User talk:MisterBee1966/Archive 9

Disambiguation link notification for November 4[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Gordon Gollob, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Malin. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:25, 4 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Ubben/Phillip/Ostermann[edit]

You contributed to the last two articles, so I thought the footage on this page would be of interest. It films their award ceremony a month before Ostermann was killed. None of them survived the war, but notice how Ostermann was talking to Himmler at the end. Was it common for Himmler to mix with German celebrities? (propaganda would have made them so). Dapi89 (talk) 22:36, 11 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Gordon Gollob[edit]

I had a look. Okay, but I question the assertion that Hitler had still not approved the Me 262 as a fighter. My view is that he came to do so by September 1944 at the latest. He did approve the creation of Me 262 units and accepted a proportion of production would be aimed at fighter variants. Dapi89 (talk) 18:49, 13 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The Bugle: Issue CXVI, November 2015[edit]

Your Military History Newsletter

Project news: From the editors; awards and honours; contest results
Articles: Last month's new featured and A-Class content
Book review: Hawkeye7 on the Battle of the Bulge
Op-ed: TomStar81 looks at the collapse of the Serbian Army in World War I
Timeline: This month in World War I

The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 03:25, 18 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for November 18[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Günther Josten, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Ramstein. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:55, 18 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Question[edit]

I was going through the list of current coordinators to see who had admin rights, and noticed that you do not currently have access to the rollback tool. My question then is would like to gain access to it? If so I'd be happy to add that tool for your use since I have full faith and confidence that you would use it correctly. TomStar81 (Talk) 11:13, 20 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

MisterBee, you should have the rollback tool; I know you would use it wisely/judiciously. Kierzek (talk) 16:40, 26 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Alright, you're in! Suggested reading is here. I have no doubt that you will use this new tool wisely. TomStar81 (Talk) 12:30, 27 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Fritz Witt[edit]

I don't know the subject, but the article has been recently rewritten. Do you accept the changes?Xx236 (talk) 12:04, 20 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open![edit]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:29, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for November 28[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Kurt Bahns, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Stargard and KIA. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:18, 28 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The portal thingy on Race to the Sea[edit]

Must you? Keith-264 (talk) 18:09, 1 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of List of living Knight's Cross of the Iron Cross recipients for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article List of living Knight's Cross of the Iron Cross recipients is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of living Knight's Cross of the Iron Cross recipients until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Legacypac (talk) 10:48, 6 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Nominations for the Military history WikiProject historian and newcomer of the year awards now open![edit]

On behalf of the Military history WikiProject's Coordinators, we would like to extend an invitation to nominate deserving editors for the 2015 Military historian of the year and Military history newcomer of the year awards. The nomination period will run from 7 December to 23:59 13 December, with the election phase running from 14 December to 23:59 21 December. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 05:06, 7 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Replying to your previous comment[edit]

Replying to the comment you left on my talk page; we have taken your suggestion and filled in all the citation needed tags. Thanks again for the suggestion =). —Preceding undated comment added 04:20, 10 December 2015 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Günther Lützow[edit]

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Günther Lützow you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Peacemaker67 -- Peacemaker67 (talk) 17:25, 10 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Günther Lützow[edit]

The article Günther Lützow you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Günther Lützow for things which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Peacemaker67 -- Peacemaker67 (talk) 02:40, 11 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Henri Joseph Fenet[edit]

MisterBee: do you have any information on the Knight's Cross awarded to Fenet? Kierzek (talk) 02:06, 14 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Merry Christmas![edit]

Merry Christmas and Happy New Year!
A very Merry Christmas and Happy New Year to you and all your loved ones, and a joyous and prosperous 2016. All the very best from your friends: Cliftonian, Mrs Cliftonian and the two little Cliftonians. — Cliftonian (talk) 20:37, 19 December 2015 (UTC) [reply]

Your GA nomination of Gordon Gollob[edit]

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Gordon Gollob you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Peacemaker67 -- Peacemaker67 (talk) 01:20, 20 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

File:Gollob and Kageneck.jpg listed for discussion[edit]

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Gollob and Kageneck.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. Peacemaker67 (crack... thump) 03:33, 20 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Gordon Gollob[edit]

The article Gordon Gollob you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Gordon Gollob for things which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Peacemaker67 -- Peacemaker67 (talk) 07:40, 20 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Season's Greetings[edit]

File:Xmas Ornament.jpg

To You and Yours!
FWiW Bzuk (talk) 18:35, 20 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Photos for badge articles[edit]

Thank you for adding the photos of the award/badges for two of the articles I have done. If you could dig up photos for: Aircrew Badge (Nazi), and Air Gunner Badge, that would be much appreciated. Kierzek (talk) 13:45, 22 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

yes will do! Cheers MisterBee1966 (talk) 14:05, 22 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks, it always helps an article when the reader can see a photo of the subject matter. Kierzek (talk) 14:33, 22 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Gunther Lutzow, etc.[edit]

Hello, Mr. Bee,

Out of curiosity...are you going to create a bio on every WWII German ace with over 100 victories? As I recall, there were over 100 of them. 111 sticks in mind, but don't quote me.

Georgejdorner (talk) 20:13, 22 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Frohe Weihnachten 2015[edit]

Have a relaxing holiday and thank you all your work herein this past year. Cheers, Kierzek (talk) 00:57, 24 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The Bugle: Issue CXVII, December 2015[edit]

Your Military History Newsletter

Project news: From the editors; awards and honours; contest results
Articles: Last month's new featured and A-Class content
Book review: Hawkeye7 on the German retreat from France in 1944
Op-ed: TomStar81 on empires of World War I
Timeline: This month in World War I

The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 05:06, 24 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for December 24[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Erwin Hentschel, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Landsberg. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:49, 24 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Did you know nominations/Braemar Hill Mansions[edit]

Please see note on your DYK review. Yoninah (talk) 23:05, 26 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

SS Number for Phleps[edit]

G'day MB. Could you provide a citation for his SS number please? Thanks, Peacemaker67 (crack... thump) 21:39, 2 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Günther Lützow[edit]

The article Günther Lützow you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Günther Lützow for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Peacemaker67 -- Peacemaker67 (talk) 22:43, 2 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Gordon Gollob[edit]

The article Gordon Gollob you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Gordon Gollob for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Peacemaker67 -- Peacemaker67 (talk) 22:43, 2 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Rudel paragraph in need of cite[edit]

"Determined not to fall into Soviet hands, he led three Ju 87s and four Fw 190s westward from Bohemia, landing at Kitzingen airfield which was held by the United States Army Air Forces 405th Fighter Group. Rudel had his men lock the brakes and collapse the landing gear to make the aircraft useless and to render the airfield unusable by blocking the airstrip. Then he surrendered to U.S. forces, on 8 May 1945. Eleven months in prisoner of war camps followed." Kierzek (talk) 14:27, 6 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This part seems a little out of chronological order; and the last sentence needs to be clarified. "Rudel returned to West Germany in 1953 and became a leading member of the Neo-Nazi nationalist political party, the German Reich Party (Deutsche Reichspartei). Rudel befriended Pierre Clostermann, a French fighter pilot, and suffered a stroke on 26 April 1970." Kierzek (talk) 17:45, 6 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

In the section:"Defeat on the Eastern Front", in this sentence a word is missing (I assume it is "tanks", but I don't have the book to check)- "From 7–10 January 1944, Rudel was credited with the destruction of 17 Soviet in these battles, he claimed his 150th tank victory on 11 January 1944, and flew his 1,700 mission on 16 January 1944." Kierzek (talk) 03:32, 11 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for Günther Lützow[edit]

On 7 January 2016, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Günther Lützow, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that on 24 October 1941, Günther Lützow became the second fighter pilot to claim 100 aerial victories in World War II? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Günther Lützow. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, daily totals), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 12:02, 7 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for Gordon Gollob[edit]

On 8 January 2016, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Gordon Gollob, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that on 29 August 1942, Gordon Gollob became the first fighter pilot to claim 150 aerial victories in World War II? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Gordon Gollob. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, daily totals), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 00:01, 8 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

About the "KdE", Oberst Edgar Petersen[edit]

Dear MisterBee1966:

The PIPE Here...numerous references from the later years (summer 1942 onwards) of WW II in Europe concerning ANYTHING to do with the WW II German Luftwaffe's military aircraft test facilities, the so-named Erprobungsstellen, HAVE to mention "that certain Colonel" named Edgar Petersen. He commanded the entire network of them from at least August 1942 onwards, and was certainly involved with quite a few developments as the war dragged on. If one Herr Gordon Gollob was sent to work in the Erprobungstellen system, he would have CERTAINLY come under Oberst Edgar Petersen's command during the time he was serving there. My latest edit to Gollob's record during the time he was serving there, currently reads as follows:

"...which two years previously came under the command of Oberst Edgar Petersen.^[1] ".

With all of the work I've done on the edits of anything to do with the Heinkel He 177 and its two "offshoots" - with which "poor Edgar" was kept awake at night for quite some time, in trying to stay on "fat Hermann's" "good side" concerning the troubled German heavy bomber design - everything available seems to show that "poor Edgar" was the "KdE", or Kommandeur der Erprobungsstellen/"Commander of of Proving/Test Test Establishments" during the time Gordon Gollob was working within the Erprobungsstelle personnel pool.

Sorry for the reminder...but Edgar Petersen WAS in command of the entire Erprobungsstellen network test facilities from at least August 1942 onwards, AND if Gordon Gollob was working WITHIN the "E-Stelle" personnel pool at that time in the second half of 1942, Petersen WAS his CO.

Thank you and Yours Sincerely,

The PIPE (talk) 17:26, 8 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

References

^ Griehl, Manfred; Dressel, Joachim (1998). Heinkel He 177 – 277 – 274. Shrewsbury, UK: Airlife Publishing. pp. 52, 244. ISBN 1-85310-364-0. "In conjunction with the Bauaufsicht Luft (Construction Supervisor, Air) Oberst Petersen (KdE)..." - the concluding abbreviation is defined as the Kommandeur der Erprobungsstellen, or "Commander of of Proving/Test Establishments", the CO of the entire set of Erprobungsstelle facilities the Luftwaffe had established for military aircraft test and evaluation, as defined on page 244 of the quoted book.

The Bugle: Issue CXVIII, January 2016[edit]

Your Military History Newsletter

Project news: From the editors; awards and honours; contest results
Articles: Last month's new featured and A-class content
Book review: Nick-D on Jefferson Davis; Hawkeye7 on Australia's war in Vietnam
Op-ed: TomStar81 discusses British World War I conscription
Timeline: This month in World War I

The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 11:23, 26 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Friedrich von Mellenthin & Panzer Battles[edit]

I am looking for someone to help with the Friedrich von Mellenthin page and the page for "Panzer Battles" authored by him. Another editor has added some rather remarkable material to the page and due to my lack of experience as an editor, I allowed myself to become entangled in an edit war. I have started a conversation on the von Mellenthin talk page but I don't believe a consensus with the other editor will be reached and I am reluctant to attempt any more editing on that page. Thanks in advance for any input you are able to give.

