User talk:Neanderdenisovan
October 2013
[edit] Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Melungeon. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism. Thank you. Aoidh (talk) 11:56, 19 October 2013 (UTC)
Speedy deletion nomination of Haplogroup E-Z365
[edit]![](http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/thumb/c/cf/Copyright-problem.svg/48px-Copyright-problem.svg.png)
If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.
A tag has been placed on Haplogroup E-Z365 requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article or image appears to be a clear copyright infringement. This article or image appears to be a direct copy from https://druidikal.wordpress.com/tag/dna/. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.
If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to modify it — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. If you are not the owner of the external website or image but have permission from that owner, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission. You might want to look at Wikipedia's policies and guidelines for more details, or ask a question here.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. AntonTalk 16:42, 24 January 2015 (UTC)
Comment
[edit]- The article was a copyright violation. Copyrighted text is not allowed in Wikipedia, as outlined in this policy. That applies even to pages created by you or your organisation, unless they state clearly and explicitly that the text is public domain. I could see no such message on the copied page. There are ways to donate copyrighted text to Wikipedia, as described here; please note that simply asserting on the talk page that you are the owner of the copyright, or you have permission to use the text, isn't sufficient.
- it did not provide independent verifiable sources to enable us to verify the facts and show that it meets the notability guidelines. Note that personal logs are rarely acceptable as independent third-part sources. You need proper scientific links (journals etc) and you should reflect any alternative views to your personal opinions
Jimfbleak - talk to me? 08:16, 31 January 2015 (UTC)
Dear colleague, I am writing to you because you recently made a meaningful edit to the "List of Irish clans" article. I started translating this article into Russian some time ago, but now it is in danger of being deleted due to the lack of links to sources. Could you please provide links to sources in the original English article? Hunu (talk) 21:48, 9 September 2023 (UTC)