User talk:Mudforce

Annika Sorenstam

Thank you for your excellent cleanup work on Annika Sorenstam. Do you know about Wikipedia:Wikiproject Golf? I just found out about this. It looks like they could use some more people who are working on LPGA and LET articles and some more people who are from outside the U.S. You might be interested in it. Crunch 12:25, 5 March 2007 (UTC)

Seon Hwa Leee - stub class?

I'm curious why you graded the Seon Hwa Lee article as Stub Class. I admit I was negligent in removing the stub tag when expanding the article, but the article is fairly complete. I think it warranted a higher rating in both the quality and importance scale. Crunch 11:16, 12 April 2007 (UTC)

Golfer Infobox

Great job adding them. Do you think it would be wise to change all golfers with the current infobox to the one we're putting up? Or would that be to controversial? Perhaps we should reach a consensus on some talk page? Let me know what you think, because frankly, the official golfer infobox is bad. Supertigerman 19:59, 14 April 2007 (UTC)

WikiProject Golf Newsletter

The WikiProject Golf Newsletter Issue IV - May 2007 If you would like to improve our future newsletters, go to our newsletter page.

Project News I am experimenting with a new layout for easy readability, as well as to make the newsletter look more attractive and more like other ones. If someone feels it could be better, go right ahead and change it. The newsletter page is right here. An assessment department has been set up. To find out how to assess an article, go to the assessment page. I have asked Snowolf if his bot could help in tagging articles. The response is still pending, but hopefully we will soon have more of an idea of how many articles we have. During the two months since the last newsletter, Annika Sorenstam has reached good article status. Congratulations to all who worked on this article. There has been a recent peer review for Jack Nicklaus. Please help by following the suggestions that are shown here. A new sidebar has been created. If you think it could be improved, go here. Several new templates have been created. Go to the templates page for a full list. Article Statistics Golf articles Importance Top High Mid Low None Total Quality FA A 1 1 GA 2 2 B 10 1 11 Start 30 3 2 6 1 42 Stub 11 3 11 73 2 100 Assessed 54 6 13 80 3 156 Unassessed 0 0 0 0 1269 1269 Total 54 6 13 80 1272 1425 New Members Welcome to all the new members over the past two months! Golfer45 Crunch Mudforce Alexander Phipps Fuzzy14 AdamKostrich Bones999 Mets Bu b0y2007 Richard B Christophee

To stop receiving this newsletter, or to receive it in a different format, please list yourself in the appropriate section here.

Vote on Merger of Annika Sörenstam at the Colonial into Annika Sorenstam

Hi Mudforce, I've proposed merging Annika Sörenstam at the Colonial into Annika Sörenstam. There is a poll to vote on the merger on Talk:Annika Sörenstam. --Crunch 21:01, 10 May 2007 (UTC)

Tiger Woods citations

Wow. Fantastic job. Brilliant. If I knew how to give barnstars I so would right now. Keep it up. You're awesome. Supertigerman 15:11, 13 May 2007 (UTC)

Annika Sörenstam reviewed

hi hi Mudforce. upon a light read of Annika Sörenstam, goooood job of references. i love refs, love em! though, i should say the second paragraph of the article - all those sentences need refs. :) there are a whole bunch of numbers, dates, money amounts and rankings in this article; i'm not sure what the manual of style (WP:MOS) for all of those, but the sheer amount of them stings my brain a bit. please standardize if they aren't already to reduce the swelling. the Professional Career section needs a separate article and a summary section in Annika's. saying 'she won this, she won that, got this, got that' over and over again gets a little tired. i also noticed from this approx one kajillion abbreviations for tournaments and awards. it is second nature to skim around a wikipedia article, and with all those abbreviations you don't know where the heck you are or if you missed a previous sentence explaining it. that end of the article template above the categories could be prettier. finally, for ultimate-ease-of-eyes, read, dive, consume this guide: it will help soooo much and holy crap does it help an articles feel. hope i've helped! :) JoeSmack ^Talk 20:31, 14 May 2007 (UTC)

Annika Sorenstam at the Colonial merged

I've completed the merge -- actually only about one sentence and a reference. All else was there. Also, let me know if you'd like help cleaning up the Annika Sorenstam article in accordance with the suggestions above. It's kind of your baby, but I can do some work on it if you want another set of hands. --Crunch 01:23, 22 May 2007 (UTC)