Teddy1289 (talk)Teddy1289  —Preceding undated comment added 04:03, 3 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your support[edit]

	Peacemaker67 RfA Appreciation award
	Thank you for participating and supporting at my RfA. It was very much appreciated, and I am humbled that the community saw fit to trust me with the tools. Peacemaker67 (click to talk to me) 04:49, 6 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Germany or Nazi Germany?[edit]

I've always preferred the academic approach. I think the German description should be used. Also, how long do I have left on MacLachlan? I haven't got the books to hand and life is hectic for me at the moment. Dapi89 (talk) 14:02, 7 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

A barnstar for you![edit]

	The Citation Barnstar
	For your diligent, continued work to add line citations, notes and references for the improvement of articles herein, I again award you this Barnstar. Cheers, Kierzek (talk) 16:33, 11 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

MacLachlan[edit]

I'll sort it out in the next few days. Dapi89 (talk) 00:54, 14 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Believe completed. Apparently is not really a weasel word. Dapi89 (talk) 17:54, 15 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Air Gunner Badge[edit]

MisterBee: might you have access to a photo of this badge for the article page? Any help is much appreciated. Kierzek (talk) 15:54, 15 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

GAR for Hans-Ulrich Rudel[edit]

I have attempted to start a GAR for your excellent article on Hans-Ulrich Rudel at this talk page - Talk:Hans-Ulrich Rudel/GA1. I am not sure if I succeeded, so I wanted to let you know I had done so, and hope to finish it tomorrow or Thursday at the latest. Thank you! --Concertmusic (talk) 17:58, 16 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Hans-Ulrich Rudel[edit]

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Hans-Ulrich Rudel you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Concertmusic -- Concertmusic (talk) 18:01, 16 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I caught one last question as I added the commas to the article - but have already passed it as GA, just FYI - really great job! In "Public scandals", 2nd sentence, you say " held a tradition meeting". What do you mean by "tradition"? It sounds like a reunion, like a school class reunion, but I was not sure if that is what you really meant. If you could clarify that term, that would be great. Thank you! --Concertmusic (talk) 20:56, 17 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Hans-Ulrich Rudel[edit]

The article Hans-Ulrich Rudel you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Hans-Ulrich Rudel for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Concertmusic -- Concertmusic (talk) 21:02, 17 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Congrats on your hard work, MisterBee and thanks for the review, Concertmusic. Kierzek (talk) 21:50, 17 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Hans Kroh.jpg[edit]

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Hans Kroh.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:31, 23 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

RS source discussion[edit]

MisterBee: Just a note that there is a Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard discussion on using Franz Kurowski as a RS source in which you may be interested. Kierzek (talk) 14:09, 24 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

WP:ORDER[edit]

Hello. Please note that 'subject bar' templates go above 'authority control' templates. [1] --Omnipaedista (talk) 17:54, 26 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The Bugle: Issue CXIX, February 2016[edit]

Your Military History Newsletter

Project news: From the editors; awards and honours; contest results
Articles: Last month's new featured and A-Class content
Book review: Hawkeye7 on nuclear weapons in Britain and Nick-D on Australia's war in the Pacific
Op-ed: TomStar81 looks at the Kamurun Campaign of 1914–16
Timeline: This month in World War I

The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 14:14, 27 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

MilHist FA/GA discussion[edit]

HI, just a quick note about a current discussion at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Military history (WWII content: Otto Kittel, other GA/FA articles) that you may be interested in. K.e.coffman (talk)

DYK for Hans-Ulrich Rudel[edit]

On 10 March 2016, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Hans-Ulrich Rudel, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that World War II Stuka pilot Hans-Ulrich Rudel helped protect the identity of former SS-doctor Josef Mengele? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Hans-Ulrich Rudel. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, daily totals), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

—♦♦ AMBER^(ЯʘCK) 00:02, 10 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The Bugle: Issue CXX, March 2016[edit]

Your Military History Newsletter

Project news: From the editors; awards and honours; contest results
Articles: Last month's new featured and A-Class content
Book review: Hawkeye7 discusses a Panzer general and a "mercenary mum"
Op-ed: TomStar81 on the terrible battles of 1916
Timeline: This month in World War I

The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 12:15, 26 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Kanalkampf[edit]

Well done on Rudel. A difficult article to get right. Could you give you're opinion on the above? I believe it is 90% ready for submission as a good article. It just needs a little editing. Dapi89 (talk) 12:31, 27 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Congrats![edit]

		The Military history A-Class medal with diamonds
		On behalf of the other coordinators of the Military History Wikiproject I am very pleased to present you with this A-Class medal with Diamonds in recognition of your great work in getting the articles Wolf-Dietrich Wilcke, Hermann Fegelein, and Gordon Gollob to A-class status. I am also pleased to report that if I am reading our awards page correctly, you are the first person to recieve the A-Class medal with diamonds in 2016. Congrats! TomStar81 (Talk) 03:18, 1 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Congrats, Kierzek (talk) 14:43, 5 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Addition of cites...[edit]

Once back from holiday, maybe you can add some RS cites to these articles (Fritz Witt, Wilhelm Bittrich and Kurt Meyer); the first two have sections which have been "commented out" as unsourced. The third one needs additional RS cites in support. Cheers, Kierzek (talk) 14:47, 5 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Helmut Dörner, here is another. It does not state how or why he was awarded the Knight's Cross. Seems like it should mention that. Kierzek (talk) 19:44, 11 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Hans Kroh.jpg[edit]

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Hans Kroh.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:44, 10 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Max Wünsche[edit]

Another article to please consider adding to your "list". Most of what was there was "commented out" as unsourced. It needs RS cites added. Cheers, Kierzek (talk) 22:38, 14 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

January to March 2016 Quarterly Article Reviews[edit]

		Military history service award
		On behalf of the WikiProject Military history coordinators, I hereby award you this for your contribution of 7 FA, A-Class, Peer and/or GA reviews during the period January to March 2016. Thank you for your efforts! Anotherclown (talk) 10:39, 19 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

<nbsp> AND THE MESSAGE LEFT BY MisterBee1966[edit]

Greetings:

Thank you for your message. I was under the assumption (yes! I know what happens when I assume (Ass U Me) and I was wrong) that the <nbsp> HTML tag was used only to prevent what I call a 'hard line-break'. By a 'hard line-break', I mean going from one paragraph to another, with a space between the two lines. I checked-out what you said and, of course, you were correct. I sincerely apologize for my screw-up. I atempted to leave a message on your TALK page, but I continue getting a message that says you've been RETIRED for the last 3 years. I hope you receive this message.

Rtmorphine (talk) 01:50, 5 July 2019 (UTC) All The Best, Robert Ternes rtmorphine[reply]

Farewell[edit]

Farewell then, my friend, and my you stay safe in all of your endeavors. You will be missed. TomStar81 (Talk) 22:32, 1 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

You've achieved a lot here - thanks again for all your efforts. Hchc2009 (talk) 06:25, 2 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I hope you will change your mind after taking a break. If not, thanks for all your contributions. Kierzek (talk) 17:46, 2 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The Bugle: Issue CXXII, May–June 2016[edit]

Your Military History Newsletter

Project news: From the editors; awards and honours; contest results
Articles: Last month's new featured and A-class content
Book review: Hawkeye7 on Australian spies (part two)
Op-ed: TomStar81 looks at the Battle of Jutland
Timeline: Events of World War I

The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 12:05, 6 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The Bugle: Issue CXXIII, July 2016[edit]

Your Military History Newsletter

Project news: From the editors; awards and honours; contest results
Articles: Last month's new featured and A-class content
Book review: Nick-D on the Australian Imperial Force
Op-ed: TomStar81 looks at the Battle of the Somme
Timeline: This month in World War I

The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 12:44, 7 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Quarterly Milhist Reviewing Award[edit]

		Military history reviewers' award
		On behalf of the Milhist coordinators, you are hereby awarded the Milhist reviewing award (1 stripe) for reviewing a total of 1 Milhist article during the period April to June 2016. Peacemaker67 (click to talk to me) 02:30, 23 July 2016 (UTC)[reply] Keep track of upcoming reviews. Just copy and paste `{{WPMILHIST Review alerts}}` to your user space

Orphaned non-free image File:Alfred Schwarzmann.jpg[edit]

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Alfred Schwarzmann.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:25, 3 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The Bugle: Issue CXXIV, August 2016[edit]

Your Military History Newsletter

Project news: From the editors; awards and honours; contest results
Articles: Last month's new featured and A-class content
Book review: Hawkeye7 looks at disease control and defence satellites
Op-ed: TomStar81 on the rise of air power
Timeline: This month in World War I

The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 07:58, 7 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Image copyright problem with File:Battle of Hamel VCs.JPG[edit]

Thank you for uploading File:Battle of Hamel VCs.JPG.

This image is a derivative work, containing an "image within an image". Examples of such images would include a photograph of a sculpture, a scan of a magazine cover, or a screenshot of a computer game or movie. In each of these cases, the rights of the creator of the original image must be considered, as well as those of the creator of the derivative work.

While the image description page states the source and copyright status of the derivative work, it only names the creator of the original work without specifying the status of their copyright over the work.

Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the original image. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have uploaded other derivative works, consider checking that you have specified their license and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem. Thanks again for your cooperation. Kelly ^hi! 17:04, 23 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The Bugle: Issue CXXV, September 2016[edit]

Your Military History Newsletter

Project news: From the editors; awards and honours; contest results
Articles: Last month's new featured and A-class content
Book review: Peacemaker67 and Nick-D on Nazi terror and covert warfare
Op-ed: Hawkeye7 looks at Australians on the Somme
Timeline: This month in World War I

The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 13:27, 7 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Bader[edit]

Yes I have. Sorry for not responding in over a month things have been non-stop and life has just got more complicated. It would be good if you could drop in. I haven't had the time to look into the circumstances of your departure. The place will be poorer without level-headed people editing German articles. Unfortunately, we have an interest in a field which is automatically difficult. German personnel, rightly or wrongly, are a target—guilty by association. People do not like to credit them with achievements of any kind, and I think there are a lot of editors who find ways to chip away at them (and your hard work). It shouldn't come as a surprise, and I don't think this is reason enough to abandon 10 years of graft. Hope to see you around soon. Dapi89 (talk) 15:36, 12 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I had a shit load of emails it might have got wiped. Can you forward it to my personal one?

