Jump to content

User talk:Minna Sora no Shita/Archive 3

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
 < Archive 2    Archive 3    Archive 4 >
All Pages:  1 -  2 -  3 -  4 -  5 -  6 -  ... (up to 100)


The Signpost: 13 May 2013

The Signpost: 20 May 2013

The Signpost: 27 May 2013

The Signpost: 05 June 2013

The Signpost: 12 June 2013

The Signpost: 19 June 2013

The Signpost: 26 June 2013

The Signpost: 03 July 2013

Decline of Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Voalte, Inc.

Hello! I'm writing to ask for more feedback about the Voalte page you declined Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Voalte, Inc.

I am working with another editor, techatology, to figure out how to make it read more like a Wikipedia page. Can you please provide feedback so I can successfully submit this article?

Thanks!

Cearly (talk) 15:00, 9 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Comments about rejection of entry for Keith N. Schoville

You recently rejected my proposed entry for Keith N. Schoville because the person was not notable. I believe that this person *is* notable because:

1) He meets the Academic standard "Many scientists, researchers, philosophers and other scholars (collectively referred to as "academics" for convenience) are notably influential in the world of ideas without their biographies being the subject of secondary sources." 2) He meets the Creative Professional standard because he has been cited numerous times. I found this website that documents 45 citations. http://research.easybib.com/research/index/search?search=keith+schoville&Search=Search&sort_by=rank&medium=all_sources

Bruce

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/User:LycusLtd/sandbox

Dear Minna Sora no Shita: I see that you declined Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/User:LycusLtd/sandbox. I was checking it out as well, and I noticed that it was actually a copyright violation from the company web site. I am going to mark it for deletion. Please check for copyright problems before declining submissions, because we have to get rid of these as quickly as possible. If you don't know how to do this, I would be glad show you. Thanks for your help in clearing the Afc backlog! —Anne Delong (talk) 20:10, 9 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Recent rejection of article, Wildflower magazine

Hi You just rejected my article on Wildflower magazine for lack of credible sources. I had just added references to the Globe and Mail, Canada's most prestigious newspaper, and to The Toronto Star, the biggest newspaper in Canada's largest city, as well as to one admittedly obscure newsletter. There is also a JSTOR link. Not really sure what more I can do. There is nothing else about it available by googling. Best wishes John Oyston

Piggybackr

I've added several additional references. Do you feel that notability is now established? Does the article accurately reflect the references (i.e. NPOV)? If "yes" to both, shall I resubmit? If no to either, can you point to a specific problem to be addressed? Thank you for your consideration.--Nowa (talk) 01:06, 10 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Decline of http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia_talk:Articles_for_creation/TerraTrike

As I'm sure you saw I have submitted this article multiple times. Each time adjusting it to meet the requests of the reviewer. I would appreciate it if you could explain specifically why this article was declined. I was modeling my article on a similar company's wiki (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Catrike) and I'm not understanding how mine is unacceptable while this one is.

captricity page

Can you give suggestions on how to improve my article/s references. I know the company and have found out about them through a friend, and I got references from them but it seems i got rejected within the few minutes i posted it. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Npunatarcy (talk • contribs) 23:19, 10 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Misplaced warning?

Hello,you have just posted a warning on my talk page,but I didn't remove the CSD tag,User:Ailemadrah did.Regards,Lsmll 05:29, 11 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Ha your name has no shit in it sorry by the way I meant no harm

Cleveland Cavaliers

I am right about him shocking the world everybody knows it — Preceding unsigned comment added by 76.255.186.62 (talk) 20:53, 11 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

hees1000

I solved the empty page note of you and tried the submit button to notify you for new content. I expected the mentioned yellow box but get no box. What do i need to do to get this article reviewed? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Hees1000 (talk • contribs) 21:08, 11 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

A kitten for you!

Thanks for doing what you do. Also, I petition that on your official page, the name "THE DENIER" (form of deny) is added as your alias. You deny a lot of creation request. But still, thanks. Your help is appreciated.


BobHelmut (talk) 00:21, 12 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

If you get to one more vandal before me....

