User talk:MorriconeEnnio

reply[edit]

Welcome!

Please read the guidance below:

When you write about a person, you must provide independent verifiable sources to enable us to verify the facts and show that they meet the notability guidelines. Sources that are not acceptable include those linked to the person or an associated organisation, press releases, YouTube, IMDB, social media and other sites that can be self-edited, blogs, websites of unknown or non-reliable provenance, and sites that are just reporting what the person claims or interviewing them. Note that references should be in-line so we can tell what fact each is supporting, and should not be bare urls.

You had no proper in-line references, and much of your text was completely devoid of any verification. When you write about a real person, we must be able to confirm what you claim.

His notability as linked above doesn't depend on what people think of his works, you need to find independent third-party sources that talk about him, you describing his work or linking to it has little relevance
There shouldn't be any url links in the article, only in the "References" or "External links" sections. You may have been trying to provide references, although incorrectly, but even then most if the links go to his own images or similar, and at least one doesn't seem to mention him

You must write in a non-promotional tone. Articles must be neutral and encyclopaedic, with verifiable facts, not opinions or reviews.

As you yourself said, it's a fan page, not an encyclopaedia article eg He discovered his passion for painting at the age of thirteen and has been developing his talent ever since... Vorih established a new aesthetic criteria and expanded the horizon of action in relation to the classical understanding of painting veduta... are just spammy opinions, not verifiable facts

You must not copy text from elsewhere. Copyrighted text is not allowed in Wikipedia, as outlined in this policy. That applies even to pages created by you or your organisation, unless they state clearly and explicitly that the text is public domain. We require that text posted here can be used, modified and distributed for any purpose, including commercial; text is considered to be copyright unless explicitly stated otherwise. There are ways to donate copyrighted text to Wikipedia, as described here; please note that simply asserting on the talk page that you are the owner of the copyright, or you have permission to use the text, isn't sufficient.

I didn't check.

You said He deserves to have a page., but nobody "deserves" a page here, they must meet our notability criteria and the fully referenced article must conform with our rules as described above.

Before attempting to write an article again, please make sure that the topic meets the notability criteria linked above, and check that you can find independent third party sources. Jimfbleak - talk to me? 14:13, 27 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks so much for this JimBleak. Weird. I included references to five independent third party sources....hence my saying "he deserves..."

It seems I may have messed up on including urls in the article text and not citing inline. I will work on the corrections outlined in your message and definitely upgrade my editorial tone. Much of the text was directly translated from the third party source material so I will perhaps need to rephrase in addition to the inline citations. All of those changes should fix the issues.

I appreciate your help very much! Thanks MorriconeEnnio (talk) 10:02, 29 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Nenad Vorih (April 12)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Ibjaja055 was:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Nenad Vorih and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Ibjaja055 (talk) 13:29, 12 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Ibjaja055.

I'm wondering why the published sources referenced are not considered adequate. Is it because although published, they are not available online? Bc that is not the criteria for reliability as per the policy at https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Reliable_sources. Were there particular sources that you found to be unreliable or were all considered unreliable? Is the issue that they were considered unreliable sources or that they were considered unreliable in terms of the statements in the text? Thanks so much for your assistance! I appreciate your feedback. MorriconeEnnio (talk) 11:22, 14 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, MorriconeEnnio! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Ibjaja055 (talk) 13:29, 12 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]