Here's one for you - 12 years old, but its a nice little piece about Gunther Rall. Dapi89 (talk) 18:09, 14 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:Knight's Cross recipients of the Volkssturm[edit]

Template:Knight's Cross recipients of the Volkssturm has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. K.e.coffman (talk) 06:18, 2 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:Combined Pilots-Observation Badge with Diamonds[edit]

Template:Combined Pilots-Observation Badge with Diamonds has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. K.e.coffman (talk) 07:25, 7 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The Bugle: Issue CXXVI, October 2016[edit]

Your Military History Newsletter

Project news: From the editors; awards and honours; contest results
Articles: Last month's new featured and A-class content
Book review: Nick-D and Hawkeye7 look at recent works
Op-ed: TomStar81 on the evolution of the tank
Timeline: This month in World War I

The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 14:18, 7 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:Knight's Cross recipients in the Bundeswehr and Bundesgrenzschutz[edit]

Template:Knight's Cross recipients in the Bundeswehr and Bundesgrenzschutz has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. K.e.coffman (talk) 03:30, 11 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

File:Manteuffel coat.jpg listed for discussion[edit]

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Manteuffel coat.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination.

Also:

ATTENTION: This is an automated, bot-generated message. This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 23:50, 14 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Hermann-Heinrich Behrend.jpg[edit]

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Hermann-Heinrich Behrend.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:31, 15 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:Related recipients of the Knight's Cross[edit]

Template:Related recipients of the Knight's Cross has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. K.e.coffman (talk) 22:49, 25 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:Knight's Cross recipients of the Bundesheer[edit]

Template:Knight's Cross recipients of the Bundesheer has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. K.e.coffman (talk) 05:11, 29 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:U-boat War Badge with Diamonds[edit]

Template:U-boat War Badge with Diamonds has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. K.e.coffman (talk) 22:28, 29 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:E-Boat War Badge with Diamonds[edit]

Template:E-Boat War Badge with Diamonds has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. K.e.coffman (talk) 02:21, 5 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:SCDiamonds[edit]

Template:SCDiamonds has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Iazyges Consermonor Opus meum 23:37, 5 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The Bugle: Issue CXXVII, November 2016[edit]

Your Military History Newsletter

Project news: From the editors; awards and honours; contest results
Articles: Last month's new featured and A-class content
Book review: Hawkeye7 looks at two new books on the US military
Interview: A chat with our new project coordinators
Review essay: Nick-D discusses recent works on the British and Australian Armies in World War I
Op-ed: TomStar81 on the end of the Battle of the Somme
Timeline: This month in World War I

The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 11:30, 7 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Reinhard Hardegen.jpg[edit]

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Reinhard Hardegen.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 15:07, 16 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Sfan00 IMG -- as MisterBee is retired, I'm stepping in here... The file above seems to be used in the article Reinhard Hardegen, so is there some other issue with it? Cheers, Ian Rose (talk) 00:44, 17 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

@Ian Rose: - I already took care of the issue. The photo had been erroneously removed from the article, and I restored it. Parsecboy (talk) 10:35, 17 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Wow, pretty quick -- have to admit I didn't think of checking the article history -- tks Nate. Cheers, Ian Rose (talk) 11:44, 17 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah, I happened to catch the notification here shortly as it happened. Parsecboy (talk) 13:06, 17 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:Knight's Cross recipients of the 262nd ID[edit]

Template:Knight's Cross recipients of the 262nd ID has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. K.e.coffman (talk) 00:08, 20 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:Knight's Cross recipients of the 334th ID[edit]

Template:Knight's Cross recipients of the 334th ID has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. K.e.coffman (talk) 00:49, 20 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:Knight's Cross recipients in the Nationale Volksarmee[edit]

Template:Knight's Cross recipients in the Nationale Volksarmee has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. K.e.coffman (talk) 01:09, 20 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:Knight's Cross recipients of the 112th ID[edit]

Template:Knight's Cross recipients of the 112th ID has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. K.e.coffman (talk) 02:53, 20 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:Knight's Cross recipients of the 104th JD[edit]

Template:Knight's Cross recipients of the 104th JD has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. K.e.coffman (talk) 03:13, 20 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:Knight's Cross recipients of the 77th ID[edit]

Template:Knight's Cross recipients of the 77th ID has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. K.e.coffman (talk) 04:09, 20 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Walter Gerhold.jpg[edit]

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Walter Gerhold.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 09:15, 20 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Karl Auer.jpg[edit]

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Karl Auer.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 09:19, 20 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

File:Lang Hartmann Schnaufer Kaubisch Skrizpek Glunz.jpg listed for discussion[edit]

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Lang Hartmann Schnaufer Kaubisch Skrizpek Glunz.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. K.e.coffman (talk) 03:19, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Udo Anneken.jpg[edit]

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Udo Anneken.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 13:10, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Adolf Abel.jpg[edit]

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Adolf Abel.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 13:10, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

TFL notification[edit]

Hi, MisterBee. I'm just posting to let you know that List of Knight's Cross of the Iron Cross recipients of the Waffen-SS – a list that you have been heavily involved with – has been chosen to appear on the Main Page as Today's featured list for December 19. The TFL blurb can be seen here. If you have any thoughts on the selection, please post them on my talk page or at TFL talk. Regards, Giants2008 (Talk) 19:21, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello again. Please note that I moved the run date of the list up to December 9. Cheers. Giants2008 (Talk) 01:38, 22 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open![edit]

Hello, MisterBee1966. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Heinz-Oskar Laebe.jpg[edit]

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Heinz-Oskar Laebe.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 03:40, 24 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:Knight's Cross recipients of the 342nd ID[edit]

Template:Knight's Cross recipients of the 342nd ID has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. K.e.coffman (talk) 22:12, 27 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:Knight's Cross recipients of the 85th ID[edit]

Template:Knight's Cross recipients of the 85th ID has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. K.e.coffman (talk) 22:24, 27 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:Knight's Cross recipients of the 33rd ID[edit]

Template:Knight's Cross recipients of the 33rd ID has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. K.e.coffman (talk) 22:38, 27 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:Knight's Cross recipients of the 359th ID[edit]

Template:Knight's Cross recipients of the 359th ID has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. K.e.coffman (talk) 22:42, 27 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:Knight's Cross recipients of the 2nd ID[edit]

Template:Knight's Cross recipients of the 2nd ID has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. K.e.coffman (talk) 22:51, 27 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:Knight's Cross recipients of the 22nd SS CD[edit]

Template:Knight's Cross recipients of the 22nd SS CD has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. K.e.coffman (talk) 07:41, 28 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

File:Wiese and others at the Obersalzberg.jpg listed for discussion[edit]

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Wiese and others at the Obersalzberg.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. K.e.coffman (talk) 00:14, 29 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Niels Bätge.jpg[edit]

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Niels Bätge.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 10:36, 30 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:Knight's Cross recipients of NJG 100[edit]

Template:Knight's Cross recipients of NJG 100 has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. ~ Rob₁₃^Talk 21:26, 5 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The Bugle: Issue CXXVIII, December 2016[edit]

Your Military History Newsletter

Project news: From the editors; awards and honours; contest results
Articles: Last month's new featured and A-class content
Book review: Hawkeye7 looks at America's nuclear capability at the start of the Cold War
Review essay: Hawkeye7 on the Manhatten Project suite of articles
Op-ed: TomStar81 discusses leadership changes in World War I
Timeline: This month in World War I

The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 14:09, 7 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:Knight's Cross recipients of the Luftwaffe reconnaissance force[edit]

Template:Knight's Cross recipients of the Luftwaffe reconnaissance force has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. K.e.coffman (talk) 00:29, 9 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:Knight's Cross recipients of the FPD 2[edit]

Template:Knight's Cross recipients of the FPD 2 has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. K.e.coffman (talk) 00:30, 9 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:Knight's Cross recipients of the Feldherrnhalle units[edit]

Template:Knight's Cross recipients of the Feldherrnhalle units has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. K.e.coffman (talk) 00:32, 9 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:KCwithOL[edit]

Template:KCwithOL has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. K.e.coffman (talk) 00:39, 9 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:Knight's Cross recipients of the 215th ID[edit]

Template:Knight's Cross recipients of the 215th ID has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. K.e.coffman (talk) 00:43, 9 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:Knight's Cross recipients of the Kriegsmarine small battle units[edit]

Template:Knight's Cross recipients of the Kriegsmarine small battle units has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. K.e.coffman (talk) 07:08, 9 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:Knight's Cross recipients of the 6th SS MD[edit]

Template:Knight's Cross recipients of the 6th SS MD has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. K.e.coffman (talk) 06:26, 11 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:Knight's Cross recipients of the 389th ID[edit]

Template:Knight's Cross recipients of the 389th ID has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. K.e.coffman (talk) 07:08, 11 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:Knight's Cross recipients of SG 9[edit]

Template:Knight's Cross recipients of SG 9 has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. K.e.coffman (talk) 07:53, 11 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:Knight's Cross recipients of the 1st FPD[edit]

Template:Knight's Cross recipients of the 1st FPD has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. K.e.coffman (talk) 07:55, 11 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:Knight's Cross recipients of KG 53[edit]

Template:Knight's Cross recipients of KG 53 has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. K.e.coffman (talk) 07:56, 11 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:First recipients of the Knight's Cross[edit]

Template:First recipients of the Knight's Cross has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. K.e.coffman (talk) 08:00, 11 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

File:Merten, Lüth, Guggenberger & Töniges.JPG listed for discussion[edit]

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Merten, Lüth, Guggenberger & Töniges.JPG, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. K.e.coffman (talk) 01:35, 15 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:Knight's Cross recipients of SxG 10[edit]

Template:Knight's Cross recipients of SxG 10 has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. K.e.coffman (talk) 01:51, 15 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

File:Wilhelm Crinius Oak Leaves.jpg listed for discussion[edit]

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Wilhelm Crinius Oak Leaves.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. K.e.coffman (talk) 17:06, 17 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:Knight's Cross recipients of the 10th SS PD[edit]

Template:Knight's Cross recipients of the 10th SS PD has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. K.e.coffman (talk) 05:09, 20 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:Knight's Cross recipients of KG 54[edit]

Template:Knight's Cross recipients of KG 54 has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. K.e.coffman (talk) 05:11, 20 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:KCwithGoldenCCC[edit]

Template:KCwithGoldenCCC has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. K.e.coffman (talk) 05:13, 20 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:Knight's Cross recipients of the 205th ID[edit]

Template:Knight's Cross recipients of the 205th ID has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. K.e.coffman (talk) 05:14, 20 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:Knight's Cross recipients of the 254th ID[edit]