I'm going to trout you! :) Great job! Dusti*poke* 03:32, 12 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The Signpost: 10 July 2013

Catholic Church Reform article

Hi, I have edited my article complete with endnotes and am ready to resubmit it. However, I have used a Word program that I was familiar with to rework the article. Is there some way that I can submit it to you with all the Bold and Italics and endnotes already done? That is the form it is in now. I'm afraid to use your program because I'm afraid it will undo the endnote links that I have incorporated into the article.

Thanks for your help, Rene Reid Churchreform (talk) 00:23, 13 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Recent revert of deletion of Dot painting section in Indigenous Australian art

Hi Minna Sora no Shita! Thanks for editing this page. I did not do the deletion of the Dot Painting section, and it is true that there was not explanation for it. But I think that the section should be deleted, fo rthese reasons:

  • It does not fit well in the section (e.g continues with Rock Art, Bark Art) which are about the materials used (but dot painting section is not)
  • There is already a section about "dot painting" (Section: Indigenous_Australian_art#Papunya_Tula_and_.22dot_painting.22)
  • It is not referenced (of course the whole article has this problem :( ) but also would need improvement (e.g. it uses "etc.")
  • I think it is case of WP:RECENT, since the dot painting style has become very popular, but it is more a recent style, than traditional. There is not reason for it to be at the very start.

Let me know what you think - or if you agree, just be bold, and delete and give some of these reasons. :)

Thanks once again for taking interest in improving that page. Mozzy66 (talk) 11:49, 14 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

explosives found in north dublin

hi,

I was just adding in the facts that the Gardai have just found semtex explosives that where suposed to have been decommisioned thus proofing what British intelligence suspected that significant weapons ( semtex ) was not decommisoned but handed to other IRA groups that are still active see reference below taken from todays Belfast News Letter newspaper

ref :: Call for IRA weapons probe - Regional - Belfast Newsletter http://www.newsletter.co.uk/news/regional/call-for-ira-weapons-probe-1-5282822


that its — Preceding unsigned comment added by 87.112.23.25 (talk) 23:20, 14 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I didn't add that link. I just moved it from the references section to the external links section. I didn't check out the link, I just placed it in its proper place. 173.67.254.41 (talk) 23:30, 14 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of User:98.166.251.75/OSC

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, introducing inappropriate pages, such as User:98.166.251.75/OSC, is not in accordance with our policies. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. The page has been nominated for deletion, in accordance with Wikipedia's criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. The Ukulele Guy - Aggie80 (talk) 23:33, 14 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Where a confession was solicited

what does "Where a confession was solicited" mean ? extracted by torture or by being made to eat chocolate cake ... oh maybe tickled with a feather — Preceding unsigned comment added by 87.112.23.25 (talk) 00:00, 15 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Re: Revision reversion

I have to say I completely disagree with the reversion of my edit to the Grand theft auto series article. The grammar was vastly improved as their method of listing violates the laws of English, though the entire section does need a rewrite. As such I will be remaking the edit before you read this, if I haven't done so already. --58.96.52.184 (talk) 00:13, 15 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

My changes on "Vogue (dance)"

Hello! You sent me a message about reverting the changes I made to the page. I am an active member of the Voguing dance scene and the article was not using vernacular that exists in the scene. As an encyclopedia, I believe the terms should be the ones that are used in the scene it is trying to describe, not a compound word that carries the gist, but is not in use. Calling "Soft And Cunt" "soft style" is a biased decision and I don't think it's a clever move to censor termini due to their semantical connotations. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Sauerrahm (talk • contribs)

Speedy deletion nomination of User:Ahmed.moawad.azab/sandbox

A tag has been placed on User:Ahmed.moawad.azab/sandbox, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done for the following reason:

Not in English.

Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not meet basic Wikipedia criteria may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, you can place a request here. Kevin Rutherford (talk) 02:30, 15 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

why do you think that? it is accurate. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Johngoodsman7007 (talk • contribs) 04:17, 15 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

AFC WECAN SOCIETY

http://ngo.india.gov.in/view_ngo_details.php?ngo_id=wecansociety&ngo_black=0&t_state=0&t_dist_new3=0&sector_key=0&ngo_name=wecan%20society&uniqueid= — Preceding unsigned comment added by Tombhaduri (talk • contribs) 07:28, 15 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Articles for creation/APU Company

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia_talk:Articles_for_creation/APU_Company

Can you please say where sources are missing or lacking. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Boris Gromov (talk • contribs) 10:07, 15 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

July 2013--Cuban National Football Team

Hi Minna Sora no Shita, I recently added some information regarding Cuba's participation in the qualifying 2014 World Cup campaign and you deleted it as you saw it as irrelevant or not constructive. I personally disgree as what I did was to illustrate an event that happened, there was no false information and I feel that was important to represent what Cuba had done recently. Honestly at this point I feel very annoyed as this is the first time I decide to contribute with Wikipedia and this happens. I would definitely love to hear from you with more information as why my comments were not constructive. You may contact me to ymmot666@gmail.com and I would appreciate if you did so. Thank you in advance. Tommy — Preceding unsigned comment added by 199.119.0.202 (talk) 18:30, 15 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Minna Sora no Shita, the comment you refer as: "Lucy likes Honduras" was added after I had created the entry about the CUban National Soccer team; that was not supposed to be part of the entry; a coworker of mine added it as I was teaching her how to add information on Wikipedia. As was about to delete the "Lucy likes Honduras" part when you decide to delete my entry which I still think was relevant to the topic of the main page therefore I am gong to add it again. Of course without the "Lucy likes Honduras" part. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 199.119.0.202 (talk) 19:25, 15 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Minna Sora no Shi, I understand that comment should not have been posted and I will avoid that situation in the future, thank you for your constant feedback. Wikipedia is something that has always interested me but there are still some things I do not know how to do so I am still learning. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 199.119.0.202 (talk) 19:59, 15 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you--199.119.0.202 (talk) 20:17, 15 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Declining AfCs

Please dont decline any AfCs for minor trivial reasons like formatting issues. It hardly takes us more than a minute to correct those issues and get it solved, rather than force the newer editors to understand all out minor formatting rules and make them wait for considerable period of times because of this.

If the article has other non-easy solvable issues, please feel free to decline it because of them, but not for such reasons. I've reverted your edit. The article was Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Vicky Tiel. TheOriginalSoni (talk) 15:13, 16 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia Articles for Creation: North-West College

Hello Minna,

I have tried contacting other moderators regarding the issue, but there are no other sources for the information within the article other than the actual website for the business. I can use http://www.nw.edu as a reference for the history and other content, but other than that there is nothing else. I am not sure what to do at this point.

Any feedback is appreciated, thank you!Successedu (talk) 20:20, 16 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

celery facts

Minna Sora no Shita, hello. Your reason for reverting my edits was that I added incorrect facts, but I did not add any facts. I only added three words that supported the facts that were already there and made the sentence structures better. To clarify: the purpose of the paragraph I edited was to communicate how the idea of negative calorie foods is a myth, and I kept that purpose intact. The word "incorrectly" was used properly based on the sources that were referenced at the end of the paragraph, and the word "However" certainly is not an incorrect fact. Please review it again with that in mind. 98.235.210.4 (talk) 22:03, 16 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Disputatio Philosophy Journal

Hello Minna,

Thanks for your review; can you please tell me why was the page rejected?

Best, — Preceding unsigned comment added by DavidGSantos (talk • contribs) 23:09, 16 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to STiki!

Hello, Minna Sora no Shita, and welcome to STiki! Thank you for your recent contributions using our tool. We at STiki hope you like using the tool and decide to continue using it in the future. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

Here are some pages which are a little more fun:

  • The STiki leaderboard - See how you are faring against other STiki users!
  • Userboxes - Do not hesitate to wear the STiki label with pride by choosing from a selection of userboxes!

We hope you enjoy maintaining Wikipedia with STiki! If you have any questions, problems, or suggestions don't hesitate to drop a note over at the STiki talk page and we'll be more than happy to help. Again, welcome, and thanks! West.andrew.g (developer) and Faizan 06:28, 17 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Gay scene in Moscow

If something does not appear contructive to you, it does not necessarily is a vandalism, as you can see here: http://www.gaytravel.com/moscow/gay-scene check first, then judge.--81.100.242.0 (talk) 04:24, 18 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

It is English Wikipedia. It is in our language and you should accept that nightlife is a part of our culture. Who do you think you are to revert anything you want?--81.100.242.0 (talk) 04:40, 18 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

It was quite constructive.

