User talk:Mottezen/Archive 1

This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page.

Archive 1

Welcome!

Hello, Emass100! Welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. You may benefit from following some of the links below, which will help you get the most out of Wikipedia. If you have any questions you can ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking

or by typing four tildes "~~~~"; this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you are already excited about Wikipedia, you might want to consider being "adopted" by a more experienced editor or joining a WikiProject to collaborate with others in creating and improving articles of your interest. Click here for a directory of all the WikiProjects. Finally, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field when making edits to pages. Happy editing! — Masum Ibn Musa ^Conversation 04:44, 9 April 2017 (UTC)

Getting Started
Contributing to Wikipedia The five pillars of Wikipedia • Tutorial • Your first article How to: edit a page • upload an image
Getting Help
Frequently Asked Questions New contributors' help page Where to: ask questions • make requests Tip of the day Request administrator attention
Policies and Guidelines
Neutral point of view • Reliable sources Verifiability • Citing sources • No original research What Wikipedia is not • Biographies of living persons Simplified Manual of Style • Three-revert rule Copyrights • Non-free content • Image use policy External links • Spam • Vandalism • Sock puppetry Deletion policy • Conflict of interest • Notability

The Community
Community Portal • Adopt-a-user program Assume good faith • Civility • Etiquette No personal attacks • Resolving disputes Build consensus • Village pump IRC channels • Mailing lists Discover what's going on in the Wikimedia community (The Signpost)
Things to do
Be bold in editing • Help develop an article Maintenance • Peer review • Requested articles Join a WikiProject • Translating articles Cleaning up: General • Spam • Vandalism
Miscellaneous
Categories • Disambiguity • Stubs User pages • Talk pages Useful templates • Tools • User scripts

Hello, I'm Deb. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions have been undone because they appeared to be promotional. Advertising and using Wikipedia as a "soapbox" are against Wikipedia policy and not permitted; Wikipedia articles are written objectively, using independent sources, and from a neutral perspective. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about Wikipedia. Thank you.
Hello, Emass100. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places, or things you have written about on Wikipedia, you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a COI may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic, and it is important when editing Wikipedia articles that such connections be completely transparent. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for organizations for more information. In particular, we ask that you please:

avoid editing or creating articles related to you and your family, friends, school, company, club, or organization, as well as any competing companies' projects or products;
instead, you are encouraged to propose changes on the Talk pages of affected article(s) (see the {{request edit}} template);
when discussing affected articles, disclose your COI (see WP:DISCLOSE);
avoid linking to the Wikipedia article or to the website of your organization in other articles (see WP:SPAM);
exercise great caution so that you do not violate Wikipedia's content policies.

In addition, you must disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution which forms all or part of work for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation (see WP:PAID).

Please take a few moments to read and review Wikipedia's policies regarding conflicts of interest, especially those pertaining to neutral point of view, sourcing and autobiographies. Thank you.Deb (talk) 16:23, 5 August 2017 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of James Thompson (American politician)

The article James Thompson (American politician) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Being a candidate does not confer notability.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. PamD 07:28, 10 August 2017 (UTC)

Nomination of James Thompson (American politician) for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article James Thompson (American politician) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/James Thompson (American politician) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Bearcat (talk) 18:14, 19 August 2017 (UTC)

@Emass100:, Joe_Roe, Zawl, Malcolmxl5, It wasn't "safe." I tried to bring up the article today using Wikilinks in the Special Election article and disambiguation pages, and when I found it didn't exist, I wrote an Article about Thompson. When I tried to rename it, I removed those links and discovered that it had actually been deleted and I couldn't make the required move. Users Emass100, Zawl, Malcolmxl5 and Joe_Roe were all very helpful in its timely restoration, and I'll be working on it to bring it up to snuff this weekend. I'm in the middle of making some updates to the Umpqua shooting article, and will get to the Thompson later today. Thanks for all your efforts to keep this important article on Wikipedia, in particular since Thompson has filed to run again in next year's KS-CD4 election, presumably against Estes. Activist (talk) 16:32, 23 September 2017 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Wang Mingfang

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Wang Mingfang requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a real person or group of people, but it does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Adityavagarwal (talk) 06:52, 17 October 2017 (UTC)