Template:Knight's Cross recipients of the 254th ID has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. K.e.coffman (talk) 05:15, 20 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:Knight's Cross recipients of the 272nd VGD[edit]

Template:Knight's Cross recipients of the 272nd VGD has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. K.e.coffman (talk) 05:16, 20 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:Knight's Cross recipients of the bomb disposal service[edit]

Template:Knight's Cross recipients of the bomb disposal service has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. K.e.coffman (talk) 05:27, 20 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:Knight's Cross recipients of the U-boat service[edit]

Template:Knight's Cross recipients of the U-boat service has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. K.e.coffman (talk) 20:43, 24 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:Knight's Cross recipients of KG 1[edit]

Template:Knight's Cross recipients of KG 1 has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. K.e.coffman (talk) 20:44, 24 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:Knight's Cross recipients of the 15th Waffen GD[edit]

Template:Knight's Cross recipients of the 15th Waffen GD has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. K.e.coffman (talk) 20:45, 24 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:Knight's Cross recipients of the PLD[edit]

Template:Knight's Cross recipients of the PLD has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. K.e.coffman (talk) 20:45, 24 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:Knight's Cross recipients of KG 3[edit]

Template:Knight's Cross recipients of KG 3 has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. K.e.coffman (talk) 20:47, 24 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:Knight's Cross recipients of the 329th ID[edit]

Template:Knight's Cross recipients of the 329th ID has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. K.e.coffman (talk) 20:47, 24 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:Knight's Cross recipients of the 320th ID[edit]

Template:Knight's Cross recipients of the 320th ID has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. K.e.coffman (talk) 20:54, 24 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:Knight's Cross recipients of the 15th PGD[edit]

Template:Knight's Cross recipients of the 15th PGD has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. K.e.coffman (talk) 06:40, 25 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Merry, merry![edit]

From the icy Canajian north; to you and yours! FWiW Bzuk (talk) 04:19, 26 December 2016 (UTC) [reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Heinrich Dammeier.jpg[edit]

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Heinrich Dammeier.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:35, 27 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Helmut Belser.jpg[edit]

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Helmut Belser.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 03:26, 28 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Wilhelm Dipberger.jpg[edit]

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Wilhelm Dipberger.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 03:39, 28 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Glasner Günter.jpg[edit]

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Glasner Günter.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 03:47, 28 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Franz Gössmann.jpg[edit]

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Franz Gössmann.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:46, 31 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Friedrich Lier.jpg[edit]

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Friedrich Lier.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:42, 2 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Heinrich Praßdorff.jpg[edit]

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Heinrich Praßdorff.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:52, 3 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The Bugle: Issue CXXIX, January 2017[edit]

Your Military History Newsletter

Project news: From the editors; awards and honours; contest results
Articles: Last month's new featured and A-class content
Book review: Hawkeye7 and Nick-D look at three recent works
Op-ed: TomStar81 on a curious episode of World War I
Timeline: This month in World War I

The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 23:07, 7 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Willy Lehnert.jpg[edit]

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Willy Lehnert.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:27, 10 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Rudolf Mühlbauer.jpg[edit]

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Rudolf Mühlbauer.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:47, 11 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Günther Nowak listed at Redirects for discussion[edit]

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Günther Nowak. Since you had some involvement with the Günther Nowak redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. K.e.coffman (talk) 20:29, 12 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

File:Hrabak-Rudel-Hentschel-Hitler.jpg listed for discussion[edit]

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Hrabak-Rudel-Hentschel-Hitler.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. K.e.coffman (talk) 07:33, 13 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

File:Oak Leaves ceremony August 1943 Rastenburg.jpg listed for discussion[edit]

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Oak Leaves ceremony August 1943 Rastenburg.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. K.e.coffman (talk) 08:05, 13 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of File:Gollob-Ostermann-Lent-Setz-Geißhardt.jpg[edit]

A tag has been placed on File:Gollob-Ostermann-Lent-Setz-Geißhardt.jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a non-free file with a clearly invalid licensing tag; or it otherwise fails some part of the non-free content criteria. If you can find a valid tag that expresses why the file can be used under the fair use guidelines, please replace the current tag with that tag. If no such tag exists, please add the {{Non-free fair use}} tag, along with a brief explanation of why this constitutes fair use of the file. If the file has been deleted, you can re-upload it, but please ensure you place the correct tag on it.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. K.e.coffman (talk) 08:30, 13 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Günther Viezenz.jpg[edit]

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Günther Viezenz.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:29, 16 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:August Lambert.jpg[edit]

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:August Lambert.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:33, 17 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of File:Streib-Wittgenstein-Rall-Nowotny.jpg[edit]

A tag has been placed on File:Streib-Wittgenstein-Rall-Nowotny.jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a non-free file with a clearly invalid licensing tag; or it otherwise fails some part of the non-free content criteria. If you can find a valid tag that expresses why the file can be used under the fair use guidelines, please replace the current tag with that tag. If no such tag exists, please add the {{Non-free fair use}} tag, along with a brief explanation of why this constitutes fair use of the file. If the file has been deleted, you can re-upload it, but please ensure you place the correct tag on it.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. K.e.coffman (talk) 08:59, 18 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of File:Rogge-Lehmann-Willenbrock-Suhren.jpg[edit]

A tag has been placed on File:Rogge-Lehmann-Willenbrock-Suhren.jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a non-free file with a clearly invalid licensing tag; or it otherwise fails some part of the non-free content criteria. If you can find a valid tag that expresses why the file can be used under the fair use guidelines, please replace the current tag with that tag. If no such tag exists, please add the {{Non-free fair use}} tag, along with a brief explanation of why this constitutes fair use of the file. If the file has been deleted, you can re-upload it, but please ensure you place the correct tag on it.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. K.e.coffman (talk) 09:02, 18 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Heinrich-Wilhelm Ahnert.jpg[edit]

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Heinrich-Wilhelm Ahnert.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:03, 18 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Reference errors on 19 January[edit]

Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. It is as follows:

On the List of Knight's Cross of the Iron Cross recipients (Ba–Bm) page, your edit caused a cite error (help). (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, ReferenceBot (talk) 00:18, 20 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Karl-Friedrich Brill.jpg[edit]

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Karl-Friedrich Brill.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:15, 20 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Gerhard Bielig.jpg[edit]

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Gerhard Bielig.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:09, 21 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Erich Handke.jpg[edit]

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Erich Handke.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:27, 21 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Hubert Brinkforth.jpg[edit]

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Hubert Brinkforth.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:28, 21 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Ihlefeld-Huy-Späte.jpg[edit]

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Ihlefeld-Huy-Späte.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:32, 21 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Hermann Büchting.jpg[edit]

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Hermann Büchting.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:30, 25 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

File:Emil Lang Oak Leaves.jpg listed for discussion[edit]

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Emil Lang Oak Leaves.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. K.e.coffman (talk) 02:11, 26 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Martin Drewes.jpg[edit]

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Martin Drewes.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:25, 28 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Schenk-Lang-Zwernemann.jpg[edit]

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Schenk-Lang-Zwernemann.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 19:01, 28 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Barnstars[edit]

I am a little confused as to your retirement, non-retirement, or partial retirement, but in any case after looking at some of your discussions regarding "Featured articles", I think you deserve more than one. Otr500 (talk) 23:45, 29 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

		The Civility Barnstar
		For interacting with civility with others. Otr500 (talk) 23:45, 29 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

		The Anti-Flame Barnstar
		For keeping cool under scrutiny. Otr500 (talk) 23:45, 29 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

. Otr500 why are you surprised? The lengths that a certain element of MILHIST editors have gone to to discredit the work that MisterBee1966 has done would drive most of us to retirement. The Rambling Man (talk) 23:48, 29 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I didn't look at his editing record, and certainly wasn't involved in any of the "discrediting" you mention. I do know you have succeeded in running me away from anything you are involved with, so you can forget my name.

Since it is considered solved by a broad community consensus (also in the Manual of Style guidelines) that blue links not indiscriminately link back to the same article, and the same with the over-use of red links, I hope MisterBee1966 considers this with other articles (several actually) he has helped get promoted, as well as other constructive suggestions, even if the project is not concerned with such things. Otr500 (talk) 02:13, 30 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Reinert[edit]

A friend of mine met him in the 1990s, said he was a man of few words. Does your sources reflect that I wonder? Dapi89 (talk) 09:53, 31 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Philipp-Ubben-Ostermann.jpg[edit]

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Philipp-Ubben-Ostermann.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 19:51, 31 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Wolfgang Kaden.jpg[edit]

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Wolfgang Kaden.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 20:29, 31 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

File:Philipp-Ubben-Ostermann.jpg listed for discussion[edit]

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Philipp-Ubben-Ostermann.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. K.e.coffman (talk) 00:52, 2 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The Bugle: Issue CXXX, February 2017[edit]

Your Military History Newsletter

Project news: From the editors; awards and honours; contest results
Articles: Last month's new featured and A-class content
Book review: Recent external reviews
Op-ed: TomStar81 looks at submarine warfare in World War I
Timeline: This month in World War I

The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 04:45, 7 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Walter Kubisch.jpg[edit]

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Walter Kubisch.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:36, 7 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Erich Leie.jpg[edit]

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Erich Leie.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:38, 7 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Hans-Georg Schierholz.jpg[edit]

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Hans-Georg Schierholz.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:53, 7 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

File:Rogge-Lehmann-Willenbrock-Suhren.jpg listed for discussion[edit]

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Rogge-Lehmann-Willenbrock-Suhren.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. K.e.coffman (talk) 06:57, 9 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

File:Mölders funeral.jpg listed for discussion[edit]

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Mölders funeral.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. K.e.coffman (talk) 23:11, 9 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Talkback[edit]

Hello, MisterBee1966. You have new messages at Talk:Gordon Gollob#Recent edits.
Message added 19:45, 10 February 2017 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Orphaned non-free image File:Franz Kohlauf.jpg[edit]

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Franz Kohlauf.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:47, 12 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome back[edit]

And so quickly... Lectonar (talk) 12:26, 15 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Talkback[edit]

Hello, MisterBee1966. You have new messages at Talk:Gordon Gollob#Recent edits.
Message added K.e.coffman (talk) 07:09, 17 February 2017 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.[reply]

Rödel[edit]

Completed I think. Dapi89 (talk) 13:42, 19 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

File:Walter Krupinski.jpg listed for discussion[edit]

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Walter Krupinski.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. K.e.coffman (talk) 23:45, 19 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Military personnel referenced in the Wehrmachtbericht has been nominated for discussion[edit]

