User talk:Ndwebfe0w
Naganuma Castle moved to draftspace[edit]
Hello Ndwebfe0w. I have moved an article you created, Naganuma Castle, to a draft at Draft:Naganuma Castle to give you more time to work on it before publishing it. When you are sure that it belongs on Wikipedia and satisfies our inclusion criteria, please submit your draft for review by following the instructions at the top of the draft. — JJMC89 (T·C) 01:36, 20 October 2018 (UTC)
- I am moving the page to draft space a second time. It is not ready for article space. It is not written in proper English, and has no references. It will probably be deleted if it is moved back to article space. Do not move it back to article space without first following the inclusion criteria, and preferably asking for advice at the Teahouse. Robert McClenon (talk) 06:42, 20 October 2018 (UTC)
Naganuma Castle moved to draftspace[edit]
An article you recently created, Naganuma Castle, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Warm Regards, ZI Jony (Talk) 17:08, 24 October 2018 (UTC)
The article Shogo Kumasaka has been proposed for deletion because it appears to have no references. Under Wikipedia policy, this biography of a living person will be deleted after seven days unless it has at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.
If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp/dated}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within seven days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. VQuakr (talk) 02:01, 6 January 2019 (UTC)
Speedy deletion nomination of Shogo Kumasaka[edit]
If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.
A tag has been placed on Shogo Kumasaka requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a real person or group of people that does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Melcous (talk) 23:11, 6 January 2019 (UTC)
An article you recently created, Mamador, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. CASSIOPEIA(talk) 03:21, 20 February 2019 (UTC)
Kitakata Ramen moved to draftspace[edit]
An article you recently created, Kitakata Ramen, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. CASSIOPEIA(talk) 03:56, 6 March 2019 (UTC)
Usukawa Manju moved to draftspace[edit]
An article you recently created, Usukawa Manju, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can develope the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Thanks, --DannyS712 (talk) 10:15, 12 March 2019 (UTC)
Kitakata ramen and Mamador[edit]
Hi there! Thanks for creating more articles about Fukushima's regional specialties. Going forward though, please make sure that the articles you are writing include citations! In Japanese Wikipedia it's okay to have an article go without citations, but that is NOT the case in the English Wikipedia. It's fine if the citations are in Japanese, but you need to include references or the article will be sent to draftspace or even deleted. Thank you! Mcampany (talk) 02:26, 31 March 2019 (UTC)
The article Nisshinkan has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
per WP:SCHOOLOUTCOMES this article needs at least 1 source to prove its existance before being accepted into the encyclopedia. Once a source has been found this template can be removed.
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. SSSB (talk) 11:29, 24 April 2019 (UTC)
A page you started (Nihonmatsu Lantern Festival) has been reviewed![edit]
Thanks for creating Nihonmatsu Lantern Festival.
I have just reviewed the page, as a part of our page curation process and note that:
The article needs more citations to reliable sources to demonstrate its subject's notability.
To reply, leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Rosguill}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ .
Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.
signed, Rosguill talk 01:58, 10 May 2019 (UTC)
Hello, Ndwebfe0w. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, Draft:Mount Iimori.
In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it. — JJMC89 (T·C) 01:49, 14 May 2019 (UTC)
Ways to improve Nisshinkan[edit]
Hello, Ndwebfe0w,
Thanks for creating Nisshinkan! I edit here too, under the username Boleyn and it's nice to meet you :-)
I wanted to let you know that I have tagged the page as having some issues to fix, as a part of our page curation process and note that:-
Please add your references.
The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Boleyn}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ . For broader editing help, please visit the Teahouse.
Delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.
Boleyn (talk) 13:43, 30 June 2019 (UTC)
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Cream Box is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Cream Box until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. William2001(talk) 01:51, 17 July 2019 (UTC)
- Never mind. I withdrew the nomination. Thanks for creating this article. William2001(talk) 01:34, 20 July 2019 (UTC)
ArbCom 2019 election voter message[edit]
 | Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add |