User talk:Mewnst

Welcome

Hello, Mewnst, and Welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions to this free encyclopedia. If you decide that you need help, check out Getting Help below, ask at the help desk, or place {{Help me}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking or by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your username and the date. Also, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field. Below are some useful links to facilitate your involvement. Happy editing! Ninney (talk) 14:24, 16 October 2019 (UTC) Getting started Introduction Contributing to Wikipedia The five pillars of Wikipedia How to edit a page Intuitive guide to Wikipedia Finding your way around Table of contents Directories and indexes Department directory Editing articles How to develop an article Simplified Manual of Style Getting help Frequently asked questions Cheatsheet Our new user help forum, the Teahouse The Help Desk, for more advanced questions Help pages Article Wizard – a Wizard to help you create articles How you can help Community Portal Join a WikiProject Follow Wikipedia etiquette Practice civility Discover what's going on in the Wikimedia community

A cookie for you!

no hurting, only cookie MoonyTheDwarf (Braden N.) (talk) 20:00, 18 January 2020 (UTC)

Thanks meow!Mewnst (talk) 20:02, 18 January 2020 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: RM Broadcasting (January 22)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Bkissin was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:RM Broadcasting and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:RM Broadcasting, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
• If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Bkissin (talk) 16:06, 22 January 2020 (UTC)

Hello, Mewnst! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Bkissin (talk) 16:06, 22 January 2020 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:RM Broadcasting

Hello, Mewnst. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "RM Broadcasting".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! UnitedStatesian (talk) 03:39, 23 July 2020 (UTC)

}}

Blanking Bored Ape Yacht Club

hi @Mewnst! I noticed that you had recently blanked the Bored Ape Yacht Club article. This led me to wonder: can you share what contributed to you making that change?

I ask the above with the following thoughts in mind:

• The edit summary you provided when blanking the article leads me to think you saw it as being "promotional" and "not notable."
• I understand Bored Ape Yacht Club to be notable considering that it has been subject to, "...significant coverage in multiple reliable secondary sources that are independent of the subject." See coverage in: The New Yorker, Rolling Stone, New York Times, and Reuters.
• I understood the article at the time of being blanked to not be promotional considering it was written in, what I perceive to be, "...an objective and unbiased style, free of puffery."
• I was surprised that you blanked the article without starting a conversation on the talk page considering there were three other, relatively experienced people (@ThadeusOfNazereth, @David Gerard, and myself), who had contributed to the article.

Stussll (talk) 05:57, 10 November 2021 (UTC)

Arguably it was pretty thin on notability, and its present redirection is fine by me - David Gerard (talk) 09:02, 10 November 2021 (UTC)

A Google search on my end turns up quite a bit of coverage, so I think the topic itself is definitely notable - That's why I only marked it as needing references improved. That said, it's not my wheelhouse and, given my biases, I don't trust myself to put together a quality article - Hopefully somebody else is able to put together an expanded version of the article (maybe you, @Stussll?). A redirect probably works fine until a draft makes the rounds, though. ThadeusOfNazereth^{Talk to Me!} 11:31, 10 November 2021 (UTC)

I concur - David Gerard (talk) 17:02, 10 November 2021 (UTC)

Hopefully somebody else is able to put together an expanded version of the article (maybe you, @Stussll?). A redirect probably works fine until a draft makes the rounds, though.

What you are describing above seems like a good course of action to me, @ThadeusOfNazereth!

I've moved the article to my sandbox to expand. Once I think it's in a good enough place to be considered for being published at Bored Ape Yacht Club what do y'all suggest I do? One thought: I could start a conversation on User_talk:Stussll/Sandbox alerting y'all that I think the article is in a state to be reviewed? Stussll (talk) 02:23, 11 November 2021 (UTC)

I was a little too excited to purge it - building up a draft is definitely worthwhile. I didn't share any talk page discussion on the matter, as there wasn't yet a talk page made, and (to me) that confirmed that the subject was not notable. Sorry for the mistake. Mewnst (talk) 18:08, 10 November 2021 (UTC)

You sharing the thinking that went into blanking the page is helpful context – I appreciate you sharing it, @Mewnst ^ _ ^

And no worries at all. I'm glad we seemed to have converged on a path forward... Stussll (talk) 02:24, 11 November 2021 (UTC)

NFT

Yes, they arent memes but they got their popularity from memes about them. NFT got popular because of memes mostly from the monkey art. I added the category because they got popular because of memes made from them. HelpingWorld (talk) 22:33, 8 February 2022 (UTC)

Fair :) Mewnst (talk) 04:07, 9 February 2022 (UTC)

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Hello, Mewnst

Thank you for creating Empire of Illusion.

User:North8000, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

Nice work

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|North8000}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~ .

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

North8000 (talk) 13:22, 20 June 2022 (UTC)

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:43, 29 November 2022 (UTC)

Cleo Wright

I noticed you wrote a person had been disemboweled, then completely recovered. I question the veracity of that source. Did someone really recover from having their guts ripped out? — Jacona (talk) 10:45, 7 July 2023 (UTC)

Howdy! Thanks for bringing this up, I partially misrepresented the documentation. My source for that was Capeci's The Lynching of Cleo Wright, page 16, which includes an excerpt:

"Dr. M.G. Anderson sewed her three fingers and closed a six-inch abdominal slash that had punctured her large bowel. More critical than these wounds or the loss of one and a half quarts of blood, however, was the life-threatening infection that followed."

"Disemboweled" is not used and is not an accurate way to describe Sturgeon's injuries. On page 72, however, Capeci wrote that "her intestines spilled out" from the altercation with her assailant. Capeci indulged in some exaggeration, likely because Sturgeon's documented experiences were partially informed by Capeci's direct interviews with Sturgeon herself. I do think it is still very important to use Capeci's work as a reference in this page, as no other source is as thorough and Capeci is a proper historian. I should get on to properly sourcing other content I wrote into the page as well. Mewnst (talk) 00:29, 13 July 2023 (UTC)

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:58, 28 November 2023 (UTC)