Category:Military personnel referenced in the Wehrmachtbericht, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to see if it abides with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. K.e.coffman (talk) 06:24, 20 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Recipients of the Close Combat Clasp has been nominated for discussion[edit]

Category:Recipients of the Close Combat Clasp, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to see if it abides with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. K.e.coffman (talk) 23:22, 20 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Bruno Kohnz.jpg[edit]

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Bruno Kohnz.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:15, 23 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Rudolf Witzig.jpg[edit]

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Rudolf Witzig.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 19:47, 24 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Rudolf Witzig[edit]

Can you add citations to this. It is easily done, but I'm busy with KG 76. Thanks. Dapi89 (talk) 20:24, 24 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Karl-Heinz Wiebe.jpg[edit]

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Karl-Heinz Wiebe.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 19:01, 28 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Hans Strelow.jpg[edit]

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Hans Strelow.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:21, 1 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Waldemar von Gazen.jpg[edit]

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Waldemar von Gazen.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 19:29, 2 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Wolfgang Kretzschmar.jpg[edit]

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Wolfgang Kretzschmar.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:45, 9 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for March 10[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Hans-Heinz Augenstein

added a link pointing to Schönborn

Werner Schröer

added a link pointing to Bretagne

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:42, 10 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Fritz Feßmann.jpg[edit]

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Fritz Feßmann.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:18, 12 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The Bugle: Issue CXXXI, March 2017[edit]

Your Military History Newsletter

Project news: From the editors; awards and honours; contest results
Articles: Last month's new featured and A-class content
Book review: Hawkeye7 and Nick-D look at works on two facets of US military power
Op-ed: TomStar81 on the Russian Revolution
Timeline: This month in World War I

The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 23:20, 12 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:Knight's Cross recipients of TPA[edit]

Template:Knight's Cross recipients of TPA has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. K.e.coffman (talk) 21:45, 18 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:Knight's Cross recipients of the 294th ID[edit]

Template:Knight's Cross recipients of the 294th ID has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. K.e.coffman (talk) 21:50, 18 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:Knight's Cross recipients of the HPBs[edit]

Template:Knight's Cross recipients of the HPBs has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. K.e.coffman (talk) 21:53, 18 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:Knight's Cross recipients of the 134th ID[edit]

Template:Knight's Cross recipients of the 134th ID has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. K.e.coffman (talk) 21:57, 18 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:Knight's Cross recipients of the 116th PD[edit]

Template:Knight's Cross recipients of the 116th PD has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. K.e.coffman (talk) 21:59, 18 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:Knight's Cross recipients of the 102nd ID[edit]

Template:Knight's Cross recipients of the 102nd ID has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. K.e.coffman (talk) 22:01, 18 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:Knight's Cross recipients of the 100th JD[edit]

Template:Knight's Cross recipients of the 100th JD has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. K.e.coffman (talk) 22:02, 18 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:Knight's Cross recipients of the 98th ID[edit]

Template:Knight's Cross recipients of the 98th ID has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. K.e.coffman (talk) 22:03, 18 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:Knight's Cross recipients of the 96th ID[edit]

Template:Knight's Cross recipients of the 96th ID has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. K.e.coffman (talk) 22:06, 18 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:Knight's Cross recipients of the 94th ID[edit]

Template:Knight's Cross recipients of the 94th ID has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. K.e.coffman (talk) 22:26, 18 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:Knight's Cross recipients of the 82nd ID[edit]

Template:Knight's Cross recipients of the 82nd ID has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. K.e.coffman (talk) 22:39, 18 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:Knight's Cross recipients of the 26th ID[edit]

Template:Knight's Cross recipients of the 26th ID has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. K.e.coffman (talk) 01:25, 19 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:Knight's Cross recipients of the 17th SS PGD[edit]

Template:Knight's Cross recipients of the 17th SS PGD has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. K.e.coffman (talk) 23:27, 21 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:Knight's Cross recipients of the 60th ID[edit]

Template:Knight's Cross recipients of the 60th ID has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. K.e.coffman (talk) 23:32, 21 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:Knight's Cross recipients of the 65th ID[edit]

Template:Knight's Cross recipients of the 65th ID has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. K.e.coffman (talk) 23:32, 21 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for March 23[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Helmut Lent, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Sloten. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:03, 23 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:Knight's Cross recipients of the 10th FD[edit]

Template:Knight's Cross recipients of the 10th FD has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. K.e.coffman (talk) 02:02, 26 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:Knight's Cross recipients of the 13th SS MD[edit]

Template:Knight's Cross recipients of the 13th SS MD has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. K.e.coffman (talk) 02:05, 26 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:Knight's Cross recipients of the 19th Waffen GD[edit]

Template:Knight's Cross recipients of the 19th Waffen GD has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. K.e.coffman (talk) 02:08, 26 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:Knight's Cross recipients of the 23rd ID[edit]

Template:Knight's Cross recipients of the 23rd ID has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. K.e.coffman (talk) 02:10, 26 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Luftwaffe units referenced in the Wehrmachtbericht has been nominated for discussion[edit]

Category:Luftwaffe units referenced in the Wehrmachtbericht, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to see if it abides with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. K.e.coffman (talk) 17:28, 26 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:Knight's Cross recipients of the 2nd MD[edit]

Template:Knight's Cross recipients of the 2nd MD has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. K.e.coffman (talk) 23:03, 26 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:Knight's Cross recipients of KG 100[edit]

Template:Knight's Cross recipients of KG 100 has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. K.e.coffman (talk) 23:05, 26 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Tank aces has been nominated for discussion[edit]

Category:Tank aces, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to see if it abides with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. K.e.coffman (talk) 23:36, 26 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for March 30[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Wilhelm Herget, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Marly. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:53, 30 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:Knight's Cross recipients of KG 51[edit]

Template:Knight's Cross recipients of KG 51 has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. K.e.coffman (talk) 01:41, 31 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:Knight's Cross recipients of the 88th ID[edit]

Template:Knight's Cross recipients of the 88th ID has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. K.e.coffman (talk) 01:43, 31 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:Knight's Cross recipients of the 562nd GD[edit]

Template:Knight's Cross recipients of the 562nd GD has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. K.e.coffman (talk) 01:44, 31 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:Knight's Cross recipients of KG 30[edit]

Template:Knight's Cross recipients of KG 30 has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. K.e.coffman (talk) 01:45, 31 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:Knight's Cross recipients of KG 27[edit]

Template:Knight's Cross recipients of KG 27 has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. K.e.coffman (talk) 02:00, 31 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:Knight's Cross recipients of the 68th ID[edit]

Template:Knight's Cross recipients of the 68th ID has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. K.e.coffman (talk) 02:01, 31 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:Knight's Cross recipients in the military of allies of Nazi Germany[edit]

Template:Knight's Cross recipients in the military of allies of Nazi Germany has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. K.e.coffman (talk) 01:45, 2 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:Medical personnel recipients of the Knight's Cross[edit]

Template:Medical personnel recipients of the Knight's Cross has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. K.e.coffman (talk) 02:03, 2 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:Knight's Cross recipients of KG 6[edit]

Template:Knight's Cross recipients of KG 6 has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. K.e.coffman (talk) 02:05, 2 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:Knight's Cross recipients of the 95th ID[edit]

Template:Knight's Cross recipients of the 95th ID has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. K.e.coffman (talk) 02:09, 2 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Luftwaffe Luftflotten has been nominated for renaming[edit]

Category:Luftwaffe Luftflotten, which you created, has been nominated for possible renaming. A discussion is taking place to see if it abides with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. K.e.coffman (talk) 03:40, 3 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for April 6[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Hansgeorg Bätcher, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Heer. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:47, 6 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The Bugle: Issue CXXXII, April 2017[edit]

Your Military History Newsletter

Project news: From the editors; awards and honours; contest results
Articles: Last month's new featured and A-class content
Book review: Nick-D and Hawkeye7 look at air power and nuclear weaponry
Op-ed: Hawkeye7 on Australia's part in the advance on the Hindenburg Line
Timeline: This month in World War I

The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 23:50, 8 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:Knight's Cross recipients of KG 26[edit]

Template:Knight's Cross recipients of KG 26 has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. K.e.coffman (talk) 21:01, 9 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:Knight's Cross recipients of the 3rd ID[edit]

Template:Knight's Cross recipients of the 3rd ID has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. K.e.coffman (talk) 21:02, 9 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:Knight's Cross recipients of the 293rd ID[edit]

Template:Knight's Cross recipients of the 293rd ID has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. K.e.coffman (talk) 21:03, 9 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:Knight's Cross recipients of the 227th ID[edit]

Template:Knight's Cross recipients of the 227th ID has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. K.e.coffman (talk) 21:04, 9 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:Knight's Cross recipients of the 4th MD[edit]

Template:Knight's Cross recipients of the 4th MD has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. K.e.coffman (talk) 21:07, 9 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:KCwithOLandSW[edit]

Template:KCwithOLandSW has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. K.e.coffman (talk) 21:16, 9 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Wirich von Gartzen.jpg[edit]

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Wirich von Gartzen.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 21:49, 26 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of List of highly-decorated German pilots of ground attack aircraft[edit]

The article List of highly-decorated German pilots of ground attack aircraft has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

An unnecessary cross-categorisation. Most of the subjects included are redirects to another list for lack of individual notability. Created under the POV title: List of German World War II ground attack aces & relies on a single, less than RS source.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. K.e.coffman (talk) 00:06, 27 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Erich Handke.jpg[edit]

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Erich Handke.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:27, 29 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of List of highly-decorated German pilots of ground attack aircraft for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article List of highly-decorated German pilots of ground attack aircraft is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of highly-decorated German pilots of ground attack aircraft until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. K.e.coffman (talk) 18:40, 29 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:Knight's Cross recipients of the 7th SS MD[edit]

Template:Knight's Cross recipients of the 7th SS MD has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. K.e.coffman (talk) 04:11, 30 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:Knight's Cross recipients of the 75th ID[edit]

Template:Knight's Cross recipients of the 75th ID has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. K.e.coffman (talk) 06:07, 30 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:Knight's Cross recipients of KG 40[edit]

Template:Knight's Cross recipients of KG 40 has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. K.e.coffman (talk) 06:45, 30 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Arved Crüger.jpg[edit]

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Arved Crüger.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:05, 2 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The Bugle: Issue CXXXIII, May 2017[edit]

Your Military History Newsletter

Project news: From the editors; awards and honours; contest results
Articles: Last month's new featured and A-class content
Book review: Hawkeye7 on Strategic Air Command doctrine
Op-ed: Tomstar81 looks at a little-known aspect of World War I
Timeline: This month in World War I

The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 03:02, 7 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:Knight's Cross recipients of EPG/SKG 210[edit]

