User talk:Morayce

This is Morayce's talk page, where you can send them messages and comments.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Your submission at Articles for creation: Aham Rochas (March 25)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by M-Mustapha was:

Please, sorry! Your submission at this time is not notable to be on Wikipedia, maybe in the near future when he ventures into other areas apart from his business and family lineage.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Aham Rochas and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Aham Rochas, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Em-em ^talk 22:25, 25 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Morayce! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Em-em ^talk 22:25, 25 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Aham Rochas (April 23)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Celestina007 was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Aham Rochas and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Aham Rochas, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Celestina007 (talk) 23:04, 23 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Morayce (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

To the best of my understanding i haven't violated or contravened any of the wikipedia guidelines, If i have i am open to guidiance as to how not to repeat my mistake/mistakes, all my edits up until now have been done in good faith, I am on wikipedia to learn and use the best of my abilities to contribute to the collaborative project, I have no intention of ever constituting a nuisance on the collaborative project.

Decline reason:

This account is not blocked. What message are you getting? --jpgordon^{𝄢𝄆𝄐𝄇} 17:43, 9 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

--jpgordon prior to now, I got a message stating that my IP or username or both had been blocked and my editing privilege rescinded, but it looks like it must have been a temporary blanket block or an auto-block on my IP range seeing that my editing privilege have been restored Morayce (talk) 21:45, 9 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Aham Rochas (June 12)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Greenman was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Changes since the last decline are not enough to establish notability.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Aham Rochas and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Aham Rochas, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Greenman (talk) 21:02, 12 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Aham Rochas (July 10)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Eternal Shadow were:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Aham Rochas and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Aham Rochas, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Eternal Shadow Talk 21:33, 10 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Aham Rochas (July 26)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by TheBirdsShedTears was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Routine press coverage, interviews, and relationships do not confer notability. You will need to provide reliable sources with in-depth coverage and independent of the subject to show notability.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Aham Rochas and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Aham Rochas, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

TheBirdsShedTears (talk) 08:57, 26 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Aham Rochas (July 29)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Goldsztajn was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

No substantial changes since the last submission. Please be aware that WP:SIGCOV is a crucial element in determining notability of individuals.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Aham Rochas and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Aham Rochas, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Goldsztajn (talk) 05:00, 29 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Aham Rochas (July 29)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Cerebellum was:

No changes made since last submission.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Aham Rochas and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Aham Rochas, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Cerebellum (talk) 09:48, 29 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Zahra Buhari-Indimi (August 2)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by MurielMary were:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The content of this submission includes material that does not meet Wikipedia's minimum standard for inline citations. Please cite your sources using footnotes. For instructions on how to do this, please see Referencing for beginners. Thank you.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Thanks for creating this draft. At least three reliable, objective secondary sources are needed to establish notability of this person.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Zahra Buhari-Indimi and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Zahra Buhari-Indimi, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

MurielMary (talk) 12:01, 2 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Nigerian defence academy attack

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Nigerian defence academy attack requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be an unambiguous copyright infringement. This page appears to be a direct copy from https://www.channelstv.com/2021/08/24/breaking-bandits-attack-nda-kill-two-officers/. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images taken from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites or other printed material as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to use it for any reason — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. The same holds if you are not the owner but have their permission. If you are not the owner and do not have permission, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for how you may obtain it. You might want to look at Wikipedia's copyright policy for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. ASUKITE 14:32, 27 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Zahra Buhari-Indimi (August 27)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted because it included copyrighted content, which is not permitted on Wikipedia.

