio2934 (talk) 01:50, 20 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I’m not paid to edit nor do I have conflict of interest

[edit]

I am not paid to contribute to Wikipedia and to the best of my knowledge I do not have any conflicts of interest with any of the pages that I edit. Meio2934 (talk) 01:49, 20 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

And yet, multiple editors have looked at your contributions and doubted your honesty. We're all here to write this encyclopedia but I think you would have a better time sticking to subjects which clearly pass notability criteria like WP:MUSICBIO. You'll find that most notable subjects have already been written here but if you check against WP:N first, you can determine if it is worth your time to research and write. We don't want to continually frustrate you and I imagine you get upset with all the push back. This is one of the reasons I quit doing paid editing: because non-notable subjects will pay for you to compromise your integrity. Subjects who are actually notable don't hire publicists for Wikipedia editing unless they seek to hide unflattering facts. If you have questions about notability, please ask. Chris Troutman (talk) 06:04, 20 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Are news articles and magazines enough for notability ? Meio2934 (talk) 13:22, 20 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
It depends. Wikipedia needs reliable sources and some like Daily Mail have been deprecated. Wikipedia also does not allow churnalism or routine coverage for establishing notability. You can search WP:RSN to read past discussions about specific sources or ask a new question about a source. Chris Troutman (talk) 19:10, 20 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Please, stop adding sources that make no mention of the article's topic at all. You did this with this edit, and it's not the first time. A cite should support the context in which it is in. That onerpm exists isn't relevant to the article. --Hammersoft (talk) 23:41, 20 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Madeline the Person requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a band or musician that does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Liz Read! Talk! 06:28, 5 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Nic Kaufmann

[edit]

Information icon Hello, Meio2934. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Nic Kaufmann, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 02:07, 21 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Precious Pepala

[edit]

Information icon Hello, Meio2934. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Precious Pepala, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 14:07, 21 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

August 2024

[edit]

Stop icon You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you remove an Articles for deletion notice or a comment from an AfD discussion, as you did at Benji Krol. Theroadislong (talk) 19:34, 8 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry for doing that I mis clicked the button was not my intention. But what I have a question on is When you name an article for deletion you are supposed to do it with explanation, you didn’t appeared with any explanation whatsoever Meio2934 (talk) 19:36, 8 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The explanation is on the discussion page here Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Benji Krol. Theroadislong (talk) 19:42, 8 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]