Template:Knight's Cross recipients of EPG/SKG 210 has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. K.e.coffman (talk) 04:51, 13 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:Knight's Cross recipients of the 9th ID[edit]

Template:Knight's Cross recipients of the 9th ID has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. K.e.coffman (talk) 08:54, 15 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:Knight's Cross recipients of the 12th SS PD[edit]

Template:Knight's Cross recipients of the 12th SS PD has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. K.e.coffman (talk) 08:57, 15 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Alwin Boerst.jpg[edit]

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Alwin Boerst.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:04, 30 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Friedrich Lang.jpg[edit]

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Friedrich Lang.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:19, 30 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Ernst Bauer.jpg[edit]

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Ernst Bauer.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:06, 31 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:Knight's Cross recipients of the Brandenburgers[edit]

Template:Knight's Cross recipients of the Brandenburgers has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. K.e.coffman (talk) 17:33, 31 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:Knight's Cross recipients of KG 4[edit]

Template:Knight's Cross recipients of KG 4 has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. K.e.coffman (talk) 17:35, 31 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:Knight's Cross recipients of the torpedo boat force[edit]

Template:Knight's Cross recipients of the torpedo boat force has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. K.e.coffman (talk) 17:35, 31 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:Knight's Cross recipients of the 23rd PD[edit]

Template:Knight's Cross recipients of the 23rd PD has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. K.e.coffman (talk) 17:36, 31 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Rudolf Witzig.jpg[edit]

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Rudolf Witzig.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:37, 31 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:Knight's Cross recipients of the 267th ID[edit]

Template:Knight's Cross recipients of the 267th ID has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. K.e.coffman (talk) 23:53, 31 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Freiherr von Malapert.jpg[edit]

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Freiherr von Malapert.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:34, 1 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Kurt Plenzat.jpg[edit]

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Kurt Plenzat.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:02, 1 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Walter Grabmann.jpg[edit]

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Walter Grabmann.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:52, 6 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The Bugle: Issue CXXXIV, June 2017[edit]

Your Military History Newsletter

Project news: From the editors; awards and honours; contest results
Articles: Last month's new featured and A-class content
Book review: Hawkeye7 looks at the Battle of Kokoda and US defence acquisition in the 1960s
Op-ed: Hawkeye7 on the Battle of Messines
Timeline: This month in World War I

The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 12:52, 8 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Alfred Druschel.jpg[edit]

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Alfred Druschel.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:04, 8 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Hans Götz.jpg[edit]

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Hans Götz.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:29, 12 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Gerhard Kollewe.jpg[edit]

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Gerhard Kollewe.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:39, 14 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Günther von Maltzahn.jpg[edit]

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Günther von Maltzahn.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:41, 14 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Werner Winter.jpg[edit]

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Werner Winter.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:58, 18 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Otto Westphalen.jpg[edit]

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Otto Westphalen.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:47, 19 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Ulrich Folkers.jpg[edit]

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Ulrich Folkers.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:26, 20 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Arthur Jüttner.jpg[edit]

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Arthur Jüttner.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:36, 20 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Replaceable fair use File:Reinhard Hardegen.jpg[edit]

Thanks for uploading File:Reinhard Hardegen.jpg. I noticed that this file is being used under a claim of fair use. However, I think that the way it is being used fails the first non-free content criterion. This criterion states that files used under claims of fair use may have no free equivalent; in other words, if the file could be adequately covered by a freely-licensed file or by text alone, then it may not be used on Wikipedia. If you believe this file is not replaceable, please:

Go to the file description page and add the text {{di-replaceable fair use disputed|<your reason>}} below the original replaceable fair use template, replacing <your reason> with a short explanation of why the file is not replaceable.
On the file discussion page, write a full explanation of why you believe the file is not replaceable.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace this non-free media item by finding freely licensed media of the same subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license, or by creating new media yourself (for example, by taking your own photograph of the subject).

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified how these media fully satisfy our non-free content criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification (7 days if uploaded before 13 July 2006), per the non-free content policy. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. -- Marchjuly (talk) 05:24, 22 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Hans-Joachim von Förster.jpg[edit]

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Hans-Joachim von Förster.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:22, 22 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Gerhard Schaar.jpg[edit]

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Gerhard Schaar.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:00, 24 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Paul Brasack.jpg[edit]

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Paul Brasack.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:06, 25 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Wilhelm Gänsler.jpg[edit]

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Wilhelm Gänsler.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:14, 25 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Horst Hofmann.jpg[edit]

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Horst Hofmann.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:16, 25 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Günther Krech.jpg[edit]

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Günther Krech.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:22, 25 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Georg Staats.jpg[edit]

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Georg Staats.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:42, 25 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Siegfried Strelow.JPG[edit]

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Siegfried Strelow.JPG. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:18, 27 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Hans Witt.jpg[edit]

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Hans Witt.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:31, 27 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Johann-Friedrich Wessels.jpg[edit]

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Johann-Friedrich Wessels.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:06, 28 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:Knight's Cross recipients of the 4th SS PD[edit]

Template:Knight's Cross recipients of the 4th SS PD has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page.

Multiple templates have been nominated for discussion; pls see linked entry for the full list. K.e.coffman (talk) 03:09, 1 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Ergänzungs-Jagdgruppe Süd[edit]

The article Ergänzungs-Jagdgruppe Süd has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

An unremarkable training unit that did not see combat. Significant RS coverage not found link, just passing mentions and / or non RS. Article lists one external link which is a self-published web site.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. K.e.coffman (talk) 07:36, 1 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The Bugle: Issue CXXXV, July 2017[edit]

Your Military History Newsletter

Project news: From the editors; awards and honours; contest results
Articles: Last month's new featured and A-class content
Book review: Nick-D looks at planning for the unthinkable
Op-ed: TomStar81 on Russia's Provisional Government in World War I
Timeline: This month in World War I

The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 07:34, 4 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Nicolai Clausen.jpg[edit]

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Nicolai Clausen.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:21, 5 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Ernst Hechler.jpg[edit]

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Ernst Hechler.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:51, 5 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Heinrich Hoffmann (Korvettenkapitän).jpg[edit]

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Heinrich Hoffmann (Korvettenkapitän).jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:52, 5 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Kurt Dobratz.jpg[edit]

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Kurt Dobratz.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:09, 5 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Reinhart Reche.jpg[edit]

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Reinhart Reche.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 19:06, 5 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Heinz Sieder.jpg[edit]

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Heinz Sieder.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 19:14, 5 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:August Maus.jpg[edit]

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:August Maus.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:59, 6 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Helmut Möhlmann.jpg[edit]

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Helmut Möhlmann.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:01, 6 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Fritz Poske.jpg[edit]

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Fritz Poske.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:25, 6 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:German World War II jet aces[edit]

Template:German World War II jet aces has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. K.e.coffman (talk) 03:53, 7 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Adalbert Schnee.jpg[edit]

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Adalbert Schnee.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:57, 7 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Gerd Suhren.jpg[edit]

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Gerd Suhren.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:03, 7 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Apr to Jun 17 Milhist article reviewing[edit]

		Military history reviewers' award
		On behalf of the Milhist coordinators, you are hereby awarded the WikiChevrons for reviewing a total of 1 Milhist article at PR, GAN, ACR or FAC during the period April to June 2017. Thank you for supporting Wikipedia's quality content processes. AustralianRupert (talk) 05:03, 8 July 2017 (UTC)[reply] Keep track of upcoming reviews. Just copy and paste `{{WPMILHIST Review alerts}}` to your user space

Orphaned non-free image File:Alfred Ambs.jpg[edit]

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Alfred Ambs.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:33, 9 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:Knight's Cross recipients of the 26th PD[edit]

Template:Knight's Cross recipients of the 26th PD has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. K.e.coffman (talk) 02:42, 10 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:Knight's Cross recipients of the Kriegsmarine surface fleet[edit]

Template:Knight's Cross recipients of the Kriegsmarine surface fleet has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. K.e.coffman (talk) 02:47, 10 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Erwin Hentschel for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Erwin Hentschel is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Erwin Hentschel until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. K.e.coffman (talk) 23:20, 13 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Diether Lukesch.jpg[edit]

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Diether Lukesch.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:13, 1 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Hans-Heinz Augenstein.jpg[edit]

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Hans-Heinz Augenstein.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:16, 1 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Josef Kraft.jpg[edit]

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Josef Kraft.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:27, 1 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Werner Husemann.jpg[edit]

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Werner Husemann.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:12, 5 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Hans-Dieter Frank.jpg[edit]

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Hans-Dieter Frank.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:17, 6 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Paul Gildner.jpg[edit]

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Paul Gildner.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:18, 6 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The Bugle: Issue CXXXVI, August 2017[edit]

Your Military History Newsletter

Project news: From the editors; awards and honours; contest results
Articles: Last month's new featured and A-class content
Book review: Hawkeye7 on the Battle of Messines and recent Australian Army leadership; Nick-D on South African armour
Op-ed: Nick-D talks photography
Timeline: This month in World War I

The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 13:38, 7 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:Knight's Cross recipients of the Fallschirmjäger[edit]

Template:Knight's Cross recipients of the Fallschirmjäger has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. K.e.coffman (talk) 02:34, 8 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Walter Adolph.jpg[edit]

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Walter Adolph.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:09, 8 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Hans-Ekkehard Bob.jpg[edit]

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Hans-Ekkehard Bob.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:10, 8 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Franz Eckerle.jpg[edit]

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Franz Eckerle.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:17, 8 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:Top German World War II Aces[edit]

Template:Top German World War II Aces has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. K.e.coffman (talk) 00:41, 13 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:Top UK World War II Aces[edit]

Template:Top UK World War II Aces has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. K.e.coffman (talk) 23:51, 13 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:Top US World War II Aces[edit]

Template:Top US World War II Aces has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. K.e.coffman (talk) 23:56, 13 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Harald Gelhaus.jpg[edit]

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Harald Gelhaus.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:17, 14 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Hans Heidtmann.jpg[edit]

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Hans Heidtmann.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:19, 14 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Wolf-Dietrich Huy.jpg[edit]

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Wolf-Dietrich Huy.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:20, 14 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Rudi Linz.jpg[edit]

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Rudi Linz.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:28, 14 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Heinrich Füllgrabe.jpg[edit]

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Heinrich Füllgrabe.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:24, 15 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Hans Grünberg.jpg[edit]

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Hans Grünberg.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:29, 15 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Hans-Werner Kraus.jpg[edit]

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Hans-Werner Kraus.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:42, 15 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Walter Loos.jpg[edit]

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Walter Loos.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:49, 15 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Rudolf Resch.jpg[edit]

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Rudolf Resch.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:03, 15 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Franz Dörr.jpg[edit]

