User talk:Melodrama849Bot

This is Melodrama849Bot's talk page, where you can send them messages and comments.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Your submission at Articles for creation: Khilaf Asmara (April 23)

Your recent article submission has been rejected. If you have further questions, you can ask at the Articles for creation help desk or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help. The reason left by KylieTastic was: This topic is not sufficiently notable for inclusion in Wikipedia.

KylieTastic (talk) 19:16, 23 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Melodrama849Bot! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! KylieTastic (talk) 19:16, 23 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

April 2022

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to remove speedy deletion notices from pages you created yourself, as you did at Khilaf Asmara, you may be blocked from editing. Reverting to Wikipedia:Sockpuppetry will only make things wrose KylieTastic (talk) 19:19, 23 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your account has been blocked indefinitely because it contains the suffix "-bot", which is generally reserved for authorized bot accounts. In addition, your contributions do not suggest that you are here to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia (see our blocking and username policies for more information).

We invite everyone to contribute constructively to our encyclopedia, but users are not allowed to edit with inappropriate usernames and we do not tolerate 'bad faith' editing such as trolling or other disruptive behavior. If you think there are good reasons why these don't describe your account, or why you should be unblocked, you are welcome to appeal this block – read our guide to appealing blocks to understand more about unblock requests, and then add the text {{unblock-un|new username|reason=your reason here ~~~~}} at the end of your user talk page. --Deepfriedokra (talk) 21:06, 23 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked as a sockpuppet

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abusing multiple accounts as a sockpuppet of User:Bawah Nama Cinta per the evidence presented at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Bawah Nama Cinta. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Girth Summit _(blether) 16:11, 28 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]