User talk:Nathaniel Bapelaa II

This is Nathaniel Bapelaa II's talk page, where you can send them messages and comments.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Welcome[edit]

Hello, Nathaniel Bapelaa II, and Welcome to Wikipedia!

Thank you for your contributions to this free encyclopedia. If you decide that you need help, check out Getting Help below, ask at the help desk, or place {{Help me}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking or by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your username and the date. Also, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field. Below are some useful links to help you get started. Happy editing! KylieTastic (talk) 13:59, 20 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Getting started

Finding your way around

Editing articles

Getting help

Frequently asked questions
Cheatsheet
Our help forum for new editors, the Teahouse
The Help Desk, for more advanced questions
Help pages
Article Wizard – a Wizard to help you create articles

How you can help

Community Portal
Join a WikiProject
Follow Wikipedia etiquette
Practice civility
Discover what's going on in the Wikimedia community

Your submission at Articles for creation: DJ Arch Jnr (May 20)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by HenryTemplo was:

This submission does not appear to be written in the formal tone expected of an encyclopedia article. Entries should be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources. Please rewrite your submission in a more encyclopedic format. Please make sure to avoid peacock terms that promote the subject.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:DJ Arch Jnr and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:DJ Arch Jnr, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

HenryTemplo (talk) 06:54, 20 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

can you help me with that or ask other qualified user to do that please, reason being I don't what that mean. Thanks Nathaniel Bapelaa II (talk) 07:25, 20 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, @Nathaniel Bapelaa II, so the problem with the article is that it is overly promotional, which is a problem, as Wikipedia has a policy about always have a neutral point of view. In order for the draft to be suitable to be accepted, it would need to be rewritten to be neutral and non-promotional. Do feel free to ask me if you have anymore questions :) HenryTemplo (talk) 09:52, 20 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I would really appreciate it if you remove promotional content @HenryTemplo you see. Nathaniel Bapelaa II (talk) 10:27, 20 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I could, but I cannot make any promises. You see, if I fixed all of the draft articles I reviewed, I would have very little time to do anything else. Besides, even if you or I did, I’m not confident that the subject is notable. Sorry! HenryTemplo (talk) 10:41, 20 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

thank you so much for your assistance @HenryTemplo . Is my draft notable enough to be in the mainspace or should I plug more Citations after fixing promotional content Nathaniel Bapelaa II (talk) 10:46, 20 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

That’s the problem with notability, you can’t make a subject more notable on Wikipedia (although you can demonstrate that the subject is notable by using reliable sources). I personally do not think the subject is notable, but I can’t accurately asses the quality of the references. Anyway, have a good day! HenryTemplo (talk) 11:04, 20 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Nathaniel Bapelaa II! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! HenryTemplo (talk) 06:54, 20 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Jason Luv (May 20)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by KylieTastic was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Jason Luv and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Jason Luv, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

KylieTastic (talk) 13:59, 20 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

May 2022[edit]

Please do not remove speedy deletion notices from pages you have created yourself, as you did with Wikipedia:Featured article candidates/DJ Arch Jnr/archive1. If you believe the page should not be deleted, you may contest the deletion by clicking on the button that says: Contest this speedy deletion, which appears inside the speedy deletion notice. This will allow you to make your case on the talk page. Administrators will consider your reasoning before deciding what to do with the article. Thank you. 0xDeadbeef (T C) 06:25, 21 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This is your only warning; if you remove or blank page contents or templates from Wikipedia again, as you did at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Kinu ^t/_c 08:27, 21 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abusing multiple accounts, as you did at Draft:DJ Arch Jnr.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Kinu ^t/_c 09:01, 21 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: DJ Arch Jnr (May 21)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by HenryTemplo was:

This submission does not appear to be written in the formal tone expected of an encyclopedia article. Entries should be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources. Please rewrite your submission in a more encyclopedic format. Please make sure to avoid peacock terms that promote the subject.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:DJ Arch Jnr and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:DJ Arch Jnr, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

HenryTemplo (talk) 11:33, 21 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Request for unblock[edit]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Nathaniel Bapelaa II (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I didn't know that creating another wiki account while already owning account is wrong. I created the page User:Pinkiee not so long ago, and it is against wiki policies. Please unblock this account and block Pinkiee as I've never made contributions on it. Nathaniel Bapelaa II (talk) 17:15, 22 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Unblock request is clearly made in bad faith. I strongly suspect, but am not absolutely sure, this is Stevence SA. Yamla (talk) 20:34, 22 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Given that you created yet another sockpuppet after posting this request, I can pretty much guarantee than an unblock is not going to happen. --Kinu ^t/_c 19:44, 22 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]