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Franz Dörr.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:12, 16 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Bernhard Vechtel.jpg[edit]

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Bernhard Vechtel.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:09, 21 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Emil Bitsch.jpg[edit]

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Emil Bitsch.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:10, 21 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Eberhard von Boremski.jpg[edit]

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Eberhard von Boremski.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:11, 21 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Franz Woidich.jpg[edit]

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Franz Woidich.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:23, 21 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Hartmann Grasser.jpg[edit]

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Hartmann Grasser.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:30, 21 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Berthold Korts.jpg[edit]

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Berthold Korts.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:40, 21 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Kurt Tanzer.jpg[edit]

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Kurt Tanzer.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:42, 21 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Werner Lucas.jpg[edit]

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Werner Lucas.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:57, 21 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Rudolf Miethig.jpg[edit]

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Rudolf Miethig.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:06, 21 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Rudolf Trenkel.jpg[edit]

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Rudolf Trenkel.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:07, 21 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Viktor Bauer.jpg[edit]

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Viktor Bauer.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:17, 21 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Peter Werfft.jpg[edit]

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Peter Werfft.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:18, 21 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Ulrich Wernitz.jpg[edit]

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Ulrich Wernitz.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:19, 21 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Wolfgang Tonne.jpg[edit]

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Wolfgang Tonne.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:20, 21 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Hans Dammers.jpg[edit]

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Hans Dammers.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:06, 22 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Edmund Roßmann.jpg[edit]

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Edmund Roßmann.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:11, 22 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Friedrich Körner.jpg[edit]

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Friedrich Körner.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:14, 22 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Gerhard Köppen.jpg[edit]

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Gerhard Köppen.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:15, 22 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Horst Hannig.jpg[edit]

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Horst Hannig.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:16, 22 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Ernst Süß.jpg[edit]

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Ernst Süß.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:39, 22 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Rudolf Rademacher.jpg[edit]

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Rudolf Rademacher.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:40, 23 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Albin Wolf.jpg[edit]

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Albin Wolf.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:03, 24 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Walter Matoni.jpg[edit]

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Walter Matoni.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:33, 24 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Emil Clade.jpg[edit]

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Emil Clade.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:10, 25 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Jakob Norz.jpg[edit]

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Jakob Norz.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:24, 25 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Klaus Neumann.jpg[edit]

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Klaus Neumann.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:33, 25 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Heinrich Sterr.jpg[edit]

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Heinrich Sterr.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:42, 25 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Horst-Günther Fassong.jpg[edit]

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Horst-Günther Fassong.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:16, 26 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Adolf Glunz.jpg[edit]

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Adolf Glunz.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:20, 26 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Hans-Joachim Birkner (soldier).jpg[edit]

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Hans-Joachim Birkner (soldier).jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:05, 27 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Adolf Borchers.jpg[edit]

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Adolf Borchers.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:06, 27 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Franz Eisenach.jpg[edit]

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Franz Eisenach.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:20, 27 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Günther Scheel.jpg[edit]

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Günther Scheel.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:55, 31 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Otto Fönnekold.jpg[edit]

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Otto Fönnekold.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:19, 4 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Fritz Tegtmeier.jpg[edit]

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Fritz Tegtmeier.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:21, 4 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Karl Gratz.jpg[edit]

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Karl Gratz.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:34, 4 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Karl-Heinz Weber.jpg[edit]

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Karl-Heinz Weber.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:53, 4 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Hermann-Friedrich Joppien.jpg[edit]

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Hermann-Friedrich Joppien.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:27, 5 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Helmut Witte.jpg[edit]

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Helmut Witte.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:50, 5 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Gerhard Hoffmanng.jpg[edit]

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Gerhard Hoffmanng.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:14, 6 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Heinz Lange.JPG[edit]

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Heinz Lange.JPG. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:19, 6 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Robert Weiß.jpg[edit]

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Robert Weiß.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:46, 7 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Heinz Wernicke.jpg[edit]

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Heinz Wernicke.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:47, 7 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The Bugle: Issue CXXXVII, September 2017[edit]

Your Military History Newsletter

Project news: From the editors; awards and honours; contest results
Articles: Last month's new featured and A-class content
Book review: Nick-D and Hawkeye7 look at two recent releases
Op-ed: Hawkeye7 on ANZACs in the Third Ypres Offensive
Timeline: This month in World War I

The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 23:32, 8 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Ludwig Becker.jpg[edit]

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Ludwig Becker.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:21, 11 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Reinhold Knacke.jpg[edit]

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Reinhold Knacke.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:23, 11 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:August Geiger.jpg[edit]

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:August Geiger.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:23, 12 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:Knight's Cross recipients of SxG 77[edit]

Template:Knight's Cross recipients of SxG 77 has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. K.e.coffman (talk) 01:35, 17 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Karl Schnörrer.jpg[edit]

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Karl Schnörrer.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:08, 19 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Heinz Schmidt.jpg[edit]

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Heinz Schmidt.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:18, 19 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Franz Götz.jpg[edit]

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Franz Götz.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:20, 19 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Günther Hessler.jpg[edit]

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Günther Hessler.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:26, 19 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Wolf-Udo Ettel.jpg[edit]

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Wolf-Udo Ettel.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:27, 19 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Heinz Maraquardt.jpg[edit]

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Heinz Maraquardt.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:14, 20 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Walter Borchers.jpg[edit]

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Walter Borchers.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:23, 20 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Ga reassess (you still there?)[edit]

Rommel myth, an article that you or your project may be interested in, has been nominated for a community good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the reassessment page. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. LargelyRecyclable (talk) 13:49, 22 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Franz Schall.jpg[edit]

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Franz Schall.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:09, 22 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Franz Schiess.jpg[edit]

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Franz Schiess.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:14, 22 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Kurt Kuhlmey.jpg[edit]

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Kurt Kuhlmey.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:12, 24 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:Knight's Cross recipients of the 1st ID[edit]

Template:Knight's Cross recipients of the 1st ID has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. K.e.coffman (talk) 21:46, 30 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The Bugle: Issue CXXXVIII, October 2017[edit]

Your Military History Newsletter

Project news: From the editors; awards and honours; contest results
Articles: Last month's new featured and A-class content
Book review: Nick-D and Hawkeye7 look at Australian involvement on the Western Front in 1918 and in post-war New Guinea
Op-ed: TomStar81 on the October Revolution
Timeline: This month in World War I

The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 23:42, 7 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Ergänzungs-Jagdgruppe Merseburg[edit]

The article Ergänzungs-Jagdgruppe Merseburg has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

An unremarkable, short-lived training unit that did not see combat. Significant RS coverage not found.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. K.e.coffman (talk) 01:48, 8 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:Knight's Cross recipients of KG 2[edit]

Template:Knight's Cross recipients of KG 2 has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. K.e.coffman (talk) 04:40, 9 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:Knight's Cross recipients of the 12th ID[edit]

Template:Knight's Cross recipients of the 12th ID has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. K.e.coffman (talk) 01:25, 14 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Walter Schuck.jpg[edit]

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Walter Schuck.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:11, 17 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Alois Lindmayr.jpg[edit]

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Alois Lindmayr.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:06, 22 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Otto Schulz (1911–1942).jpg[edit]

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Otto Schulz (1911–1942).jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:15, 24 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The Bugle: Issue CXXXIX, November 2017[edit]

Your Military History Newsletter

Project news: From the editors; awards and honours; contest results
Articles: Last month's new featured and A-class content
Book review: Recent external reviews
Op-ed: TomStar81 on late 1917 naval warfare
Timeline: This month in World War I

The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 13:29, 7 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message[edit]

Hello, MisterBee1966. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The Bugle: Issue CXL, December 2017[edit]

Your Military History Newsletter

Project news: From the editors; awards and honours; contest results
Articles: Last month's new featured and A-class content
Book review: Recent external reviews
Op-ed: TomStar81 on the Halifax Explosion of 1917
Timeline: This month in World War I

The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 11:16, 10 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for December 14[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Erwin Clausen, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Stromberg and Westerland (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 18:30, 14 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Seasons' Greetings[edit]

...to you and yours, from the Great White North! FWiW Bzuk (talk) 03:53, 24 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for December 28[edit]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Erich Hartmann, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Orel (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 10:52, 28 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The Bugle: Issue CXLI, January 2018[edit]

Your Military History Newsletter

Project news: From the editors; awards and honours; contest results
Articles: Last month's new featured and A-class content
Book review: Hawkeye7 looks at tropical medicine and Operation Market Garden
Op-ed: Hawkeye7 on US Army doctrine in World War I
Timeline: This month in World War I

The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 13:15, 8 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for January 29[edit]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Walter Nowotny, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Nevel (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 10:19, 29 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Template_talk:Top_German_World_War_II_Aces#Proposed_change_to_initial_state[edit]

Hi MisterBee1966. Just a courtesy note to let you know I have closed the request for comment you initiated at Template_talk:Top_German_World_War_II_Aces#Proposed_change_to_initial_state. Apologies for the delay, there is quite a large backlog of discussions requiring closure. Best regards, fish&karate 14:53, 1 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The Bugle: Issue CXLII, February 2018[edit]

Your Military History Newsletter

Project news: From the editors; awards and honours; contest results
Articles: Last month's new featured and A-class content
Book review: Nick-D on the Napoleonic Wars and Hawkeye7 on World War II
Op-ed: Hawkeye7 on generalship in 1918
Timeline: This month in World War I

The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 07:16, 11 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The Bugle: Issue CXLIII, March 2018[edit]

Your Military History Newsletter

Project news: From the editors; awards and honours; contest results
Articles: Last month's new featured and A-class content
Book review: Hawkeye7 looks at a work by Daniel Ellsberg
Op-ed: TomStar81 on the 1918 flu pandemic
Timeline: This month in World War I

The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 10:36, 12 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The Bugle: Issue CXLIIV, April 2018[edit]

Your Military History Newsletter

Project news: From the editors; awards and honours; contest results
Articles: Last month's new featured and A-class content
Book review: Nick-D looks at the bombing of Darwin; recent books by female military historians
Review essay: K.e.coffman on Wikipedia's representations of the Nazi German military
Op-ed: TomStar81 on the Red Baron
Timeline: This month in World War I

The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 09:55, 8 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The Bugle: Issue CXLIV, May 2018[edit]

Your Military History Newsletter

Project news: From the editors; awards and honours; contest results
Articles: Last month's new featured and A-class content
Book review: Hawkeye7 looks at coalitions and logistics in World War II, and Nick-D at Australia's frontier wars
Timeline: This month in World War I

The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 15:00, 12 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The Bugle: Issue CXLVI, June 2018[edit]