There is no consensus that Prokharovka was even a tactical German victory. The sources consisted of one authoritative source (Clark) who merely stated that the Germans could have claimed a tactical victory, a second authoritative source which made no claim as to who had a tactical victory, and a third source which was merely a college student's webpage. Please do not undo without an explanation of what specifically you object to in these changes and why. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.191.213.248 (talk) 06:22, 18 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The Signpost: 17 July 2013

Speedy deletion nomination of User:LennyAnn/sandbox

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on User:LennyAnn/sandbox requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article or image appears to be a clear copyright infringement. This article or image appears to be a direct copy from http://www.bayhealth.org/BayhealthContentPage.aspx?nd=839&parm1=P02559&parm2=90&doc=true. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to modify it — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. If you are not the owner of the external website or image but have permission from that owner, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission. You might want to look at Wikipedia's policies and guidelines for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Roger (Dodger67) (talk) 09:23, 21 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Reversion of Open pop star

Hi, I'm wondering if you could tell me why this revert to the article Open pop star was made. The deletion criteria does not seem to apply to the older version. CitiCat ♫ 00:18, 22 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Hello,

What is the issue with my submission?

Hi Minna Sora no Shita,

i would like to understand how to change my wiki entry to be approved. You mentioned by entry might not fulfil the criteria of notability, and to include referencing that is verifiable. However, i have referenced a few newspaper articles, which are independent. Perhaps could you highlight which part of the entry needs verification

thx — Preceding unsigned comment added by Abccpub (talk • contribs) 09:49, 22 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

submission

Hello, please explain why you dismissed my submission!

Thank you! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Christianvalenzuela105 (talk • contribs) 19:48, 22 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Rejection of http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia_talk:Articles_for_creation/BuFaTa

Dear Minna Sora no Shita,

I modified the article http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia_talk:Articles_for_creation/BuFaTa . It was rejected because of missing sources. There are no sources on BuFaTa in English yet. THats why I am writing the article. It was rather intended to be a translation of this article http://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bundesfachschaftentagung_der_Sprachwissenschaften . I hope the additionally included sources suffice. I just dont want to resubmit it and get it rejected again.

Best,

Garrafao (talk) —Preceding undated comment added 00:01, 23 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Message regarding recent comment

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:130.102.82.1#July_2013 Just letting you know I replied to the message you left at the link above. --Sauronjim (talk) 04:23, 23 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Please respond!

Hello,

You're going to have to elaborate on why you dismissed my addition. I ask you this I your text box every day that I do not hear your valid response, that isn't an opinion. Because you cannot discredit a logical THEORY, with an opinion.

Regards

Christianvalenzuela105 (talk) 05:14, 23 July 2013 (UTC) Christian[reply]

Hello

Have you ever heard of Murphy's Law? If it doesn't make sense to you, that is a problem with your understanding, and not my theory. Please explain to me how you believe Murphy's law, which is a Wikipedia article, makes more sense than the theory I'm proposing.

Christianvalenzuela105 (talk) 17:02, 23 July 2013 (UTC) Christian[reply]

Removing by Edit from article "Health Insurance"

Hi,

You need to elaborate your reasons as to why my change doesn't add value. I think it does add value as it give the user the perspective of the Australian health insurance companies that provide comparisons. I am going to re add my change until you provide me with a good reason. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 144.140.137.121 (talk) 02:22, 24 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Page rejection

Hello,

My article have ample of references, have you read all of them? What other reference should I add?

can you at least read the references that I added? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Siddharthyit (talk • contribs) 08:59, 24 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia_talk:Articles_for_creation/Raj_Dam — Preceding unsigned comment added by Siddharthyit (talk • contribs) 08:55, 24 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

What do you mean "Maybe ask somebody else as well"?? Should I resubmit it? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Siddharthyit (talk • contribs) 10:06, 24 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Quick notice about UAA

Greetings.

