User talk:Minicoyamini
Welcome!
[edit]Hello, Minicoyamini, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:
You may also want to complete the Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Wikipedia. You can visit the Teahouse to ask questions or seek help.
Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or , and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome! DBigXrayᗙ 10:33, 12 September 2019 (UTC)
New message from DBigXray
[edit]Message added 10:34, 12 September 2019 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.
DBigXrayᗙ 10:34, 12 September 2019 (UTC)
Copying licensed material requires attribution
[edit]Hi. I see in a recent addition to Hinduism in the Republic of Ireland and Islam in the Republic of Ireland you included material from a webpage that is available under a compatible Creative Commons Licence. That's okay, but you have to give attribution so that our readers are made aware that you copied the prose rather than wrote it yourself. I've added the attribution for this particular instance. Please make sure that you follow this licensing requirement when copying from compatibly-licensed material in the future. — Diannaa 🍁 (talk) 11:35, 20 October 2019 (UTC)
November 2019
[edit]Please do not add or change content, as you did at Shri Hinglaj Mata temple, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Doug Weller talk 10:27, 11 November 2019 (UTC)
- And worse than that, you removed material sourced to Roshen Dalal saying it needed more citations. Yet you used a personal website and some sort of spiritual site as sources, both of which clearly fail WP:RS. Doug Weller talk 10:28, 11 November 2019 (UTC)
ArbCom 2019 election voter message
[edit]Disambiguation link notification for November 21
[edit]Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Hinduism in Pakistan, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Saidpur (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 07:30, 21 November 2019 (UTC)
Copyright problem on Forced Conversions in Pakistan
[edit]Hello. I am Diannaa and I am a Wikipedia administrator. Prose you find online is almost always copyright, and cannot be copied here; it's against the copyright policy of this website to do so. All prose must be written in your own words. The Wikipedia copyright policy and its application are complex matters, and you should not edit any more until you have taken the time to read and understand our copyright policy. There's a simplified version of our copyright rules at Wikipedia:FAQ/Copyright. — Diannaa 🍁 (talk) 11:42, 22 November 2019 (UTC)
November 2019
[edit]Hello, I'm Walter Görlitz. An edit that you recently made to Religion in Canada seemed to be a test and has been removed. If you want to practice editing, please use the sandbox. If you think a mistake was made, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks! Walter Görlitz (talk) 06:20, 27 November 2019 (UTC)
- The article is ordered so that the Abrahamic religions are grouped together, and other religions are organized by the provenance of their origin. if you wish to reorganize it, you might want to gain WP:CONSENSUS on the article's talk page first. Walter Görlitz (talk) 06:23, 27 November 2019 (UTC)
Love Jihad - sources must discuss the concept
[edit]So far as I can see they don't, so I've reverted you. Editor's opinions can't be used to interpret sources. Doug Weller talk 15:00, 28 November 2019 (UTC)