User talk:Oblivy

Archives

This page has archives. Sections older than 30 days may be automatically archived by when more than 3 sections are present.

Your edit on South Korea[edit]

I just reverted it. 99,720 km2 was the recalculation in 1998, 100,210 km2 was the recalculation in 2000 and 100,363 km2 was the recalculation in 2001, and has been accepted since 2010. World Factbook is irrelevant. Do you regret changing it? I will face the music (talk) 18:28, 23 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I will face the music

Best you go to these talk pages. Don't get blocked before you have a chance to explain. Your random changing of these numbers is definitely odd. You're reverting yourself in some cases. Moxy🍁 19:58, 23 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Here[1] you changed the number to 100,210 which wasn't supported by either of the sources. Oblivy (talk) 23:05, 23 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Robison[edit]

Thanks for fixing my error.[2] My browser deleted words when I searched for “abortion”. FWIW, I hadn’t added or subtracted any text- just moved some to a better location. Since it was long-uncited, I went ahead and deleted it. WestRiding24 (talk) 05:51, 26 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

OK, I get it now. What I was reacting to looked like putting in unsourced biographical details, and then I saw the abortion thing and I reverted it. Now I see you had just moved the unsourced text. Oblivy (talk) 09:48, 26 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Appin Article and Talk Page[edit]

Hey, when you have the time, can you please take a look at the Appin Article and Talk Page? The same user (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Contributions/Ciudatul) is removing legitimate edits again and now also messing up my comment in the talk page (vandalism?), perhaps to get me to start an edit war (he moved my comment to the wrong section that has nothing to do with it).

Thanks. HARRISONSST (talk) 13:55, 3 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Even if you think another editor is baiting you you need to assume good faith and engage with them. I appreciate that you have been using the talk page, but honestly some of your remarks could come across as hostile or sarcastic, and not AGF. If you seek out administrator help you are likely to end up getting in some kind of trouble.

With respect to the article, personally, I think it should be reverted (i.e., add back what was blanked). I am trying to maintain a bit of distance from the article. There's a request for another editor to have a look at the changes and I'm OK with seeing how that turns out. Oblivy (talk) 15:05, 3 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]