Jump to content

User talk:Monophile

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

October 2024

[edit]
Stop icon

Your recent editing history at Shibu Chacko shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war; read about how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you do not violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. Badbluebus (talk) 15:36, 1 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Badbluebus what a joke, One, you are doing wrong by making personal attack and blaming from above, First of all I am the creator of this page Shibu Chacko i reserves the right to return, If vandalism is done All bio added after that is as per wikipedia guidelines no WP:PROMOTION words are used it page has been checked by Administrators also, I'm not new to Wikipedia. I originally started editing 10 years ago. Actually you are targeting this page and Vandalism it and making Personal attacks so be careful blocked from editing. you are a new editor you have been 6 months on wikipedia I have checked your all edit here on every page and found vandalism. You always target other editors and make personal attacks. It may also be your new account and you already sockpuppet can be. You also nominated article for deletion here, can be see Only for vandalism or personal attack. Monophile 💬 09:31, 01 October2024 (UTC)

Nomination of Shibu Chacko for deletion

[edit]
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Shibu Chacko is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Shibu Chacko until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Badbluebus (talk) 16:40, 1 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

October 2024

[edit]
Stop icon
You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for persistently making disruptive edits.
If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  Bbb23 (talk) 17:04, 1 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Monophile (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

Apologies, I admittedly did not fully read the rules and when I received the warning. I now understand No personal attacks Policies and guidelines I will not attempt to personal attacks with editors. in the future and iwill only contribute to pages. Please give more one chance, respectfully ask to be unblocked. Monophile (talk) 03:49, 2 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

I'm a bit concerned that you had to read a rule to know that you shouldn't make personal attacks- but leaving that aside, personal attacks are only one aspect of the block, please discuss your edit warring and tell how you will handle disputes in the future. I am declining your request. 331dot (talk) 06:41, 2 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

I suggest any admin reviewing an appeal of this unblock denial take note, if it's not already obvious through admin tools, that this user was initially 48hr blocked after bringing an unfounded ANI[1], after two rapid-succession SPI filings (rapidly deleted by @Bbb23). I believe everyone deserves a chance or two to redeem themselves, but this was way outside community norms and in my opinion deserves a fulsome explanation. Oblivy (talk) 07:56, 2 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@331dot Sure I'm really Apologies Sorry, i made a mistake, seeing the edit warning, I give full assurance that I will avoid tampering with any page in future, I will add only the contributions that are allowed by looking at Wikipedia's guideline policies, I would read and learn more Contributing to Wikipedia Policies and guidelines. Monophile 03:23, 2 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Monophile (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

I'm really Apologies , i made a mistake, seeing the edit warning, I give full assurance that I will avoid tampering with any page in future, I will add only the contributions that are allowed by looking at Wikipedia's guideline policies, I would read and learn more Contributing to Wikipedia Policies and guidelines. Please give more one chance, respectfully ask to be unblocked. Monophile (talk) 11:59, 2 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Even if you weren't a sock puppet, your English language proficiency is too low to edit English Wikipedia. Talk page access revoked to match master. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 20:42, 2 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Stop hand
Your ability to edit this talk page has been revoked as an administrator has identified your talk page edits as inappropriate and/or disruptive.

(block logactive blocksglobal blocksautoblockscontribsdeleted contribsabuse filter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, you should read the guide to appealing blocks, then contact administrators by submitting a request to the Unblock Ticket Request System.
Please note that there could be appeals to the unblock ticket request system that have been declined leading to the posting of this notice.

File:8 Parche.jpg Baani Sandhu.jpg listed for discussion

[edit]

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:8 Parche.jpg Baani Sandhu.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. Ixfd64 (talk) 00:13, 14 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]