This submission appears to be taken from thecityceleb.com/biography/entrepreneur/businesswoman/zahra-buhari-biography-age-son-phone-number-house-husband-wedding-pictures-net-worth-wikipedia-birthday, saharareporters.com/2021/03/10/buharis-daughter-threatens-saharareporters-lawsuit-exposing-n51-billion-fraud-apc. Wikipedia cannot accept material copied from elsewhere, unless it explicitly and verifiably has been released to the world under a suitably-free and compatible copyright license or into the public domain and is written in an acceptable tone—this includes material that you own the copyright to. You should attribute the content of a draft to outside sources, using citations, but copying and pasting or closely paraphrasing sources is not acceptable. The entire draft should be written using your own words and structure. Note to reviewers: do not leave copyright violations sitting in the page history. Please follow the instructions here.

You are welcome to write an article on the subject, but please do not use copyrighted work.

Draft:Zahra Buhari-Indimi may be deleted at any time unless the copied text is removed. Copyrighted work cannot be allowed to remain on Wikipedia.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page. or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

ASUKITE 14:36, 27 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Aham Rochas (September 4)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Modussiccandi was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

The Business Insider Africa piece is a step in the right direction but I'm not convinced the other sources rise to the level required by WP:GNG. There are a few other problems to do with neutrality and verifiability: why is he referred to by his first name? Why is his university degree portrait as an "award" even though it is very common for UK students to get a first? Where is the source for his Cambridge degree and for his brith date?

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Aham Rochas and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Aham Rochas, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Modussiccandi (talk) 20:44, 4 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Aham Rochas has been accepted

Aham Rochas, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Comr Melody Idoghor (talk) 15:02, 24 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Aham Rochas moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Aham Rochas, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. scope_creep^Talk 21:06, 2 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Scope creep i would like to know specifically what information on the article are not properly referenced and need to be removed. The article meets wikipedia standards based on WP:GNG unless there are other guidelines on general notability that aren't stated on the WP:GNG. how many more sources exactly are needed for the article to attain presumed notability by those standards? and also if you can point out specifically the references in the article that do not currently meet wikipedia standards and why it would be very much appreciated. please be rest assured of my wholesome intent to contribute. The neo (talk) 00:53, 3 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

They're all WP:PRIMARY references, essentially interviews. For a WP:BLP articles, WP:SECONDARY sources are needed to establish notability, that is people taking about the subject, who doesn't know the subject. Hope that helps! scope_creep^Talk 00:59, 3 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Morayce, do you mind reading WP:CUSTOMSIG/P? Your customized signature is definitely in variance with what that states. Thanks for the catch @scope_creep, I saw this last week & was going to affix the {{COI}} tag on it but completely forgot to. I’m going ahead to add the tag. Celestina007 (talk) 01:03, 3 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@celestina007 thank you for pointing out the issue with my signature, i have done well to rectify it. in addition can you please also state what is non-neutral about the article that requires for it to be taged {{COI}}? thanks The Neo Morayce (talk) 01:24, 3 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Honestly please do not do this. I did not speak about neutrality I spoke about a glaring conflict of interest which I believe you have not declared. Please don’t do this. I believe Idoghor Melody incorrectly accepting this draft didn’t help either. Celestina007 (talk) 01:30, 3 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@celestina007 quoting {{COI}} "Like the other neutrality-related tags, if you place this tag, you should promptly start a discussion on the article's talk page to explain what is non-neutral about the article. If you do not start a discussion, any editor will be justified in removing the tag without warning." i have done well to remove the tag.The Neo Morayce (talk) 01:45, 3 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Conflict of interest

Hello, Morayce. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places or things you have written about on the page Draft:Aham Rochas, you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a conflict of interest may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for organizations for more information. We ask that you:

avoid editing or creating articles about yourself, your family, friends, colleagues, company, organization or competitors;
propose changes on the talk pages of affected articles (you can use the {{request edit}} template);
disclose your conflict of interest when discussing affected articles (see Wikipedia:Conflict of interest#How to disclose a COI);
avoid linking to your organization's website in other articles (see Wikipedia:Spam#External link spamming);
do your best to comply with Wikipedia's content policies.

In addition, you are required by the Wikimedia Foundation's terms of use to disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution which forms all or part of work for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation. See Wikipedia:Paid-contribution disclosure.