Famousbirthdays.com as a source

Hi Emass100. I'm in the process of removing famousbirthdays.com as a source from Wikipedia, because it's not reliable (See Wikipedia:Reliable_sources/Noticeboard/Archive_153#Is_famousbirthdays.com_a_reliable_source_for_personal_information). I noticed that you've added it, and wanted to make sure you understood why it's being removed. If you disagree, let's discuss it. Thanks. --Ronz (talk) 21:29, 12 November 2017 (UTC)

I don't disagree. It didn't know it was so unreliable. Thank you. Emass100 (talk) 21:39, 23 May 2018 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for March 5

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Schenectady, New York, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page NRA (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:39, 5 March 2018 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for March 14

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Languages of Canada, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Madawaska (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:12, 14 March 2018 (UTC)

Graham Fraser

I have reverted your move as there are only two articles with this name, and the original page is currently the primary topic with far too many incoming links etc. There's no need for a disambiguation page now, and I've changed the hatnote to directly take one to the other article instead of going through the dab. cheers. —SpacemanSpiff 07:43, 6 April 2018 (UTC)

I agree, it's better without the move. Emass100 (talk) 21:37, 23 May 2018 (UTC)

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Libertarian Party (UK) (6th nomination)

I have asked the closing Admin for the above to reconsider their decision, either to relist or to expect a 7th nomination in due course. This is just to let you know of my view. doktorb _words^deeds 04:58, 30 May 2018 (UTC)

Liberal Socialist Party moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Liberal Socialist Party, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please follow the confirms on the Articles for Creation template atop the page. The Duke of Nonsense^{What is necessary for thee?}. 14:29, 13 July 2018 (UTC)

File:Symbol of the Liberal Socialist Action Party.jpg

Hi, I'm RonBot, a script that checks new non-free file uploads. I have found that the subject image that you recently uploaded was more than 5% in excess of the Non-free content guideline size of 100,000 pixels. I have tagged the image for a standard reduction, which (for jpg/gif/png/svg files) normally happens within a day. Please check the reduced image, and make sure that the image is not excessively corrupted. Other files will be added to Category:Wikipedia non-free file size reduction requests for manual processing. There is a full seven-day period before the original oversized image will be hidden; during that time you might want to consider editing the original image yourself (perhaps an initial crop to allow a smaller reduction or none at all). A formula for calculation the desired size can be found at WP:Image resolution, along with instructions on how to tag the image in the rare cases that it requires an oversized image (typically about 0.2% of non-free uploads are tagged as necessarily oversized). Please contact the bot owner if you have any questions, or you can ask them at Wikipedia talk:Non-free content. RonBot (talk) 17:17, 15 July 2018 (UTC)

Ways to improve Regina East (provincial electoral district)

Hi, I'm Meatsgains. Emass100, thanks for creating Regina East (provincial electoral district)!

I've just tagged the page, using our page curation tools, as having some issues to fix. Consider providing reliable sources to strengthen the page's verifiability.

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, you can leave a comment on my talk page. Or, for more editing help, talk to the volunteers at the Teahouse.

Meatsgains^(talk) 00:19, 9 October 2018 (UTC)

File:Canadian federal Budget '89 logo.jpg

Hi, I'm RonBot, a script that checks new non-free file uploads. I have found that the subject image that you recently uploaded was more than 5% in excess of the Non-free content guideline size of 100,000 pixels. I have tagged the image for a standard reduction, which (for jpg/gif/png/svg files) normally happens within a day. Please check the reduced image, and make sure that the image is not excessively corrupted. Other files will be added to Category:Wikipedia non-free file size reduction requests for manual processing. There is a full seven-day period before the original oversized image will be hidden; during that time you might want to consider editing the original image yourself (perhaps an initial crop to allow a smaller reduction or none at all). A formula for calculation the desired size can be found at WP:Image resolution, along with instructions on how to tag the image in the rare cases that it requires an oversized image (typically about 0.2% of non-free uploads are tagged as necessarily oversized). Please contact the bot owner if you have any questions, or you can ask them at Wikipedia talk:Non-free content. RonBot (talk) 18:12, 28 October 2018 (UTC)

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Emass100. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)

Nomination of Yoel Adler for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Yoel Adler is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Yoel Adler until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Icewhiz (talk) 10:03, 30 November 2018 (UTC)

California Democratic Party chair

Regarding the "Disputed section" tag you put on California Democratic Party, I have answered in the Talk. Is your concern addressed? Because of my potential COI, I'd rather that you remove the tag yourself. It could also be good to add "Alex Gallardo-Rooker (acting, 2018-present)". She is already listed in the info box.RichardMathews (talk) 00:58, 12 January 2019 (UTC)

Thank you for the info, I removed the tag. Emass100 (talk) 02:30, 12 January 2019 (UTC)

Thanks.RichardMathews (talk) 01:04, 13 January 2019 (UTC)

A page you started (Interprovincial migration in Canada) has been reviewed!

