User talk:Natman94

Welcome

Hello and welcome to Wikipedia! We appreciate encyclopedic contributions, but some of your recent edits do not conform to our policies. For more information on this, see Wikipedia's policies on vandalism and limits on acceptable additions. If you'd like to experiment with the wiki's syntax, please do so in the "sandbox" rather than in articles.

If you still have questions, there is a new contributor's help page, or you can write {{helpme}} below this message along with a question and someone will be along to answer it shortly. You may also find the following pages useful for a general introduction to Wikipedia.

I hope you enjoy editing and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. Feel free to write a note on the bottom of my talk page if you want to get in touch with me. Again, welcome! —C.Fred (talk) 03:18, 9 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

April 2013[edit]

Hello, I'm C.Fred. I wanted to let you know that I undid one or more of your recent contributions to Hotel Transylvania 2 because it didn't appear constructive. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks! —C.Fred (talk) 03:18, 9 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Natman94, you are invited to the Teahouse[edit]

Hi Natman94! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from peers and experienced editors. I hope to see you there! Writ Keeper (I'm a Teahouse host)

Visit the Teahouse

This message was delivered automatically by your robot friend, HostBot (talk) 01:16, 12 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

April 2013[edit]

Please do not add or change content, as you did to Hotel Transylvania 2, without verifying it by citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. - SummerPhD (talk) 02:46, 13 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop adding unsourced content, as you did to Brad Garrett. This contravenes Wikipedia's policy on verifiability. If you continue to do so, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. - SummerPhD (talk) 14:34, 13 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This is your last warning. The next time you add unsourced material to Wikipedia, as you did at List of programs broadcast by Nickelodeon, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Geraldo Perez (talk) 04:28, 15 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 2 weeks for abuse of editing privileges. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding below this notice the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Spencer^T♦C 04:33, 17 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Untitled Tron Legacy Sequel[edit]

The article Untitled Tron Legacy Sequel has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Untitled, planned 2014 film with rumored cast, incomplete script, and lack of principal photography fails notability per WP:NFF.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Cindy(talk) 03:19, 30 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for May 31[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Untitled Tron Legacy Sequel, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page David Warner (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:14, 31 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Development of Star Wars Episode VII[edit]

Please do not add or change content, as you did to Development of Star Wars Episode VII, without verifying it by citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Erik (talk | contribs) 22:54, 1 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Untitled Tron Legacy Sequel[edit]

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Untitled Tron Legacy Sequel, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion debate, such as at articles for deletion. Under the specified criteria, where an article has substantially identical content to that of an article deleted after debate, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, you can place a request here. Geraldo Perez (talk) 23:34, 2 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

June 2013[edit]

This is your last warning. The next time you add unsourced material to Wikipedia, as you did at The SpongeBob SquarePants Movie 2, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. You have been warned about this before, and blocked for the same behavior. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 00:17, 3 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

By the time you read this, you may have already been blocked from editing. You have a number of on-going problems with unsourced or very poorly sourced additions to future films. Everything you added to Development of Star Wars Episode VII was reverted as the sources were all broken links, except for one which gave the name of a blog as the supposed source. Your addition to 2015 in film was reverted as unsourced. Your addition to Jonathan Frakes took him saying he would take a role in a movie as a rumor that he has a role in that movie -- also reverted. Your addition to Robert Englund was reverted as the source you cited was a broken link to a blog.

I would strongly suggest you consider our Adopt-a-user program before attempting to edit again on your own. - SummerPhD (talk) 03:31, 5 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your edit to List of Walt Disney Pictures films included an unsourced release date. Please try to only include information from the sources you cite.- SummerPhD (talk) 05:33, 5 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your edits to 2016 in film were completely unsourced. You hijacked a weak source for an untitled 2016 film, decided it was the Brave sequel and added a complete cast list that apparently came to you in a dream. - SummerPhD (talk) 05:37, 5 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 31 hours for persistent vandalism. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding below this notice the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Alexf^(talk) 11:35, 5 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop adding unsourced content, as you did to Bazelevs Company. This contravenes Wikipedia's policy on verifiability. If you continue to do so, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Geraldo Perez (talk) 05:58, 10 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Block for persistent disruption re sources[edit]

You have been blocked temporarily from editing for abuse of editing privileges. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. However, you should read the guide to appealing blocks first.

Despite two previous blocks and the clear warnings above, you have continued to use unreliable sources such as blogs and IMDB to justify changes you have made to articles. These are NOT reliable sources, MUST NOT be used and you WILL be blocked for increasingly long times if you carry on using them. As the box above says, you may appeal this block and if you do so you should indicate that you understand this and will not do so again in future. Kim Dent-Brown ^(Talk) 10:30, 20 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open![edit]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:02, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]