Also, editing for the purpose of advertising, publicising, or promoting anyone or anything is not permitted. Thank you. – Athaenara ✉ 03:07, 3 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Athaenara thank you very much for clearly stating this, i do not have an external relationship with the subject i am writing on, how ever i have volunteered with the Rochas Foundation in the past, a foundation closely related to the subject by virtue of it's founder being the subjects father and as such have been exposed to the subject however i still reiterate that i am not being paid, niether am i expecting to be paid or compensated for editing wikipedia, my intention are of good faith and i now understand that my over enthusiasm may have made my writing come off as promotional but please be rest assured that i am a willing learner and i respect the decision to block my account but i would like to appeal for my account to be unblocked.The Neo Morayce (talk) 18:25, 3 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This is to note that the Rochas Foundation organization Morayce references in which they disclose above they are affiliated or acquainted with, as observed above has an article here which was created by an indef blocked editor by the name of Ugbedeg a notorious master sock and serial abuser., Furthermore the article in itself is an advertisement masquerading as an article which fails to meet NGO. Celestina007 (talk) 19:55, 3 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@celestina007 also allow me to sate that i am in no way related to the alleged Master sock Ugbedeg and haven't made any contributions or edits to Rochas Foundation in my 8months on wikipedia.

@celestina007 i'd like to apologize for removing the COI tag from the article i created, even though i may feel that i do not have a conflict of interest i shouldn't have done that because it further makes it seem as though i do, i should have allowed a neutral editor do so. i recorgnize that you have been on this collaborative project longer than i have and have a better understanding of the policies, i may have engaged in disruptive behaviour but i would like to state again that my intentions are far from harming the collaborative project, i know that you most definitely do not hold a personal grudge against me and you are only acting in the best interest of the wikipedia project and as such please accept my sincere apology. I know now that i have only scratched the surface of the wikipedia policies and i am going to utilize my time being blocked to get an indept understanding of the same. thanks once again as i bow out. The Neo Morayce (talk) 00:56, 5 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

You removing a COI tag is well within your rights so there is nothing to apologize for. You aren’t here to build an encyclopedia and that is the long and short of it. Celestina007 (talk) 07:29, 5 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@celestina007 thats a rather judgemental thing to say don't you think? The Neo Morayce (talk) 11:49, 5 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because your account is being used only for advertising or promotion.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.

– Athaenara ✉ 03:07, 3 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Morayce (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I beleive there has been a misunderstanding which has resulted in the indefinite block on my account, the article for which i believe i am being blocked even though it has now been deleted, had been moved back to draftspace from mainspace on the bases that it did not provide enough secondary sources and i had been asked by an admin to continue improving the article to meet wikepedias BLP standards, even though it did not contain external links to products or services and wasn't intended for advertisement or promotional purposes, Upon further reflection and research it is possible that i may have made significant errors in formating my submission despte the fact that i tried to keep the tone Neutral and approach writing it from a neutral point of view, i am appealing to be unblocked and allowed to continue editing on the collaborative project. i would also like to state that i have not been paid and, i do not expect to recieve any compensation, neither do i have any close affliation to the subject of the article, my contributions are solely with the intent to contribute, not damage or disrupt the collaborative project. The Neo Morayce (talk) 07:47, 3 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

I believe you are attempting to mislead us; you have a clear conflict of interest and meet the definition of a paid editor.(you don't have to be specifically paid to edit Wikipedia to be a paid editor) Until you are honest with us, there is no pathway forward. As such, I am declining your request. 331dot (talk) 09:02, 3 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

@@celestina007 i understand that you raised This SPI against me, even though that may not have resulted directly in my block i would like to unequivocally state that i do not know or have any affiliations whatsover to the user @Awiniasurania324 i am aware that the user contribution and submission of the Draft:Aham Rochas but that is as far as an interaction goes.

UTRS appeal #75918

is closed -- Deepfriedokra (talk) 12:32, 10 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]