Thanks for creating Interprovincial migration in Canada.

I have just reviewed the page, as a part of our page curation process and note that:

Very interesting article; made a few edits to standardize the format with WP. Always make sure in WP that you are quoting/stating what other quality third-party sources said, and that you are never drawing your own conclusions/inferences from that. An examples in this article is the "Influences" section that needs to confirm that the 4 influences are the ones identified by other notable researchers, and not you (otherwise it becomes WP:OR). Good work!

To reply, leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Britishfinance}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ .

Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Britishfinance (talk) 12:14, 14 January 2019 (UTC)

@Britishfinance:Thank you, carry on page-patrolling!Emass100 (talk) 23:39, 14 January 2019 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:Liberal Socialist Party

Hello, Emass100. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Liberal Socialist Party".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 18:20, 15 January 2019 (UTC)

@Liz: Delete it it's fine.Emass100 (talk) 19:43, 15 January 2019 (UTC)

If you would like to restore it and continue work on it, just go to WP:REFUND/G13. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 21:56, 15 January 2019 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Graham Fraser

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Graham Fraser you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of AhmadLX -- AhmadLX (talk) 19:41, 9 April 2019 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Graham Fraser

The article Graham Fraser you nominated as a good article has failed ; see Talk:Graham Fraser for reasons why the nomination failed. If or when these points have been taken care of, you may apply for a new nomination of the article. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of AhmadLX -- AhmadLX (talk) 21:22, 9 April 2019 (UTC)

Wired UK article about Brexit Wikipedia page

Hello,

I'm a journalist for Wired UK magazine and I'm writing a piece about the Brexit Wikipedia page. I see that you've been a really active contributor to the entry and would love to talk to you about it. Are you up for being interviewed for the piece?

You can find my email on my Twitter page if so.

Thanks, Matt Mrey445 (talk) 15:07, 11 April 2019 (UTC)

WikiProject Canada 10,000 Challenge third anniversary

The 10,000 Challenge of WikiProject Canada is approaching its third-anniversary. Please consider submitting any Canada-related articles you have created or improved since November 2016. Please try to ensure that all entries are sourced with formatted citations and have no unsourced claims.

You may use the above button to submit entries, or bookmark this link for convenience. For more information, please see WP:CAN10K. Thank-you, and please spread the word to those you know who might be interested in joining this effort to improve the quality of Canada-related articles. – Reidgreg (talk) 03:15, 16 October 2019 (UTC)

ArbCom 2019 election voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:21, 19 November 2019 (UTC)

Infobox notification

This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.

You have shown interest in discussions about infoboxes and to edits adding, deleting, collapsing, or removing verifiable information from infoboxes. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.

For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.

Johnuniq (talk) 01:05, 28 November 2019 (UTC)

Akane Yamaguchi

Hello. Help copy edit. Thanks you. Vomli (talk) 07:47, 30 March 2020 (UTC)

Asked for input

WP:BRD,,,,dont get blocked WP:3RV.--Moxy 🍁 02:37, 31 March 2020 (UTC)

Sorry, I didn't know about this. Mottezen (talk) 02:48, 31 March 2020 (UTC)

Pls give me a second

I am trying to move the page history. Pls stand down. --Moxy 🍁 22:15, 31 March 2020 (UTC)

Alright, I'll stop what i'm doing and let you do it. Mottezen (talk) 22:17, 31 March 2020 (UTC)

WikiProject Canada 10,000 Challenge award

		The Red Maple Leaf Award
		This maple leaf is awarded to Emass100 for creating two Canada-related articles during the third year of The 10,000 Challenge of WikiProject Canada. Congratulations, and thank you for your contributions! Reidgreg (talk) 17:03, 26 November 2019 (UTC)

Climate Change in Canada

Je suis beaucoup moins actif ces jours-ci. Ne vous gênez pas pour mettre à jour la carte. Merci. Bouchecl (talk) 10:02, 6 April 2020 (UTC)