WikiProject Golf Newsletter

The WikiProject Golf Newsletter Issue V - June 2007 If you would like to improve our future newsletters, go to our newsletter page.
Project News An assessment department has been set up. To find out how to assess an article, go to the assessment page. I have asked Snowolf if his bot could help in tagging articles. This should be starting soon. There has been a recent peer review for Golf. Please help by following the suggestions that are shown here. Several new templates have been created. Go to the templates page for a full list. The Outreach department has been founded. It now holds the newsletters, and soon a welcome message and an invitation message. Member News No new members have joined the project in the past month. Keep on recruiting! Congratulations to all the editors who contributed to the newest Good articles: Byron Nelson	From the Editors Welcome to the 5th issue of the WikiProject Golf newsletter! There are a few new additions that I hope will be up and running soon. A welcome message and an invitation message for prospective members should be ready within two weeks. A collaboration of the fortnight, or collaboration of the month i'm hoping will be ready by the time of next month's newsletter. Lastly, this is your newsletter and you can be involved in the creation of the next issue (Issue 6 – July 2007). Any and all contributions are welcome. Simply let yourself be known to any of the undersigned, or just start editing! Contributors to this issue Grover 08:01, 1 June 2007 (UTC)
Article Statistics Make visible or invisible by clicking Show or Hide, respectively. Golf articles Importance Top High Mid Low None Total Quality FA A 1 1 GA 3 3 B 9 1 10 Start 32 3 3 10 2 50 Stub 10 4 11 75 4 104 Assessed 55 7 14 86 6 168 Unassessed 0 0 0 0 1282 1282 Total 55 7 14 86 1288 1450
To stop receiving this newsletter, or to receive it in a different format, please list yourself in the appropriate section here.

Monobook.js

I have responded to this one on the Outriggr discussion page. :: Kevinalewis : ^{(Talk Page)}/_(Desk) 12:38, 3 July 2007 (UTC)

Service awards

This editor is a Journeyman Editor, and is entitled to display this Service Badge.

Just to let you know, you qualify for this. This award is determined strictly by your time on Wikipedia and edit count. Congrats! --BrokenSphere 23:48, 4 July 2007 (UTC)

Award

		The Working Wikipedian's Barnstar
		I hereby award The Working Wikipedian's Barnstar to Mudforce in recognition of assessing over 3779 articles for WikiProject Biography's Summer 2007 Assessment Drive. Psychless 00:37, 20 September 2007 (UTC)

WikiProject Golf

Hi Mudforce
I thought that a way to further improve the golf articles on Wikipedia is for the whole project to work together towards a goal. An example of this could be a certain number of good articles in so many months, or to create the project's first ever featured article. If you are interested, come to the talk page and discuss it. And hopefully through this the project can continue to work towards several goals in the near future. Grover 10:10, 7 November 2007 (UTC)

New LPGA players photos

Hello, there's bunch of new high quality photos uploaded from flickr into wiki commons, authored by Keith Allison. They can be found in the 'LPGA photos taken by Keith Allison' commons category. Please consider embeding them into existing players' wiki profiles and update this page accordingly. I've sent this message to User:Crunch, User:Dale Arnett, and User:Giants2008 so please synchronize :). BR, Wmigda (talk) 18:41, 17 March 2009 (UTC)

ALOHA!

hello mudforce! I'm user Hollstien and I have a question for you .my brother (user:CitizenofEarth) is trying to perfect his "wikipet" creation and i thought i'd ask you for him. he wants it to be like the cookie, where you type {{subst:wikipet}} and it pops up. Do you have any ideas? Thanks.Hollstein ^{I love Pizza!} 11:05, 11 November 2009 (UTC)

Unreferenced BLPs

Hello Mudforce! Thank you for your contributions. I am a bot alerting you that 2 of the articles that you created are tagged as Unreferenced Biographies of Living Persons. The biographies of living persons policy requires that all personal or potentially controversial information be sourced. In addition, to insure verifiability, all biographies should be based on reliable sources. if you were to bring these articles up to standards, it would greatly help us with the current 389 article backlog. Once the articles are adequately referenced, please remove the {{unreferencedBLP}} tag. Here is the list:

1. Florence Descampe - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
2. Val Skinner - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Thanks!--DASHBot (talk) 20:57, 8 January 2010 (UTC)

Female golfers photos

Hello, I think I've finished adding and processing photos of european players taken during 2009 Women's British Open. You can find them here: http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Category:LPGA_photos_taken_by_Wojciech_Migda . I've added some already to the infoboxes, but still there are plenty for players who don't have their wiki pages yet - maybe it is a good opportunity to create those. Anyway, please take a look and maybe you will make use of them on en.wiki. Cheers, Wmigda (talk) 20:11, 10 January 2010 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:59, 23 November 2015 (UTC)

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:16, 23 November 2021 (UTC)

Good article reassessment for Annika Sörenstam

Annika Sörenstam has been nominated for a good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the reassessment page. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. Schierbecker (talk) 04:01, 21 February 2024 (UTC)