User talk:Naf24

August 2011

Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Note that human editors do monitor recent changes to Wikipedia articles, and administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism.
ClueBot NG produces very few false positives, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made should not have been detected as unconstructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this warning from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Organ transplantation was changed by Naf24 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.869891 on 2011-08-31T17:46:50+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 17:47, 31 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia!!!

Hello Naf24! Welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. If you decide that you need help, check out Wikipedia:Where to ask a question, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. Below are some recommended guidelines to facilitate your involvement. Happy Editing! _{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| talk to me} 19:49, 3 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Getting Started
Wikipedia Tutorial How to edit a page The five pillars of Wikipedia Manual of Style Be bold in editing How to write a great article WikiProjects
Getting your info out there
Cite your sources Neutral Point of View Point of View Verifiability Uploading images Image use policy
Getting more Wikipedia rules
Policy Library

Getting help
New contributors' help page Where to ask a question Help Desk Frequently Asked Questions
Getting along
Wikiquette Civility Sign your posts Wikipedians Conflict resolution
Getting technical
Pages needing attention Peer review Utilities Village pump

Your first edits

Good job leaving a note on my talk page ([1]). I see you did leave a proper signature; (Wikipedia:Signature), great! Also, good job adding yourself to your group ([2]). Keep in mind that your groupmates should add themselves, if you do it form them, they don't get the credit.

Also, good job making the edits on the previous days. I see that a bot had an issue, but it is indeed a false positive. I encourage you to read the message, and report it as a false positive per the instructions, it should be a good editing experience.

I see you had some issues with this series of edits: [3]. Good addition, but you also seem to have removed the content added there previously. Why? If it was not intentional, please go back and restore the content you removed.

Keep up the good job, and try making more edits on Wikipedia to get a feel for it! You are definitely among the most active wiki-explorers in our class, that's great! --_{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| talk to me} 19:49, 3 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Excellent job so far; I've awarded you an extra 1.5 credit points for being one of the most active Wikipedia editors in our class! --_{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| talk to me} 22:26, 12 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Good job adding the citations! --_{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| talk to me} 04:32, 19 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Re: Extra Credit

Thanks for pointing those out, I've updated the score to 5 :) --_{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| talk to me} 14:14, 20 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Update

Hey Natalie! If you go to my talk page the teacher gave me a cool link to show how to write a proper lead. ttys--Nas132 (talk) 14:20, 21 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

RE: last edit

Hey Natalie,

I removed the citations per the suggestion of the wiki editor who said they didn't match up w/ the info. I'm trying to find the article where I actually found the data... Ntj2 (talk) 23:51, 13 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Editing

Hey Natalie I went to the writing center again yesterday. I could only get a 30 minute appointment... That was enough time to check over my section. What are your thoughts on what we should do about the editing? Happy Thanksgiving--Nas132 (talk) 15:16, 23 November 2011 (UTC)

This is a comment that the teacher left on our discussion page: It is important that various sections share the same style and flow logically into one another. A collaborative project needs to have at least one editor who ensures that the contribution of various authors fit well with one another, both with regards to logic, and to style. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Nas132 (talk • contribs) 15:22, 23 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:51, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]