Leon "Leonidas" Howard

I'm taking some of my idle time during lockdown to create stubs for the Reconstruction-era black legislators of my native Tennessee. I hope to come back and make much, much longer articles about each of them. --Orange Mike | Talk 21:11, 5 May 2020 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for May 7

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Kambrell Garvin, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Attorney (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 12:48, 7 May 2020 (UTC)

Nomination of Rita Mestokosho for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Rita Mestokosho is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rita Mestokosho until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Bearcat (talk) 13:34, 7 May 2020 (UTC)

Copying within Wikipedia requires attribution

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you copied or moved text from Public–private partnership into Public-private partnerships by country. While you are welcome to re-use Wikipedia's content, here or elsewhere, Wikipedia's licensing does require that you provide attribution to the original contributor(s). When copying within Wikipedia, this is supplied at minimum in an edit summary at the page into which you've copied content, disclosing the copying and linking to the copied page, e.g., copied content from [[page name]]; see that page's history for attribution. It is good practice, especially if copying is extensive, to also place a properly formatted {{copied}} template on the talk pages of the source and destination. Please provide attribution for this duplication if it has not already been supplied by another editor, and if you have copied material between pages before, even if it was a long time ago, you should provide attribution for that also. You can read more about the procedure and the reasons at Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. Thank you. If you are the sole author of the prose that was copied, attribution is not required. — Diannaa (talk) 06:55, 14 May 2020 (UTC)

Got it, thank you.Mottezen (talk) 07:33, 14 May 2020 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for May 20

An automated process has detected that you recently added links to disambiguation pages.

Public-private partnerships by country (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Fortis

Public–private partnership (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Transparency

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 11:01, 20 May 2020 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for May 27

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Public-private partnerships by country, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Fortis (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 08:45, 27 May 2020 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for July 6

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Foreign policy of the Stephen Harper government, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Tamil (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:22, 6 July 2020 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:Local referendums in Canada

Hello, Mottezen. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Local referendums in Canada".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 00:11, 10 November 2020 (UTC)

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:53, 24 November 2020 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for December 11

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Castrato, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Limb.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:12, 11 December 2020 (UTC)

Three Ds of antisemitism

I don't know anything about the demographics of Northern Cyprus, but some people have claimed that the Turkish government was trying to transform the ethnic balance on the island by introducing Anatolians there (whether it succeeded or not)... AnonMoos (talk) 08:57, 10 February 2021 (UTC)

Basically the North is 99% Turkish and the South is 99% Greek. Take a look at Northern_Cyprus#Demographics, especially the second paragraph. The number of settlers is completely speculative, but never alleged to be equal or bigger than Greek Cypriots in the South. I think this settler situation is hardly comparable to Israel or Morocco. Mottezen (talk) 17:54, 10 February 2021 (UTC)

Obviously Turkey's government was not trying to change the ethnic balance within Northern Cyprus, but trying to modify the situation according to which Northern Cyprus has 36% of the land area of the island, but significantly less than that percentage of population of the island. AnonMoos (talk) 00:32, 11 February 2021 (UTC)

The text I removed was deliberately unclear on that. Clarifying this aspect to it would make its argument fall apart. Mottezen (talk) 01:40, 11 February 2021 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for February 14

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Three Ds of antisemitism, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Sahrawi.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:18, 14 February 2021 (UTC)

Autopatrolled granted

Hi Mottezen, I just wanted to let you know that I have added the "autopatrolled" permission to your account, as you have created numerous, valid articles. This feature will have no effect on your editing, and is simply intended to reduce the workload on new page patrollers. For more information on the autopatrolled right, see Wikipedia:Autopatrolled. However, you should consider adding relevant wikiproject talk-page templates, stub-tags and categories to new articles that you create if you aren't already in the habit of doing so, since your articles will no longer be systematically checked by other editors (User:Evad37/rater and User:SD0001/StubSorter.js are useful scripts which can help). Feel free to leave me a message if you have any questions. Happy editing! Go Phightins! 02:18, 13 March 2021 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for March 13

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Alimenta, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Dacian Wars.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:23, 13 March 2021 (UTC)

Deprodding of Roxio Toast

I have removed the {{proposed deletion/dated}} tag from Roxio Toast, which you proposed for deletion. I added few references, but there are far more sources from the late 90s/early 00s (see the article talkpage). If you still think this article should be deleted, please do not add {{proposed deletion}} back to the page. Instead, feel free to list it at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion. Thanks! Pavlor (talk) 18:29, 17 March 2021 (UTC)

Yunus Brothers Group

We all make mistakes at AFC. I've made more than I can count.