Your Military History Newsletter

Project news: From the editors; awards and honours; contest results
Articles: Last month's new featured and A-class content
Book review: Recent external reviews
Op-ed: TomStar81 on a supergun of World War I
Timeline: This month in World War I

The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 10:35, 11 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Gemeinschaft der Jagdflieger for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Gemeinschaft der Jagdflieger is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Gemeinschaft der Jagdflieger until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Catrìona (talk) 04:26, 18 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for July 8[edit]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Kurt Ubben, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Albano (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:07, 8 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The Bugle: Issue CXLVII, July 2018[edit]

Your Military History Newsletter

Project news: From the editors; awards and honours; contest results
Articles: Last month's new featured and A-class content
Book review: This month's external reviews
Op-ed: TomStar81 on the murder of the Romanovs
Timeline: This month in World War I

The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 12:12, 10 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The Bugle: Issue CXLVIII, August 2018[edit]

Your Military History Newsletter

Project news: From the editors; awards and honours; contest results
Articles: Last month's new featured and A-class content
Book review: Nick-D looks at a classic US official history
Op-ed: TomStar81 on belated declarations of war in 1916–18
Timeline: This month in World War I

The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 08:35, 12 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The Bugle: Issue CXLIX, September 2018[edit]

Your Military History Newsletter

Project news: From the editors; awards and honours; contest results
Articles: Last month's new featured and A-class content
Book review: Indy Beetle and Nick-D on the Katangese Gendarmes and India during World War II
Op-ed: TomStar81 looks at two important treaties of World War I
Timeline: This month in World War I

The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 22:19, 10 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The Bugle: Issue CL, October 2018[edit]

Your Military History Newsletter

Project news: From the editors; awards and honours; contest results
Articles: Last month's new featured and A-class content
Book review: Nick-D looks at the use of so-called "substandard" manpower in armies
Interview: On the Bugle turning 150 (issues that is!)
Op-ed: TomStar81 on the collapse of empires at the close of World War I
Timeline: This month in World War I

The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 07:00, 7 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hans-Joachim Jabs[edit]

I saw the listing of claims you added for the article on Jabs. Excellent. And in a collapsable section makes it information that is readily available to the interested reader, and yet does not overwhelm the page. And I see you defended the addition well. Nice. Thanks so much for improving the article! Gunbirddriver (talk) 03:57, 18 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The Bugle: Issue CLI, November 2018[edit]

Your Military History Newsletter

Project news: From the editors; awards and honours; contest results
Articles: Last month's new featured and A-class content
Book review: Peacemaker67 looks at the Sydney Wars
Op-ed: TomStar81 on the end of World War I
Timeline: This month in World War I

The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 09:40, 14 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message[edit]

Hello, MisterBee1966. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for November 21[edit]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Wilhelm-Ferdinand Galland, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Watten (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:17, 21 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Oswald Boelcke[edit]

Hello, That was a good catch on the faulty cites for the above article. As a result of your diligent checking, I was able to further improve this article. I believe you will now find all is correct.Georgejdorner (talk) 20:46, 1 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The Bugle: Issue CLII, December 2018[edit]

Your Military History Newsletter

Project news: From the editors; awards and honours; contest results
Articles: Last month's new featured and A-class content
Book review: Recent external reviews
Op-ed: Indy beetle looks at military newspapers in East Africa

The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 10:34, 9 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Wehrmachtbericht mentions[edit]

According to a recent RfC, references in the Wehrmachtbericht may be included "when a reliable source that focuses on the mentioned person or unit specifically states that the mention was an honour." You've added many mentions that are sourced to books, as well as many instances of the unsourced phrase "To be singled out individually in this way was an honor and was entered in the Orders and Decorations' section of a soldier's Service Record Book." Since you seem to have access to these sources, would you be willing to help go through the articles and confirm that they meet the new requirements? I would suggest including relevant quotes, perhaps as a note within the reference, to help other editors verify this. –dlthewave ☎ 16:52, 9 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for December 16[edit]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Günther Freiherr von Maltzahn, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Dungeness (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:32, 16 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Merry Christmas and Happy New Year[edit]

Merry Christmas and a Prosperous 2019!

Hello MisterBee1966, may you be surrounded by peace, success and happiness on this seasonal occasion. Spread the WikiLove by wishing another user a Merry Christmas and a Happy New Year, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past, a good friend, or just some random person. Sending you a heartfelt and warm greetings for Christmas and New Year 2019.
Happy editing,
Meatsgains^(talk) 01:51, 24 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Spread the love by adding {{subst:Seasonal Greetings}} to other user talk pages.

Disambiguation link notification for December 29[edit]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Heinrich Ehrler, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Halle (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:13, 29 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The Bugle: Issue CLIII, January 2019[edit]

Your Military History Newsletter

Project news: From the editors; awards and honours; contest results
Articles: Last month's new featured and A-class content
Book review: Nick-D looks at Albert Speer
Op-ed: Factotem on common problems affecting infoboxes
Timeline: This month in World War I

The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 23:58, 6 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The Bugle: Issue CLIV, February 2019[edit]

Your Military History Newsletter

Project news: From the editors; awards and honours; contest results
Articles: Last month's new featured and A-class content
Book review: Recent external reviews
Review essay: Nick-D on the Japanese battleship Mikasa

The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 12:19, 10 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

File:Heinz Schmidt.jpg[edit]

Hi, I'm RonBot, a script that checks new non-free file uploads. I have found that the subject image that you recently uploaded was more than 5% in excess of the Non-free content guideline size of 100,000 pixels. I have tagged the image for a standard reduction, which (for jpg/gif/png/svg files) normally happens within a day. Please check the reduced image, and make sure that the image is not excessively corrupted. Other files will be added to Category:Wikipedia non-free file size reduction requests for manual processing. There is a full seven-day period before the original oversized image will be hidden; during that time you might want to consider editing the original image yourself (perhaps an initial crop to allow a smaller reduction or none at all). A formula for the calculation of the desired size can be found at WP:Image resolution, along with instructions on how to tag the image in the rare cases that it requires an oversized image (typically about 0.2% of non-free uploads are tagged as necessarily oversized). Please contact the bot owner if you have any questions, or you can ask them at Wikipedia talk:Non-free content. See User:RonBot for info on how to not get these messages. RonBot (talk) 17:59, 23 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

FAR Notice: Heinrich Bär[edit]

I have nominated Heinrich Bär for a featured article review here. Please join the discussion on whether this article meets featured article criteria. Articles are typically reviewed for two weeks. If substantial concerns are not addressed during the review period, the article will be moved to the Featured Article Removal Candidates list for a further period, where editors may declare "Keep" or "Delist" the article's featured status. The instructions for the review process are here. –dlthewave ☎ 17:08, 24 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The Bugle: Issue CLV, March 2019[edit]

Your Military History Newsletter

Project news: From the editors; awards and honours; contest results
Articles: Last month's new featured and A-class content
Book review: Hawkeye7 on US Navy aviation safety and Australian war crimes trials

The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 11:00, 10 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

GAR Notice: Hans Philipp[edit]

Hans Philipp, an article that you or your project may be interested in, has been nominated for an individual good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the reassessment page. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. –dlthewave ☎ 12:13, 11 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

March 2019[edit]

A recent edit of yours at Hermann-Friedrich Joppien added material sourced to Stockert 2012. I'm not sure if you're aware, but this source is unreliable per community consensus at RSN. The edit has been reverted and I would ask that you not use this source again without first establishing its reliability at RSN. Feel free to discuss any concerns. –dlthewave ☎ 15:21, 22 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for letting me know MisterBee1966 (talk) 16:16, 22 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The Bugle: Issue CLVI, April 2019[edit]

Your Military History Newsletter

Project news: From the editors; awards and honours; contest results
Articles: Last month's new featured and A-class content
Book review: Peacemaker67, Nick-D and Hawkeye7 look at three books focussing on the World Wars
Op-ed: Indy Beetle on the fall of Idi Amin

The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 21:59, 8 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

MfD nomination of Portal:Military of Germany/Selected biography/6[edit]

Portal:Military of Germany/Selected biography/6, a page which you created or substantially contributed to, has been nominated for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; you may participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Portal:Military of Germany/Selected biography/6 and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of Portal:Military of Germany/Selected biography/6 during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. K.e.coffman (talk) 00:59, 13 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The Bugle: Issue CLVII, May 2019[edit]

Your Military History Newsletter

Project news: From the editors; awards and honours; contest results
Articles: Last month's new featured and A-class content
Book review: Hawkeye7 on Australia's leadership and medical services in World War II and Peacemaker67 on Israel's targeted assassinations
Op-ed: TomStar81 looks at the fate of the German fleet at Scapa Flow

The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 11:04, 12 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Good article reassessment: Hans-Joachim Marseille[edit]

Hans-Joachim Marseille, an article that you or your project may be interested in, has been nominated for an individual good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the reassessment page. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. --K.e.coffman (talk) 23:22, 23 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Douglas Bader[edit]

Please dont edit war on Douglas Bader it is not very clever, you need to gain a consensus on the talk page. MilborneOne (talk) 13:28, 24 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Wolfgang Tonne.jpg[edit]

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Wolfgang Tonne.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:49, 24 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The Bugle: Issue CLVIII, June 2019[edit]

Your Military History Newsletter

Project news: From the editors; awards and honours; contest results
Articles: Last month's new featured and A-class content
Book review: Nick-D looks at the Dambusters, and Hawkeye7 at Allied code breakers and Australia in New Guinea and Vietnam
Op-ed: TomStar81 on the treaty that ended World War I

The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 13:08, 14 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Congratulations from the Military History Project[edit]

		Military history reviewers' award
		On behalf of the Military History Project, I am proud to present the The Milhist reviewing award (1 stripe) for participating in 2 reviews between April and June 2019 Peacemaker67 (talk) via MilHistBot (talk) 03:05, 4 July 2019 (UTC)[reply] Keep track of upcoming reviews. Just copy and paste `{{WPMILHIST Review alerts}}` to your user space

Retired?[edit]

Perhaps time to take that off your user-page? Regards. Lectonar (talk) 13:55, 10 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

[1] Griehl, Manfred; Dressel, Joachim (1998). Heinkel He 177 – 277 – 274. Shrewsbury, UK: Airlife Publishing. pp. 52, 244. ISBN 1-85310-364-0. "In conjunction with the Bauaufsicht Luft (Construction Supervisor, Air) Oberst Petersen (KdE)..." - the concluding abbreviation is defined as the Kommandeur der Erprobungsstellen, or "Commander of of Proving/Test Establishments", the CO of the entire set of Erprobungsstelle facilities the Luftwaffe had established for military aircraft test and evaluation, as defined on page 244 of the quoted book.

[1]