User talk:Mulman82

March 2020[edit]

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Karmichael Hunt has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
For help, take a look at the introduction.
The following is the log entry regarding this message: Karmichael Hunt was changed by Mulman82 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.86193 on 2020-03-13T06:25:11+00:00

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 06:25, 13 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Why? Karmichael is a good friend of mine and he likes to be called K and there is nothing in there showing that Mulman82 (talk) 06:29, 13 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome![edit]

Hello, Mulman82, and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines, and may not be retained.

There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the Teahouse, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{help me}} on this page, followed by your question, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Questions or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! Capewearer (talk) 06:50, 16 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Mulman82 (talk) 03:51, 17 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Liam Mulhall[edit]

The article Liam Mulhall has been proposed for deletion because it appears to have no references. Under Wikipedia policy, this biography of a living person will be deleted after seven days unless it has at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp/dated}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within seven days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. Capewearer (talk) 06:50, 16 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Mulman82 (talk) 03:52, 17 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I’m the coach and have added references but any help would be appreciated. Thankyou

Mulman82 (talk) 03:53, 17 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

subject appears to meet WP:GNG thus far Mulman82 (talk) 11:17, 23 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Liam Mulhall[edit]

The article Liam Mulhall has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Autobiography of semi-pro player and coach, not yet notable per WP:RLN, and no significant coverage online in reliable sources, just mentions on sports forums.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Capewearer (talk) 15:01, 2 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

subject appears to meet WP:GNG thus far Mulman82 (talk) 11:17, 23 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

September 2020[edit]

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. We appreciate your contributions; however, it appears you may have written a Wikipedia article about yourself, at Liam Mulhall. Creating an autobiography is strongly discouraged – please see our guideline on writing autobiographies. If you create such an article, it may be deleted. If what you have done in life is genuinely notable and can be verified according to our policy for articles about living people, someone else will probably create an article about you sooner or later (see Wikipedians with articles). If you wish to add to or change an existing article about yourself, you are welcome to propose the changes by visiting the article's talk page. Please understand that this is an encyclopedia and not a personal web space or social networking site. If your article has already been deleted, please see: Why was the page I created deleted?, and if you feel the deletion was an error, please discuss this with the deleting administrator. Thank you. Capewearer (talk) 03:45, 5 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

subject appears to meet WP:GNG thus far Mulman82 (talk) 11:17, 23 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Liam Mulhall for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Liam Mulhall is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Liam Mulhall until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Capewearer (talk) 04:47, 5 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia. Constructive contributions are appreciated, but, in this edit to Liam Mulhall, you removed Articles for deletion notices from articles or removed other people's comments in Articles for deletion debates. This makes it difficult to establish consensus. If you oppose the deletion of an article, please comment at the respective page instead. Thank you. Materialscientist (talk) 10:23, 23 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Mate I have done this!!! Honestly what more do you want!!!! Mulman82 (talk) 10:25, 23 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

All instructions about AFD relisting and time frames are meant for administrators and other editors; they only refer to AFD nomination pages, but not the nominated articles. In other words, do not remove AFD templates from articles. Materialscientist (talk) 10:27, 23 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I don’t understand Mulman82 (talk) 10:28, 23 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

subject appears to meet WP:GNG thus far Mulman82 (talk) 11:16, 23 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Sockpuppet investigation[edit]

An editor has opened an investigation into sockpuppetry by you. Sockpuppetry is the use of more than one Wikipedia account in a manner that contravenes community policy. The investigation is being held at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Mulman82, where the editor who opened the investigation has presented their evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with the guide to responding to investigations, and then feel free to offer your own evidence or to submit comments that you wish to be considered by the Wikipedia administrator who decides the result of the investigation. If you have been using multiple accounts (in a manner contrary to Wikipedia policy), please go to the investigation page and verify that now. Leniency is usually shown to those who promise not to do so again, or who did so unwittingly, but the abuse of multiple accounts is taken very seriously by the Wikipedia community.

Ytoyoda (talk) 00:29, 6 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I have one account account Mulman82 (talk) 01:51, 6 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

You’re a grub Mulman82 (talk) 14:35, 1 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Alwyn Simpson for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Alwyn Simpson is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Alwyn Simpson until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. ToThAc (talk) 15:38, 6 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

October 2020[edit]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 2 weeks for abusing multiple accounts. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Maxim_(talk) 00:06, 7 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Jason Hanrahan for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Jason Hanrahan is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jason Hanrahan until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. ToThAc (talk) 18:26, 7 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Steve Lacaze for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Steve Lacaze is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Steve Lacaze until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Ytoyoda (talk) 14:09, 9 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Liam Mulhall for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Liam Mulhall is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Liam Mulhall (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Ytoyoda (talk) 14:21, 11 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

November 2020[edit]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 1 month for making personal attacks towards other editors. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. RickinBaltimore (talk) 14:23, 17 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Mulman82 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Ytoyoda is out on a mission to sabotage every article I have written and added too. He doesn’t look at fact but rather a personal vendetta against me. He is trying to get many articles deleted that I have added factual content too and yet I’m the bad person!!! It’s crazy. He wants Delaware Black Foxes deleted yet they are in the USARL and that me delete all the other teams in that competition that have wiki pages????? But noooo so I feel this is just bastardisation Mulman82 (talk) 02:14, 24 November 2020 (UTC)

Decline reason:

Please carefully read the reason for the block. This appears to be an attempt at justifying a crude personal attack. Kuru (talk) 04:25, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Rugby league club articles[edit]

Hi, Mulman82. Thanks for patrolling new pages. I've declined your deletion request for a page that you tagged for speedy deletion, because the criterion you used or the reason you gave does not cover this kind of page. Please take a moment to read the new tutorial for patrollers, criteria for speedy deletion, and particularly, the section covering non-criteria. Such pages are best tagged with proposed deletion or proposed deletion for biographies of living persons, or sent to the appropriate deletion discussion. Thanks!

I noticed that you tagged a page for speedy deletion. I have removed the tag from the page because it does not meet the criterion specified. Please fully read Wikipedia:Criteria for speedy deletion before tagging pages for speedy deletion. Thank you.

June 2021[edit]

Please STOP adding frivolous PRODs to American Rugby League articles. Once a PROD has been removed, it must not be reinstated. If you genuinely believe an article meets Wikipedia deletion policy, you must instead go down the AFD route. HOWEVER, as your PRODs have been contested by multiple users and suspicion has been raised that you're editing in an unconstructive manner, this would be unwise. Thank you c87d98b10 13:46, 14 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Crack a egg and beat it Mulman82 (talk) 12:05, 6 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]