There are several things that raise red flags on this, sock puppetry notwithstanding. It looks to be notable, that is not the issue. The references are all PR or regurgitated PR. Some even say "from a press release". The corporation looks as if one could write a half decent article, but the editor looks like a paid hack and hasn't bothered.

With more reviews under your belt you'll be able to sniff this out, so don't be disheartened. Keep reviewing. Fiddle Faddle 09:32, 16 April 2021 (UTC)

It's ok, I'll remember to check if the author was a sock puppet now. And indeed, it is a pretty bad article. However, I disagree with the idea that "the references are all PR or regurgitated PR", as they were all published in Dawn (newspaper), and it is not journalistic malpractice to quote press releases as sources. Mottezen (talk) 16:55, 16 April 2021 (UTC)

Some of the Dawn references are PR pieces, I'm afraid

https://www.dawn.com/news/1297762
https://www.dawn.com/news/738596/luckys-acquisition-of-ici-at-152-5m
https://www.dawn.com/news/164563/industrial-group-donates-rs10-79m "According to a press release"

and http://www.ybpakistan.com is the company's own site

In terms of WP:THREE there remain two references. And each of these appears be generated from PR. https://profit.pakistantoday.com.pk appears to be a news aggregator, albeit with some journalistic input. There is no byline on the article https://www.dawn.com/news/1463164 had a byline and appears to be journalism Fiddle Faddle 18:20, 16 April 2021 (UTC)

It is not journalistic malpractice, no.But Wikipedia does not recognise a press release or a PR piece as anything other than a primary source. Fiddle Faddle 18:21, 16 April 2021 (UTC)

But the article itself is not a press release, it just cites a press release as one of its sources. Secondary sources are all based on primary sources: they have to be. In this 2-paragraph "according to a press release" article, there is a second source cited: the "Federal Minister for Privatization and Investment Dr Abdul Hafeez Shaikh". I do not see any indication that these three articles are sponsored posts, the authors are either "The Newspaper's Staff Reporter" and "Dilawar Hussain". The article with no author byline dates back from 2005, when web technologies were different. Even the "Who’s the richest of them all?" is a legitimate article: it is normal for a mainstream newspaper to cover the richest people in the country, and to ask the question "who is it" when data on the rich's wealth is not available in said country. I'd argue that these sources make this topic pass WP:THREE with flying colors, even when taking into consideration that [1] fails NCORP's standards. The company homepage was only used for context: the origin and size of the company. Mottezen (talk) 19:07, 16 April 2021 (UTC)

We differ in opinion. I have not persuaded yo, you have not persuaded me. That is fine. Fiddle^Timtrent Faddle^{Talk to me} 19:36, 16 April 2021 (UTC)

Please reinstate the CSD if you have not done so already. It is unusual to remove CSDs regarding block evasion. THsi tag has no bearing in the discussion of article quality Fiddle^Timtrent Faddle^{Talk to me} 19:45, 16 April 2021 (UTC)

Thank you for doing so Fiddle^Timtrent Faddle^{Talk to me} 19:58, 16 April 2021 (UTC)

User:Timtrent Ok, I reinstated it, but I have a question. In the reviewing instructions, it doesn't say anywhere that we have to check if the author is evading a block or is a sockpuppet. The tutorial for New page patrollers is vague on the subject. Say someone evading a block writes a perfectly fine article with no other issues, do we have to delete it regardless? Mottezen (talk) 20:00, 16 April 2021 (UTC)

I agree with you. But it cannot guide us everywhere. An AFC reviewer is a doorkeeper. We must use our judgement about how far we go. Generally that judgement is informed by experience, and by the advice of others (when that advice is judged to be relevant), and by making mistakes and varying our work based on all of that.

I do many unguided things, including following pictures to Commons and checking licencing, sniffing out UPE, recently determining that an editor both said he was the subject of his draft and also was not. It is not a simple and pure article review task. And I also try to teach editors, real volunteer ones, how to do better. I also teach reviewers, if they are willing, to review slightly better

I am not error free, nor will I ever be. But I do better as time passes. That is true of you, too.