I don't know if your stop at UAA was a one off or if you plan to be there regularly but I figured I should just let you know that if a user has only made RFC Contributions then they aren't good for UAA yet, likewise if they have no contributions. Bear that in mind okay?

Have a good one. MM (Report findings) (Past espionage) 12:21, 24 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The Signpost: 24 July 2013

Hey, how am I supposed to leave valuable uh, info? I left an IMDB page for the person, which has all the info necessary to prove my stuff correct. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 74.129.108.150 (talk) 01:09, 26 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Problem of submission Automatic Systems

Hi, I submitted my article "Automatic Systems" to revision for the 4th time this morning, yesterday my submission was rejected because there was not enough reliable sources and references. So this morning, I found external and reliable references to add (press articles). I modified my article 2 hours ago following the reviewers advice and submitted it again. Just 30 secopnds after it was automatically rejected and the same message than yesterday was send to me, with the same recommandation "you have to add reliable sources...". What am I supposed to do? I did everything the reviewers told me and my article is still being rejected... Please help me, I have been writing on Wikipedia forums for days! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Mmarraas (talk • contribs) 11:16, 26 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Minna!

In the last days I try to submit a new article about THE REVIVAL INFO. It was not accepted in a row and talking with the Wikipedia help desk I got the approval that the link in the last modification was good reference as an independent third party reference. Please notice this change and if there were other things to change name it concretely!

Thanks.

Chris Springer — Preceding unsigned comment added by Wikipedinfo (talk • contribs) 08:31, 27 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

A little confuse on IMDB

I'm new to this but you said that IMDB isn't a reliable source but I came across my pages that had IMDB as a source maybe this link will show you http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:IMDb — Preceding unsigned comment added by Lordainsworth100 (talk • contribs) 01:35, 29 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

AfC review

Please explain your recent review of Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Template:Film reception. Theopolisme (talk) 02:33, 29 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia_talk:Articles_for_creation/Elektronik_Meditation

Hi there,

I am new to wiki creating, I just signed up 2 days ago for the first time. I have edited the page as best I could, but it keeps getting rejected. I have not added any concert pictures yet, to show that Elektronik Meditation is real (because this requires an account that is at least 4 days old, from what I read), but I've been to their concerts, I have their CDs, they are real and awesome. Unfortunatelly, there hasn't been a lot of talk about them (they're not pop, but they represent a kind of music that is not very popular, music that sounds like Brian Eno or Tangerine Dream, but made exclusively with analog instruments and effects, live on stage. And it's not just their music, their live act includes Deniz doing live painting while Jannis creates his sounds. They're not that well known, but they have a cult following, and they have been invited outside Greece to concerts, too, e.g. Cyprus and Oslo, Norway.

I really don't know what else to add, to increase their notability. Does that mean this page cannot be created? Has someone that understands Greek looked at the sources?

Please let me know if there's anything else I can do, or if there's anything that I'm doing wrong. This is my first wiki attempt, and I wouldn't like it to be a failure :(

Best regards, Alex (TangerineFloyd) —Preceding undated comment added 04:28, 29 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Much of the links are not notable. There is also one link that isn't reliable (blog). I'm not sure if the CultureNow link (http://www.culturenow.gr/14464/o-kerkville-kai-o-giannis-anastasakis-live-sti-knot-gallery) provide sufficient notability, so right now it cannot be accepted. Sorry about that. --みんな空の下 (トーク) 04:34, 29 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Well, thank you very much for your very quick reply :) Ok, I will remove the blog link, and maybe I will wait until someone else writes about them, I guess. Thanks, Alex (TangerineFloyd)

Question about GPEDC edit

Hello - you just deleted my article on the basis that much was taken from the GPEDC webpage (http://www.effectivecooperation.org/).

Actually, I am one of the administrators for that page and simply wish to make the information that appears on it available to a wider audience. The wording has been carefully considered in order to best express the organization's aims - do I have to change it in order for it to meet Wikipedia stipulations?

Thanks in advance for your feedback!

KirstyRossTaylor (talk) 04:59, 29 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Minna_Sora_no_Shita/Archive_3&oldid=1168304963"