User talk:Natoresi.mp1976

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Welcome[edit]

Hello, Natoresi.mp1976, and Welcome to Wikipedia!

Thank you for your contributions to this free encyclopedia. If you decide that you need help, check out Getting Help below, ask at the help desk, or place {{Help me}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking or by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your username and the date. Also, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field. Below are some useful links to help you get started. Happy editing! KylieTastic (talk) 20:52, 13 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: MP Shafiqul Islam Shimul (June 13)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by KylieTastic was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
KylieTastic (talk) 20:52, 13 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Teahouse logo
Hello, Natoresi.mp1976! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! KylieTastic (talk) 20:52, 13 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: MP Shafiqul Islam Shimul (June 13)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Tol was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
Tol | talk | contribs 21:12, 13 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Sockpuppet investigation[edit]

An editor has opened an investigation into sockpuppetry by you. Sockpuppetry is the use of more than one Wikipedia account in a manner that contravenes community policy. The investigation is being held at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Natoresi.mp1976, where the editor who opened the investigation has presented their evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with the guide to responding to investigations, and then feel free to offer your own evidence or to submit comments that you wish to be considered by the Wikipedia administrator who decides the result of the investigation. If you have been using multiple accounts (in a manner contrary to Wikipedia policy), please go to the investigation page and verify that now. Leniency is usually shown to those who promise not to do so again, or who did so unwittingly, but the abuse of multiple accounts is taken very seriously by the Wikipedia community.

Tol | talk | contribs 21:54, 13 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Shafiqul Islam Shimul MP[edit]

Shafiqul Islam Shimul MP, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Natoresi.mp1976 (talk) 08:16, 14 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

June 2021[edit]

Information icon Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Md. Shafiqul Islam Shimul, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear to be constructive and has been reverted. If you only meant to make a test edit, please use your sandbox for that. Thank you. – Rummskartoffel 08:43, 14 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Warning icon Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to blank out or remove portions of page content, templates, or other materials from Wikipedia without adequate explanation, as you did at Md. Shafiqul Islam Shimul, you may be blocked from editing. – Rummskartoffel 08:50, 14 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Information icon Hello, I'm Vinegarymass911. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, it's important to be mindful of the feelings of your fellow editors, who may be frustrated by certain types of interaction, such as your addition to User:Vinegarymass911. While you probably didn't intend any offense, please do remember that Wikipedia strives to be an inclusive atmosphere. In light of that, it would be greatly appreciated if you could moderate yourself so as not to offend. Thank you. Vinegarymass911 (talk) 09:37, 14 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Stop icon You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Shafiqul Islam Shimul. Your attempts at whitewashing the content on Shafiqul Islam Shimul on Wikipedia by creating drafts, duplicate articles, posting content to user and user talk page are disruptive.NJD-DE (talk) 20:53, 15 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Stop icon

Your recent editing history at Shafiqul Islam Shimul MP shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See the bold, revert, discuss cycle for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you do not violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. Curb Safe Charmer (talk) 08:16, 16 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Natoresi.mp1976 (June 15)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Theroadislong was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
Theroadislong (talk) 21:26, 15 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your article[edit]

Hi there! I think we need to talk about your edits, because they are disruptive to the project and may lead you to being blocked from editing, which we try to do as a last resort.

  • Wikipedia is a collaborative project. Each editor tries to build an encyclopedia and to improve existing articles. There is an article about Shafiqul Islam Shimul that can be improved by your contributions, but we don't accept 2 articles on the same subject.
  • You need to work with other editors. When someone removes one of your edits or contacts you here, you need to keep in mind that they too want to improve the encyclopedia and you need to think about what they try to tell you.
  • In order to ensure that all content hosted on Wikipedia is verifiable, every edit and information needs to be backed by reliable sources
  • There is also a strong commitment to having a neutral point of view. If you are close to a subject, it is very hard to adopt this, so you may want to avoid editing on subjects where you have a conflicts of interest.

I hope this helps clearing any misunderstanding about why you are being reverted. Please take this in mind and stop engaging in "edit warring" or disruptive editing. If you need further help, please don't hesitate to post on my talk page or to put {{helpme}} followed by your question on this page. -- Luk talk 08:45, 16 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

June 2021[edit]

Sockpuppet investigation[edit]

An editor has opened an investigation into sockpuppetry by you. Sockpuppetry is the use of more than one Wikipedia account in a manner that contravenes community policy. The investigation is being held at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Natoresi.mp1976, where the editor who opened the investigation has presented their evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with the guide to responding to investigations, and then feel free to offer your own evidence or to submit comments that you wish to be considered by the Wikipedia administrator who decides the result of the investigation. If you have been using multiple accounts (in a manner contrary to Wikipedia policy), please go to the investigation page and verify that now. Leniency is usually shown to those who promise not to do so again, or who did so unwittingly, but the abuse of multiple accounts is taken very seriously by the Wikipedia community.

Vinegarymass911 (talk) 03:49, 22 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]