And yes, we propose for deletion regardless. Block evasion is always for a reason. Were I an admin I would not shoot on sight. I believe deletion is a dual key process. So I propose and the admin checking my rationale has to agree or disagree. Fiddle^Timtrent Faddle^{Talk to me} 20:13, 16 April 2021 (UTC)

I just realised why you might find it difficult to spot blocked editors.

Pop over to your Preferences > Gadgets > Strike out usernames that have been blocked and turn that gadget on. It reveals blocked users very well, and gives us a clue to look for block reasons. Fiddle^Timtrent Faddle^{Talk to me} 16:52, 17 April 2021 (UTC)

Because, and only because, Requests for Undeletion is on my watchlist I noticed you requested and then self reverted a request for undeletion of this ietm. Might I suggest that you write the article, and frm scratch? What we truly cannot do is to reward sockpuppetry, so I suggest you leave it a while, do your own researches, and write it afresh. It may well be notable, and I know you are certain it is. I never got that far when G5ing it. I think it likely you will write a far better article than the sock ever did. THis sock area is rife with UPE so by definition your work will be better. Fiddle^Timtrent Faddle^{Talk to me} 08:50, 19 April 2021 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Pakistani companies established in 1962

A tag has been placed on Category:Pakistani companies established in 1962 requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the category has been empty for seven days or more and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 15:18, 17 April 2021 (UTC)

I have unreviewed a page you curated

Hi, I'm Hatchens. I wanted to let you know that I saw the page you reviewed, Nabhit Kapur, and have marked it as unpatrolled. If you have any questions, please ask them on my talk page. Thank you.

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Hatchens (talk) 06:33, 19 April 2021 (UTC)

BLP

This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.

You have shown interest in articles about living or recently deceased people, and edits relating to the subject (living or recently deceased) of such biographical articles. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.

For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.

TAXIDICAE💰 14:48, 19 April 2021 (UTC)

Please note that sources such as this are wildly inappropriate and not at all reliable. TAXIDICAE💰 14:48, 19 April 2021 (UTC)

Your acceptance of multiple questionable drafts

Hi Mottezen! Could you please explain to me the rationale behind your acceptance of Saffron Barker and Vitore Nino at AFC? --TheSandDoctor ^Talk 15:06, 19 April 2021 (UTC)

Based on finding Marta Burda as well, I am going to go ahead and remove your AfC access at this time. Please explain. --TheSandDoctor ^Talk 15:20, 19 April 2021 (UTC)

Hello TheSandDoctor, I approved Saffron Barker's page because I thought she was notable. This was the best source [2]. I noticed the other sources were indeed pretty tabloid-y, but I thought that the sheer amount of them meant she was probably notable. As for the two albanian actors you noted, I google-translated the sources available to assess their worth. They described them as very influential actors in their time. Since there are few sources from Hoxha-era albania available online, and that albanian cinema is poorly covered on wikipedia overall, I decided to accept them. Note that I assessed many albanian actor's drafts, and that I refused about half of those that I came across. Mottezen (talk) 16:51, 19 April 2021 (UTC)

Also: Since I started reviewing drafts I kinda just went ahead with what I thought was a notable topic, and accepted it based on that. But I was new to reviewing. Having multiple drafts I reviewed being suddenly re-draftified is a very unpleasant experience, something I wouldn't want happen again. TheSandDoctor, if I am ever returned my AfC access, I'll make sure that the drafts are completely bulletproof before approving them. I would not have accepted any of these drafts if I had known. I would have used the same standards of assessment for english and non-english sources, and make sure multiple RS were available for tabloid obsessions like Saffron Barker. Mottezen (talk) 17:01, 19 April 2021 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Pakistani companies established in 1968

A tag has been placed on Category:Pakistani companies established in 1968 requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the category has been empty for seven days or more and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 15:13, 20 April 2021 (UTC)

Request on 19:05:45, 21 April 2021 for assistance on AfC submission by Musiklova67

Musiklova67 (talk · contribs)
- Draft:Terisa Griffin (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Musiklova67 (talk) 19:05, 21 April 2021 (UTC)

Hello Mottezen,

Thank you for your helpful comments on the draft's submission. I will review the verbiage and make the necessary alterations.

Have a great day, thanks again for the tips. Musiklova67 (talk) 19:05, 21 April 2021 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for April 28

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Kyle Kulinski, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Democratic Party.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 05:57, 28 April 2021 (UTC)